At 12:01am, the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy was formally repealed. Gays and lesbians can now serve freely in the US Armed Forces. The official notice from the US Army was released last night, in a completely understated document. “The law is repealed,” says the letter from Army Chief of Staff Ray Odierno, Secretary of the Army John McHugh and Sergeant Major of the Army Raymond Chandler. “It is the duty of all personnel to treat each other with dignity and respect, while maintaining good order and discipline throughout our ranks. Doing so, we will help the US Army remain the strength of the Nation.”
The military began accepting applications from gay recruits last night. Defense officials have played down the change, seeing it merely as a new law they plan to follow.
But, other than a few news conferences, no formal military events or instructions are planned. Pentagon officials said Monday that 2.25 million troops have completed training briefings on the rule changes since last spring, and no new sessions or advisories are expected after repeal.
In July, when the Sept. 20 repeal date was announced, Defense Department General Counsel Jeh Johnson said that he expected the changeover to be “as smooth as possible. What we believe we’ve done here is create a sexual-orientation-neutral environment in which all members can operate, do their jobs, serve in their units with dignity, professionalism and respect.”
Last week, AFRICOM Commander Gen. Carter Ham, who co-chaired a military study on implementing a “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal, said he saw the actual end date of the law as a non-issue. “My hope, my expectation, my belief is that it will be pretty inconsequential.”
As it should be, for the military. But for the LGBT rights community, it marks a significant victory, part of the slow but steady actualization of their rights. Activists worked tirelessly to see this day come, including those groups who, when repeal looked bleak, took over and refused to be silent, forcing the political hand of the Congressional and Presidential leadership. It was an incredible display and a textbook example of how outside activism can bring change. Make no mistake – without the push from groups like GetEQUAL and others, the Department of Defense would have gotten their way, and 2010 would have ended without repeal in place.
At the root, this is a victory for those who serve, who can stop living a lie, afraid to express who they are to their colleagues. But military integration has historically been ahead of the curve, and if gay and lesbian men and women can now serve their country, the arguments for denying them marriage equality or other rights become far more tenuous.
Credit must also be given to the deliberate policy laid out by the President, Joint Chiefs Chairman Mike Mullen and former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who were able to get the military on board and comfortable, and who kept their promises on the process they set up with repeal. It took a long time, but the end result is very positive.
And there’s a great postscript. Over the weekend, the military determined that a gay former World War II veteran had an honorable discharge, changing his status and making him eligible for long-denied benefits. There are probably 100,000 like him who were dishonorably discharged between World War II and the institution of DADT in 1993, and I hope as many of them as possible come forward and force a reckoning, based on this precedent.
UPDATE: I’ll put the President’s statement on repeal on the flip.
Today, the discriminatory law known as ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ is finally and formally repealed. As of today, patriotic Americans in uniform will no longer have to lie about who they are in order to serve the country they love. As of today, our armed forces will no longer lose the extraordinary skills and combat experience of so many gay and lesbian service members. And today, as Commander in Chief, I want those who were discharged under this law to know that your country deeply values your service.
I was proud to sign the Repeal Act into law last December because I knew that it would enhance our national security, increase our military readiness, and bring us closer to the principles of equality and fairness that define us as Americans. Today’s achievement is a tribute to all the patriots who fought and marched for change; to Members of Congress, from both parties, who voted for repeal; to our civilian and military leaders who ensured a smooth transition; and to the professionalism of our men and women in uniform who showed that they were ready to move forward together, as one team, to meet the missions we ask of them.
For more than two centuries, we have worked to extend America’s promise to all our citizens. Our armed forces have been both a mirror and a catalyst of that progress, and our troops, including gays and lesbians, have given their lives to defend the freedoms and liberties that we cherish as Americans. Today, every American can be proud that we have taken another great step toward keeping our military the finest in the world and toward fulfilling our nation’s founding ideals.




29 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
This will raise some interesting questions about how to incorporate the policy into boot camps, communal living quarters, bath and shower facilities, etc. I look forward to the circus.
Just like the Europeans, we really are capable of entering the modern era!
The questions have already been dealt with in European armies. The answer: No biggies.
I suppose I could research it more, but I would be genuinely interested to know how the Euros incorporated LGBT’s into their armed forces, especially in the boot camp phase or in close-quarter confines while on active duty.
I’m ambivalent about the plan itself, but I’m also former USN and so I do have some knowledge of how people live in communal spaces aboard ship.
Unh, those questions have already been dealt with. Exhaustively. Practical examples can be found in just about every military but ours.
Bottom line: Not an issue, barring homophobia.
Boxturtle (And if you’re a homophobe, my advice is don’t re-enlist. Go home, and live in peace))
It didn’t take anything special. But then, the Europeans were always more tolerent of things that offend America’s religious right.
Boxturtle (My British friend once described our attitude as “Bloody Silly”)
What, specifically, are you afraid of, Rafe?
DW
Congratulations, America!
Gay people have been there all along. It’s homophobia that’s no longer official policy.
You may have missed the word “ambivalent” in my post, so would you do me a favor and refrain from personal judgments about my concerns?
I’m simply interested to know how the military plans to incorporate LGBT’s into a system that is not coed in some of its basic functions at this time. Men and women don’t share berthing spaces in Navy ships, for example, so how will gay men be incorporated into that paradigm.
I was discharged from the Army in 1976. We knew who was gay. Nobody cared.
Here’s how they did it in the (Royal) Navy circa May of 2007 :
I noted the word, “ambivalent”, Rafe, but you have not clarified your concerns, so I assumed that you felt someone, somehow, might be at risk.
Otherwise, unless you anticipate some sort of “harm”, specifically, then what, again with some specificality, are your “concerns”?
You cannot expect the rest of us to read your “ambivalence” as anything but “fear” or “concern” for the well-being of others … in any other fashion.
Again, what is the nature of YOUR concern?
DW
I don’t understand the problem. Gay men are men and lesbians are woman.
Gee the concern at FDL is so overwhelming. First we need to be majorly concerned that gazillionaires might have to pay a little more in taxes, which *of course* will do nothing to pay down the deficit.
And now, we all need to join hands & sing kumbayah because some enlisted personnel might… I dunno??? might have to figure out that the dude next to them in the shower likes guys. OHMIGAWD!!! Gay alert!!! Let’s flap ‘n twirl & freak out!
I worked for the US Army way back when in Germany. Like someone said up above, nearly everyone knew who was gay, and it was just no big deal. Whaddaya think happens in the school system when kids take showers after gym class, fer the dawg’s sake?
What? Gays & lesbians are so *out of control* that they can’t control themselves? Good thinking, 99. Sheesh.
Unfortunately, trans-people are still prevented from serving in the military. Unlike Canada and the Europeans where they are allowed to serve their county bravely.
Finally the LGBT community can openly and proudly serve in our Imperial Military and do their part in occupying and subjugating the noncompliant peoples, gay and straight, of the world. It will be a truly proud day, for Civil Rights, when the first openly gay Kill Team displays their trophies for the world to see.
I may be wrong and we will see more Bradley Mannings but i’m sure i will be attacked for my comment.
As I’ve stated multiple times now: How will LGBT’s be incorporated into a military system that gender-segregates at certain times?
The Army doesn’t put a handful of women into a 50 man boot camp company for a reason, just as the Navy has separate berthing spaces for gender aboard ship; there are very real privacy concerns that include physical attraction and the problems inherent to that.
Those same issues come to the fore with gays and lesbians. Sure you can write it off by saying “Quit being so uptight and repressed” but that doesn’t really cover it. Then take it even further by imagining the integration of transsexuals and perceived privacy in shared quarters.
I for one applaud your commment. Despite being happy at a victory for equality.
Troll alert, Troll alert. You logic is bogus. It is time you joined the 21st century moron.
“Then take it even further by imagining the integration of transsexuals and perceived privacy in shared quarters”—–uhhhhh I just cant with this statement.
I wish the General could find a secretary to say that his hope/expectation/belief ARE….I know: Too much to ask.
Your comment, wayoutwest, deserves the respect of being seriously considered … for it goes to the heart of a deeper human issue, yet one still tied to conscience and personal responsibility, and that is the issue of killing other human beings. It is my hope that as the military, which as you say IS primarily used for conquest and oppression, the stuff of empire and “organized mayhem”, as the military becomes more humanly inclusive that individual human beings within that “institution” will exercise greater conscience and resposibility in insisting that the missions of the institution be grounded in reason and humanity not in the destruction of those things. There ARE human beings of integrity and humanity in the military, Bradley Manning, as you suggest, being such a one.
Example matters very much and at least some of those who may now serve, honorably, unmolested, and respected in the military, who were once excluded, not for just reason, but because of prejudice, unreasonable fear, and even hatred MAY, possibly remember their own history, and, in that remembering, rise to create a new and more honorable history for an institution which is, justifiably, often guilty of inspiring atrocity rather than justice, or reason … and too often, not held to proper account. These new potential recruits bring with them the possibility of understanding the NEED of institutions, and individuals, being held to account.
Long before the appalling vision you reasonably, based on the history of the behavior of certain of America’s “warriors”, place before us might occurr … our society will have had to embrace the widspread use of torture and remotely controlled, wholesale murder at a distance …
The question for all of us, now, is to ponder just how far along such a course of depravity and mindless destruction we already are.
As I suspect you might agree, we are, even now, quite some distance “advanced” in that deadly direction … which is why your question does resonate in this time and place and deserves the consideration of all. Long before we can lay waste the lives of others we have had to, first, lay waste our own sanity … and humanity.
I thank you, wayoutwest, for daring to ask such a question, and hope that all your comments and questions, henceforth, will equal the moral imperatives which this question asks, most eloquently, if brutally, of the heart of humanity … for such a voice is much needed.
DW
Thank you Judge Phillips for ruling DADT unconstitutional and forcing Congress to hold their little farce; pretending they have the authority to judge the very same laws they create.
Asking to be treated equally in the military meat grinder and serving in armies of imperialism is not a civil rights achievement. I doubt Gandhi or MLK would approve.
“Military glory – that attractive rainbow that rises in showers of blood”- Abraham Lincoln
What a day long overdue! Could any of the people previously discharged apply to be re-instated? Some people might want to accrue 20 years military service & be eligible to a pension.
Thank you for your response DW, i should have also mentioned that we will see more openly LGBT servicemembers returning with brain damage and PTSD from their service in the belly of the Beast.
I am hopefull that someone like Dan Choi will come out, pun intended, against this Military Madness.
While I wish that NO ONE would serve in this military of ours these days, I heartily applaud and congratulate the entire LGBT community for this RESOUNDING development and may it indeed lead to national legalization of weddings and all civil rights for them.
Huzzah!
I am proud of how the military handled this: just another day, no big deal, DADT is dead, gays come out of the closet and say they are gay, and are greeted with, “Yeah, I knew that” or “Really? OK. Wanna go for a beer?”
A stupid policy is dead, and is already being forgotten for the rubbish it was. How professional! How human! Others should learn from this.
What the fuck is everybody talking about the LGBT community for? The T aren’t included, they can still be thrown out based on nothing other than being who they are. But I guess that’s okay. Guess I shouldn’t rain on the parade.
Spit.