While the US may actually withdraw from Iraq, the government is out today threatening to turn one of their undeclared wars into an explicit one.
The Obama administration has sharply warned Pakistan that it must cut ties with a leading Taliban group based in the tribal region along the Afghan border and help eliminate its leaders, according to officials from both countries.
In what amounts to an ultimatum, administration officials have indicated that the United States will act unilaterally if Pakistan does not comply.
The message, delivered in high-level meetings and public statements over the past several days, reflects the belief of a growing number of senior administration officials that a years-long strategy of using persuasion and military assistance to influence Pakistani behavior has been ineffective.
White House officials and Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta are said to be adamant in their determination to change the approach, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity about internal administration deliberations.
I’m trying to figure out how this isn’t a threat of unilateral war. The US is vowing to unilaterally pursue and kill people in a foreign country. Just because we’ve been doing this in an undeclared way for so long doesn’t mean that it’s not an act of war when you declare it.
Speaking of undeclared wars, numbers 4 and 5 get a mention today in the WaPo:
The Obama administration is assembling a constellation of secret drone bases for counterterrorism operations in the Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula as part of a newly aggressive campaign to attack al-Qaeda affiliates in Somalia and Yemen, U.S. officials said.
One of the installations is being established in Ethiopia, a U.S. ally in the fight against al-Shabab, the Somali militant group that controls much of that country. Another base is in the Seychelles, an archipelago in the Indian Ocean, where a small fleet of “hunter-killer” drones resumed operations this month after an experimental mission demonstrated that the unmanned aircraft could effectively patrol Somalia from there.
The U.S. military also has flown drones over Somalia and Yemen from bases in Djibouti, a tiny African nation at the junction of the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. In addition, the CIA is building a secret airstrip in the Arabian Peninsula so it can deploy armed drones over Yemen.
The President is speaking right as I write this at the United Nations, talking about the need to work colelctively to pursue peace. At the same time, his government is assembling a drone army to unilaterally hunt down and kill, without trial, foreign citizens – in a few cases, US citizens – in foreign countries. And we’ve become so desensitized by a decade of war without end, that we say almost nothing about it.
The money spent on this, for some reason, never enters our discussions about the deficit.




4 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Dday, you didn’t name the target, but your WaPo link names the target. It’s the Haqqani network:
ISI is gonna shit themselves. Failing to protect Haqqani from U.S. attacks is gonna make ISI a new hot target. Haqqani is gonna slaughter hundreds of Pakistani military spies. Not sure what that means for short-term stability in Pakistan.
OTOH, I think progressives can find a way to understand U.S. strategy, if not to support it openly. There is really no question that Haqqani are murderous fucks who have been sneaking agents all over AfPak, killing our guys with IEDs, training bunches of Taliban to build more IEDs, then sneaking back into their safe houses in Quetta province. I think we can understand this strategy as a slight expansion of “hot pursuit.”
Will it mean that we get our troops out of AfPak by the end of 2012? No. Will it mean we finally get them out by the end of 2014? Not if preznit is re-elected.
If we are gonna invade Pakistan, can we PPLLLLLEEASSSE agree on how to pronounce that damn country’s name. Pak-i-stan OR Pok-i-ston.
Fractal, I don’t normally disagree with you … but we’re the worst murderous fucks in the world and if we were invaded and droned what the fuck would “we” do?
We send drones where ever we want. And kill whomever we want … even children under the age of five, cuff their hands behind their backs and shot them in the head.
Horrific images … you bet!!
Let’s do the math, shall we? How many human beings have “we” killed since beginning a war on Iraq based on lies? (We could start earlier, at the founding of this nation, but let’s keep it simple and in this century.)
We don’t even know, do we? “We” aren’t supposed to know, right?
How many have “they” … ALL of “them” … put together … killed? You can throw in all those killed on 9-11, if you wish.
Who the FUCK has killed more human beings?
We kill with impunity and “sneak” back to fortified componds in how many freaking countries? We have kill teams in how many countries, special ops, what is the number, now, over seventy …
I loath US POLICY and its “strategy” as well.
Not as a “progressive”, or a “liberal” or even as a “revolutionary” but as a human being.
Damn pax Americana!
“We” are the more powerful … “we” have the moral obligation, and “we” should have the PRINCIPLE to dare to end the madness … else it will engulf us and destroy us, first our reason and then our humanity …
Enough, Fractal, do not speak of “understanding”, please …
DW
Haqqani were the “murderous fucks” who drove the Russians out of Afghanistan but back then they were known as “marvelous fucks.”