The real bombshell of the past 24 hours in housing was the report of the FHFA Inspector General, the second in two weeks damning the conduct of the GSEs. In this case, Fannie Mae was found to have known about foreclosure fraud, including serial fabrications of foreclosure documents and robo-signing, as far back as 2003.
Only after news reports in mid-2010 began to describe the dubious practices, like the routine filing of false pleadings in bankruptcy courts, did Fannie Mae’s overseer start to scrutinize the conduct. The report was critical of that overseer, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and was prepared by the agency’s inspector general.
In one notable lapse, even after the agency reported problems to Fannie Mae in late 2010 about some of the approved law firms, it did not request a response from the company, the report said.
“American homeowners have been struggling with the effects of the housing finance crisis for several years, and they shouldn’t have to worry whether they will be victims of foreclosure abuse,” said Steve Linick, inspector general of the finance agency. “Increased oversight by F.H.F.A. could help to prevent these abuses.”
Fannie Mae had a retained attorney network with a select list of law firms that would perform any foreclosure operations with payment on a volume basis. These firms included notorious foreclosure mills like the Law Offices of David J. Stern. Even after whistleblowers, and even Fannie’s own outside law firm, identified persistent foreclosure abuses, Fannie never mentioned this to its regulator, nor did they stop using the law firms in their network. In fact, they required that their servicers ONLY use these law firms that Fannie knew were committing systemic abuses.
I asked Sen. Jeff Merkley about this disturbing report yesterday. “It raises new questions,” he said. “And hearings are the appropriate venue to examine that.” So I’d expect hearings at the Senate Banking Committee about this complete failure of oversight, and facilitation of systemic foreclosure fraud that steals homes from borrowers with fake documents. Elijah Cummings, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, also expressed outrage at this, and planned to take it up with the FHFA Acting Director in a meeting this week.
Just to expand on this briefly, the unifying thread in all of this is a total collapse of federal oversight over many years. The banks basically had free reign to do whatever they wanted on foreclosures and housing, and the federal agencies charged with regulating this either looked the other way or actively participated.
Relating this to the present, the feds may want to take over the foreclosure fraud settlement process. In fact the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has its own regulatory “crackdown” on banks over the issue in the form of consent decrees. Anyone who thinks these will work need only look at the prior history.




15 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Let’s put these same governmental agencies in charge of our healthcare, what could go wrong.
… it would have to be better than the plutocrats running the insurance industry.
Oh, wait… under Obamacare the people who run the insurance industry run health care… and they’re the same people who run the banks…
Rafe, if you weren’t so full of winger talking points you’d actually notice something :)
Wasn’t Rahm on the board of Freddie or Fannie back then?
X1,000,000,000,000,000!!!
Rafes familar/usual response!!
Your Right Rafe we should have a revolution first and make Freddie and Fannie completely non profit no big salaries for guys like Rahm, no lobbying, no more buying stock in them either Government does its best work without a profit motive.
We don’t want the Banks who got a bailout because of funny home loans having anything to do with home loans.
Thants like asking a problem gambler to watch your piggy bank.
We deregulated the airlines and how many times have airlines gone broke or gotten bailed out since then as service was cut?
We deregulated the phone companies and now we have slower internet than the places like South Korea and we pay more for cell phone service than France does for cellphone, internet and cable service!
We have seen in America what private healthcare is like illegal immigrants live longer than Whites with healthcare and much more money.
The Free Markets suck at providing for society Rafe thanks for inspiring me I Never would have done this rant without you providing inspiration:)
Your Right Rafe we should have a revolution first and make Freddie and Fannie completely non profit no big salaries for guys like Rahm, no lobbying, no more buying stock in them either Government does its best work without a profit motive.
We don’t want the Banks who got a bailout because of funny home loans having anything to do with home loans.
Thants like asking a problem gambler to watch your piggy bank.
We deregulated the airlines and how many times have airlines gone broke or gotten bailed out since then as service was cut?
We deregulated the phone companies and now we have slower internet than the places like South Korea and we pay more for cell phone service than France does for cellphone, internet and cable service!
We have seen in America what private healthcare is like illegal immigrants live longer than Whites with healthcare and much more money.
The Free Markets suck at providing for society Rafe thanks for inspiring me I Never would have done this rant without you providing inspiration:)
What a clueless bunch of shit.
“These same governmental agencies” that failed in the foreclosure fraud were not “in charge” of mortgages, or foreclosures.
They failed in their duty to regulate those who WERE IN CHARGE of those activities. So this is an example of what happens when there is no government regulating the private market.
And with Single Payer healthcare, the people “in charge” of healthcare will still be the patient and the Doctor. And if we get over the stoopid right wing rants about regulation then the Government will do it’s proper role of REGULATING those that are IN CHARGE of health care.
What a bunch of teh stoopid.
Fraud? No, not them. Noooooooooooooooooooooooo! (clenches fists, shakes at sky)
Anyone remember Kellerman of Freddie who committed suicide in his home in APril 2009?
Here’s a great NYT article, Reported Suicide Is Latest Shock at Freddie Mac, … kinda.
“Then early this month, Mr. Kellermann and other executives at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae became the focus of intense scrutiny when lawmakers learned they would receive bonuses totaling $210 million. Mr. Kellermann was set to receive $850,000 over 16 months.”
Oh, and my favorite part:
“The roots and causes of suicide are often unclear. It is not known if Mr. Kellermann succumbed to the pressures of his job. But in the aftermath of his death, it is plain that at Freddie Mac, as at many of the companies in the center of this economic storm, there are forces so strong they can overwhelm almost anyone.
At General Motors, executives are fighting to save a company that has cut their salaries and suspended their vacations. On Wall Street, professionals are demonized and then asked to work overtime to repair the damage colleagues have wrought. These professionals may not deserve tears, particularly compared to the millions of Americans who have lost their jobs and their homes. But Mr. Kellermann’s death is a reminder that those suffering in this crisis reside in every neighborhood, from the squalid to the opulent.”
So we should all just take it easy on these poor troubled souls.
Sure he’s getting 850k, but he’s got a tough job, right? And those poor Wall Street kids/major corporate execs. Why would anyone want to be angry at them??? I mean it’s not like they’re destroying millions of lives and relegating them to being destitute, and then dying a slow and miserable death … right?
BTW, one does not commit suicide because “things are rough”. But thankfully the NYT “reporter” doesn’t bother with that minor and unimportant issue. Thankfully they just covered for corrupt execs and Wall Street.
Geesh I love the NYT. Go NYT … straight to …
To keep this in context, one must remember that Fannie Mae was a GSE, government sponsored entity, at the time of all the shenanigans. Fannie and Freddie have since been nationalized. With the familiar band of sociopaths running Freddie and Fannie when they were for-profit entities, what other outcome would be expected of them ? They were padding their bonuses like the rest of the financial services industry. At least now, they are government entities in whole, like they always should have been. There are no band of thieves at the top working daily on making bad decisions to enrich themselves, which is how our financial system largely works. The people running these places now have to go to Congress and justify why they should be paid more than the congress people signing off on their compensation. And no games to play with the stock prices, either. There are no mortgages being underwritten by anyone but Freddie and Fannie anymore. Can crooks still originate bogus mortgages and ask Freddie and Fannie to buy them ? Yes, but the motive for Freddie and Fannie looking the other way while crap mortgages were loaded off of trucks onto their loading dock, those days are over.
Cummings always expresses “outrage” when something comes to light and then later on in the proceedings somehow or another manages to slide back into a live and let live posture. Barney Frank had intimate dealings with both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and he is acting very quietly right about now. Nancy Pelosi is like a little mouse. Timothy Geithner is probably on the phone with Bernanke and freaking out about the trillions of dollars that are at stake in their virtual economy. It may be that they are just about to start looting the cash deposit boxes in the banks vaults hoping to find whatever cash or jewelry and Rolex watches that they can so they can stash them away for a rainy day. Looking out my window I see, guess what, IT’S RAINING.
I am very confused by this article as someone who has been following the mortgage fiesta and hangover for a very long time. There wasn’t rampant foreclosure fraud in 2003. In Fact in 2003 we were hip deep in mortgage palooza when the whole country was on the pigs back and anyone could even lie about having a pig and get a “no doc 5/1 arm”. I’m not saying in any way that Fannie and Freddie haven’t been criminally negligent in almost everything they do but no one wanted to no anything in 2003.
I’m shocked! shocked! Every time a pay to play scheme is exposed everyone acts as if it’s the exception, not the rule. Not only was Barney Frank’s boy friend hired by Fanny or Freddie, both organizations made large political contributions. Face it. The system’s corrupt. Get over it or change it. I suggest the latter. Any ideas on how we might begin?
Merkeley looks for congressional investigation…Pelosi and Frank looked the other way. So will we get another whitewash? Where is the Department of Justice? Holder is on an Obama hold?
The crime syndicate still rules.
“I’m not saying in any way that Fannie and Freddie haven’t been criminally negligent in almost everything they do but no one wanted to no(sic) anything in 2003.”
Actually there were government officials who wanted to know, who were trying to look into mortgage fraud as early as 2003, but they were all state and local officials, both Republican and Democratic officials.
From following NY Times link, Dec. 21, 2008 article, entitled: “Bush drive for home ownership fueled housing bubble.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/business/worldbusiness/21iht-admin.4.18853088.html?pagewanted=all
“As for Bush’s banking regulators, they once brandished a chain saw over a 9,000-page pile of regulations as they promised to ease burdens on the industry. When states tried to use consumer protection laws to crack down on predatory lending, the comptroller of the currency blocked the effort, asserting that states had no authority over national banks.
The administration won that fight at the Supreme Court. But Roy Cooper, North Carolina’s attorney general, said, “They took 50 sheriffs off the beat at a time when lending was becoming the Wild West.”
This NY Times article from late 2008 is well worth reading, especially when read in the context of this latest NY Times article. It’s obvious what happened and who did it.
The fanatically anti-regulation Republicans in the Bush administration blocked investigations into the fraud-driven housing bubble from both the top-down and the bottom-up, from 2003 through the housing bubble’s collapse in 2007/2008 and the stock market crash in late 2008.
This latest NY Times article describes the Bush administration’s top-down process of having the federal government turn a blind-eye to mortgage abuses (which led to derivatives-package abuses, including the mis-rating of mortgage-packed derivatives packages by Wall Street-owned ratings agencies). All Bush-controlled federal agencies and offices participated in this cover-up of mortgage abuses.
The Dec. 21, 2008 NY Times article makes a passing reference, in the quoted section above, about how the Bush administration, and the White House’s office of the comptroller of the currency, took all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court all the state and local officials who tried to apply state and local consumer protection laws to investigate and prosecute mortgage lender abuses. All state and local consumer protection laws governing mortgage fraud were put on hold for several years after 2003 while this case was working its way up to the Supreme Court, where a majority of Republican-appointed justices ruled in favor of the Bush administration and the mortgage lenders, allowing the mortgage fraud abuses to continue (as well as the fraud-driven mis-rated derivatives packages).
We saw a preview of this in the ENRON collapse in 2001, when the Bush administration refused repeated requests by California’s governor to have the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) investigate the West Coast energy market. Months passed in 2001. Ratepayers’ utility bills skyrocketed. Rolling brown-outs and black-outs. Oh, wait, some ENRON on-line energy traders were rigging the energy markets. By the time ENRON was uncovered as being the culprit, it was too late and even ENRON collapsed and went bankrupt. Sound familiar? The Bush-inflated housing bubble follows the same pattern, from 2003 to 2008, with the same result, but on a much bigger scale, adversely affecting tens of millions of more U.S. citizens, not just those on the West Coast as in ENRON, but across America…oh, and around the world, where anyone (or any government) that got involved in Wall Street’s fraud-driven toxic-mortgage-packed derivatives packages got scammed or anyone (or any government) that had dealings with any of the Wall Street firms behind all this fraud got screwed.
I’m just surprised that there isn’t a EuroZone fleet off New York’s coast, demanding the heads of all those on Wall Street responsible, including the heads of any of the fanatically anti-regulation Republicans in the Bush administration (who aided and abetted all this corruption). A EuroZone fleet off New York’s coast could provide back-up for the OWS protesters, showing solidarity with the 99 percenters, because over in Europe the same thing is happening, the 1 percenters taking advantage of the 99 percenters, the 1 percenters calling for austerity and tax cuts while demanding cuts in 99-percenter social programs and safety nets. Do the 1 percenters really want another Great Depression, do they really want another French Revolution?
It’s the biggest heist in American history and nobody is perk walk and put in jail.
If you or I rob a convenience store we go to jail, but if our presidents, congress, wall street, and ceo’s of corporations defraud us of trillions. They walk free and are invited to bring their trophy wives to state dinners at the white house.
Know what I mean????????