This week, when the House passed what is colloquially known as the “Let Women Die” Act, which would among other things make it illegal for hospitals to perform a life-saving abortion on a woman, 15 Democrats joined all but two Republicans in voting for it. Here are the names of the 15 Democrats:
Jason Altmire (PA), Sanford Bishop (GA), Dan Boren (OK), Jerry Costello (IL), Mark Critz (PA), Henry Cuellar (TX), Joe Donnelly (IN), Tim Holden (PA), Dan Lipinski (IL), Jim Matheson (UT), Mike McIntyre (NC), Collin Peterson (MN), Nick Rahall (WV), Mike Ross (AR), Heath Shuler (NC)
Boren, Costello and Ross are retiring this year. But the other twelve are on track to run for re-election as Democrats. Joe Donnelly is looking to step up by running for US Senate in Indiana. Jim Matheson may do the same in Utah, for either Governor or Senate.
So these twelve Democrats would consign over half the population to potentially being refused life-saving treatment at a hospital. And over the next year, the lead committee that elects Democrats will tell you to overlook that and help fund them in their re-election efforts.
CREDO, the progressive organization, has had enough. They noticed that the DCCC, the campaign arm for Democrats in the House, which solicited fundraising right after the vote on the Let Women Die Act saying that Democrats had to be elected to “protect the health of women,” listed three of the Democrats above as “Frontline” candidates, meaning they will be at the front of the line for that cash (the three are Matheson, Mark Critz and Mike McIntyre). So they have begun a campaign to get the DCCC to stop funding candidates who sell out women. Here’s an excerpt from the email to supporters; I’ll put the entire email on the flip.
It is shameful that the DCCC is using these horrible attacks on women’s lives as a chance to fill their own coffers with the money of supporters who are genuinely angry about the war extremists in Congress are waging against women.
Not only is it hypocritical for the DCCC not to mention that the money raised for their women’s health fund will be going directly to three anti-choice candidates, but it is simply wrong that they are funding candidates who are so anti-choice that they voted for a bill that would let women die in a hospital without any intervention.
The DCCC’s two-faced messaging must stop. If they care about protecting women’s health, then they need to stop funding extreme anti-choice candidates — and if they want to fund those anti-woman candidates, then they need to stop running fundraising campaigns that use attacks on women’s health to solicit contributions from pro-choice activists.
This is a rare challenge from a progressive group, directly confronting the party on an important issue. The DCCC has been pissing away money they fundraise from liberals on conservative candidates for a long time. They gave well over a million dollars to Parker Griffith, who ended up switching parties. That’s just one of dozens of examples. The top option should be funding candidates worthy of support directly, instead of these campaign arms that hand money over to people who vote against the interests of the donors. But the D-Trip should have to answer for their investment in anti-woman lawmakers.
The silence from women’s groups, incidentally, is deafening.
The full letter is below.
The House of Representatives voted to let women die by passing a bill that would make it legal for hospitals to refuse to perform a life-saving abortion on a woman as an emergency procedure.
In response to that vote, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) sent out a fundraising email asking supporters to donate to help protect the health of women.
But three out of fifteen of the DCCC’s top candidates who would receive that money voted to let women die.
Tell the DCCC: You can’t have it both ways. Either stop fundraising off attacks on women’s health or stop fundraising for anti-choice Democrats who vote to let women die.
It is shameful that the DCCC is using these horrible attacks on women’s lives as a chance to fill their own coffers with the money of supporters who are genuinely angry about the war extremists in Congress are waging against women.
Not only is it hypocritical for the DCCC not to mention that the money raised for their women’s health fund will be going directly to three anti-choice candidates, but it is simply wrong that they are funding candidates who are so anti-choice that they voted for a bill that would let women die in a hospital without any intervention.
The DCCC’s two-faced messaging must stop. If they care about protecting women’s health, then they need to stop funding extreme anti-choice candidates — and if they want to fund those anti-woman candidates, then they need to stop running fundraising campaigns that use attacks on women’s health to solicit contributions from pro-choice activists.
Tell the DCCC: You can’t have it both ways. Either stop fundraising off attacks on women’s health or stop fundraising for anti-choice Democrats who want to let women die.
Thank you for speaking out against hypocrisy at the DCCC and working to defend women’s rights.Ali Rozell, Campaign Manager
CREDO Action from Working Assets




37 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thanks, dd.
One more reason to call for public funding of elections with no bribes (donations) from anyone….and I do mean ANYONE! In the meantime we should do our utmost to replace every vermin in Congress who votes like this.
Great reporting DD. I hope there will be an uprising among progressives. This is just the latest and most egregious example of the DCC funding of Blue Dogs who have so contaminated the traditional Democratic Party and sabotaged most real liberal and progressive reforms and remedies to the damages done by 30 years of conservative rule. I have not been responding strongly enough to their pleas for us to donate so they can get these people elected, though the general disenchantment certainly keeps my donations low or more recently with hard times zip.
I really wish we could get a mini-movement going to respond to their reach outs with an appropriate message. Stop supporting Blue Dogs or no more money.
The DCCC. Where contempt for progressive candidates and voters is not just business, it’s personal.
It’s certainly very personal for women. We must not let them get away with this. Everyone please e-mail or write or call your Congress critter and let’s stop this. I can’t believe that in the 21st century women are still second class citizens but we are.
We already know who the real cretins are in both parties. What is astonishing to me is that the women in this country ALLOW men to make decisions about their reproductive healthcare. Where are the women in the streets demanding that men shut up, bow out, and leave women alone when it comes to decisions about their own bodies? What if women demanded that every man that had fathered a child must have a vascetomy because we have enough people on earth already? Can you imagine the male outrage? Well, where is the female outrage? We are being treated like children incapable of making our own decisions as if it were still the 1700s. Congress is by and large a bunch of paid shills for some special interests. Less than 1% have any medical training, let alone any special skills to speak of. Why should they be making laws about women’s healthcare procedures? The first big lawsuit is coming and I hope it’s a doosey.
It’s maddening to me that the sole important factor to the DCCC and other political powers is that the candidates have a “D” after their names. Never mind if he (or she) has an “R” voting record or beliefs.
Hmmm, what do the people who support the “let women die” act call themsleves? Oh yeah, “pro life”. Got it.
I will never, ever donate a nickel of my money to the DCCC. In 2006, it blew off all challengers in Michigan and, at the same time, supported Blue Dogs like Heath Shuler and wasted millions on crap candidates like Tammy Duckworth. May they all burn in political Hell.
I hope there will be an uprising among progressives.
I’m not optimistic. We’re stuck in an endless loop: the Democratic Party mandarins tell progressives it’s the wrong time to challenge the establishment because the next election is so critical; the progressives meekly obey; and after the election, the mandarins tell them to remain silent because the election after that is so crucial.
May I say AMEN.
A corrupt political class deserving the fate of traitors.
Good for CREDO. None of those Democrats should get any support. Anyone here think that NARAL or NOW will follow suit? I’m guessing they won’t.
This has been the problem with progressive organizations. They go along with this crap, because they’re afraid of the GOP. And all the while the GOP gets what it wants anyway.
NOW is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party and, like the Democratic Party, accomplishes nothing while hindering the creation of a truly progressive organization.
I say let the chances of election for these vile pieces of shit, DIE.
The women, victims of the conservative manipulation of male/female perceptions of sexuality, are cowering in fear of men not liking women who are not sterotypically submissive. Or, heaven forbid, being seen as aggressive. “Feminazies” or lesbian. One of Dick Armey’s favorite put downs of female pundits is “I wouldn’t want to be married to you.” He gets away with it most of the time.
Every morning watching the women on the cable news shows really makes me feel like vomiting.
I think it is time to throw away the bras once more and let the hair grow where it will.
I wouldn’t bet against your pessimism, but still hope.
No one should ever give money to the DNC,the DCCC, or the DSCC. This was already true before this issue came up. The advantage of central committees like these is that they have a national strategy and can direct the money where it’s most needed. Unfortunately, their national strategy includes maintaining center-right control of the Democratic Party, and they will always strategize against us.
My understanding is that Collin Peterson is invulnerable as Big Ag’s #1 Democrat in the House. He may be a little more vulnerable now that he’s not a committee chair. I doubt that he depends at all on the DCCC.
Joe Donnelly is my rep. I have written numerous times, since he seems to have voted several times for anti-women things. I get back form letters. He’s another “lesser of two evils” whom I won’t be voting for. In his last House run, it was “dumb” and “dumber” (Jackie Walorski). I didn’t vote for either, but he got in.
Lotsa religious fundies in South Bend, IN.
I’m not a big petition fan but I signed it along with this:
It’s pretty apparent you think we’re stupid. However, your mistaken. Not only will you not get my money with anti choice candidates but you and they will not get my vote. I’m done with my health and life decisions being determined by a bunch of individuals who have absolutely no stake in the outcome. Furthermore it’s disgusting that anyone would use the lives of women and their families to score political points.
I actually added more about tired of a bunch of small minded petty male control freaks who will never have to worry about dying thinking they can substitute saying “God’s will” putting their money where their mouth is the next time THEY NEED MEDICAL INTERVENTION. After all, if a woman be told that she can’t have a medical procedure to save her life I see no reason that these fools should have access to antibiotics. After all, we might be subverting “God’s will” since he apparently wanted them sick to begin with.
They need to be called what they are PRO FETUS. They aren’t even pro child since half these f-wits are the same ones who whine about the deficit and cutting programs largely meant to help children.
Who were the two GOPers who voted against? I looked at the vote record but couldn’t find them. Just curious. Thanks if anyone knows!
As to the supposed D’s who voted in favor-the Big Tent is not large enough for you so do everyone a favor and switch to the cretinous party you rightly belong to! No one gives a fig if you can’t get re-elected by being truthful about your ideology. Buh-bye!
Not to worry,the bill in question has no chance in the Senate and if it could pass the Senate,Pres.Obama would veto it anyway.We have a good chance to take back the House next year with their 12% approval rating. Lets not let a symbolic bill which has no chance of ever becoming law stand in the way.
This is why CREDO is my phone company. I’m not optimistic about the DCCC *caring*, of course, but I’m glad my money goes to people who give a shit about me.
Because Obama has a stellar track record of protecting our rights, yeah.
Unfortunately, the dem party has proven it is not actually the friend of liberals or progressive – at least not on a national level.
In Wisconsin, there has been more of a tradition for a progressive-leaning party.
I am grateful that an open dialog about this exists here (thanks to the work of Jane) – this was one of the first “superblogs” to speak the truth about obama and the party he supposedly leads.
I don’t want to see repugs elected, but we have to take back the dem party if we expect to motivate voters. “I stink less then that turd” is not a viable election strategy, which is why no advertiser ever promotes a product/service by saying, “Yeah, I may be bad, but I am better than product X!”
The evil orange site doesn’t get it, but there continues to be more and more speaking out there – doubt that would ever have happened without the dialog here.
(FWIW: kos admits to being a former repug and it appears to me that he could not be a “big boy” there, so he came over to the other side but still is a repug at heart)
I wouldn’t call it a good chance to retake the House. A good chance in Vegas is >50%. But don’t get me wrong: Anybody who lives in a swing district should vote blue even if they loathe that person. Think about it as a vote for Nancy Pelosi versus Boehner or Cantor.
You mean the same Nancy Pelosi who allowed the anti choice Bart Stupak and his 11 degener-er collegues to hijack the health care debate and advance the idea that federal funding should not be allowed for abortions to begin with? The Nancy Pelosi who took single payer off the table?
With “friends” like Nancy who needs enemies.
I last sent money to the DCC in 2004. they are a bunch of corporat a$$lickers. remeber Rahm emannuel?
I should have pointed out that a kos-style repug party would be better than the current clowns, but the way he is directly and indirectly stifling legitimate dialog about the potential DISASTER coming in 2012 because obama has no respect for his base just makes him part of the problem.
yes, he found a voice as a “super-blog” that mindlessly promotes dems, but he has shown that site has no problems joining obama and dissin’ the folks that worked their butts off to get him elected.
Everyone here needs to remember, the evil orange site did everything they could to label the dialog his with a condencending, insulting, and dismissive label, “firebaggers”, but I don’t see that term bantered about anymore – those that sprew it prove they have no credibility.
If someone calls you a FIREBAGGER wear it with pride! If you read the orange site, you will see that the dialog here is growing over there.
well, it might be appropriate to point out that some do like to get screwed in the butt from time to time, nancy has shown us she is very good at that.
Please, show some tolerance for diverse needs and lifestyles!
Women’s rights in America is pretty dismal. We have the dubious honor of being in solidarity with the Islamic Republic of Iran, for not signing the CEDAW women’s rights treaty.
1984? I’m more worried about the Republic of Gilead.
They are plain and simple opposed to women as free individuals. Their activism and opinion on abortion has nothing to do with life. We need to forget even the claim and call it what it is. They believe women’s natural status is as chattel and they shall have no sex outside their master’s bed.
Actually some of the Democratic women in Congress made that statement on TV Friday. Only in order I suppose to not offend too much they called the Republicans and the bill misogynist! Of course it is but that statement has about as much pazazz as Obma’s response to the OWS on Wall Street criminality was to gently say the consumer protection agency is about to become activated.
Criminently!!! when are the Democrats Liberals and Progressives going to learn to use gut wrenching language to confront these actions that are killing and robbing the people in the US?
Thanks so much for assuming women have any control over what politicians do.
which would among other things make it illegal for hospitals to perform a life-saving abortion on a woman,
I have to nit-pick here.
The bill would make it legal for hospitals/doctors/medical providers to refuse to perform abortions or even the referral for the abortion, even for a woman in need of life saving intervention. (That’s not the same thing as making it illegal to perform the life saving abortion.)
The “big tent” meme the Democratic party wears on its sleeve is the cockroach in the cheese dip. Just because a candidate has a D after their name doesn’t mean diddly squat if they don’t respect the parties basic goals – one of which is, I thought, respect and support of a woman’s rite to control their own body. All of the blue dogs should face primaries .
The problem is that the DCCC is in a loss aversion mode. They don’t want to give up seats to the Republicans even if the Democrats are not fully in line with the Democratic party in all respects, such as a woman’s reproductive rights. Until we have equal representation in Congress, men will be ruling things and this will keep happening. Even with Pelosi as leader of the House, she caves to loss aversion. If you are in those Democrats’ districts – run against them! It is as simple as that. Emily’s List and other Women’s groups will support you.