As expected, Senate Republicans blocked the state fiscal aid bill that would have put as much as 400,000 teachers and public safety officials back to work. All 47 Senate Republicans voted against cloture on the motion to proceed on the bill. In addition, three members of the Democratic caucus said no. We knew that Joe Lieberman and Ben Nelson would be no votes, but Mark Pryor also decided that a 0.5% surtax on every dollar over $1,000,000 for Sam Walton and the Walton family wealthy Americans was too much to ask. This means that the final tally on the bill was 50-50. In a sane world where majority rules, Vice President Biden would have cast the tie-breaker and 400,000 teachers and fire fighters and cops would have jobs to look forward to. As it is, the Senate is an undemocratic institution, and states still suffering with depressed tax revenues will have to continue the rounds of layoffs that have been a lead weight on the economy. Or maybe the states can just stop serving lunch to prisoners on the weekends like they’re doing in Texas.
Republicans, seeking a talking point, forced a vote of their own last night, on another, more obscure aspect of the American Jobs Act. For some reason, President Obama inserted a provision that would delay the 3% withholding rule for large government contractors. Here’s the NYT to explain that:
The provision, adopted in 2006, requires federal, state and local government agencies to deduct and withhold 3 percent of payments they make to many suppliers of goods and services. The requirement was adopted after federal auditors found that thousands of government contractors had substantial amounts of unpaid federal taxes.
Democrats supported the intent of the bill, but blocked its consideration because it would also require unspecified cuts in spending for domestic programs [...]
Enforcement of the requirement has been delayed several times. As part of his jobs bill, Mr. Obama proposed a further delay, to 2014. Businesses say the withholding will disrupt their cash flow and cause administrative headaches.
Scott Brown called this an unfunded mandate. It’s actually an insurance policy on tax cheats. The IRS is too cash-strapped to find every tax cheat, and it turns out that government contractors make up a large pool of them. A 2007 Government Accountability Office reporte showed that contractors cheated the government out of $8 billion. The CBO estimates $30 billion in revenue collection off of the 3% rule because of compliance with the law. The Republican plan here is to allow tax cheating to go on without the federal government using any of its leverage.
And that got more votes than keeping teachers and public safety workers on the job! It failed to clear cloture but got 57 votes. And it might have passed if the pay-for wasn’t domestic spending cuts. Why that provision delay was in the American Jobs Act, as if it would create jobs to simply allow businesses to cheat on their taxes, is beyond me.
All of the rallying by President Obama and Vice President Biden on the jobs measures, then, went to naught. They got part of what they wanted: more evidence of obstructionism by the GOP. The American public got nothing.
Incidentally, the Senate did some other actual legislating last night. They confirmed John Bryson as the Secretary of Commerce; that nomination had been threatened by Republicans over Bryson’s environmental record. In addition, there were a number of amendments to the “minibus,” a collection of three appropriations bills for Fiscal Year 2012. The Senate voted to end federal payments to farmers with incomes over $1 million, voted against a ban on Article III trials of terror suspects, and voted for an extension of a higher threshold for federally backed mortgage loans. This was part of an all night vote-a-rama on the minibus, which did pass a final cloture vote.
UPDATE: Matt Yglesias reminds me that Senate Republicans blocked Bryson for Commerce Secretary because of the free trade agreements. So with their passage, they gave up on the obstruction and went ahead with the Bryson nomination.
UPDATE II: Might as well add the President’s full statement on the vote:
For the second time in two weeks, every single Republican in the United States Senate has chosen to obstruct a bill that would create jobs and get our economy going again. That’s unacceptable. We must do what’s right for the country and pass the common-sense proposals in the American Jobs Act. Every Senate Republican voted to block a bill that would help middle class families and keep hundreds of thousands of firefighters on the job, police officers on the streets, and teachers in the classroom when our kids need them most.
Those Americans deserve an explanation as to why they don’t deserve those jobs – and every American deserves an explanation as to why Republicans refuse to step up to the plate and do what’s necessary to create jobs and grow the economy right now.
We must rebuild the economy the American way and restore security for the middle class, based on the values of balance and fairness. Independent economists have said the American Jobs Act could create up to two million jobs next year. So the choice is clear. Our fight isn’t over. We will keep working with Congress to bring up the American Jobs Act piece by piece, and give Republicans another chance to put country before party and help us put the American people back to work.




41 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Of course, Obama is HELPLESS in the face of this. Yeah, right.
He wanted this to die so he could have an election talking point.
Boxturtle (One person’s helpless is another person’s ineffectual)
Nice head line, though as CNN reports, “Senate blocks vote on Jobs Bill”. I really wish CNN would try to report some things accurately, I mean they are only a news organization.
Another tax cut for the top 1% will fix this.
It’s the subtle misdirection with that headline that annoys me. Not Republicans, but the senate.
I suppose technically it’s a tri-partsian block. All the GOPers, two Blue Dogs, and Holy Joe.
Boxturtle (Didn’t notice the phrasing until you pointed it out)
A .5% surtax on $1,000,000 or more? What a joke. Last December the Democrats could have gotten a MUCH MUCH BIGGER tax increase on the rich just by sitting on their asses and letting the BushCo tax cuts expire.
This is bullshit, folks.
Why did obama want to be president? Did he have a vision, did he want to make this a better country, did he want to right some wrongs? NO and NO!!! This guy is the worst of the worst. In fact, he is a scourge on the American people. obama is what happens when the people of this country loses all reason. I remember the chants and the crying – it was sickening. This piece of crap has got to go. At least, if we have a republican president, the hypocritical democrats will stand up against him (maybe).
yup = at the national level the dem party is worse than worthless.
Here in WI there is a difference between r and d after your name.
Perhaps all we can hope for is a figurehead placekeeper in the WH and we really need to just take care of things in our own backyard and states first.
Just an idea that I think is worth discussing.
Yeah I hear you. Thats why i come here for my news. I mean I understand that all democrats shouldnt vote the same everytime because they represent different sets of people. Its just that when every Republican vote no ever single time on everything a news organization should start to see a pattern. But I guess they are paid to read and not to report or think . . .
Remember bush’s tv statements about how he couldn’t get things through congress or do what he pleased with signing statements ?
Me neither.
Just like the Ds stood up to W when he was prez.
Cue the Kabuki Show. This Act is called: desparately trying to make it seem like there’s a difference between so-called “Democrats” and putative “Republians.” aka: suck on it, ya 99% bitches.
Hysterical. Thinkprogress can’t figure out why Pryor voted against it.
My thought as well. What is she smoking?
I can understand the GOPer voters remaining loyal to the GOP because a lot of them are know-nothing assholes to begin with. But why do Democratic voters put up with this bullshit year after year?
I guess there’s a lot of people out there who, after being fucked like dogs, will just roll over and beg for more.
I’ll be darned, you’ve found a difference between Bush and Obama!
Boxturtle (Now try to find one between Obama and Romney!)
Because the Corporate Dems are very skillful at preventing progressive challengers. Obama had the Calif Progressive caucus decertified from the Calif Dem party for suggesting a primary challenge.
And in the general, the Dem is normally less distasteful than the GOPer.
Boxturtle (Warning to ObamaLLP: Who is more distasteful, O or Romney? Tough call, eh?)
Unfortunately authoritarianism does not afflict conservatives only. Many people are reflexive voters and, for a variety of reasons, do not really pay enough attention to what’s going on.
You got that right. My friend from Houston forwarded some remarks of mine to a man she met at a D event for local pols. (I gather the D mayor of Houston is pretty good, but I don’t really know.) This man sez in his email that he would have liked to continue the discussion about what’s wrong with O, a person he would like to be able to support.
So this was a political gathering of Ds in Houston, meaning the attendees are more aware of political events than the average voter, the man is middle aged, O’s been prez for 3 years, and the man still would like to be able to support O despite his faults.
Gah.
The brainwashing starts when they’re tykes at sunday school and it never lets up.
One of the big drivers against legalizing weed is the fear of loss of control by the control freaks. Mind-expanding drugs cause people to start questioning authority. Can’t have that!
Surf the “liberal” tubes of the inter-tubes and you’ll find obamabots everywhere. They consider anyone who isn’t a bot a “Koch shill.” FDL is considered a Tea Party organ because it criticizes their fearless leader.
A year ago, at a outdoor org annual picnic, with a lot of progressives in attendance, I had a long discussion with a couple of them about O. One is a retired therapist, so I talked about O’s affect, or the lack thereof, and what that might infer about how he is internally motivated. I even used the sentence: You’re the expert. You should notice this much more than I do.
As he was saying his good-byes, he told me with a grin: Now don’t be so hard on O.
Everything I said passed completely over his head.
Yes. I have a number of trad-Dem voter friends who are easily mollified by Obama’s American exceptionalism speeches. They get starbursts every time O speechifies.
OWS is just starting to get some of them to question their “reality” a little bit, for which I am totally grateful to OWS. That, and the fact, that as more & more citizens lose their jobs and cannot find another one… it starts to awaken some out of their deep slumber.
Then there IS the issue that the TeaGOP *deliberately* runs a slate of barking lunatics for POTUS, and so… by comparison (if you’re not really paying attention) O looks, uh, “normal”…
Yes and yes.
Plus I think BigPharma doesn’t like legal weed bc it causes too many to not have to bother with the very very very expensive pills that BigPharma is peddling.
It’s all very carefully orchestrated. It’s not an accident. Just like how the Koch’s astroturfed the Tea Party, which did, in reality, begin as a grass roots movement. The initial Tea Party rallies DID reflect what those citizens were upset about… but quickly transmorgified into dumb stuff signifying nothing, which is too bad.
Here’s the best rant on legalizing drugs that I’ve heard in a long time. Nothing new, just a really really good rant.
Back when most of us had jobs, houses, health care, and retirement funds it was fun to watch the DC Kabuki theater. Now it’s horrifying to see politicians fiddling while the country burns.
When he had the numbers and the mojo, 0 worked hard at being ‘bipartisany’ and threw all of his political capital away ‘trying’ to get ONE lousy rethug vote. That was the ostensible reason for all of the backing and filling. The real reason, as we now know, was to pull the repugs back from the edge of the hole where they were to be buried. We see the hidden agenda well defined now.
I am amazed at the number of people, even on this site, that say they don’t want to vote for 0 but are worried about the scary repug that will probably be nominated. To me, that is an 0bot realizing that he/she is an 0bot and wanting to hide the fact from the world. I can’t vote for either ‘party’ at this point; I won’t vote for 0 no matter who the opponent is.
They didn’t pass the trade bills until it was Obama pushing them.
When does Obama’s self-selected Senate mentor retire? Who will run against
Nelson ans Pryor soon? Obama needed to camp out in the Senate for this one.
american liberals have no self-respect and that’s why the democratic party treats them like pieces of shit
when you say you’re going to vote for obama no matter what he does you are a fool
when you support scum like pryor, tester, landrieu, lieberman, the nelsons, etc just because they have a d next to their names you are just begging to be treated like shit
obama 12: we WILL get fooled again
When the progressive primary challenger to Obama posted a Diary yesterday, it got one comment that I saw. (Aldous Tyler) He isn’t even getting moral support here, much less any other kind. So take all those fierce declarations with several grains of salt.
If anybody is interested, his website is America Changes Today.
wbgonne–agree at #30. The d is for decoration.
I always think it best to acknowledge the arguments/”defense” of our opponents even when we know it is just a cover for protecting the rich and screwing the unionized.
In this case the GOP complaint was that legislation was not for heavily restricted direct grants for teacher/police/fire salaries, but like the stimulus these were to be block grants to the general budgets of the recipients – and in the case of the stimulus block grants, some, but not that much, of the money went to golf courses, salary increases, etc.
I don’t think the GOP can really defend against the coming Obama ads about the GOP screwing teachers/firemen/police in order to protect the rich, but there is a “defense”.
This country is seriously f#cked. Join your local occupy and try your best to escape if you can. If you’re a boomer or an early gen x’er with a career already, you may be relatively safe, the rest of us are in hell. Forget blowing your money on college here. Spend the same amount and study abroad somewhere with a better government and economy.
Next elections are lose-lose for us:
1. Obama wins, Republicans remain as much as in control as they are. They block everything decent just so they can watch Obama and the Democrats burn. Obama and Democrats likewise blame Republicans for shitty economy. This is what is happening now.
2. Republican candidate wins and Republicans push through a bunch of solutions aimed at pleasing the 1%. They get richer, hoard more money, Republicans make excuses like immigrants or distract us with more terrorist fear-mongering.
I think we MAY have a chance if Romney wins, Democrats dominate, and the occupy movement is in full effect, larger and more powerful than now. Republicans can take credit for producing jobs that way, Romney will have an excuse for seeming to move to the center, and Democrats haven’t historically been a party that opposes everything the other party proposes for election gains. Then again, who knows?
Somoehow, the government and its employees have become the priority.
As we all know, as soon as this funding runs out, those 400,000 people will again be out of a job.
Why isn’t Obama doing something to help people create permanent jobs, not needing tax support to survive? People needs JOBS, not hand outs. They need jobs that they know are going to last. Not make work baloney that disappears as soon as the funding runs out.
They are almost acting like the 1%, take care of government and its own, let the rest fend for themselves.
IMO, in your #1 we lose significantly on social security and medicare, which might be stopped if a Republican president tries to do it (which Romney absolutely would do) as long as there were Dem majorities in the house and senate.
With either 1 or 2, we could very well be looking at some sort of revolution.
NO, I think it is easy.
Here’s the ad.
Government only seems to care about itself and its employees. Lots of proposals to save government workers, none to save everybody else.
when are the Democrats going to care about the rest of us?
Played with Reid’s quote about the private sector doing just fine.
If you aren’t part of the government elite, you are left for the dogs.
So, you have two groups battling the rest of us.
1. the 1% government elite and employees
2. the 1% private elite.
The rest of us get nothing.
I’m starting to think the best we can hope for with the parties as they exist now and the way things are set up is a (moderate) Republican president and Democrats controlling the house and senate, in large enough numbers the DINOs can’t spoil everything. The worst case is a radical right/tea party type president and Republican control over the house and senate.
The former, like you said, will make it easier for Democrats to oppose bad ideas, it makes it difficult for the Republican president to get right-wing things through, and the (soft) left isn’t sitting around debating the intentions of the president and how to get him/her to see the light. They are immediately energized to oppose them.
The best we can wish for overall is for the occupy movement to grow to a point serious changes are made to our democracy and the power of private corporations, banks, the financial sector, etc. regardless of who is in power.
This is what Obama gets for not tossing the traitor LIEberman out of the Dem Party completely.
The Dems play the fear card as well as the Rethugs, ie:, well if the Rethug gets elected he/she/(it) will be much worse than The Obomber. What could be worse than expanding war, letting torturers and war criminals go scot free, allowing the continued economic rape of the country and letting millions lose their homes, pensions, jobs and hope. If enough Dems STAND UP to the DNC, DCCC, whatever their bought vote acronyms are, then maybe they’ll have the sense to primary the useless failure. I will not, under ANY circumstances, vote for Obama again. So if the Dems don’t come up with an alternative, then I’ll vote 3rd party, Green or write in Ralph Nader (for the third time). I’m getting too old (61) to hold my nose and vote for a Dem again. I even wrote my Congressional Rep Michaud, Maine, who while a blue dog, is pretty good on most issues, to tell him that his support for throwing Anthony Weiner over board is the likely loss of my vote. Because at least Weiner was a fighter, the rarest of people in the spineless, cowardly Dem party.