We’re a day from the “deadline” for European leaders to come up with a solution to their bank crisis – and it is a banking crisis, as evidenced by the fact that Greek bailout money doesn’t go to the people of Greece, it goes to bondholders. I can hardly believe that WaPo wasted column inches on a story that money to pay off debts accrues mostly to the holders of the bonds on those debts.
Slowly, more details are being provided on the ultimate resolution, with the caveat that there’s no consensus on which plan to use. First, those same Greek debtholders are being asked to take a 60% haircut on the bonds, which would stagger the entities with the most exposure. Germany has taken the lead in proposing this big a haircut, precisely because their banks aren’t as exposed as, say, France’s. But we can’t say for certain, however, because as Atrios points out, we don’t really know who owns what!
According to officials briefed on the talks, France, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund remain concerned the tough stance could trigger bondholder insurance policies known as credit default swaps, sparking investor panic because of uncertainty over which financial institutions face CDS losses.
Unregulated capitalism!
In order to keep the banks suffering from this bond loss solvent and creditworthy, and in order to keep the crisis from spreading from Greece to other countries on the continent, two additional steps need to be taken, European leaders say. First, the banks need to be recapitalized; according to a secret stress test, they would need €108 billion in new capital. Second, the EFSF, the European bailout fund, would need to expand greatly to cover contagion spreading to the larger troubled countries of Italy and Spain. Initially, €2 trillion was suggested, but now it looks like €1 trillion will become the target. But the story here is that Europe is looking to emerging markets to bail them out:
European leaders are closing in on an agreement to fight the region’s debt crisis by making their bailout fund worth more than $1.4 trillion, partly through public and private investments they hope will come from fast-growing countries such as China and Brazil, German officials said Monday.
The boost would come through using the emergency backstop to insure holders of Eurozone public debt against a portion of their potential losses and by setting up a fund that could attract outside investors such as the government of China. Both options would multiply the power of the bailout fund without demanding more money to be pitched in by the Eurozone governments themselves, which are leery of inciting taxpayer ire.
Increasing the firepower of the bailout fund — formally known as the European Financial Stability Facility, or EFSF — is considered crucial in the battle against the debt crisis, because its current size is too small to prop up major economies such as Italy and Spain if they come under attack from the markets.
The EFSF has already been deployed to combat market runs on Portugal and Ireland, so the idea that it has €440 billion available is misleading; it’s probably down to €250 billion. And the notion that China and Brazil, already witness to global investment nearly buckling from mass purchases of mortgage backed securities in the bubble years, would willingly buy tranches of European debt from a leveraged CDO strikes me as about as likely as House Republicans passing a “World FDR Appreciation Day” bill this week. And that’s to get them to half as much as what’s seen as necessary by most experts.
This is just the most wobbly leg of the world’s wobbliest three-legged stool.





14 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
“We can’t be out of money, we still have checks in the checkbook.”
Get those printing presses fired up, Weimar Republic here we come!
We are having a long weekend with Bernie.
Related comedy over here…
I happened to catch a few (too many) minutes of the quasi-estimable Thaddeus McCotter contributing his two-bits worth. To suggest that he’s a smug sonofabitch would be a charitable utterance.
DD, I have to disagree on one point. The people of Greece did receive goods and services (after a fashion) leading to some resulting standard of living, plus plenty of graft and waste, all from money borrowed which the country can’t pay back. It shouldn’t be a parsing issue about sovereign debt crisis versus banking crisis. It’s the same issue, but the guys in the black hats are as you say.
The bad guys’ just desserts include the 60% haircut, but they are being “asked” to volunteer for such to avoid a hard default by fiat. I don’t think the credit raters will buy this illusion for an instant — not at a 60% figure or with replacement bonds worth far less than market value. So those credit agencies may be as malicious as the bondholders, themselves, and cause as much damage.
Now the problem for Greeks has to do with what standard of living the country can generate going forward without borrowing to pay the rent. They’ll have to shed a corrupt power structure, begin to consistently pay taxes, and avoid costly borrowing like the plague. However they pay for healthcare and education comparable to Germany’s. . . go figure.
Link.
Yes, I had read that. And yet recently, I can’t recall in which pieces, WSJ had figures of Greek deficit far exceeding 100% of GDP in the best of circumstances going forward. There are few exportables, unlike Argentina. It seems like they’ll be eating their seed corn.
There was another piece last summer about wealthy Greeks having fled the country and insulating their wealth overseas — those who could get out and take it with them, did.
Agree on China and Brazil, especially China. There’s no way they’re going to jump on this scheme unless they’re given guarantees up, down, and sideways that their losses are covered. I guess the countries can come out and say that’s the plan, but the people they need to join the plan won’t be eager to agree in the timeframe they need.
there is only one way out for the global financial elite and that is to steal the german people’s tax money
which is exactly what wall street’s waterboy, our very own timmeh g, is urging
the rest of the machinations are designed solely to disguise the theft
keep your eye on the german taxpayers’ money, all else is misdirection and head fakes
I’m not so sure China won’t bite. Timmy is very creative when it comes to stealing money from the masses.
Perhaps there’s a three-way deal. China buys $200 billion worth of Brazilian raw materials… with a caveat that Brazil gives the EU a $100 billion bailout? Maybe India buys $300 billion worth of oil futures from Saudi… with a a caveat that Saudi “guarantees” $200 billion in EU bailout money.
I dunno. But as wbgonne points out… they will steal our money. The only question is how?
that is indeed my fear
if the global financial elite gets too impatient with germany or if the germans refuse the thievery of their money, the u.s. taxpayer may be offered up yet again by “our leaders”
watch the money and who is being put on the hook
if the gfe gets away with it this time, we can’t say we weren’t warned
p.s., why isn’t occupy wall street on top of this? this is the wall street bailout/theft all over again
For years now people have said that the US can keep printing money… and China will keep buying… because China has nowhere else to go.
I wonder if the history books will someday describe this moment as the tipping point where China began reducing their (what is it??) $1.4 trillion in loans to the US?
the only way china put its money up for this disaster-a-coming is if it uses funny money guaranteed by suckers like the u.s or german taxpayers
iow: china won’t be the sucker, we will
I had thought the same. But the German voters have zipped up their wallets by now for sure. It’ll be, “we already paid for such, and we expect so going forward.”
Also Germany is a tempting target, the largest there. Still not big enough by itself. It remains a collective fiasco.