By any objective measure, Leon Panetta has been a terrible Defense Secretary. Just look at the series of missteps and gaffes he has committed in his young tenure at the Pentagon. He claimed that the President sent 100 combat equipped soldiers to central Africa not to help combat and disarm the Lord’s Resistance Army, but to combat Al Qaeda. He defended a continued presence in Iraq because of Al Qaeda and 9-11. He has become similar to a George W. Bush action figure circa 2005, shouting 9-11 and Al Qaeda at every opportunity.
And when you factor in his ridiculous rhetoric on the defense budget, you see real problems.
But it’s on defense spending where Panetta has really gone off the deep end — taking on maximalist, almost apocalyptic, positions including calling potential cuts “catastrophic,” “draconian” “doomsday”-inducing and akin to America “shooting itself in the head.” This tracks with [what] he said in August, when he wrote only days after the hard fought debt limit deal was signed that automatic cuts to the DoD budget “would undermine the military’s ability to protect America and its vital interests around the globe” and that such a move would “do real damage to our security.” This is bizarre hyperbole, particularly since Panetta hasn’t identified a single way in which these cuts will “hollow” out the US military.
In fact, as Ben Armbruster pointed out recently, when pushed to identify what risks would come from these reductions in current military spending (a fiscal outlay that far surpasses US spending during the Cold War) the best example that Panetta could point to was that the US presence in Latin America and Africa would have to be reduced. And why? Because according to Panetta the US would need to maintain a presence in the Middle East and the Far East.
Panetta doubled down on that today, intimating that troops scheduled home from Iraq and Afghanistan would be used in Asia to stop China’s advancing military. “Advancing” on what I have no idea.
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said troop withdrawals from Iraq and Afghanistan will allow the Pentagon to shift more of its resources to Asia, signaling the administration’s resolve to check China’s rapid military buildup despite budget woes at home.
In his first trip to Japan as Pentagon chief, Mr. Panetta said the U.S. was at a “turning point” and saw Asia as the nation’s next big priority after 10 years of war.
Despite intense budget pressures, Mr. Panetta said he did not expect U.S. forces in Asia to face cuts in the coming round of belt-tightening. Officials said the Pentagon was looking at ways to expand the U.S.’s presence in the region, particularly across Southeast Asia and the Indian Ocean, by shifting resources from other areas.
My favorite part of this is when Panetta said that China had to be more “transparent” about their advanced weapons it is developing. Because if there’s one thing the US military always puts first, it’s transparency.
There’s no indication that China needs to be checked militarily, outside of fantasist ravings from the likes of Bill Kristol, desperately searching for a new villain to fight, circa 2001. This is lunatic fringe stuff, the idea that the rise of China must be checked in some fashion militarily. If you didn’t notice, it’s on the economic front that China is eating America’s lunch, not on the guns and planes front.
Panetta sounds like a caricature of how “hawkish” liberals desperate to suck up to the foreign policy establishment sound. In a way they’re more dangerous than the neocons, because they’re trying so hard to prove their “toughness.”
The upshot of this is that Panetta will have the US deploying to the South China Sea and the Pacific Ocean, with some kind of full readiness, keeping the military-industrial complex well-fed while the social safety net slowly withers. It’s a vision of no cuts to defense, with Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security paying the price, that would be right at home in the House GOP.
When the President announced the draw down of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, I don’t think he added the proviso that those troops would be shuttled off to Asia to provide a check on China. Someone should inform him that his Defense Secretary is running around saying that.





59 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
What makes you think Panetta isn’t doing exactly what Obama tells him to do, or that he’s off the reservation with his comments or stances, as far fetched as they seem to be.
I thought Panetta was an honorable man, prior to his service with Obama LLC. No more.
Very good (as usual) on Panetta, DDayen. He’s an empty suit, or worse.
On Asia, Panetta is following Clinton’s lead after her recent pronouncement of “America’s Pacific Century.” (excerpts)
Gotta defend freedom of navigation for the region’s key players in the South China Sea! I lay awake nights worrying about them, the players and their freedoms and their transparency.
What a bunch of clowns, expensive ones.
These Bushie warmongers.
What we need is some guy to come in with a vapid yet strangely compelling slogan who can turn things around. It should be someone that the most intelligent and progressive people in the room can really get behind, not just another white hayseed from the racist south; the less experienced the better.
but, they hate us for our freedoms. no more chinese food for me. or maybe, if they call it
freedom chow mein.
It’s obvious.
only the worst of people are interested in high office.
May I join your club?
THis guy sounds like somebody (MIC) purchased him lock, stock and barrell. This NOT the Leon Panetta I remember.
Southeast Asia? Here we come again. I bet the Vietnamese can’t wait to have us back. Whodathunkit?
Early onset Alzheimer’s.
U.S. gotta keep fighting the VN war until U.S. wins.
The US spends more than all other countries combined on its military empire. The Chinese are just laughing their asses off. Exhaust all your treasure you dumb asses and your empire will soon be dust. The Chinese should certainly know about that.
All it will take is for the next financial crash to take out the US economy and remove the dollar from reserve status.
By any objective measure, Leon Panetta has been a terrible Defense Secretary. Just look at the series of missteps and gaffes he has committed in his young tenure at the Pentagon. He claimed that the President sent 100 combat equipped soldiers to central Africa not to help combat and disarm the Lord’s Resistance Army, but to combat Al Qaeda. He defended a continued presence in Iraq because of Al Qaeda and 9-11. He has become similar to a George W. Bush action figure circa 2005, shouting 9-11 and Al Qaeda at every opportunity.
Leon seems to want to invade Africa I guess a Malaria vaccine must be nearing approval we can’t send large numbers of troops to Africa without one.
I take it back. Apparently he’s 73, so plenty old enough for Alzheimer’s to really be setting in. Here’s another link about his tripz.
Think I heard that ASEAN has agreed to trade in yuan rather than USD. I’ll see if I can remember where.
“If good men will not come to the service of their Country, others will.” John Adams
We desperately need a third party. OWS unite for the common good and lets vote for a CHANGE.
We are officially in a Dumocracy.
I believe Panetta is Italian for ‘hack’. Well suited for the MIC establishment.
Hey, Leon, what’s ‘catastrophic’ is US ‘defense’ spending, busily bankrupting the country. There’s a real threat for you.
You hit a home run with bases loaded on that one. Malaria vaccine breakthrough.
these guys living in the dc bubble don’t even pretend to listen to reason or public opinion
revolution is the only solution
at least, how about a third party candidate and it just so happens that jill stein announced for president yesterday as the green party candidate
i, for one, intend to vote for jill stein and encourage others to do so as well
the occupiers are putting themselves on the streets, the least i can do is refuse to vote for the plutocracy
If this is what Panetta is doing in public as SecDef, you can imagine the harm he did out of sight at the CIA.
I think the first Q O asks himself the minute he wakes up in the morning is: What should I do to wreck the U.S. today.
panetta looks like scalia’s younger brother
http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSQtTEoeCENd3xz44rSMdCoOEOqpWVjz6ra_PMKy1Qh3qXWfXsy
Panetta just a puppet for the global MIC. there is a battle getting hotter by the minute for resources and access and Asia is a big part of that. lot of posturing been going on of late between india, cambodia, phillippines so i am sure MIc is getting antsy. Panetta is just doing his job.
Twins separated at birth. Only 2 years age diff. Scalia is 75, Panetta is 73.
You’d think they could get some one more articulate to do that job, but you’d be wrong.
It sure do look like U.S. is widely hated by the real people around the globe, and that, increasingly, the 1%ers in other countries are sniggering up their sleeves at U.S. 1%ers.
“If you didn’t notice, it’s on the economic front that China is eating America’s lunch, not on the guns and planes front.”
this has to be at least partly true, although China faces its own severe problems. It also hurts working Americans that wal st douchebags/venture cpaitalists are feeding China all of our lunches, with the hand over fist assistance of the Bill Clintons, Barrak Obamas and Leon Pannettas of the world.
Mods: Why is my comment at 22 awaiting your approval?
On edit: Mods, you can remove this comment it you like.
America is competing with China for resources in Africa and of course cheap labor. I guess the plan to control the Arab oil countries has been put on the back burner for now this is plan B. But its a joke America can’t survive without China buying our debt so I expect we will try and take as much as Africa as we can and sell their natural resources to China.
It’s not Panetta; it’s the whole foreign policy establishment, who since the late 1990s if not earlier have viewed war with China (cold or hot) as inevitable. Once one gets past the individual craziness that characterized the Bush administration’s invasion of Iraq, one can see a consistent line that goes back a long way and dominates everything, including domestic policy. Why do you think the policy elites are so worried about the national debt and social security? They can’t afford a head-on confrontation with China without managing the debt enough so other countries will lend to the United States and gutting the social security and medicare programmes that are the only place where real money is to be found to fund wars.
I suppose the good news in all this is that China can bankrupt the US simply by building more aircraft carriers, just like the US bankrupted the Soviet Union by building more missiles. What goes around comes around.
The proxy war will be fought in Africa.
Argentina is doing great they defaulted on their debt increased social spending and now have an economy thats going great thanks to increased consumption internally. America seems to be hooked on an idea that exports cheap exports are the way to go never mind it hasn’t worked so far.
But in order to have cheap exports we need lower costs for raw materials and thats where Africa fits in.
Well, first Team USA will have to arrange for drones to assassinate Mrs. Kirchner.
Did you see the link in 15 in response to TCU, that malaria vaccine is on the cusp?
http://www.cnn.com/2011/10/18/health/trial-malaria-vaccine-africa/index.html
50% protection rate among a population that has lived with Malaria for thousands of years I wonder how the rates are for people with no history of Malaria exposure?
Long term protection is not known if people carry the disease and its dormant for years then flares up again think chicken pox becoming shingles when you are older Health care costs will sky rocket.
But of course Leon does not have to worry about his grandkids getting Malaria.
We can invade Africa for a few years but 50% protection and likely 100% exposure means how many will likely die?
Troops in the field are healthy so they should have less immediate death rates but if the vaccine provides no long term protection and stays in the human body…a worse case scenario is thousands of troops bring the deadlier African Malaria disease to America and years later thanks to bug bites they spread the disease to America and global warming helps spread the bugs that spread the disease.
1) Panetta’s nutz but as others have said, so is the whole MIC Foreign Policy bunch. N they are ALL dangerous for the power and ability they have to gin up shit that’s not real and take us to war FAST!
2) This scenario has been in place since post WW2, if not earlier. The militarization of US Government And Governance has long been in place. And it’s all driven by the former industrialists now turned bankers, or a merge of both.
Better Africa than bombing Iran . . . but shit, fucking with China is NOT like fucking with Russia . . . it’s like fucking with The Turks, and everyone knows in the ME ya just don’t fuck with The Turks.
I have NO idea how we the people regain any semblance of control over any of this in the remaining 30 or so years I got on this rock.
Occupy as is won’t cut it, but it’s young and still growing. Sadly, the resistance against Occupy is growing, too . . . tensions mount on all fronts domestic and foreign . . . dawg help us all.
I’m sorry to disillusion you TCU, but truth or evidence is NO DEFENSE. It only matters that U.S. 1%ers can argue that U.S. troops are immune from malaria once they are vaccinated & sent to Africa in numbers.
I remember, back in the daze when I believed in cspan, a DoD lackey showing up on WJ, very certain that ALL the DoD studies showed that there was NO negative health influence from DU.
Not to mention all the years the U.S. denied any health influences of Agent Orange.
Yep, and it makes sense to me. They still have the tse-tse fly stuff there, though, not to mention rampant HIV in the whorehouses.
America has been to busy in Iraq to get rid of Hugo South America has benefited from America being to busy to influence South America more stupid American wars its sad to say are helping brown people who speak Spanish.
That could change if America is shut down in the Middle East and Africa:(
China I think has nothing to worry about Leon trying to check China in an overseas war is a joke we can’t do it.
Uh, materials and exports would imply some sort of domestic manufacturing which I don’t see . . . so I would quibble that your posit is really . . . . US gets African resources so the others don’t, and WE sell them to China and inter national corporations for THEM to use in manufacturing where labor is cheaper . . .
IMF/New World Order means there will NOT be an emergence of any manufacturing base in USA . . . the job here at home is to destroy any possible resistance to IMF/New World Order by eliminating middle class and increasing the divide between haves n have nots till the haves can be easily managed and ordered about like good little ‘slavos’ . . . a job that’s going along very nicely it would appear.
Well scripted TCU, well done . . . all very possible.
Who KNOWS what shit we boomer kids were injected with when our parents took us overseas in service of country, or what we contracted in the 50′s and brought back with us, lying there dormant waiting for a reason to erupt.
“Catastrophic” — to Panetta’s future income as a defense contractor consultant and board member.
Read an interesting post somewhere in last couple of days, but won’t be able to dredge it up, that U.S. workers are in a state that many historians would call slavery without exaggerating too much. Ah yes, here it is, an emptywheel post.
I agree it won’t stop Leon or O but I am arguing its stupid real stupid to invade Africa we evolved down there there are lots of diseases that kept the human population in check for thousands of years there diseases we stopped having even some immunity to once we left Africa.
Death rates in Africa a population that has exposure and some immunity to many of these diseases are already horrible if we send our troops there in large numbers we expose them to diseases they have no immunity from.
Think plague blankets given to American Indians only this time its our troops who will be getting exposed.
Crap I bet Leon plans to send African American troops to Africa and he hopes they might still have some immunity.
Yeppers. I’ve noticed how the U.S. oxygen has been sucked out of the Western Hemisphere. However, not entirely. U.S. still mucking about in Honduras, bigtime.
Uh, materials and exports would imply some sort of domestic manufacturing which I don’t see
What better way to break American Unions than set up factories in non union African countries right next to all these natural resources?
What better way to defeat China than taking the resources and making stuff cheap with African labor and under cutting their prices?
Panetta is NOT that schmart.
Lets hope so eCAHN otherwise his Africa plans will remind people of Medical Experiments done on African Americans.
The govt uses the troops as human lab rats. they inject them with all kind of stuff and most have no idea what it is. if I remember correctly drug companies have complete immunity for their vaccines. Why would they be given that? Seems to me every day I read about a new vaccine that they want children to take. I honestly do not know if we can trust what we are being told, and i remember when swine flu scare was big and they were pushing the vaccine thinking I would just take my chances.
As for Africa makes sense that it would be the first black POTUS that would lead the charge to bring peace, LOL, to africans
Maybe someone gave him a ceti eel, the brain eating earworm.
Yes, he is horrible in this positon but he’s a trusted DLC member put there to cut “entitlements,” not the budget for moribund defense hardware for the all new and not improved old cold war strategy.
Comments from the military members at http://www.stripes.com over the cuts in their tuition assistance… thank the gods they are pissing these people off.
By the time it comes out he will be long gone. That is how they get away with this stuff
You got that right.
This is how the creeps on both sides of the aisle see the world–using our billions to shore up eroding American hegemony and keep the only viable industry we’ve got left–arms–going. Each of these people (Obama, Panetta) receives a daily intl briefing from paranoid crazies who tell them how our “enemies” are advancing. Before you know it it’s okay to kill people because they might be a threat to you someday.
You don’t fix this sh*t with a slightly better Democrat. We have tried that a fair few times. Our system is not sustainable; the military is the world’s biggest polluted. Fully half of the economy links to military activity, the one kind of welfare they allow. Enough already.
I just read something about that coming swine flu epidemic that never arrived.
if I remember correctly that flu originated from a lab in the US.
We really need a new government. All the stake holders in the current racket need to be swept away.
They really are trying to bring on that crapture, aren’t they?
What arrogance to think the USofA can or should even TRY to confront China.
This is beyond insanity!
Like I said before, OBAMBI is nothing more than a 3rd term for Bush….
More War
More FISA
More Free Trade
More Wall Street Protection
Less JOBS
Less HOPE
And NO CHANGE!!!!!
Actually, I would say even worse than bush’s 3rd term.
At least with bush, we knew what was coming.
Ahh so very true my friend………………..
I’m reminded of an old annual departmental award, the “Cappy” (Weinberger), given to the manager claiming the direst outcomes if their budget requests weren’t met…
I think this is just part of their job description.
We’re leaving Iraq and Libya is winding down and there’s a plan to leave Afghanistan and no plan to go into Iran, so you’re wrong.
The 3 trade bills recently passed were negotiated by Bush and Obama improved at least one of them a little. So, you’re not entirely right or wrong on that.
More FISA? What do you mean?
Is Dodd-Frank “Wall St. Protection”? Would Bush have supported D-F?
Bush was losing almost a million jobs a month when Obama took over. I’d say Obama is doing a lot better than that.
“Less Hope” is amazingly stupid. With Bush there was absolutely NO hope. Remember, the Republicans are the party of “NO”.
There certainly has been change and that’s why the Republicans have something to try to roll back. If there were no change gasoline would still be $4.00+ per gallon and we would probably be at war in Iran and we certainly wouldn’t have any economy to worry about.
No, this isn’t Bush III or anything resembling it.
After the Saudi ambassador assassination story we’ve seen Panetta, Holder and Clinton speaking very hawkishly. I wish it would stop.
Thank God something like that could never happen in the United States.
[/snark]
The U.S. military is leaving Iraq. Our mercenaries are not. Our monster huge embassy and its staff is not. Our threats against Iran “meddling” in Iraq have ramped up. We are not paying reparations despite having utterly destroyed the country and parcelling out its oil. Yay Obama!
Poor Obama. He had no choice but to push through the Bush “Free Trade” bills that will destroy many American jobs. He couldn’t withdraw them. He’s helpless. He has no power — he’s only the President. Yay Obama!
I’m not sure what this means either, but I’ll guess it’s that Obama has continued Bush’s tradition of completely ignoring the FISA law and continuing the ongoing illegal wiretapping of all the American people — our phone calls, our web searches, our e-mails. Yay Obama!
D-F isn’t Wall St. protection, but it doesn’t crimp their style very much, either. Bush wouldn’t have supported it, but it’s pretty inconsequential. No restoration of Glass-Steagal. No repeal of Gramm’s Commodity Futures Modernization Act. No prosecution of the Wall St. executives who destroyed our economy, plundered the treasury and made figuring out who owns real estate in America damn near impossible. And Obama hired Timothy Geithner, who probably belongs in jail, and Lawrence Summers, who helped to creat the mess we’re in, as his top economic advisors. Yay Obama!
Obama isn’t doing as badly as Bush, but that’s not the obituary I’d want on my tombstone — “He wasn’t quite as awful as George W. Bush.” Obama needed to take strong action when he came in. He passed a watered-down stimulus bill that was grossly inadequate. Now we’re very seriously fucked. Yay Obama!
Stylistically, I agree with you. Substantively, Obama has nibbled a little around the edges, but not enough to turn this battleship around. What’s that ahead? Niagara Falls? What the heck — Obama isn’t quite as awful as Bush. Yay Obama!
At least we’ll quit buying their crap. That only makes sense doesn’t it?
bluewombat@57 gives a kind response.
Democrats have been doing a pretty decent job being the party of no as well unless the question is don’t look back look forward, no financial terrorist left behind, grow the empire, and race to the bottom.
Obama is not only a continuation of the failed foreign and domestic policies, in many instances he has actually made more progress than shrub could. Why? Because dems really want to serve corporations and obama provides the leadership. Give obama a chance to destroy social security and medicare by nibbling at it here and there. Give him a chance to press forward the neocon/neolib agenda and he will succeed where shrub couldn’t.
Oh, but yeah, you’re right to the extent that there is not complete overlap in shrub’s and obama’s millionaire and billionaire friends. That’s where the differences come in.
And all those people calling it shrub’s third term, I mean his name isn’t even George and he’s from Chicago not Texas so there, silly.