Yesterday, I mentioned that Republicans laid a trap for the White House. They took the most GOP-friendly idea in the American Jobs Act – a permanent elimination of the 3% withholding rule, which would mandate that government contractors have 3% of their invoices withheld until they prove that they are current on their taxes – and they teamed it with the most GOP-friendly pay-for in Obama’s deficit reduction scheme – a bill limiting eligibility for Medicaid for elderly beneficiaries of Social Security. Put those together, and you have a right-wing “even Obama supported” bill, something they could squeeze the President with.
Within hours of the introduction of the bill, scheduled for a vote in the House tomorrow, the White House came out in support of both measures. Here’s their statement on HR 674, the elimination of the 3% withholding rule.
The repeal of the withholding requirement in H.R. 674 would reduce a burden on government contractors who otherwise comply with their tax obligations, particularly small businesses. As evidenced in the President’s proposed American Jobs Act, released September 12, 2011, the Administration has supported alleviating this burden, which was originally enacted into law on May 17, 2006.
Of course, it also reduces a burden on government contractors who don’t comply with their tax obligations, which study after study shows includes a majority of government contractors. This bill – passed and signed under George W. Bush! – relinquishes the best leverage that government has over these tax cheats. And while cash flow is a tricky thing, if 3% withholding is enough to destroy it, I’m not sure your business is in such solid shape. And the idea that improving cash flow is going to somehow turn into job creation is so silly it shouldn’t ever be committed to paper – except it’s right there, in the statement of Administration policy.
The effect of the repeal of the withholding requirement would be to avoid a decrease in cash flow to these contractors, which would allow them to retain these funds and use them to create jobs and pay suppliers.
That’s especially ridiculous because the withholding rule has never been implemented, so the effect would be that nothing changes.
The statement of Administration policy helpfully adds that the White House believes that ensuring compliance with federal tax laws is “important.” Just not important enough to use leverage to enforce. Oh well, I’m sure they’ll hire a bunch of new IRS agents to make up for this. Or, the opposite!
Here’s the SAP on the Medicaid rule change:
The Administration supports passage of H.R. 2576, which would change the calculation of modified adjusted gross income, as defined in section 1401 of the Affordable Care Act, to include both taxable and non-taxable Social Security benefits. Beginning in 2014, this income definition will be used to determine financial eligibility for Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, and for premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions available through Affordable Insurance Exchanges. The Administration looks forward to working with the House to ensure the bill achieves the intended result.
There you have it. A bill that facilitates tax cheating, paid for by kicking poor old people off of Medicaid, blessed by our socialist Kenyan President. The White House’s support doesn’t necessarily mean it will pass in this form, but a similar bill on withholding got 57 votes in the Senate last week. I imagine the President’s support means it will eventually get through in some manner.
Let’s be clear: this is not a “cave.” It’s the expression of support for ideas the President himself included in high-profile jobs and deficit packages. Maybe they threw them in to attract GOP support. But now they are endorsing them without hesitation. This is what the President believes.
UPDATE: Digby, again:
What, at this point, is the rationale of the Democratic Party? We’ll kill terrorists twice as hard and only slash the safety net half as much? We’ll pass the Republican agenda so they don’t have to?
So here’s what’s happened so far. The President put forth a jobs bill, which didn’t make it through the congress, as expected. This jobs bill was highly touted as containing “ideas” that Republicans had proposed in the past and therefore, it should have “something for everyone.” Needless to say, the GOP wasn’t interested in any one from column A and one from column B negotiating. After the defeat of the big jobs package, the Democrats announced they were going to propose popular pieces of the bill and force the Republicans to prove once and for all that they don’t care about the plight of the average American as they join together in Scrooglike conformity.
Unfortunately, the Republicans decided not to play (surprise!) and are instead proposing their own combinations of the most toxic conservative elements of the President’s bill and the President is apparently signing on, thus signing into law a terrible GOP policy while simultaneously giving them a “bipartisan” win.




30 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
As I typed on your thread yesterday, dday, this is exactly the outcome that O wanted.
Yup,Obama was not squeezed imo.
ugh. it’s so clear how cynical this is. ugh ugh ugh.
I read a OWS: too many D congressmen, too many R congressmen, not enough US congressmen.
Exactly. I didn’t think I could be any more disappointed in a POTUS than I was after Clinton’s first term but Obama has clearly surpassed that bench mark for me.
The last time I voted for a “D” or an “R” before 2008 (I’ve actually never voted for an “R” for POTUS) was Clinton’s first term. I voted for change then and got NAFTA instead.
I am SHOCKED, SHOCKED I say!
you need to write that diary ecahn, the real story of 0
for everyone else, this is what obama is there to do, he is there to deconstruct the middle class and bring back a corporate robber baron economy
he IS playing for the other team, he WILL do more corporate harm then any republican can hope since he is wearing a blue suit instead of a red one
we NEED him OUT of office
Words fail me.
Thanks, I think, David. Also from zerohedge its take on O’s refinance mortgage plan
he basic thrust of the plan is straightforward: encourage “underwater” homeowners whose mortgages exceed the value of their homes to re-finance at lower rates. The stated incentive (i.e. the PR pitch) is to lower homeowners’ monthly payments via lower interest rates. This is the Federal Reserve’s entire game plan in a nutshell: don’t write off any debt, as that would reveal the banking sector’s insolvency, but play extend-and-pretend with crushing debtloads by lowering the cost of servicing the debt. The key purpose of this “plan” is to leave the principle owed to banks on their books at full value while ensnaring the hapless debt-serf (the “homeowner”) into permanent servitude to the banks. If the net worth of your home is a negative number, then what exactly do you own? You have the right to occupy the shelter, and you own the debt.
This is just the start.
Is Obama really this stupid?
This is why people are marching in the streets. I really don’t think that the President understands that he’s part of the problem.
Tired of the subject.
There was someone on book-tv this past weekend who wrote a bio of O’s father. Seems like a domineering mercurial man, not the kind who would normally be chosen by either CIA or State Dept to carry out U.S. secret work. Also had many jobs & was an alcoholic, iirc.
So they might have had intentions to recruit him but he must have dropped out of the pool pretty early on. Ann Dunham could have been the contact.
And LOL, looky what I found. Well known conspiracy nut, Wayne Madsen, has already written the story.
That certainly makes me doubt it.
The Obama version (or is it vision) of quid pro quo: I’ll give you something you want, if you take something I (am supposed to) want. I’d say QED, but we’re past that, aren’t we?
“This is the Federal Reserve’s entire game plan in a nutshell: don’t write off any debt, as that would reveal the banking sector’s insolvency, but play extend-and-pretend with crushing debtloads by lowering the cost of servicing the debt”
EXACTLY! It’s refreshing to see someone here who gets it, who isn’t taken in by the touchy-feely “keeping people in their homes” crap.
The newest plan is like all the others – help the banks using the homeowners as conduits, just like bailing out Greece was really all about bailing out the stupid Euro banks.
Honestly, a lot of underwater homeowners would be better off doing jingle mail, or better yet, just stop paying the mortage and living mortgage/rent free until the banks get around to foreclosing, which can take a long time because of the backlog.
This is not a “I told you so.” We ended up with this POS because people lost all reason. When I think of the chanting “hope & change” and the fainting I feel sick. This POS was marketed like toothpaste, a detergent, mc donalds, jack-in-the-box, pharmaceuticals, etc. etc. and we all know how successful they are. But the real kicker was he was a black POS. Oh, how the collective guilt kicked in. This POS has no interest in the people of this country, he is beholden to his benefactors and he is only interested in being re-elected – power & money for him and his creepy family. NO, NO, NO, I say. This POS has to be driven from office. I have been a democrat all of my life, but I refuse to vote for a republican posing as a democrat. Fuck obama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! and may he live in hell.
I think he understands perfectly that he is part of the “problem” – he just doesn’t interpret it as a “problem”. (His view of a problem right now is OWS and I think he is behind the force being used in Oakland and the crap happening in Atlanta)
Oh, exactly. It’s like the nonsense about that poor brain-damaged guy who the US now says was trying to off the Saudi ambassador (and notice how quickly that story got shoved off the stage once too many people started mocking it openly?) — there’s no way any bunch of clandestine operators worth their weight in invisible ink would go with a guy like that for such a sensitive mission.
Read the Madsen article I linked to. I gave up on Madsen years ago bc he is a conspiracy nut.
BUT he asks a lot of the same Qs that I have asked myself about O. Which is what got me onto the subject in the first place.
I am in no position to assess what Madsen alleges about O’s mother, stepfather, and grandparents bc I know nothing about Indonesia & East-West institute at U of Hawaii, or other CIA fronts.
So read it & see if you can poke holes in it. There’s some big secrets in O’s past that tie into his peculiar behavior.
When the prime rate is pushing 1 percent, cash flow should not be a problem for any contractor who is solvent and has a reasonable claim to be able to handle a line of credit. What a load of crap this is. Of course, the government can borrow at even better rates, but we can’t allow that. Deficit!
Who the hell does he think is going to vote for him? It’s certainly not the beneficiaries of this shit.
Poll after poll proves that independents–the mythical, magical center–want the same things as liberals. The only group that’s out of touch with the mainstream is the self identified republican group.
The other thing the really creeped me out about the bio of O’s father was that the personalities of O and his father seem like direct opposites, and O never knew his father, so how could that have happened?
I don’t think he’s overly concerned with votes – he just needs enough to look somewhat legit. They’ve stolen the election from us at least twice now – I don’t see what would keep them from doing it again. They figure we did not rise up the last time, so they can keep doing it.
Obama does it backward and in high heels–his job is much tougher than that of the (out)right. Dems ARE smarter than Republicans, who can’t even begin to spell “duplicitous.”
Who the hell cares about the POS’s father? obama is a POS.
O’s parents, stepfather, grandparents might be a large part of the story about how the U.S. got such a POS as prez.
My basic question. If you have them painted in the corner, why not make sure the paint stays wet?
Tell them you also want the approval of putting police, firemen & teachers back on the menu!!!!
This is another Affordable Care Act without the Public Option!!!!
It just shows that he might actually be a Machrian Candidate.
Scary stuff, eCAHN
12″ snowstorm here in northern Colo is causing intermittent power and cable brownouts. Forgot I had msnbc on, it sputters back on with Zero giving a speech in Denver, but the signal’s so garbled that he and the speech and the chryon are a total gibberishness of mis-pixalated garbage. Makes his standard garbage seem refreshingly candid and transparant in this case.
It’s the story I made up (H/T to onitgoes as we were noodling about it one night late in a thread) just from public info.
Bushes, as you know, had long & deep ties with CIA too, but that is widely written about.
What got me curious about O is how do people like him pop up on the screens of PTB. It is NOT by merit alone.
And yet they’re going to ding poor old people in order to ‘pay for’ repealing it!
He sure played them. Not.
Did Obama lick the spittle off Boner’s stick when he was finished?