It’s not clear how the general strike called by the Occupy Oakland general assembly for Wednesday, November 2, will fare. The protesters passed the resolution in the haze of the brutal crackdown last week on their encampment, where police used rubber bullets, flash grenades and other projectiles (the protesters are now back in the public plaza from which they were removed). They did not consult with local unions, who could give the general strike some muscle. Organizers only met with union leaders after the declaration of the general strike. And initially, union leaders were wary of participating.
“It’s virtually impossible for any union to endorse a work-stoppage because all contracts have no-strike clauses, which unions are bound to honor. However most of the unions on the west coast, including ILWU, have been involved in supporting the Occupy Wall Street movement in their local communities,” ILWU communications director Craig Merrilees said.
Separately, Peralta Fedration of Teachers labor representative Sara Connors said that while that union did have a process by which to call for a strike, it involved a union-wide vote that the organization’s leadership had not as yet scheduled. “We’re going to do what we can to have members there participating. We didn’t call a strike vote, but we’re participating in the day of action,” she said. The plan for Thursday’s action includes three separate assemblies — at 9 a.m., noon, and 6 p.m. — to be held in downtown Oakland. Unions have encouraged their members to attend when they can, but not to skip work.
But while unions may not be able to authorize an official strike action, they can find ways to join the effort. Indeed, longshore workers in Oakland endorsed the call for a general strike late last week, planning to shut down ports in the Bay Area. And among nonunion workers, the concept of the general strike in Oakland is gaining traction. The organizers have set lofty goals:
Occupy Oakland demonstrators expect tens of thousands of people to participate in a general strike Wednesday in the California city, an organizer said.
Flyers announcing the strike said “all banks and corporations must close down for the day or we will march on them.” The flyers called for solidarity with the global Occupy movement, an end to police aggression and pledged support for local schools and libraries.
Organizer Tim Simons said organized labor plans to participate.
General strikes have a long history in Oakland. In 1946, unions in Oakland participated in a “work holiday” in sympathy with a work stoppage at a local department store. That general strike lasted three days with 100,000 workers walking off the job, until a compromise agreement was reached. And then the energy from the general strike transferred into political action. The Oakland Voters League, a populist political party, seated four out of five labor candidates on the city council in the next elections.
Since that time, anti-union laws and low union density make pulling off a general strike difficult. But ILWU has shut down ports for various actions, so that could bring economic activity in the Bay Area to a crawl. It will be interesting to see how successful Occupy Oakland is in one of the most ambitious actions from the OWS movement outside of holding a physical space.




18 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
What if the general strike comes to nothing? What does that say about Occupy Oakland? How will it effect the local occupation and the movement as a whole?
I think a lot of people want to go on strike but are terrified of losing their jobs. the system knows that and will use it to keep folks in line
Gee, this is getting out of hand .
And not a moment too soon !!!
in that ’46 strike didn’t the women that started the strike land out getting screwed by the unions in the negotiations.
Reply to #1.
Regardless of the outcome on Wednesday, it will have the significance of being the first of what is likely to be a series of labor actions.
I remember when we did this in high school between classes. When the halls were nice and crouded a big group of us would turn around and reverse direction causing a big pile up. It was a riot.
Sounds like a myth the 1% will play to the hilt.
It’s not a myth. If I walked off my job on Wednesday I’d be fired.
Most of us aren’t in unions and don’t have the protections associated with them.
That being said, I’m taking a paid day off on Wednesday. Even though I’m not in the Bay Area anymore, I’m still going to stand in solidarity with them.
two things at random…
Oakland ILWU has been keeping it real for a long, long time, eg,- they have called wildcats to protest the Iraq war
now, somewhere in one of Mike Elk’s longer pieces about Wisconsin, he quotes a forklift driver on how to get around Taft-Hartley, unfortunately, Elk quotes the guy in more than one of his posts and I haven’t been able to find that specific mention – as a fourth generation Labor, it caught my eye and made perfect sense at the time -sigh- guess I’ll keep googling
There are definitely ways around the no strike clause such as having people call in sick on a rotating basis, sounds to me like the unions are trying to have their cake and eat it too.
nothing illegal about unions “educating” their members about general strikes – allowing individuals (en masse of course) to strike without a formal declaration by Union Leadership
from one of Elk’s pieces:
“Under the Taft-Hartley Act, a general strike in support of other workers is illegal; the key word of their resolution was the calls for the federation not individual unions to “begin educating affiliates and members on the organization and function of a general strike.”
Many private sector unions would not formally endorse the idea of a general strike out of fear of being of sued by their employer, but workers without formal endorsement of their unions could engage in wildcat strikes by simply deciding to walk out individually.
“If the unions do not make a formal call for a general strike, it probably avoids a Taft-Hartley issue,” says Don Taylor, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin School of Workers
Power to the people!
The unions only have to look at recent history to see their bleak and not-to-distant future.
Live on your knees or stand on your feet. Both have consequences.
The power of unions has fallen immensely and the fall of the worker is inevitable on this course.
There is tremendous power and massive amounts of money being funneled to crush unions and workers. And it’s working.
So the unions can “ride it out” if they wish. And see their power even further diminished, until they are nothing but cogs in the machine. That’s the current course.
Even now they have some power. They could still use it. But if I was a betting man, I would bet they will not.
I know someone who lives in Oakland. They were scheduled to be out of town during the general strike, but will return to participate in it. Best of luck to them — if they can pull it off, it may serve as a template for actions elsewhere.
learn, regroup, move on.
grieve, build, celebrate another step forward.
not about unions anymore, anymore than it is about legilators owned by the corps. this is between us and them (two words i hate using).
This is about “this job ain’t worth the effort”.
It’s about tune in, drop in, find the local consensus.
Occupied everywhere? occupy everything.
Occupy your mind and your heart, the One that speaks from the still within.
We know what’s right, we know what’s wrong, all we have to do is sit down and agree what to do about it. Striking will definitely need to be a part of the movement, along with electoral gains someday, we need to use every leverage, but the future holds only what the best within us can imagine.
My main interest is in how many people just call in sick, or don’t actually do anything at work, around the whole world. If we got good at this it could accumulate to make some significant dents across the board.
We need t call for WORK HOLIDAYS
It’s a shot across the bow…
If this strike does not make “enough” of an impact consider it a test run under the best current conditions.
Live on your knees or stand on your feet.
I seriously doubt that Taft-Hartley’s prohibition against a general strike would survive REAL Constitutional scrutiny (not that we’re going to see that)… if the Constitution forbids involuntary servitude for individuals, then it forbids involuntary servitude for the whole, and thus a general strike is legal.