I guess the President is meeting with House Democrats at this hour to map out some kind of strategy on jobs and the economy. Regardless of the strategy, here’s what’s going to happen: there will be no jobs bills, and Republicans will bring the country to the verge of a government shutdown. Again.
On the jobs front, the Senate will try again with the Rebuild American Jobs Act this week, but again they expect defections on their side and none on the other side. So this will get filed away with a series of other jobs bills that didn’t pass thanks to a stone wall on the other side. Democrats are amping up the rhetoric against Republicans, claiming that they are allowing the country to suffer for political gain, but since Republicans are, well, gaining politically from their actions, they’re not likely to reverse course. As far as actual jobs measures, the President will be reduced to designating national monuments and similar actions that “create” a handful of jobs, by a very charitable definition.
When it comes down to the payroll tax cut extension as well as an extension of unemployment insurance, for a total price tag of close to $200 billion, this may get slightly interesting, but that will come toward the tail end of the year. Brian Beutler has a preview:
According to a top Senate Dem aide, Democrats probably won’t put the issue on the floor until later in the year, to increase the public’s sense of urgency about renewing both programs. And they hope, too, that negative press and public hostility about the Republicans’ continued patten of obstruction will make them more willing to deal on must-pass measures.
“The point of holding it back is to soften Republicans up before we get to that vote and get closer to the deadline,” the aide said.
But the fact is, Republicans have mastered the technique of using hard deadlines as leverage over Democrats. And if they follow suit now, Dems will probably have to negotiate new ways to pay for the plans without raising taxes.
Even before that, there’s the fact that Congress’ last continuing resolution to fund the government expires in just 17 days. The Senate actually went ahead and gave final passage to three annual appropriations bills stuck together in a “minibus” appropriation (the bills were for Agriculture, Transportation and Housing), but they are still at 1/3 of the total annual bills that need to be passed every year; the House is up to just 6 out of 12. So even with the Senate planning another minibus this week, there’s no way that the spending bills will be ready in time, meaning another continuing resolution.
And that means House Republicans have another hostage-taking event on their hands.
“As you know, there is longstanding precedent not to use appropriations bills to enact major changes in national policy, and the bills being reported from Appropriations subcommittees this year violate that precedent,” wrote Hoyer in a letter signed by 182 other Democrats. “While not all policy riders are objectionable, many of those included this year are not only controversial but blatantly partisan. Included riders would block the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, roll back important clean air and clean water protections, and place new restrictions on women’s access to a full range of medical and health services, among others.”
If Boehner passes these bills with Republican votes alone, he sets up a major standoff with Senate Democrats, who will reject the spending bills, leading to another government shutdown standoff. Of course, all year a rump of extremely conservative Republicans, eager to slash significantly more money from federal programs, has thwarted Boehner, and forced him to pass legislation with House Democratic votes. If that dynamic plays out again, it will give Hoyer and his party plenty of leverage, and perhaps force Boehner to strip these riders out of the legislation.
Otherwise, it’s a repeat of last spring’s shutdown fight, only this time Democrats aren’t nearly as willing to get rolled by the GOP.
That shutdown fight is pretty close to being upon us, just two weeks from Friday.




37 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
What we need is a Super Committee.
Yes, rule by fiat is my favorite form of government.
Democrats:
Yeah, right.
You mean a “Super Duper Committee”.
David, perhaps you and Walker can come up with a surrender calendar that details how many more opportunities Boehner will have till election day to threaten to shutdown the govt and/or default on national debt unless the White House gives in.
The problem the White House is going to have is they’ve already surrendered so much, there’s not a whole lot of excess baggage they can throw to the wolves.
Boy, this “Deja vue all over again”. This is one of the worst non-Congress’ ever, why more folks aren’t calling them on it is absurd. Total lack of participation in Government by its people.
And its not all that bad out in the “Heartland”. Just did a 10K jaunt around the country, not as bad as the “coasts”. There are even “Help Wanted” signs up in quite a few places, granted its not Mgmt. jobs, but it is jobs for un-employed construction workers and such.
If the Democrats have 17 days until a shutdown, doesn’t that really mean they have 17 days to cave in to themselves?
Yep, like they’re going grow a backbone. Just more dog and pony show and then nothing for Main Street. Close to 2 million loose UI first of 12 may be they join others in the streets.
Absolutely. We need a supercommitte committed to implementing the GOP’s agenda under the banner of “bipartisanship”. That will solve everything.
I was consoled on the serious tone of the meeting when I spied David Axelrod’s presence in a photo. No electioneering for Obama LLC, no sir, just concern for the little people and a sure fire approach dealing with the usual GOP suspects (Ben Nelson, Joe Lieberman, Harry Reid (what!) Eric (sing me a song) Cantor and John Boner).
We are already in a depression and the 1% who run Congress don’t care.
Get some gonads and shut it down. Allow chaos and civil disruption.To hell with it. The system is not worth saving.
I was wondering what the definition of depression is? Wait, when is the situation economically considered a depression? Who decides (decider) when it becomes a depression?
That’s because they all GOT jobs. But, ya’ know, what’s funny…..they might NOT come 2013. THey’d better wake up and smell the coffee. This “vote them all out” movement is gaining strength.
Hmmm, let me guess how this movie will turn out.
The Repubs will get what they want and the Dems will claim they did the best they could but were backed into a corner by the mean, scary, and omnipotent Repubs.
Truth is, the Dems will have also gotten what they want and will seamlessly pivot to once again propping up the fiction that they give a damn about the 99%.
Obama will pay lip-service to our “frustration” but behind our backs will be as pleased as a vampire in a blood bank.
The O-bots will pronounce that we must support Obama and the Dems because those Repubs are, wait, don’t panic, INSANE.
It’s who we replace them with that is important. OWS you are our only hope
I can see it coming, we are rnning out of money again. damn why can’t Ben print enough of that stuff to avert this. I’m tired of running out of money for pete’s sake.
I admit to finally getting to the enjoyment stage of grief. In a masochistic kind of way.
I concur but since we can’t vote for the two controlling party’s and all the third party’s are off-springs of the two what does one do?
Bowles tells us that the government has simply made promises it can’t keep.
Well, if so, seems to me that it’s pretty stupid to put any faith of any kind in such a government. And why should I or any American pay one cent in taxes to a government that Mr. Bowles promises me will break every promise.
Mr. Bowles and his sorry band of plutocrats wants to break all the old promises and replace them with what? New promises? New promises Mr. Bowles and his sad band of plutocrats will break next year?
I suggest Mr. Bowles that the government better damn well figure out how to keep the promises it has already made because we’re not following any government that boasts of its zeal to break faith with the American people.
Hmmm…I don’t believe we promised not to tax you Mr. Bowles and your sicko band of plutocrats.
There is a little bit of fun involved in watching our leaders reach around.
Vote your conscience.
Goldman made promises it couldn’t keep… but wait a savior
I see a shot in the dark
Great observation. I watched thru about a minute of interview of Simpson/Bowles on cnbc earlier, and the reporter never asked that Q. I wonder why. Not.
When is this dumb SOB going to realize the pukes want money as much as the dems. Hold their sacred cows hostage for a change! Close the military bases in Texas and Alabama. Screw ‘em!
My conscience won’t let me vote for war-mongering murderers, so that eliminates both the Dem and Repub wings of the fascist warmongering party currently running the show.
When the time comes I’ll evaluate third-party options and see what gives. In the end, it will be either third-party or write-in for me.
“…bring the country to the verge of a government shutdown.”
If you know it ain’t going to happen, hasn’t the government already shut down? Good grief, let’s get real!
I agree the write-in shows a degree of intellect.
By all means keep this useless,pointless D vs. R framing front and center because Barack Obama,Hillary Clinton,Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid clearly have had no power to alter what followed 2006,2008 or 2010 elections.
Obama,Clinton,Pelosi and Reid were/are just helpless political victims of The All Knowing/All Powerful/Eye of Mordor Guided Orc Repuglicans –
>>>See Stop Iraq Surge and/or Impeachment “taken off the table” by who? HS Nancy Pelosi(D)
>>>See Bush/Cheney Illegal Wiretaps/Torture “disappeared”/No Looking Back/Only Forward by who?
>>>See American HCR turned into AHIP/PhARMA pay to play “ACA” by who?
>>>See USG Austerity Crisis Fraud being used to undermine unrelated SS/MC USG succesful policies/programs by who?
Answers for last three ?’s listed above? POTUS Barack Obama(D)
>>>See who are truly TBTF Wall St./Banks BFFs — Chuck Schumer(D)Barack Obama(D)Eric Holder(D)
Using/promoting D vs. R framing and narrative while serving as a easy partisan politics tool and for Duopoly Party propaganda catapulting has little to do with who is playing Political Charades and What’s My Lie and Line? in WH and Congress since years 2006,2008 and 2010.
I wish they would just all turn out the lights and go home. Stop pretending. We would at least save some money on the electricity bill.
The Ponzi scheme isn’t Social Security, it’s the schemers like Bowles who think they can do a Madoff and take the money invested in Social Security and use if for their own schemes from here to Afghanistan.
If they break faith on Social Security why I am supposed to believe they’re going to pay out for those government bonds my 90 year old mom might try to use instead. If they’re going to welch on Social Security, why believe they are going to come through on that FDIC insurance. For that matter, why hold dollars. Better buy gold.
I don’t know if anybody outside the federal government has noticed, there hasn’t been any coverage on cable TV, but many federal agencies are now several months into a hiring freeze. Coupled with early retirement programs, that means key people are leaving who cannot be replaced.
Why SHOULDN’T the batshit insane Republicans take hostages again? They’re always rewarded for it.
More kabuki theater. More rape of the bottom 90% by the top 10%. Elections won’t change that. Only power will.
Indeed. Had we let it go to hell in a handbasket in 08, we’d be in the rebuilding phase by now. Or dead. But, at least it would be over. This death by a thousand cuts stuff sucks.
good one, rafe!
:)
i agree pragmatic-it’s all just a waste of taxpayer money paying ANY of these people to pretend to do ANYTHING.