The Occupy Oakland general assembly, a day before a proposed general strike, ruled that they would encourage the occupation of foreclosed and abandoned properties across the city. This is a natural development, but also a useful one.
The rush to foreclose has left blighted properties all over the bubble states, serving no productive purpose. The banks have neglected these properties and allowed them to drift into disrepair, sometimes drawing fines from communities like Los Angeles, which passed a blight resolution last year. In fact, some banks are dealing with the problem by demolishing the properties, despite the clear human need for shelter. So if the Occupy movement extends to vacant homes, it creates a living space for people and saves the properties from demolition. What’s more, the dirty secret is that the banks cannot prove ownership on these properties, making it difficult for them to evict the squatters without some chicanery.
The Occupy Vacant Properties movement has been slow going, but has expanded. In California, groups like the Home Defenders League are becoming more aggressive on this front, as in San Francisco, where a family will re-enter and re-claim their home, asserting that they were wrongfully evicted. One story describes a home on Quesada Avenue in the Bayview section of the city that the family built and owned since 1962. Here’s a statement from the homeowner:
My family has been in this neighborhood for 50 years, and since I’ve been evicted, the place has been vacant, like so many homes in the Bayview. Families have been ripped off by banks, scammed by brokers and nothing’s done to them. It’s time for the families and the community to stand up and take back what’s theirs.
This battle, one home at a time, is a powerful reminder of the human costs of foreclosure fraud. The banks stole homes from citizens without due process. The citizenry has been riled up so much that they are taking them back.
Mike Konczal has been following this over the past few weeks. Here’s his latest report. I thought this quote from the head of Springfield No One Leaves, an anti-foreclosure organization in Massachusetts, was great:
I think that (the Occupy Foreclosures movement) exemplifies the importance of two things: community mobilization around eviction defense is a powerful grounds on which we can fight the banks, where our demands with concrete solutions to keep homes occupied comes directly in contrast to banks insistence on vacating homes and destabilizing neighborhoods. Funneling the incredible energy of resistance into existing or new efforts to mobilize eviction defense, demanding to pay rent or principal reduction, not only brings concrete demands to the forefront of that energy, but also mobilizes new leaders for our movements. It’s encouraging to see these two growing and powerful movements supporting and building together.
This is only going to grow.





27 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Good on them!
Meanwhile, a whole new scam, patterned on the foreclosure crisis model, is in the making.
I don’t know, this seems like treading some very thin ice.
Looking at it from a liability standpoint there is likely to be very real concerns for outside vendors such as the gas company providing service or an insurance company being able to insure the dwelling. Would either be willing to sign-off on a family that is, technically at least, illegally occupying a house?
This is brilliant.
Remember, the utilities are generally owned by the municipality. They get a paying customer, and a safer neighborhood.
This is a great idea.
Besides, living in a house without utilities is better than living in a tent without utilities.
from 4closurefraud
An Open Letter to the Citizens of Oakland from the Oakland Police Officer’s Association
1 November 2011 – Oakland, Ca.
We represent the 645 police officers who work hard every day to protect the citizens of Oakland. We, too, are the 99% fighting for better working conditions, fair treatment and the ability to provide a living for our children and families. We are severely understaffed with many City beats remaining unprotected by police during the day and evening hours.
As your police officers, we are confused.
On Tuesday, October 25th, we were ordered by Mayor Quan to clear out the encampments at Frank Ogawa Plaza and to keep protesters out of the Plaza. We performed the job that the Mayor’s Administration asked us to do, being fully aware that past protests in Oakland have resulted in rioting, violence and destruction of property.
Then, on Wednesday, October 26th, the Mayor allowed protesters back in – to camp out at the very place they were evacuated from the day before.
To add to the confusion, the Administration issued a memo on Friday, October 28th to all City workers in support of the “Stop Work” strike scheduled for Wednesday, giving all employees, except for police officers, permission to take the day off.
That’s hundreds of City workers encouraged to take off work to participate in the protest against “the establishment.”
But aren’t the Mayor and her Administration part of the establishment they are paying City employees to protest? Is it the City’s intention to have City employees on both sides of a skirmish line?
It is all very confusing to us.
Meanwhile, a message has been sent to all police officers: Everyone, including those who have the day off, must show up for work on Wednesday. This is also being paid for by Oakland taxpayers. Last week’s events alone cost Oakland taxpayers over $1 million.
The Mayor and her Administration are beefing up police presence for Wednesday’s work strike they are encouraging and even “staffing,” spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars for additional police presence – at a time when the Mayor is also asking Oakland residents to vote on an $80 parcel tax to bail out the City’s failing finances.
All of these mixed messages are confusing.
We love Oakland and just want to do our jobs to protect Oakland residents. We respectfully ask the citizens of Oakland to join us in demanding that our City officials, including Mayor Quan, make sound decisions and take responsibility for these decisions. Oakland is struggling – we need real leaders NOW who will step up and lead – not send mixed messages. Thank you for listening.
SOURCE: Oakland Police Officer’s Association
So I guess what they saying is the mayor asked them to shoot and beat peaceful protestors
Oakland has only 645 police for pop of 391,000? That would be approx 1/4 the ratio of police to pop in NYC. NYC has too many, but Oakland sounds completely understaffed.
I’m all for it. I’ve seen some footage on tv “nooz” programs (don’t know what, as it was the roommate who had it on) about citizens moving back into their foreclosed homes because… why not? So many of them sit around vacant, and as others have pointed out, they end up being something of a potential blight for the neighborhood.
If the frickin bank isn’t going to sell it, then why not move back in?? I don’t see the point of having loads of vacant properties sitting around. Anyone in RE will tell you that a vacant property starts going to seed pretty quickly, not to mention the issues with vandalism, etc.
Great idea!
I have never had a utility check ownership or rental agreements.
Me either. They are just happy to get the money, in my experience.
This page on the AFL-CIO site, which asks people to stand with the Oakland general strike on November 2nd, was referenced under General Union News on the ILWU (Longshoreman’s Union) site.
http://blog.aflcio.org/2011/10/31/unions-stand-with-occupy-movement-in-oakland-and-nationwide/
Very good. Prove it, dirtbags..
There have been several Priests that have been doing this all along and not having too many problems identifying foreclosed homes and then moving homeless families into them. We even had a Bankster VP who moved into a Malibu beach house for a few months but she got in trouble big time for that.
I work for a company that maintains foreclosed properties for the banks all over the country. Most of our work comes from BofA work orders. I would love to get in contact with someone spearheading this movement and just email them list after list of all the forclosure orders we receive. We get damn near 50k orders or more a month.
OffTopic DD you are quoted by Greg Sargent again. Don’t you ever sleep, how many posts have you done this week? Thanks for all the work it is really appreciated and well done.
Ok, I just wasn’t sure about it, though I would suppose a bank could contact the power company to make them aware (even if it didn’t change a thing).
They never give up do they?
One would assume the bank would notify the utilities. I say move back into your home and let the bank pay them. The bank would also be responsible for paying any homeowner association assessments that exist, although I can see why continuing to pay them would help enforce your squatters rights in many states.
We actually had some scammers in ABQ who put up rental notices/ads on craigslist for foreclosed (vacant) properties, took deposits and rent from people who rented in good faith unknowing that the person who rented the property had no legal right to rent it! I don’t know how long that charade went on, but I say if people can move in and just pay utilities, keep the place decent, go for it!
This is a great forum for spreading the word. InterOccupation communication is still in its infancy, I think, but I am going to start talking about it at our GA. We need to move on from some of our other internecine problems.
Finally. Some creativity and a pressure point. If they’re prepared to do so they’ll be able to hammer on the banks’ document chain deficiencies with this tactic.
This is smart and innovative.
This is great idea and people should have been doing it all along. If you need further guidance and motivation, READ THIS:
With Gadhafi gone, many Libyans want confiscated property back, some at gunpoint
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle-east/with-gadhafi-gone-many-libyans-want-confiscated-property-back-some-at-gunpoint/2011/10/28/gIQAqQ0tPM_story.html
i would agree with that however my comment was about the buy here pay here used car scam posted by Faster. Sorry should have been more specific.
Oh, absolutely not. Why? There are how many millions of Americans to rip off?
David has more on this in today’s Roundup, too.
I guess, once people who’ve had to abandon their houses due to the mortgage fraudsters buy an old clunker to live in, they’ll then have to abandon the old clunkers once they get foreclosed on for them and just take to the streets. Sick! Sick! Sick! And what are our legislators and other elected officials doing about it?
It’s Occupy Everything. Amazing! Such unity in their diversity. The 99% are One. A quantum leap to transcendent renaissance.
Yet, for the most part, the status quo holds. I wonder if they are not trying to kill the economy, but it is too vital. Nevertheless, if just about everybody (the 99%) doesn’t wake up and do something about it, they will. A nation divided…
Global corporatism is a fundamental problem. It is a self-destructive business model, flawed by the inability to recognize anything but self-aggrandizement.
Improvement not “growth” (the capitalist meme) is the way to progress to a better tomorrow. Cut back on much resource extraction to produce all that worthless stuff and find out what is really important, like good healthy food, sweet clean air, fresh water, good neighbors, clean conscience, not in debt, time to enjoy life in a place called home, and get rid of the advertizing marketing propaganda bullshit. Occupy Bullshit.
Not a f**king thing.
this is true. Even the electric company only wants to know where to send the bill. A P.O. box will do.
Sounds good but someone still needs to be responsible to pay the utilities and if no one is given legal right to the property then no one is compelled to pay for anything and we just create more problems. I do believe that banks have screwed lots of people but to allow people to occupy vacant properties just so they can have a place to stay can create more problems for a neighborhood. The greed in our government must be met head on with punishment. We have plenty of laws on the books, so instead of creating more laws how about we enforce the ones we have. Let’s put those responsible for making decisions that hurt us in jail.