In six days, the continuing resolution to fund the government runs out. To avoid a government shutdown, the House and Senate will have to agree on some stopgap measure to allow the government to continue to run. Yet all the talk in Washington is over a completely separate budget process, the Super Committee deliberations, which must come to a resolution by November 23.
It’s certainly possible that some stopgap bill, set at current levels, will emerge next week. This happened at the end of September. But if that is being readied, it’s hard to find. Here’s the House Rules Committee report of bills that will be considered on the floor next week. You can’t find a continuing resolution there. Obviously that could be generated pretty quickly, but right now there are no plans. And it’s six days before a shutdown. In the Senate, the last recorded vote Thursday was an appropriations bill for energy and water development. That means the normal appropriations process is moving forward, but not a continuing resolution, which they would have to get onto and pass at some point next week. And it’s six days before a shutdown.
The two parties are negotiating a broader budget agreement, but nobody expects that to resolve itself within a week. And the David Rogers story linked above was written over a week ago, and gave Monday as the deadline for a spending compromise bill. But there’s been nothing since then, and almost a total media blackout on the precarious situation with the nation’s finances thereafter.
At least the House and Senate are both in session next week, a rare occurrence lately. The President, who presumably would be interested in funding the government and who has a role to play by signing the legislation, left town for a week on a tour of the Pacific. It makes political sense for him to distance from that other budget negotiation, with the Super Committee, and certainly he has staff to work through some kind of continuing resolution compromise, but there won’t be a President there to knock heads together. If Congress does manage to pass a bill, the President could sign it by autopen, but Press Secretary Jay Carney didn’t seem to know the plan, suggesting that this hasn’t even really been talked about at a high level at the White House:
Q: And the continuing resolution, assuming there is one on the 18th, is he going to robo-sign it? How will you guys handle this?
MR. CARNEY: I’ll have to take that question to figure out how that’s done. Let me check.
It seems like there’s not enough urgency out there for the wheels to come off and for Friday to pass without agreement. But at the same time, it’s also waaaay too quiet in Washington over this.



13 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
So, like, it’s Deja vu, all over again.
Those crafty Congress-critters: couldn’t have Joe Pa and Hermie Cain dominating the headlines for toooo long, now could they?
If Congress does manage to pass a bill, the President could sign it by autopen
paging Linda Green
in fact linda should sign all bills as the are just fraud foisted on the people
There hasn’t been a president to knock heads together since Jan 20, 2009.
Look for shutdown/deficit/etc. hoopla to provide cover for cracking down on OWS.
The shattering of key myths of global financialization 1%ers use to get their way and for which the US Congress is desperately trying to find cover/perpetuate:
[OTE131] On the Edge with Charles Hugh Smith (PressTV.Com with Max Keiser, Nov. 12, 2011)
Note the true financial dynamic with the ChineseG (time point 6:10) and, by example, the other 1%ers running the central governments. Chinese people (and other peoples of “emerging markets,” e.g. East Indians) aspiring to “Middle Class”-hood are by design never going to get it.
There’s always the coin-seigniorage option to directly fund the current appropriation with freshly minted money. The necessary legislation has been in place since 1996: TITLE 31 > SUBTITLE IV > CHAPTER 51 > SUBCHAPTER II > § 5112 (k):
Just sayin’.
What the hell difference does any of it make? The law is pretty much a dead letter in any area of government at this point.
Boy cried wolf. And all the villagers ran to help.
Boy cried wolf. And all the villagers ran to help.
Congress cried wolf. And no one cares.
Pragmatic Realist jumps to the heart of the matter: there are real-world / material problems, and there are procedural problems.
The real world problem is that the post-War global system that allows nations to coexist in relative peace depended on sufficient material resources for at least the hope of a better life if folks just adhere to the system as it was.
With 7 billion folks, there just aren’t the resources.
A hard rain is gonna fall.
Solving procedural problems such as legislative systems and timetables are just whistling past the graveyard.
If our problem had its source in the law, we could also find the solution in the law. It does not and we cannot.
O/T, with apologies.
Update on Kamala Harris and the mortgage fraud matter.
With “You fellas figure out what you want to do and get back to me” being the operating mode under Obama, maybe a series of intensive Beer Summits is
in order? But seriously folks, pretty soon the world’s money people are going to give up on EU-US monetary systems and put their wealth in precious metals, precious gems, and other commodities. Pull it out of sovereign debt.
Sorry, but here’s another one.
The WH may be the key vote in proposed fracking in the Delaware River Basin (in a river basin? Unbelievable!)
Marcellus Shale is “employing former military counterinsurgency officers . . . to deal with media inquiries and citizen opposition to drilling . . ..” More here.