The delay of the Keystone XL pipeline has led Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper to threaten that he will pick up his dirty oil and go to Asia instead:
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he will step up efforts to supply energy to Asia after Washington delayed a decision on whether to approve a new oil pipeline from Canada to the United States.
In a subtle warning to Washington, Harper told Chinese President Hu Jintao that providing energy to Asia was an important priority for Canada.
“This does underscore the necessity of Canada making sure that we are able to access Asia markets for our energy products,” Harper told reporters on Sunday at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation leaders’ meeting in Hawaii.
“That will be an important priority of our government going forward and I indicated that yesterday to the president of China.”
This is an idle threat. First of all, the Keystone XL pipeline only facilitated the tar sands oil to US refineries. It didn’t earmark the oil for US markets; oil is a globally traded commodity, and the tar sands oil delivered through Keystone XL to refineries would then move onto the open market. So for Canada to supply Asia with oil, it doesn’t really matter what route the pipeline from the tar sands takes. That’s a fact that’s been lost in this discussion.
The other part of this is that, if it were so easy to just reconstruct the pipeline through, say, British Columbia, presumably Canada would have accomplished that by now. There’s far less red tape involved in routing a pipeline internally than in putting one through a transnational border. My assumption is that a) refineries in B.C. don’t have the capacity or the expertise to handle tar sands oil, or b) Canada has as much NIMBY problems in its own country as the State Department does with residents of the Nebraska Sand Hills.
President Obama met with Harper on the sidelines of the APEC summit, and here’s the readout on the issues concerning Keystone XL:
The Leaders discussed the recent announcement regarding the Presidential Permit process for the Keystone XL pipeline application. The President underscored his support for the State Department’s announcement regarding the need to seek additional information about the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal to ensure that all questions are properly addressed and all the potential impacts are properly understood.
So far, this weak attempt at bullying from Harper hasn’t swayed the President. Of course, all that Obama announced was a delay, not an end to the pipeline project.





38 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Yes on both counts.
Not only does British Columbia not have refineries capable of handling this muck, it doesn’t have ports capable of handling the supertankers needed to transport this goo cheaply enough for the goo’s owners to turn a profit. We’re talking about the most expensive, as well as the most carbon-releasing, petroleum to produce — it costs $30 a barrel to create, which is why it needs oil prices to stay well north of $90 a barrel for even a pipeline (the cheapest form of moving mass quantities of oil) to be an attractive proposition.
In addition, the First Nations peoples have been fighting TransCanada rival Enbridge’s proposed “Northern Gateway” pipeline and Kitimat harbor expansion for some time now. The level of their success may be gauged by the fact that both Enbridge and TransCanada have of late put far more effort into pipeline plans that traverse US terrain.
“Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper to threaten that he will pick up his dirty oil and go to Asia instead” So, Stephen, don’t let the door hit you on the way out. Or maybe a simple “Go-go-go!” will do it. Whatever.
Not so fast PW; Canada DOES have refineries that have the capacity and the expertise to handle tar sands oil,
I’m beginning to suspect that the purpose of ALL these mega-energy projects is not to have them completed (heaven forbid) but to raid the taxpayer treasury for funds that will disappear into CEOs comp over their long life of incompletion.
O gave $9 billion to Excelon for nuke plant which will never be built, as just one other example.
Think Harper & O have been on the red hotline to figure out the screen play.
I suspect you are right. seems a few twigged onto that a long time ago
I am convinced that the agreement [Bretton Woods] will enthrone a world dictatorship of private finance more complete and terrible than and Hitlerite dream. It offers no solution of world problems, but quite blatantly sets up controls which will reduce the smaller nations to vassal states and make every government the mouthpiece and tool of International Finance. It will undermine and destroy the democratic institutions of this country – in fact as effectively as ever the Fascist forces could have done – pervert and paganise our Christian ideals; and will undoubtedly present a new menace, endangering world peace. World collaboration of private financial interests can only mean mass unemployment, slavery, misery, degradation and financial destruction. Therefore, as freedom loving Australians we should reject this infamous proposal. — Labor Minister of Australia, Eddie Ward, during the inception of the World Bank and Bretton Woods, he gave this warning.
Marvin K. Mooney will you please go now.
The first ‘book’ my son learned to read.
Let me add our own Marvin K. Mooney to that request. Please!
British Columbia is librul. They don’t like Harper. Ex.: They don’t like Nukes. There are signs on the highways – No Nuclear Power.
Also there is a vast mountain range betwixt the tar sands oil and the Pacific Coast. It’s a lot easier to pipe it south than west.
Going west ain’t gonna work for Harper and the Canadian Conservatives (Rethugs).
Obama (or any other Rethug) will surely go along with the Poopline after he gets reinstalled. This is Kabuki.
Look! Stevie Boy is mad! The libruls got over on him!
BullShirt. It’s gonna happen. The MIC is too powerful.
Also. The pipeline is already in place. This project is an expansion of an exisiting pipeline. (Albeit a massive expansion).
Please include the First Nations opposition to any Pacific port. Oil tankers companies have already begun charting the inner passages to Kitimat, BC.
Many of the First Nations people in the region have formed a coalition, which while not unprecedented is unusual, to fight this. The Athabasca First Nations of upper Alberta have been impacted very heavily by the Tar Sands development. Cancer, loss of important wildlife habitat, poisoned rivers and water, boreal forest destruction through giant open pit mining and air pollution, and societal disintegration are the terrible legacies that other First Nations are noticing as effects of Tar Sands extraction and upgrading, as they are concerned with their own cultural survival.
Thanks PW for your observation of this. If we can stop the pipeline here (because as DD notes, the pipeline has not been stopped only delayed) then Canadian First Nations peoples may very well become even more energized in their opposition to the desecration of their own lands and lives.
Awwwww, many thanks!
“Speaker of the [Nebraska] Legislature Mike Flood said Monday that TransCanada has agreed to move the Keystone XL pipeline out of the Nebraska Sand Hills [the Ogallala Aquifer].” More here.
Yes, and yes! Thank you.
Waiting to see what the new discovery of gas in the Cook inlet has to offer in the building of the gas line from the Alaska north slope to the tar sands.
Oh wait that gas was meant for the mid-west of the US-right?
I am hoping we have an instate line and the gas never make it to destroy where they are getting the tar sands from. Not to forget the co2 contribution.
Hell will freeze before the very, very hard left Province of British Columbia allows that pipeline o’ feces to soil B.C.
Why do you think Canada’s own flyover state right wingers are working so hard to dump their pipeline o’ feces on US? They don’t want the shit either!
The “threat” from Harper seems like a gift to American politicians intended to hand them a scary thing to wave in front of the public and the political class.
You folks are just determined to look the proverbial gift horse in the mouth. We’re talking jobs here. Jobs building the pipeline, jobs in the refineries. You all remember the country suffers from high unemployment, yes?
Don’t you think China has enough US jobs already?
More importantly, the US doesn’t have much to offer on the world market these days. Being a snob doesn’t feed the cat.
Canada and the fossilfuelmeisters probably want both a pipeline to Pacific ports and a pipeline to the Gulf of Mexico, rather than an either/or. And, still my 2 cents:
1. The August 2011 National Geographic has excellent articles on the western pipeline from the tar sands to the Pacific ports (“Pipeline Through Paradise”) and the Spirit Bear (“The Wildest Place in North America – Land of the Spirit Bear”).
2. Even an 18-month “delay” is meaningless to the fossilfuelmeisters. It ain’t over. It’s part of the Standard Operating Procedure Handbook. Years ago when I worked on an environmental assessment of a proposed pipeline project, I learned that the fossilfuelmeisters chart several routes simultaneously, each project titled differently and “owned” by various corporate subsidiaries. Typically, one route was designed to incite public opposition, so that another route, which was actually the fossilfuelmeisters’ preferred route, would be a politically acceptable alternative as public opposition waned – and elections came and went.
3. They’re already moving pipeline equipment through Idaho. Activists there lie down in the road to block the trucks as they come through. A year and a half “delay” before official approval gives the fossilfuelmeisters time to have everything in place wherever they actually want it to be.
There are no jobs in this project. Don’t you read the news?
If the PTB cared we’d still be producing things in this country you know, with factories.
Moscow Idaho Anti-Tar Sands Protesters: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31pFgmljwGU&feature=player_embedded
Regular updates: https://www.facebook.com/pages/This-Is-What-Democracy-Looks-Like/169824663070383
But not one of those is in British Columbia, which is where the ports are. However, those ports can’t handle the thousand-footers, and oil supertankers run at least 1,100 feet nowadays.
I suspect the mountains are the single biggest physical obstacle.
Don’t feed that troll!
The First Nations have been fighting the Kitimat harbor expansion and the Northern Gateway pipeline so hard and so well that Enbridge turned to the Flanagan plan — which is essentially their extension of the existing Alberta Clipper line that runs through Alberta and into the US (yes, folks, it was easier for them to deal with US officials than try to and get the First Nations folks to accept a pipeline) down from Flanagan, Illinois to the Gulf of Mexico. Except that’s been shot down twice by the FERC.
If anyone is interested. Google Earth gives a good perspective of the primary mining and upgrading site at latitude 56N59 and longitude 111W27. Although tar sands extraction actually happens in a much larger area surrounding Fort McMurray, and to the west at Peace River and the south at Cold Lake as well.
You need to enter it this way
56 59′N, 111 27′W
It may be stupid.
It may be threatening.
But it is not “bullying”.
Then again, Canada is bigger than the U.S. – -
And has more nuclear weapons.
Harper is a small-time pol who thinks he is somebody important. It’s unusual for Canadian politicians to parade this weakness on the world stage. He actually thinks he counts. Sad case.
The First Nations are well protected by treaties. These can be overturned, but it takes some doing, and will be costly. And as noted above, the BC ports can’t take the supertankers, which are the only thing that makes the effort worthwhile.
Take a break. Take your Koch cash, and use it to get educated. The jobs are temporary. Or do you expect to be on the pipe earning your pay by sucking oil rather than your employer’s dick?
Well, there may be some jobs in the future removing petrochemical pollutants from underground aquifers so people can drink and bathe in clean water, but that technology has not been found yet. Same with CO2 and SO2 contamination of the atmosphere. And building dikes around Manhattan, LA, Seattle and most other coastal cities will create jobs, and caring for millions of climate refugees will also create some other jobs I suppose.
Huh? Prince Rupert has the deepest port in North America.
And its leaders are begging for port expansion.
And those above talking about mountains –
Yellowhead Pass is the lowest pass across the Rockies – almost unnoticeable.
The real issue is the Lower Skeena.
Environmental risks there are extreme.
No jobs? Does the pipeline just appear magically? Of course there are jobs, more importantly they are jobs someone other than taxpayers pay for.
The temporary tag is funny, so are the infrastructure jobs. Tsk.
It doesn’t work that way. One has to compete for work.
The reason why Canada does not build pipeline to BC is because the USA is the market into which they desire to see the vast majority of the oil.
Canada sells twice as much petroleum to the US today, without the pipeline, than does Saudi Arabia, most of it tar sands oil.
of course it is.
It’s probably also true. Do you think Canada is going to let what may be the 2nd largest reserve of oil sit idle while prices are far above the cost of extracting that oil?