Republicans apparently just submitted a last-ditch effort to get agreement on the Super Committee. It was a $545 billion proposal, less than half of the minimum requirement to avoid all of the automatic trigger cuts. And it included $3 billion in tax increases.
For those of you scoring at home, that’s a ratio of about 181:1.
Democrats rejected it.
It’s almost getting fun to watch the catfood commission fail so thoroughly. If we’re already submitting proposals of less than half the minimum requirement, then there’s nothing left to fear from this thing. It’s also good news that the unbalanced proposal was rejected, because that probably included a lot of cuts already offered in past proposals by Democrats.
It will be fun to watch Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles and David Walker and Maya MacGuineas and all the rest whine and cry next week when this thing gets a real Viking funeral. What they know, but won’t tell you, is that simply doing nothing would lead to $7.1 trillion in deficit reduction. In other words, just offsetting any changes to current law will accomplish about twice as much as their alleged goal for cutting deficits. They won’t tell you this because it comes primarily from letting tax cuts expire.
$3.3 trillion from letting temporary income and estate tax cuts enacted in 2001, 2003, 2009, and 2010 expire on schedule at the end of 2012 (presuming Congress also lets relief from the Alternative Minimum Tax expire, as noted below);
$0.8 trillion from allowing other temporary tax cuts (the “extenders” that Congress has regularly extended on a “temporary” basis) expire on schedule;
$0.3 trillion from letting cuts in Medicare physician reimbursements scheduled under current law (required under the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate formula enacted in 1997, but which have been postponed since 2003) take effect;
$0.7 trillion from letting the temporary increase in the exemption amount under the Alternative Minimum Tax expire, thereby returning the exemption to the level in effect in 2001;
$1.2 trillion from letting the sequestration of spending required if the Joint Committee does not produce $1.2 trillion in deficit reduction take effect; and
$0.9 trillion in lower interest payments on the debt as a result of the deficit reduction achieved from not extending these current policies.
The point is not to let all of this happen; the point is not even to pay for all the fixes to this, necessarily. The point is to show that the medium term budget is ALREADY in primary balance, and that just relatively following that guide path – even while allowing for targeted measures to improve the economy – is completely sufficient, rather than cutting everyone’s Social Security and Medicare benefits.





26 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
0 man holding out for 200 to 1 or nothing.
The super committee was a stupid and possibly illegal idea from the start. I noticed that yesterday Congress very quietly passed a measure to keep the government running in
case ofwhen the super catfood committee fails. I guess the one percent are having none of that shutdown bullshit this go around.What can be done must be done. Just let the Bush tax cuts expire. All it takes is some Democrats who are not one the take or in the pocket. Woof!
And has that solution of doing nothing, the sufficient solution, intentionally been the big secret? I want to say something about more secrecy in gov, but that may not be accurate here;)
It ain’t over ’til it’s over. Congressional Dems are experts at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory, usually at 0bama’s insistence. I won’t breathe a sigh of relief until the deadline passes and the committee concedes that no agreement could be reached.
The stupid shit Democrats could have had plenty of new tax revenue if they had just sat on the butts and let the BushCo tax cuts expire. I guess “sitting on their butts” is now too much to ask of “our” party.
Good luck on finding even one.
Interesting
In all the times that the Democrats had the Republicans by the short hairs if they had forced them to go on record voting against really popular public opinion or hypocritically voting contrary to their own rhetoric, never once have they forced the issue. Every single time the Vichycrats came to their rescue by pulling legislation, allowing the Republicans to attach a poison pill, precapitulating or taking the same position as the Republicans themselves. The Democrats could be enjoying approvals in the seventies and the remnants of the Republican Party would probably have already reorganized and renamed itself but that didn’t happen. The Dems could either be too stupid to see their chance and seize it or they could be complicit. Either way, they are not qualified for their positions but I’ll say this: nobody is that stupid.
Dont worry. The spineless wonders will cave like always. Its all rigged to make it appear that one party is working for us. Both are paid shills of the one percent. Dems are a mirage. A giant propaganda train that always caves to the rich while claiming to be on our side. We need a Liberal Party. Not a Democratic mirage.
Alas, there lies the rub . . . no such creature is in existence.
Indeed.
N I won’t hold my breath about any expiring tax cuts . . .
But as Mr. Dayen and we all know, that would be a HUGE first step for government revenues . . .
I guess, we can hope . . .
*G*
Here’s the link to the story. As you might expect, the ‘baggers hate it but apparently the Republican Wall Street/Banking caucus is worried about current and future Wall Street/big bank
fundraisingbribery.Spot on it’s the maintaining of the status quo, no WAY the 1% overlords want either party to get too far ahead of the other, they might decide to do things different . . . ;-)
Great minds….
10 MOST BANKSTER BRIBED DEMOCRAT (and Independent) SENATORS:
#1 Ker.ry – MA Takes 29.4 Times More from Banksters than Labor
#2 L1E’Ber.man – CT Takes 20.7 Times More from Banksters than Labor
#3 Sc.hu.m.er – NY Takes 18.2 Times More from Banksters than Labor
#4 Hark!n – IA Takes 12.0 Times More from Banksters than Labor
#5 War.ner – VA Takes 10.1 Times More from Banksters than Labor
#6 Ben.net.t – CO Takes 8.8 Times More from Banksters than Labor
#7 Cantwe11 – WA Takes 5.4 Times More from BankstersthanLabor
#8 Murk0s.ki – AK Takes 5.3 Times More from Banksters than Labor
#9 Ne1son – FL Takes 5.1 Times More from Banksters than Labor
#10 Gi11ibrand – NY Takes 5.0 Times More from Banksters than Labor
WHY THE CAPS? Seriously, it looks like you’re trying to convince me that Democrats are corrupt as well as Republicans. I assure you, you’re wasting your time. I came to that conclusion decades ago.
Thanks.
I KNOW the banksters don’t want a government shut-down. Where would their lolly come from? Same with the war profiteers. And now 0 is over setting up another costly marine in Australian. HE doesn’t care what they decide.
you’d think the President of the Untied State would take a little more interest if this was so gods damned important. He knows they’ll screw US sooner of later….probably later as , somehow, people still think it’s the nasty republicans with the knives out for the social programs. Wasn’t it him in his inaugural speech who said “make me do it!” and now that we’re are, he turns a blind eye.
He’ll get it done AFTER the erections…..just like Keystone.
Talk about Shock Doctrine.
My bad. I copied it from a website……..and I didn’t mean to respond to you particularly.
I know I don’t have to convince YOU, of all people, how corrupt the whole shebang is.
Nice list of what the “do nothing” plan offers in the way of deficit reduction, but parts of the “do nothing” plan are so unacceptable that the result would have to be at least slightly lower. Cuts to Medicare physician reimbursement rates are a non-starter if we want physicians to actually see Medicare patients in our current for-profit system of health care. And I’m reasonably sure that a strong case can be made that doing away with adjustments to the AMT is going to result in a tax code that is somewhat less progressive by shifting taxes onto households that are comfortable but really on the upper end of the middle class rather than wealthy.
Margaret, just wanted to say that I like the way you think. If this was target shooting, you’d be dead on the bulls-eye.
I think that the caps are to show that they are CAPITALIST TOOLS. (And looking at the list, not the sharpest tools in the drawer, either.)
Another NYT piece just posted predicting that the super-committee fails…both Rs and Ds thinking they gain something by do-nothing.
Strategy to fail….
Why isn’t anyone pointing out that the Super Congress is non Constitutional. If you give this power to a Super Congress where does that leave our elected representatives. Biting the dust. This committee is just an arm of the executive, and it’s great to see that it is as dysfunctional as the head, of the body that is, which I guess is the President. He is off golfing in the Pacific somewhere doing deals with that red head who’s supposedly running Australia. Wonder what hair color she uses?
gawd, I hate this partisan bickering – can’t they just meet in the middle, at 90:1 ! / snark
out here in the pacified northwest, great state of wishy warshy, city of Seattle and SOMA
I start my critiques of Dim-0-craps by asking about their competence – and I end with a question – incompetent, sold out, or a mix of each.
too few could handle me getting to my real point – they’re lying fucking sell outs – NObody could be this goddam incompetent if they tried.
rmm.