Yesterday’s Occupy Together day of action yielded hundreds of protests and hundreds of arrests. Union involvement was palpable, and provided a model into closer connections going forward. In addition, the incidents of police brutality seemed to ramp up a notch, particularly in New York City, where even a state Supreme Court justice received a shove. But yesterday’s actions also represented a subtle but definitive shift in tactics, away from ongoing occupations of public space (though that’s still an element) and toward more temporary occupations of symbolic sites:
The “Day of Action” saw Occupy Wall Street organizers trying new tactics: a roving protest model; continuous, decentralized direct action; and disruptions to New York City that reach beyond the boundaries of downtown’s financial district.
The leading occupiers are spinning the eviction as creative destruction, a way to refresh and revitalize a movement that had grown stale and claustrophobic. Amid reports that the recent spate of police raids were nationally coordinated and federally planned, organizers hope to boost coordination themselves — from Oakland to Albuquerque. The new message: Leave the parks and take to the streets; occupy offices, bridges, subways, and Ivy League schools.
Harrison Schultz, a central organizer of the protests, has been at the occupation since it was just a handful of people in used sleeping bags. Along with the AdBusters crew, he was among several early arrivals who laid the occupation’s foundations; now, they’re racing to rethink them. “Many of my colleagues and I do think that this is the beginning of a new phase for the occupy movement,” he told New York. “New tactics are in order to respond to a national effort against the occupy movement.”
A good example of this from abroad is Occupy London’s move into an empty former UBS bank, and transformation of the space into a “Bank of Ideas,” kind of a performance space for political discussion and organizing.
Ultimately, I think this is positive, and I think creative destruction is a good way to look at it. The movement already had been branching out. Yesterday’s bridge protests were planned for weeks. Across the country, Occupy members are delivering “Mic Checks” on powerful politicians, confronting them with the consequences of their own policies. The Occupy Homes and Occupy Foreclosures movement has advanced, saving at least a few homeowners from eviction. One ubiquitous quote I’ve seen in recent days is that “you cannot evict an idea.” There are plenty of opportunities to move forward.
When even Robert Rubin, of all people, is forced to respond to the Occupy movemnet, and agree that they have “highlighted important issues,” you can see the potential here. The naysayers questioning the wisdom of dissent and protest will have to get ready for this shift in tactics, rather than lazily intoning about what could be done differently.
UPDATE: And just as I write this, the announcement is made for Occupy Congress next month.




8 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
The former police chief in Seattle during the WTO battle of 1999 has written an article about the paramilitary police operations model. Let’s hope its widely read and appreciated.
Thank you for putting up that link, fatster, Norm Stamper, the former police chief whom you mention has been at the fore-front of speaking reason, regarding police “tactics” around “crowd control”. Stampers words are always well worth the read … and he, fortunately, has the ears of many police officers across the country.
Thank you, as always, DDay, for staying focused upon ALL of the important and genuine news and actual realities of our time.
DW
You’re most welcome, DWB.
Here’s a former police captain from Philadelphia interacting with the OWSers. Provides some interesting insights. He was arrested during the big march yesterday.
Thank you for that link as well, fatster.
Philadelphia Police Captain Raymond Lewis, clearly, understands that the corporate elite, and not the Rule of Law, is the deciding “factor” determining what happens in America today, as his mention of “Inside Job” confirms.
DW
There’s a game changing quality about this ‘movement’ that the MSM hasn’t really caught up with yet.
I’m a pretty square guy. I went to Zucotti to see what was what about a month ago.
What I found was a peaceful mix of folks advocating for a varied set of issues.
The symbolic tell for me that this was seriously different than anything I’ve seen in past protest movements in NYC were the women of a certain age, proudly (and enthusiastically welcomed) walking with signs hung around their necks calling for an audit of the FED and soliciting for members to Compliance.org!
OWS is not the 60s-70s burn down the ghettos, the police are pigs movement NYers reflexively presume when there is a large protest movement going on in the city.
Yet the police are responding as if OWS is a 60s-70s NYS + al-quauda threat.
I am impressed that NYC cops are equipped to deal with a terrorist threat, but OWS is so not terrorist. I resent the MSM meme that they( OWS) are ‘terrorists’ rather than rational people with legitimate gripes looking for like mined friends at the park.
The NYC police response to OWS as an excercise in anti-terrorism practice might be defensible if it didn’t involve trampling on reasonable dissent by folks genuinely interested in focusing attention on the 1%’s abuses.
Perhaps Bloomberg has conflated home-grown opposition to Wall st.abuse with al-q hatred of Wall St and is overeacting. If so, he’s wrong.
OWS in NYC is a sober, quiet, long simmering call to action protest by average folk who don’t normally take to the streets.
Occupy Congress is not the OWS movement. It’s just the SEIU and like groups trying to glom onto to the spirit of OWS to get people to support Obama’s crappy jobs bill and other make-work half-ass bandaid measures.
That’s why it’s in the Post, way in advance. It actually sounds lame. Not to be flippant, but who cares about Congress at this point? We’re living in a police state.
Congress, like the White House or the Mall is considered “free speech zone” by the powers-that-be. I like OWS becuase it’s beginning to target the invisible powers, which are omnipresent.
Congress, as it has so unreflectively illustrated with it Super Wankers conclave, is an irrelevant sham, as is the electoral process, as witnessed by the freak-show charade of the Republican primaries.
I say that as a square who will continue to vote for (but not donate to) the Democrats.
The regime can’t be petitioned. It doesn’t have legitimacy to address our grievances even if it wanted to.