Though the FDA supported it, the Department of Health and Human Services decided against allowing young teens access to the morning after pill in over-the-counter drugstores without a prescription. Though birth control is now available for free from doctors for anyone with health insurance, women under 17 facing an unplanned pregnancy will still have to consult a doctor before getting the morning after pill. Current law states that women over the age of 17, if they show ID to a pharmacist, can access the morning after pill without a prescription.
The announcement surprised even HHS staffers:
The nation’s health secretary says young teenagers cannot buy the Plan B morning-after pill without a prescription — a surprise move overruling her own experts, who were preparing to let it be sold on drugstore shelves like condoms.
Here’s HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius’ statement. In it, she says that, while the science shows that the morning after pill is both “safe and effective with appropriate use,” she cautioned against allowing its free usage over the counter:
The switch from prescription to over the counter for this product requires that we have enough evidence to show that those who use this medicine can understand the label and use the product appropriately. I do not believe that Teva’s application met that standard. The label comprehension and actual use studies did not contain data for all ages for which this product would be available for use.
FDA has recommended approval of this application in its Summary Review for Regulatory Action on Plan B One-Step. After careful consideration of the FDA Summary Review, I have concluded that the data, submitted by Teva, do not conclusively establish that Plan B One-Step should be made available over the counter for all girls of reproductive age.
What are we talking about with “using the product appropriately?” As far as I know, it involves taking one pill and then another an hour later. No chemistry is involved in the application of Plan B. Major medical associations have called for over-the-counter use since 2000. And there’s a pretty good reason: use of Plan B is time-sensitive, and often doctors are unavailable for prescription-writing when women need to use the drug. Furthermore, minors are often in situations where they have nobody to turn to for help after becoming impregnated. All this announcement will do is lead to more abortions.
Jessica Valenti wrote a couple days ago that all indications pointed to HHS approving the switch. Previous policy on the morning after pill favored ideology over sound science. I don’t see this announcement moving away from that approach.
UPDATE: Rob Stein has a lot more. FDA confirmed that they approved OTC use of Plan B, and that Sebelius, in what clearly looks like a political decision, overruled them.
UPDATE II: More fallout. According to Jodi Jacobson, an HHS secretary has never overruled an FDA decision like this before. Sarah Posner also has a good take.





35 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
we can thank the new “populist” for appointing Sibelius, who can’t find it within herself to do the good thing for women, time and again. What a cabinet and advisory bunch of disappointments for regular people! Hardly a backbone amongst them.
Barack “hypocrisy you can believe in” Obama.
President Obie didn’t want this to be a campaign issue. Tough luck, young women — but there’s always the back-alley abortionist!
of course they need more victims for pedaphiles and warriors to kill brown people.
They are so moral you know /s
BC pushover lefties would never make anything like this a campaign issue.
So all it takes is having a 17 year old to get it for you? Doesn’t seem like a very high hurdle to clear. It’s really a law in name only. I don’t know that I’m that comfortable with young teens having access to powerful drugs like that considering how many drugs have been labeled safe in the past only to be recalled later with serious side effects.
“…
the Department of Health and Human ServicesPresident Obama decided against allowing young teens access to the morning after pill in over-the-counter drugstores without a prescription.”Must give credit where credit is due.
Do you have evidence that your skepticism is warranted? What other countries have allowed this for mid-teen girls, and what has the outcome been.
Is an unwanted pregnancy safer for a 15 or 16 year old than taking 2 pills?
This ties in with the seeming hypocrisy of Bristol Palin’s pregnancy: why were the Palin rightwingers so readily accepting of Bristol’s obvious sexual activity? Because Bristol was pregnant. Pregnancy is really all they’re about. It would, of course, be nice if Bristol had been married first, but the important thing is pregnant. And pregnancy in that context is prurient and about control.
Has anyone else read the reports that America has the highest rate of unplanned pregnancies, any age, among developed countries? The highest teenage pregnancy rates, as well? I’m sure I read something like pretty recently.
I haven’t done research on it, but I know there are dozens of drugs that have been approved by the FDA only to be recalled after really bad side effects were found (you know, like death). Maybe that’s not the case here, I don’t know. What I do know is that when I was a teenager, a toothless law like that wouldn’t have stopped me from getting anything I wanted.
Guess what country has the best family planning program in the world?
You prolly won’t be able to. It’s Iran. You can read about it in Wright’s book on the Revolution.
You don’t have to rely on the FDA necessarily. I think this has been in use for some time in other countries. What is the record there.
I don’t know anything about it myself, just asking.
I thought this was supposed to be a science-based rulemaking administration, unlike the last one with its politically driven decisions? This is outrageous.
I guess Obama knew what he was talking about yesterday when he slipped up and called Kansas Texas, with Sebelius alongside him.
Might as well vote for a Republican if I’m going to have to have a Republican for President. Fuck Obama.
Very, very poor political decision by the president. One of O’s core constituencies is business and professional women who may not be too liberal on economic or labor issues, but are stalwart defenders of a women’s right to choose and obtain needed contraceptives. A lot of Republican as well as Democratic women fit in this category. Even some men are included. O has just lost a big block of voters–not just lost them, but made many absolutely outraged.
Thank God that we’ve discovered that putting Democrat women in high places will help protect reproductive freedom.
Members of disadvantaged groups must prove they’re members of the Ole Boys Club to get to high places. You can almost guarantee that any woman, black, Hispanic high in USG will pursue policies anathema to their group.
Sebelius is hardly a member of any “disadvantaged group”. She is a careerist politician and is conducting herself as one.
“And pregnancy in that context is prurient and about control.”
Indeed. This is only one more example of authoritarian sexual control, which in a patriarchal society puts the onus on women. They are confined to and celebrated for bearing children, but god forbid they have have free exercise over their own sexuality.
I would be behind this decision, except that I know better. I am going to assume that the logic is that a sexually active mid-teen needs to see a medical practitioner for the basic advice the ostrich crowd do not allow kids to get in school (or from Mom and Dad): stuff like, “Don’t be a fool, wrap that tool!”, or, “No glove, no love.” Things like, “Condoms are effective at disease prevention. Even if you are using hormonal methods you ought to use them.” Stuff like, “Have you been vaccinated against HPV? No? You really ought be, you know.” Other things like, “What is the best birth control method available for you in your circumstances?”
But I happen to know better. It is true that sexually active teens need to hear all those things, even if they have already heard them at school and from Mom and Dad. But our health care chaos has such perverse priorities that that conversation with a physician or a nurse-practitioner is not going to happen. It is what ought to happen. If I believed keeping Plan B off OTC status for teens would make that conversation happen, I would back it. But it will not. So, you can color me disappointed.
Good thought! (Wish I had had it first.) Specious argument about safety. How many of us are remotely qualified to make that judgment on anything we ingest? Age has nothing to do with it. I missed the uproar over HRT because everything I read said don’t, but I’ve fallen into a few other bad remedy tar pits.
I believe Iran has a huge population percent of under 25s. The social and political implications of that skew haven’t escaped the ruling clique.
Someone remind me again why we voted for this Schmuck? Why vote for Democrats when they give you Republican policies?
Healthcare bill == Republican Health Care proposal from Heritage Foundation in 1991 to oppose Clinton’s bill.
Seems like whoevers in the White House we get Republican policies.
Women are definitely a disadvantaged group when it comes to positions in high places.
The started the program as a consequence of 1986 oil price crash, and within a decade or 15 years, #kids/couple dropped from 7 to 2.7. I think the course is required bef marriage, and all devices and docs visits are free. The only method not discussed in the course is rhythm, bc it doesn’t work.
Makes U.S. look medieval by comparison.
I believe that if you step outside the scrunched perspective of the United States and look at this country from that vantage, we are furiously working our way back to medieval. Other countries must think we’re insane.
Agree with you 1000%.
Scott Horton, the one who does the radio interviews on antiwar.com, has a saying (think he copped it from some one else mebbe): empire makes you stupid.
Sums it up about as well as any short sentence.
This kind of crap is straight out of the DLC playbook: compromise your most basic principles in a vain effort to get the support of swing voters. The sooner the Democratic Party dies, the better for all of us.
Both parties are gangrenous.
It’s so comforting to be able to have my view of Obama affirmed. From teen health to Medicare eligibility he has consistently lost my vote.
It’s been several hours and I still haven’t calmed down sufficiently to adequately express myself. “This absolutely sucks” will have to do.
Women for Obama–are you paying attention?
Not too much, no.
Looks like NOW can recycle their March 2010 press release titled “Obama Breaks Faith with Women” in which they stated: “President Obama campaigned as a pro-choice president, but his actions today suggest that his commitment to reproductive health care is shaky at best.”