Protests in Russia over the weekend, after a rigged Parliamentary election that still saw Vladimir Putin’s party lose ground, has led to an additional challenge for Putin in next year’s Presidential race.
Tens of thousands of Russians protested in Moscow and elsewhere over the weekend, the largest such demonstrations in 20 years, shouting “Putin is a thief” and “Russia without Putin,” among other slogans. The demonstration was so large that even Russian state TV reported on the news, an unusual occurrence for the buttoned-down news. This capped off a week of protests since the parliamentary election results, which international monitors said showed signs of ballot-stuffing. Even with the vote-rigging, Putin’s party, United Russia, was unable to secure a majority in the Parliament, settling for a plurality.
But Putin’s announcement that he would again seek the Presidency was as much a spark for the protests as the election irregularities. Dissident elements in the country have grown tired of one-party rule, with Putin and current President Dmitry Medvedev scheduled to switch places next year. Medvedev ordered an investigation into the election results with a post on Facebook, of all places, and within six hours the post drew thousands of mostly negative comments. The fact that Medvedev was on the apparently rigged ballot doesn’t inspire confidence in the investigation.
The near-term ramifications for this open dissent is that it offers an opportunity to potentially challenge Putin in the elections, and one Russian billionaire will take up that effort.
Mikhail Prokhorov, one of Russia’s richest tycoons and the owner of the New Jersey Nets basketball team, said Monday he will run against Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in the March presidential election.
Prokhorov has been cautious not to cross Putin’s path in the past, but the billionaire may pose a serious challenge to Putin, whose authority has been dented by alleged widespread fraud during Russia’s Dec. 4 parliamentary election.
Putin’s party only won about 50 percent of that vote, compared to 64 percent four years ago, and the fraud allegations have allowed opposition parties to successfully mount massive anti-Putin protests in Russia [...]
“The society is waking up,” Prokhorov said at his news conference in Moscow.
Prokhorov tried to form a political party for the parliamentary elections, but then abandoned the idea because of pressure from Kremlin insiders. With Russia being generally a plutocracy, I’m not surprised that the great hope to unseat Putin comes from a billionaire.
Given that the last election featured widespread vote fraud, I don’t know how significant the development of a challenger for the Presidential election can be. But Putin definitely feels the heat now, as a substantial portion of society is waking up and dissenting from a virtual dictatorship. A familiar sign at the protests shows a picture of an aging Putin with the date “2050,” and the single word “Het,” meaning or “no.” That has been a familiar reaction around the world to dictators and world leaders in this year of uprising.




7 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Occupy Red Square.
Yeah I’m sure a Millionaire will care about the people far more than Putin…. Elections are absurd.
This whole story is absurd. Putin’s party won 64% four years ago and just over 50% this time. That sounds like a reasonable decline in support over a four year span. Does the opposition want us to believe that Putin and Medvedev’s support entirely evaporated in a few years? There may or may not have been voter fraud, but this is very remote from an entirely fraudulent election.
The reason why there are protests is because Putin’s still very broad-based popularity is no longer unanimous, full stop.
Here’s another story with a different slant on Prokhorov’s challenge:
News Daily article on Prokhorov
So with respect to this story is the article an attempt by the existing opposition to dump on Prokhorov? And is Prokhorov sufficiently pissed off/authentic about being kicked out of the Potemkin Right Cause party to go all in to gain the Russian presidency? $18bn could certainly do a lot to build an opposition if he has the time and ability to put it in to play. Also given the Russian public’s opinion the Kremlin may not be able to give him the same treatment they did to Mikhail Khodorkovsky.
Would it be advantageous to Prokhorov to draw explicit attention to Putin’s past actions at excluding rivals by including Khodorkovsky in his campaign in some fashion, even granted that he is still in prison?
“Elections in Russia”?????? I just spewed my Diet Dr Pepper all over last months financials. Betcha they got LOTS of “hangin” chads over there. My money is on Putin for another term. Assuming, of course, I can find somebody to take the bet.
I think you have to decide which kind of a dictatorship you prefer. A capitalist dictatorship, or an old-style Soviet one. Personally I go with the devil you know. If the business community ever got a hold of the Russian state, the people could kiss good-bye to whatever is left of their social safety net. We are off to Moscow in three weeks. Will get back to you when I have some opinions from the locals.
Americans are too quick to presume that Russia is under perpetual authoritarian rule due to decades of indoctrination concerning the Soviet Union.
When you look at this legislative election, you see a governing party (United Russia) that got roughly 50% of the vote. The biggest opposition (at almost 20%) party continues to be the Communist Party, 20 years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union by Boris Yeltsin and other leaders of the dominant Russian republic. This fact should remind Westerners that it is not the case that Russian people in their majority are groaning for Western-style cookie-cutter liberal and conservative parties.
In addition, you see an array of medium-sized to small opposition parties that are not unified enough to provide a serious rival in Russia’s electoral system. But in all honesty – big deal. Japan for most of it’s post war history had a so-called one and a half party system in which the ruling Liberal Democratic Party held power almost continuously. Nobody called Japan a dictatorship on that account, or almost nobody. This was because the elections were still ostensibly free or largely so, to the extent that elections are free in any capitalist society.