In a stinging report, the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division released their findings of a two-year investigation into Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, showing that he unfairly targeted Latinos and discriminated against them at the expense of other crimes in his jurisdiction, including sexual assault crimes.
After an investigation that lasted more than two years, the civil rights division of the Justice Department said the sheriff’s office has “a pervasive culture of discriminatory bias against Latinos” that “reaches the highest levels of the agency.” The department interfered with the inquiry, the government said, prompting a lawsuit that eventually led Mr. Arpaio and his deputies to cooperate.
“We have peeled the onion to its core,” said Thomas E. Perez, the assistant attorney general for civil rights, noting during a conference call with reporters on Thursday morning that more than 400 people were interviewed as part of the review. Mr. Perez said the inquiry raised the question of whether Latinos were receiving “second-class policing services” in Maricopa County.
The report stems from a civil inquiry and Mr. Perez said he hoped that Mr. Arpaio would cooperate with the federal government in turning the department around. Should he refuse, a lawsuit will be filed, Mr. Perez said, adding that the Justice Department is conducting a separate criminal inquiry of the department.
I think there’s enough evidence for a criminal investigation already. Here’s the DoJ release on the report. As you can see, it includes what the Department specifically terms “unconstitutional conduct and/or violations of federal law.” The report charges that:
• The Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) unlawfully pulled over, arrested and detained Latinos in a coordinated fashion;
• Retaliated against anyone who criticized the office for these discriminatory policies; and
• Punished Latino detainees who had limited English skills, and denied them required services, including medical attention.
The investigation also turned up evidence of excessive force used by Sheriff Office personnel, and a failure to investigate crimes against Latinos, as well as allegations of sexual assault. Arpaio’s boys were too busy punishing Latinos for their brown skin to pay attention to actual crimes taking place in their community. Arpaio himself was cited for passing around constituent emails with clear racist overtones, and highlighting passages in a way that it looked he gave his endorsement to them.
The Constitution is pretty clear on cruel and unusual punishment, and this document details a pattern and practice of it in the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Arpaio, who has endorsed Rick Perry for President, is seen as a darling on the right, and awarded himself the term “America’s Toughest Sheriff.” If by “toughest” you mean “most unconstitutional,” I agree.
The entire report is here. Thomas Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division and one of the better public servants in the executive branch, said in a statement, “MCSO’s systematic disregard for basic constitutional protections has created a wall of distrust between the sheriff’s office and large segments of the community, which dramatically compromises the ability to protect and serve the people. The problems are deeply rooted in MCSO’s culture, and are compounded by MCSO’s penchant for retaliation against individuals who speak out.”
The result of the investigation, which as mentioned DoJ had to go to court to obtain the proper access, is that DoJ wants a court enforceable agreement on reforming the Sheriff’s office and stop constitutional violations. If that doesn’t work – and considering Arpaio tried to stop DoJ from even investigating him, I have little confidence it will work – Perez said he is prepared to “take appropriate legal action.”
More from TPM Muckraker.




20 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
“Stinging”! Oh, yes!!! Now, let Justice be served, and swiftly!
And why didn’t this happen 2.75 years ago?
Didn’t I read here yesterday that somebody stumbled upon AG HOlder in Aspen???? He’s been there since August. Who is this Perez guy. Didn’t he get the memo that the DoJ was on “holiday” until after, well, “the holidays”.
“Arpaio, who has endorsed Rick Perry for President..”
—————
Poor Perry. That guy just can’t catch a break. From 33% in Iowa just a couple of months ago to 3% currently NH. Looks like you guys will NOT have another governor from Texas to kick around anymore.
Does the DoJ still prosecute criminal activity by White folks?
WTF?? R U declaring WAR Inc on Christmas??!!??… you commie you… /s
I just shook my Magic 8-ball and it says: “A sternly worded letter is in Sherrif Arpaio’s future.”
I like this news, but I’ll take my usual position of: Actions Speak Louder than Words. I’ll believe something will “happen” to Arpaio when I see it happening. Not holding my breath.
The retaliation allegation is very interesting – if true, it would show that the department was aware that its behavior was controversial at least and that it took steps to shut down the raising of public awareness. Shutting down dissent and public expressions of concern is willful and conspiratorial.
No. It doesn’t want to be accused of reverse discrimination.
So – is anything going be actually DONE to this guy?
I know, silly me and my silly, archaic notions.
Why is this man still in office? How can the DoJ legally stand by and let him abuse constitutional rights after their investigation yielded these results?
You would think he’d be in handcuffs within minutes of the report being released…
Don’t hold your breath. Sheriff Joe knows nothing will happen to him as long as he plays along with the 0 team charade to attract Latino voters.
They need the handcuffs for those Occupy folks, get serious would you.
So who lives in AZ? Citizens’ arrest this fucker.
This is great news tell me when they arrest him I want picture of him in handcuffs:)
I think there is some kind of “unwritten agreement” that law enforcement does not enforce the law against, well….uh……law enforcement officers.
The right-wing trolls in TPM’s comments section are practically having strokes right now.
Eh? The majority of AZ citizens are probably “upset” to hear that beloved Sherrif Joe is having his wrist tapped by the DOJ.
Don’t doubt it. Rightwingers, esp the bigoted variety, love ‘em some Sherrif Joe big-time! How DARE the DOJ investigate the “law” of AZ?? The federal govt is over-stepping it’s boundaries blah blah blah…
Is this all the power the DOJ has? A slap on the wrist and a phony promise to do better in the future. The world does not operate that way. If you let him remain in a leadership or any other capacity,he will have the same or worse conduct in the future. The payback any of the complainants may get, will be directly on the heads of the DOJ. If this is the case, why do we have prisons? All we need to do with criminals crooks and banksters, is get them to promise to do better in the future. Think of all the money that could be saved.