The Obama Administration, expecting that we’re in an age where the normal rules of politics apply and not an age of nullification, nominated two labor officials for open slots on the National Labor Relations Board. That board will see previous recess appointments expire at the end of the year, leaving it without a quorum and unable to function. The two appointees would fill the Democratic spots on the board.
Obama picked Sharon Block, a deputy assistant secretary for congressional affairs at the Department of Labor and Richard Griffin, general counsel for the International Union of Operating Engineers, to join the panel [...]
Given recent criticism of the NLRB by prominent Republicans as well as recent successful efforts to block nominees for administration posts, confirmation of the NLRB nominees is not assured.
Senate Democrats began urging Obama to make a recess appointment of former Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray to run the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau after Republicans blocked his nomination last week.
On Monday, Senate Republicans also blocked Obama’s nomination for U.S. ambassador to El Salvador as well. In response, the White House said the GOPer’s obstruction of the nomination was motivated by partisanship.
What you’re seeing here is a growing boldness on the part of Senate Republicans to block appointments of Presidential nominees. Sometimes it’s because they don’t like the nominees, but in the case of the CFPB and the NLRB, it’s simply because they don’t like the agency. Republicans see an NLRB without a quorum and unable to issue rulings as their favorite kind of NLRB. So their plan is to keep those seats vacant, so businesses can intimidate workers, block union elections and harass union organizers with impunity.
If no price is paid for this obstruction, there’s no reason for Senate Republicans to stop. The only way that they back down is if the President uses the recess appointment power, making their obstruction on nominations meaningless. As I’ve said repeatedly, the President has all the authority he needs to make a recess appointment. He can even do it in one of three ways. He could use his constitutional power to adjourn Congress, and recess-appoint thusly. He could make appointments inside the traditional three-day recess window that has been used for some time, but which is not a statutory requirement. Or, he can wait until the inter-session recess, where Congress has to stop the first session of this Congress and start the second session, and make recess appointments in that period. None of these options are any more power-expanding than what Senate Republicans are doing right now, by blocking the ability of legally constituted federal agencies to function simply because they don’t like them.
So nominating people to the NLRB is one thing; appointing them is quite another. The President should not give Senate obstructionists the benefit of the doubt anymore. He needs to make some recess appointments.




15 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Figures Oblahblah would pick a guy from the IUOE. Totally worthless union, I had to sue them for non representation.
Talk about an exercise in futility – none of his nominees every get confirmed and he won’t fight for them. What a joke.
Let us not post anything that Obama does unless it is actually done; I mean it could be listed on a resume as an accomplishment. How would his current resume look? Not many bullet points on it I would guess. Obama has only answered the age old question; What if Herbert Hoover had a predator drone?
Typical Osterity move. If the IUOE is a worthless union why not appoint the guy who gives it legal advice to the NLRB.
I was just thinking the same thing. I’m tired of reading about obama – I just want him gone. I’d much rather read about the Occupy movement.
This Act in today’s Kabuki Show is called: Wherein the putative “POTUS” pretends to be doing something but isn’t really.
I think this is just more campaign-kabuki bullshit from Obama. He knows he can’t get them through without a recess appointment, and he’ll bitch and whine, and then do nothing…just like he did with Warren.
I’m still faintly hoping for a recess appt…but then, after the declaration that he won’t even veto NDAA, well, my hope on such subject sis never more than faint.
Honestly, Obama might have been okay in more or less normal times; but he’s all wrong for these times. Whatever his actual beliefs, he simply is non-confrontational. Compromising, giving in, getting along have all been the path to success for him. Avoiding confrontation at all costs. I guess we should have known, but, that method just can’t work with the current state of politics.
So ironic that so many R voters want Gingrich ’cause they think O is so radical, so confrontational they have to have someone to push back against him.
Of course, I do think most of why they think that is bc O is black; which illustrates well exactly why non-confronting became his lifelong m.o.
This is a very good comment, if O was around in 2000 instead of Gore he might have been successful and his skillset as you describe would have been a plus instead of a minus. He would have easily beat Bush instead of the Supreme Court protected photo finish that it was.
Please even during the season of hope, there is no hope, there is no people’s president .
Name one veto, just one.
No recess appointment without congress adjourning. Have you noticed lately that it’s the Senate staying in session? Reid has kept the Senate in pro-forma session even when the House adjourns. Collusion?
Extra room in those Hanes (Michael Jordan) briefs with no cajones.
It depends on what the definition of “nominates” is.
It depends on what your definition of “collusion” is.
Yup.