Activist Dan Choi was wrestled to the ground by MPs and thrown off the base at Fort Meade, where he was to attend the trial of Bradley Manning. Choi, who went with Pentagon Papers leader Daniel Ellsberg to the trial, has now been banned from the courtroom, and must stay off the base for at least 24 hours.
Choi, in an interview after the incident, said that he picked up Ellsberg and went to the front gate at Fort Meade, where he was stopped for 10 minutes. The base officials at the front gate apparently had a problem with him wearing his uniform onto the base. “They said, ‘you don’t have the right to wear the uniform,’ and I said I did, I was honorably discharged and I have the legal right to wear this uniform,” said Choi, who was discharged initially under the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy after coming out publicly in 2010.
Eventually, officials let him through, apologizing to Choi, and he and Ellsberg passed security and made it through to the courtroom. Moments before the trial was to resume, Choi spied a military member he identified as Staff Sergeant Leo, who Choi claimed had been giving him dirty looks before. “I said to him, ‘Hello, staff sergeant, how’s your dog.’ He ignored me, and then the marshal told me I was heckling,” Choi said.
The marshal (named John, according to Choi) and a Major Sides told Choi that someone else was tossed from the courtroom for heckling, and that he could not do that. Choi protested that he was not heckling, and that he sat through the entire trial the day before without saying a word.
Finally, the marshal told him to get out. Choi replied that they were in a contained area and he could not leave. At that point, MPs pinned Choi to the ground, ripping off his rank. Choi tweeted a picture of this from his Twitter feed. He was handcuffed and told he would be charged with assault and resisting arrest.
“I asked, what’s the charge? I will obey the order you give me, even if I don’t agree with it, but you have to charge me with something,” Choi said. The marshal responded that they would use the “same standard” they used on the heckler from earlier, banning him from the courtroom and keeping him off the base for at least 24 hours.
After a period of argument, the marshal decided not to charge Choi, but to throw him off the base. They never had him sign an affidavit or a sworn statement. Ellsberg remained at the trial, and Choi complied with the order. He said that his hand was numb from “excessive force” and the handcuffs.
Choi, a West Point graduate, went to the Manning trial because “soldiers stand up for integrity, and if the code of ethics and army values are important, then we should support Bradley Manning.” He added that Manning’s actions were not only in the interest of his unit, but also in the interest of the country. “He believed that our country as a whole needed to have integrity. The law of land warfare says that if a soldier sees a crime — a rape or a murder — it’s their responsibility to report it. As I understood it, he brought it up to the chain of command. The chain of command knew about it, and they were the ones who were in violation of the law of land warfare. To not report it is to be complicit. He was the only soldier in the chain of command to do the right thing, so that’s why we have to support him.”
I contacted the public affairs office at Fort Meade looking for their side of the story. They have not yet responded. When I receive a comment from them, I will update this post.




30 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Does the staff sgt have a dog? Inquiring minds…
Thanks for the update on this unfolding story. Clearly the PTB are looking for any excuse to kick out Lt. Dan Choi.
No. I think the staff sergeant is just auditioning for a job at TSA or the border patrol, neither of which are bound by rule of law.
It’s funny that they think they need a hair-brained fig-leaf of an excuse rather than using no excuse whatsoever & forcing Choi into time consuming plan B, whatever that might be,
They must hate Dan going around telling all that truth and stuff. He and others who stand for our rights are a real danger to them.
That’s certainly a possibility. Albeit I still think the PTB don’t want Lt. Dan Choi around their phony “trial” of Pfc. Bradley Manning, who the Commander in Chief has publically declared as “guilty” before being tried.
I think that there’s enough international media watching this dog ‘n pony show, so perhaps the PTB have some sense of whatever and figure they’d better gin up an “excuse” to scuttle Choi outta of the courtroom and get Choi off the “stage,” so to speak.
Yes. Can’t have truth and facts get in the way of a fascist system, now can we??
And they just gave him all the publicity he could possibly want and he’s already speaking out about it. The PTB are really not very smart.
Yes and no. The PTB also sending the message that IF you speak the truth, etc, you, too, can be wrestled to the floor, stripped of your military rank and kicked to the curb. It goes both ways.
Dan Choi’s actions here are quite heroic. If the military loses control of this trial, and it is exposed as the circus that it really is, than some small sliver of justice may survive the oppressive weight of the cover-up.
Truth-tellers not permitted.
It’s only a matter of time until the media is all kicked out for “reporting.”
I’m sure we’ll see much more restrictive access rules for Bradley Manning’s “trial,” whenever that begins.
“Hello, staff sergeant, how’s your dog.”
Hilarious!
They’re smart enough. Even though we, the people BOUGHT it, they control the weaponry. It is up to us to beat it into plowshares.
It’s a coded message. Classified. Might be a threat to national security and all that.
If? They’re putting Barnum and Bailey to shame.
Ripping off Choi’s rank really bothers me. I know they can do that when the person is IN the military, but all this sounds to me as if the sgt. assaulted a civilian. Did the sgt have the right to do that?
Not sure the sgt had the right to do that, but I think I saw sort of the same thing happen once in a Bugs Bunny cartoon.
Rather telling that the Obama Administration’s only exception to their mantra of “Look Forward” is the prosecution of people who honor their oath to the Constitution or others who expose the crimes of our government and corporations.
Precisely. They’re the heretics of the “Look Forward” religion and so must be burned at the stake.
Chase Madar is releasing a book about Bradley Manning:
“Scott Horton Interviews Chase Madar” (AntiWar.Com, Scott Horton, July 11, 2011)
Editor, co-publisher of OR Books:
Double DING!
Seriously, it almost seems unsportsmanlike to ridicule the DoD when they are doing such a great job of bringing ridicule upon themselves.
This trial is already a thinly veiled show. The judge granted 2 witnesses out of 38 not requested in common with the prosecution. This is not a fair trial and those running the dark show are irritated and annoyed that anybody even witnesses or reports on their travesty of justice.
I’m shocked I tells ya !
the big swingin dicks of the “greatest military force in history !™ are nothing but thin skinned watb’s – although in this case, they are simply following orders . . . from the Heathers White House®
waves to our spineless, treasonous DIA minders
spit !!!
The U.S. military is full of pussies like this.
MPs taking advantage of the only time in their life that they will be able to man-handle a West Point graduate and get away with it.
Support the troooooops.
I suspect the Department of War will charge Choi with the same thing they’re charging Manning: violating the UCMO – the Uniform Code of Military Omerta.
Anyone know if this is accurate?
The Case Against Alleged WikiLeaks Supplier Bradley Manning Takes a Strange Turn
LINK.