The Department of Justice has announced a $335 million settlement with Countrywide, the former subprime mortgage giant now subsumed into Bank of America, on claims of housing discrimination.
The Justice Department on Wednesday announced the largest residential fair-lending settlement in history, saying that Bank of America had agreed to pay $335 million to settle allegations that its Countrywide Financial unit discriminated against black and Hispanic borrowers during the housing boom.
A department investigation concluded that Countrywide had charged higher fees and rates to more than 200,000 minority borrowers across the country than to white borrowers who posed the same credit risk. It also steered more than 10,000 minority borrowers into costly subprime mortgages when white borrowers with similar credit profiles received prime loans, the department said.
The pattern and practice covered the years 2004 to 2008, before Countrywide was acquired by Bank of America.
“The department’s actions against Countrywide makes clear that we will not hesitate to hold financial institutions accountable, including one of the nation’s largest, for discrimination,” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said. “These institutions should make judgments based on applicants’ creditworthiness, not on the color of their skin.”
I’m waiting for someone to hold financial institutions accountable for discrimination against every one of its customers, by defrauding them and destroying the residential home mortgage market. That’s obviously not going to happen here.
As the report states, this is a significant settlement on fair lending claims, the largest on record. But compared to the crimes being perpetrated in the home mortgage market over the past several years, it’s a drop in the bucket. DoJ’s silence on other financial fraud issue resonates larger, in a way, in the face of this settlement on other charges. And we’re still talking about civil settlements here rather than criminal prosecutions.
One such prosecution available to DoJ is a complete slam-dunk. Today, Rep. Brad Miller (D-NC), along with bipartisan support from his Republican North Carolina colleague Rep. Walter Jones, urged DoJ to prosecute violations of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which led to wrongful foreclosures on active duty military members while they served in war zones. We know this happened; the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is currently reviewing 5,000 such foreclosures. Most major banks have admitted to the violations and made restitution to the military members involved. Yet violations of the SCRA are extremely clear – they carry prison sentences of up to one year. Miller said in a statement:
The SCRA is not some obscure legal technicality that might just have escaped the attention of mortgage servicers. Those servicers are all affiliates of the biggest banks, but they’re huge and specialized. Servicing mortgages is all they do, and they really don’t have that many laws to keep up with. They have got to have known what the law required, and consciously decided that they could just ignore it, the same way they apparently decided it was okay to file false affidavits in legal proceedings [...]
The continued failure to pursue criminal charges in the face of flagrant violations of the criminal law is destroying Americans’ faith in their government and democracy. In a democracy, no one is too big to prosecute.
The whole letter is here. Criminal prosecutions for SCRA violations are really not optional. That DoJ makes them optional, while settling left and right on other crimes, tells you most of what you need to know about the seriousness of their push on financial fraud.
UPDATE: Here’s the settlement agreement, and once again you see that Countrywide doesn’t have to admit wrongdoing for their crimes.




21 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
So nice to know that those pesky minorities that were the cause of the whole housing bubble, by cheating all those poor mega-banks, were being cheated right back by those mega-banks.
If you don’t do time, there ain’t no crime.
Thanks DDay.
It would be interesting to see a rundown of the special, preferred mortgages granted to “Friends of Angelo.” Wondering if that roster follows the pattern of discrimination described above.
Eric Holder is probably the worst AG in office next to Gonzales.
What we could use is someone from my time, Robert F. Kennedy to get the job done.
It is amazing to me that none of the banks are held to the fire and maybe because of Holder the President mey not get elected due to him being late to the table on the draconian GOP governors VOTER ID bills (poll tax).
This is one sorry AG!
Any real settlement would give home owners who were screwed over new home loans with interest for what they were over charged.
Uh Eric with this kind of record you can forget about Hispanic votes next election.
Are you sure he is any better than Gonzales? I see them as neck & neck for worst AG of the past 200 years.
Even if they WERE required to admit wrongdoing, this is what they’d say:
“We here at Countrywide are sorry for getting caught. Obviously we did something wrong in our attempts to avoid being caught. We pledge to work harder in the future to ensure we are never again caught for wrongdoing.”
Its a freaking open and shut case why plea bargain just tell Countrywide admit to everything or we will bring RICO conspiracy charges against your entire organization using that leverage on everyone in the organization I am sure we will find some people at Countrywide willing to cooperate and testify.
In this day and age many workers take work home with them and have back up copies of work data at home.
Countrywide I am sure hid evidence but the worker drones I am sure have copies.
This Countrywide settlement should be called another Obama surrender.
Anthony Mozillo ALONE made over $100 million during the subprime orgy. The Holder justice dept simply ooozes incompetence and cowardice. Unbelievable. Obama talks justice but totally embodies criminal complicity. And the new NDAA amendments cement his lack of character or morality unless he vetoes the bill, but I’m not holding my breath. However, you can count on me to OCCUPY!
He serves, and always has, at the pleasure of the President.
….and he is worse than berto.
Dday…I read you quite a bit and often just lurk but I have a question that might be somewhat off-topic but then, not totally ;-) The (I believe) National Association of Realtors today announced that (ahem) they made a (cough) slight mistake in reporting the number of houses sold over a couple of critical years in the (ummmmmmm…) recession.
Did the NAR purposely overstate sales in an attempt to put lipstick on our pig of an economy? Or, was it just shoddy reporting? Does it have any impact on what our government reported about the economy? In other words, if the numbers had been correctly reported, would it have been stated that we were truly in a depression?
I just don’t know how all this works, and I have an inquiring mind…
I’ll venture to answer that. The cover story being given is that the over-estimate was due to more sellers than usual listing with realtors, as opposed to those who sold on their own. This would be a natural trend for sellers in a dead market, as it takes a lot of time and energy to market your own home for an extended period of time. It is inconceivable to me that the industry big shots would be unaware of this trend for so many years. OTOH, who benefits? Clearly, all those involved in the real estate industry, as well as all the politicians, since they had a great interest in making the economy look better than it was, as they tried everything they could to sell the idea that a recovery was happening. Convincing thee public that a recovery was underway would bring buyers waiting for the “bottom” back into the market that much faster.
They screwed 200,000 borrowers according to the agreement, and are settling for around $1,600 per borrower 3 to 7 years later. My guess is that they made at least $10,000 per loan more than they should have, even after commissions and other expenses. This settlement does nothing to discourage similar behavior in the future. It is not clear if they even investigated B of A (non Countrywide) or just agreed that there was no problem there as part of the settlement.
It isn’t the change I was hoping for.
He’s smarter than Gonzales. Gonzales didn’t know how to cover his tracks. In retrospect, the Republicans who opposed him for getting a Presidential pardon for the Williamsburg/Israeli shyster (Mark somebody’ I forget his name) were right about him, for the right reasons. I think if they had thought it through, they would have voted unanimously for him.
Totally sickens me. I’d rather risk acquittal and have a criminal trial, though I’m sure they’d have a hard time picking a jury given everyone’s house in the U.S. was devalued. So who does that money go to anyway? Will it go to we the people?
Along with a fine, shouldn’t these corporations be jailed too? After all, the Supreme Court has said they are people, so they should be incarcerated just like any other common criminal.
I should not have assumed that everyone would know that these numbers are assembled with a statistical model that assumes the usual proportion of owner sales to realtor sales. So, here, there would be an ASSUMPTION of more owner sales than were actually taking place, thus the over-reporting of the headline number. The realtor-sold homes number is readily determined because they are computerized in the Multiple Listing systems, unlike the sale-by-owner transactions.
I guess we think alike… Thanks for your thoughts! I just wonder what kinds of further adjustments this will require. In other words, is there, perhaps, a further backlog of another 3 million homes awaiting sale that has not been reported? I am just asking theoretically. I just pray that the powers-that-be are not that stupid!!
Pond scum………