I haven’t seen Republicans mismanage the public relations of one of their schemes this badly in quite a while. Check out this scene on the House floor from today. During a pro forma session designed to block recess appointments (streams crossing), Steny Hoyer asks for unanimous consent to bring up the Senate two-month stopgap on the payroll tax, unemployment insurance and the doc fix. Instead of just objecting to UC, the presiding officer, in this case Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA), just ignores Hoyer and gavels down the session, walking away. This allows Hoyer to grandstand:
“You’re walking out, you’re walking away, just as so many Republicans have walked away from middle-class taxpayers, the unemployed and … those who will be seeking medical assistance from their doctors.
“We regret, Mr. Speaker, that you have walked off the platform without addressing the issue of critical importance to this country,” he added.
Hoyer then yielded to House Budget Committee ranking member Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who began to speak to a chamber that had no presiding officer. C-SPAN’s coverage of the floor ended moments after Van Hollen started speaking.
This was at the direction of the House leadership. C-SPAN does not actually control the cameras on the House floor. The House Recording Studio made the decision to pull the plug, but not before capturing Hoyer calling out Republicans for a full minute.
The House has another pro forma session on Friday. This will just continue to happen throughout the holiday break, much to the embarrassment of the GOP.
Meanwhile, Harry Reid, in a letter to John Boehner, reiterated that he will not agree to the House’s demands until the two-month stopgap gets passed. So far, Reid will not bail out the House GOP. This is the entire letter:
Our respective chambers have been seeking for weeks to negotiate a year-long extension of the payroll tax cut for middle-class families, as well as unemployment benefits and Medicare payments for physicians. You and I agree that this should be our goal. But as these weeks have made clear, there remain differences between our parties over how to fund and implement these programs that will take longer then a few days to reconcile.
Recognizing this reality, eighty-nine Republican and Democratic senators came together to agree to a short-term extension of these programs. As you requested when we met last Wednesday, Senator McConnell and I worked together to find this common ground. Once the House of Representatives acts on this immediate extension, we will be able to sit down and complete negotiations on a longer extension. But because we have a responsibility to assure middle-class families that their taxes will not go up while we work out our differences, we must pass this immediate extension first.
As the Senate vote made clear, there is no reason for this to be a partisan issue. I am fully confident that we can work out our differences and find common ground on a year-long extension. But in the meantime, families should not have to worry that they will wake up to a tax increase on January 1, 2012.
To provide middle-class families the certainty they deserve, I urge you to reconvene the House to act on the Senate’s bipartisan compromise as soon as possible.
For his part, the President spoke both to Boehner and Reid today. And according to the readout, he told Boehner that “the short-term bipartisan compromise passed by almost the entire Senate is the only option to ensure that middle class families aren’t hit with a tax hike in 10 days and gives both sides the time needed to work out a full year solution.” So he’s siding with the Senate as well. For good measure, Obama lauded Reid for coming up with a broad compromise.
This is going to end in disaster for the GOP. After that point, we can step back and look at the final result as it is; we’re not talking about progressive policy here by any stretch. But Republicans face a political hit that could resonate for some time.




39 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Mike Fitzpatrick is a gooper. (you can look it up.)
otherwise, this makes no sense.
also, this engagement my put Obama in a bind on recess appointments, if he cannot recess the House (as the Constitution provides) so he can fill vacancies.
He may still be able to use the dead time that exists between sessions, however.
I can only hope that “traditional” GOP people and far left Democrates see themselves as Independants and vote that way in 2012.
That issues matter and that the middle class, no matter what party affiliation, considers the existing voting culture. Are you for progress of this country over party affiliation?
What peterboy said. It is Rep. Mike Fitzpatrick (R-PA). Somebody fix it in the post body, please.
“Mister Speaker, we Democrats regret that the Republicans will not join us in this golden opportunity to ransom Medicare and Unemployment in exchange for screwing our children and grandchildren out of Social Security, all for the sum of about 3 dollars a day in tax relief. Raising the cap is unthinkable, and as Johnathan Smith pointed out, in tough times, the young are mighty tasty. We’ll go start our holiday drinking now, since its the only way we can live with ourselves. God Ble$$ Us, Everyone…”
The only thing Democrats are good at.
Isn’t that the truth. We as democrats are supposed to be outraged that the democrats want to put less money into SS so that in the future the democrats can kill SS. We for sure live in an upside down world.
With what voting bloc? Voters have short memories. Nobody is going to think about this at all next November. The House has job security for another 11 months, during which time everyone will forget about this crap, concern themselves with the issue de jour, and vote reflexively next November.
No problem here, as far as I can see. Except these lying, money-grubbing assholes manipulating the argument again, using the same language tricks they used to pass the Obama Tax Cuts for Millionaires last year.
What was temporary tax relief aimed at gutting social security and designed to expire after a year is now billed as a tax increase if the legislation actually does what it’s supposed to. Horseshit, I say.
which will be the last jingle they hear on the TeeVee before they head on over to the Diebold box.
Exactly. The people who aren’t writing in a Progressive or *blech* Libertarian candidate are the majority of Americans on either side of the political divide who find themselves in the middle. They vote based on what comes out of a candidate’s mouth in the 2 or 3 weeks before the election. None of them pay any real attention, because that would require putting down their iPads and actually thinking. It’s a lot more comfortable to let the TeeVee think for you.
Who won Survivor on Sunday?
Yet more Kabuki Show, this time entitled:
Wherein the so-called “Republicans” can’t be bothered to do a damn fucking thing because why should they? Who’s gonna make ‘em? Suck on it ya 99% bitches. And then the chorus in the background – composed of both putative “Democrat” & “Republican” politicians – shrieks: I got MINE, Fuck YOU! Peace on earth blah blah blah…
You forgot the obligatory “America, Fuck Yeah!” Chorus line.
Why bother??
Seriously, does it make a damn bit of difference??
Oooops, sorry: what you said! blah blah blah
What has always confounded me was that right before a major election there are always 5-10% who are undecided. I guess that means they’ve yet to see the commercial that makes an imprint on their skull.
You’re asking the wrong person about Survivor. Haven’t seen a TeeVee show since they de-commissioned my rabbit ears.
#Lulz.
Precisely.
Point! – onitgoes
this also seems to sign everyone up for the repealing-tax-cut == tax-hike equivalence, which doesn’t help the case for undoing the Bush tax cuts. not that any of them are really so interested in that anyway i suppose.
The Survivor bit was my attempt at humor. I couldn’t care less about that show or any other piece of reality TV drivel.
AS for the ‘undecideds’, these are people who go into the voting booth and make a decision with their ballot in front of them. Having had months to study the candidates and issues, they shirk their responsibilities as voters in a democracy(NOT) and make a split-second decision that has ramifications beyond their understanding.
Unless, of course, you believe as many do that the system is rigged and our votes don’t count anyway. (See Florida, circa 2000)
They’re not even repealing a tax cut. They’re just allowing it to expire as it was designed.
When you realize that the tea party people are just doing exactly what they were elected to do and promised to do; not allow politics as usual, you can see why no backlash.
Dems can dream of PR coups all they want. That is because they are still living in the “polite games” fantasy world of 2010 and before. As shown by the Gallup poll not moving for Obama since end of August, the public sees the games and wants work, not baloney. A full year and not just two months.
DC is just used to the polite games that happen and pull the wool over the public’s eyes, so they see what is happening as “horrid.’
No, it is “let’s get the full year done,” and move on to other issues rather than the Obama/Reid formula which is, “Do this and then we will redo it again in a month and fight about the same things.”
No, let’s fight about it now and get it done.
On the other hand, Obama has given up on this year anyway. He’s too busy campaigning.
Tunis is.not about getting it done now. The republics want to send this to committee so it dies there.
The NY Times tried to explain the Social Security accounting issues last week:
Disagreement Over Payroll Tax Cut’s Impact on Social Security Critics predict one extension will lead to another as politicians balk at raising taxes to their former level, especially if unemployment remains high.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/16/us/politics/payroll-tax-cut-extension-seen-as-peril-to-social-security.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha24
Graphic: Accounting for Social Security
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/12/15/us/politics/accounting-for-social-security.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha24
It would also be nice if the media and President Glory Hound would not only mention the unemployment extensions that are IMO far more important than a lousy $20/week FICA bump but also note that the deadline for those is not “the end of the year”; Tier 1 extenstions expire Sunday (Merry Christmas!), for some goddamn reason I don’t understand. (The other tiers are valid until year-end, it’s true.
What does this mean? Well, for the roughly 26% of the unemployed who are still on state benefits, it means we get screwed, of course, but for the thousands (with 14,000,000 or so receiving benefits, even just 1% means 140,000 people are affected, and as benefits are bi-weekly, I and those like me are probably closer to 2% of the unemployed) like myself whose state benefits are exhausted with the current check, it means we lose the opportunity we would otherwise have had to gain access to Tier 1 if the eligibility window covered next week, as all the other windows do. I have no idea where the 1-week variation came from, but it’s going to screw me (and thousands of others) royally, even if something happens next week. (Would we then have to manually reapply, rather than the state automatically handling the transition as is normal? Probably; the paperwork delays will cost us 1 or 2 checks and thus, in my case, possibly my residence/possessions/few shards of remaining dignity.
Probably some Democratic PR genius designed this variation in the past just so they could say to the Rs “you can’t let people starve at Christmas, boohoohoo!”, just for such grandstanding opportunities as the Distinguished Assholes from Maryland indulged in today. Only problems are
1) The Repubs don’t GAF about the unemployed, “Christmas” or not, and
2) The Dems blew the whole PR deal anyway, by shifting focus to the
pretext for claiming Social Security is broke“payroll tax holiday” instead, and that does run through 12/31.So I lose my opportunity to enter Tier 1 just so the Dems can have a grandstanding opportunity that they didn’t actually use, anyway, preferring to worship at the altar of Tax Cuts, Tax Cuts, Let’s All Lick Howard Jarvis’s Decomposing Butthole rather than dare be so gauche as to even mention we dirty smelly unemployed fucked-up losers (who should all be shot, anyway).
Thanks, O Guardians of the “Safety Net”! God bless the Democrats, every one! Happy Days are Here Again! Woo-hoo!
(Of course, I have no one but myself to blame. If I’d applied right away when I got sacked at the end of May [three days before my birthday], I’d be snugly in Tier 1 right now. But instead I spent a couple weeks being proud/hurt/lazy and draining my meager savings before biting the bullet and applying at the end of June. Dumbass.)
It’s like a basketball game that decided in the last 10 seconds. Nobody in this country can remember more than 2 weeks in the past anymore. Video games must have destroyed long term memory.
No, they are not stupid. They know the only reason Reid wants to do this is to keep the issue going into next year. Give it two months then they can just re-hash the same issues in February and try to make the same points and dog and pony.
The media paints them as stupid, but the 2 month deal was only to prolong the issue for Democrats.
As noted, the GOP got no backlash for the debt ceiling deal, they won’t get any for this either. Yeah, some editors will make more jokes, they only thing they know how to do.
They are not stupid, I hope. That is why the dims don’t want this to go to committee.
Yep. Spot on. Can’t argue with you, more’s the pity. The public GETS what it gets bc no one pays attention.
My fine congressman, mikey.
I didn’t contribute but sarah baby gave him $5,000 and the Keystone alliance, behind the pipeline, gave another $5,000 along with boner .
i believe the Dems are starting to fight fire with fire, as the saying goes, yes it took them a while to figure it out.
the Dems would like nothing better than to debate every two months on tax cuts for billionaires vs. tax cuts for working families
they really have to do it this way to get any corporate press attention, the corporate media has to report the debate, the deadline, and how the tea party is voting. maybe the dem strategy geniuses have realized that “joe sixpack numskull voting public” has to have a very clear picture shown to him over and over again until he can figure out who’s trying to screw him and who’s trying to help him
I’m not sure you aren’t giving the democrats more credit than they deserve. They have not exhibited the ability to develop a plan, as far as I can see. They’re just reacting. And not doing that very well, in my opinion.
I think they have finally reached a tipping point where they don’t look principled even on the MSM, they just look like snarky bullies and mean girls. Not that this doesn’t also make Democrats look like the wimps they are. But voters vote for people who make them feel comfortable. They like to be pandered to on taxes and social issues, sure, but they don’t really like feeling like they are taking sides in a playground brawl.
“i believe the Dems are starting to fight fire with fire, as the saying goes, yes it took them a while to figure it out.
the Dems would like nothing better than to debate every two months on tax cuts for billionaires vs. tax cuts for working families”
Certainly the Democrats have picked up the fire to now be champions of long-standing conservative economic principles like austerity while advancing tax-cuts-to-prosperity, but that means we lose either way unless you just care about tribalist victories rather than the actual impact on people’s lives of the various legislation. Democrats trying to Starve the Beast by combing tax cuts with austerity certainly helps some people – namely conservative economists – but it hurts everyone else.
Fighting over which tribe can out tax-cut the other just leads to MAD.
yes, they are not exactly master tacticians, but imo they’ve figured out that if they can shine a light on the extremism of house rethugs, they score points. they don’t really have to do anything creative themselves, they can take back the house just by showcasing tea party rethugs in their natural habitat.
just remember the austerity bullshit comes from Obama, the whole dumb-ass economic “starve the beast” policy as you say, comes from the oval office. that’s why control of the House and Senate is just as important now as it would be if we had a REAL progressive/liberal in the white house. that’s how you neutralize and control Obama, with a dem majority in both houses, since it should be obvious to everyone by now that Obama is a conservative.
the sad truth is we’re stuck with him for four more years, or we get immediate fascism with Mitt or Newt or Jeb. I’d choose Obama in that scenario. I don’t think dem leaders in the House and Senate would allow him to dictate policy the next time around, they know the guy now. It’s not a stretch at all, christ, we’ve got people in the streets pissed off, finally, it’s not out of the question that a progressive-leaning congress can be elected, and that they can then tell Obama what’s going to happen and when he’s allowed to open his fucking mouth.
stranger things can happen
“the sad truth is we’re stuck with him for four more years, or we get immediate fascism with Mitt or Newt or Jeb”
We aren’t getting fascism now?
sure, it’s a fascist country now, but these would be remembered as the good ‘ole days after Newt, Paul Ryan and the Koch bros take over. I mean, we have the leading rethug nominee talking about arresting judges and bringing back child labor, and we’re still in the campaign season when the candidates are trying not to be too controversial !
hostage taking sobs????
Corporate fascist, as Jefferson warned?
Huh. My perception is that “taking sides in a playground brawl” is the only thing that gets most American voters to the polls.