Observers from the Arab League have reached Homs, Syria, at the same time as Syrian security forces pulled tanks off the streets. Even then, security forces squeezed off their final shots at the protesters:
But sporadic fighting continued on Tuesday morning in Bab Amr, the neighborhood hardest hit by the violence that has left dozens of people dead in recent days, residents said. Activists said some tanks were still visible. They claimed others were being hidden.
Early Tuesday, a contingent of observers met with the governor of Homs and then with opposition figures inside the city.
Ahmed, an activist with the Local Coordination Committees in Homs, said in a telephone interview that he was among a group of people escorting observers from Sudan, Egypt, Algeria and Mauritania. As the group tried to visit a mosque where several bodies were being stored, they were stopped by gunfire coming from a government checkpoint.
This is a moment of truth for the Arab League. The condition for Syria signing their agreement was to withdraw heavy weapons from the major cities, and stop the indiscriminate murder of protesters. Almost immediately upon signing, Syrian forces loyal to Bashar al-Assad escalated the killing, using a suicide bomb attack on a security outpost as a pretext.
Protesters claim hundreds have been killed in the days leading up to the monitors entering the country. Clearly Assad was trying to kill as many protesters as possible before observation would make that impossible. And still, the observers saw plenty. In YouTube videos, you can see activists urging the observers to announce that they saw snipers and “martyrs” in Homs. And others criticized the observers for failing to reach the “hot spots” and witnessing the true brutality. In addition, the security forces are the observer’s drivers, escorting them to the conflict zones.
The observers did provide the opportunity for demonstrations in Homs, with thousands participating. But what will the observers make of the situation? Will they be able to claim that the government is not following the Arab League agreement? What sanctions could they slap on Assad? Will they see both sides firing at each other, with military defectors and civilians finally taking up arms against their oppressors, and call it a civil war? Will they consider security force actions self-defense?
The credibility of the Arab League is on the line with the observer’s report. And many activists in Syria are not hopeful.
More from The Guardian.
UPDATE: Activists believe the tanks which withdrew can redeploy again within five minutes, that they were just set aside while the observers walk through town.




15 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
credibility of the Arab League is on the line
I not sure but they have about the same credibility as Amerika as in We Are Here To Help You
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen this is indeed a moment of truth for the Arab League but it is also man-up time for groups like the Arab Brotherhood in places like Egypt and Tunisia. Whether or not the corporations can kill grassroots political opposition in the Middle East will depend on whether or not groups like the Arab brotherhood and Hamas see it in their interest to cut an independent identity in the politics of the region.
KEEP THE FAITH AND PASS THE AMMUNITION…AND REMEMBER THAT THERE IS NO COMPROMISIN’ WITH FASCISM!!
What? The Arab League doesn’t get as many moment of truth do-overs as teh U.S. Seems hypocritical.
If what’s happening in Syria were to start happening in the United States, who would come in to monitor? If it were to happen here, would Obama approve the use of unmanned drones?
One speaker on KPFA said that the snipers were CIA guys trying to foment a “revolution” by creating an impression that Hassad was killing his own people. I have no idea if what he was saying was true.
http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/76242
Link to the KPFA show:
http://www.kpfa.org/archive/id/76242
Giraldi hears that left over NATO arms & NATO trained fighters from Libya are being sent to foment unrest in Syria.
That’s the problem when you end a war. What do you do with all the leftovers. Got to serve them up before they become stale.
Isn’t there some video showing tanks in the streets? Wouldn’t the Syrian government be able to show evidence of such outside interference if it were there?
Hmmm. Fighting a war & tracking down the sources of the insurgents at the same time. Seems the kind of job the U.S. military is really good at.
REad this first, before you judge:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/nato-vs-syria/
h/t ecahn
OT, but good riddance to Ben Nelson. I’m as sick of DINO’s as I am rethuglicans.
Someone recently wrote that the group of countries most grateful for the US military, neocon, focus on destabilizing the Middle East, are the countries we undermined for the last 70 years in South America.
Looks like NATO is poised for another kinetic military action for “humanitarian” reasons. Will the USA and it’s NATO affiliates ever stop doing the bidding of Israel and Saudi Arabia?
I was sitting here yelling “yes, yes, yes.” when I read that. Neighbors probably think I’m nuts. It’s like a gift to us.
That might have been me, as it’s something I’ve been saying. But it could have been a lot of people bc it’s pretty obvious.