Concerned about a nonexistent threat to the integrity of the caucuses, the Iowa Republican Party will move their ballot-counting operation to an “undisclosed location.”
The state party has not yet told the campaigns exactly where the returns will be added up, only that it will be off-site from the Iowa GOP’s Des Moines headquarters. The 2008 caucus results were tabulated at the state party offices, which sit just a few blocks from the state capitol.
Activist groups including the Occupy movement have indicated that they’ll attempt to interrupt rallies in the closing days before next Tuesday’s caucuses.
The AP reported today that Occupy is making plans to even attend some caucuses and vote “no preference,” but not disturb the voting process.
I get the press releases and have talked to a couple of the folks running the Occupy the Iowa Caucuses movement, and the idea that they have a nefarious plan to disrupt the caucuses and tamper with the vote-counting process is completely misguided. What you believe about the Iowa GOP’s decision can range from interpreting it as pants-wetting fear of scary hippies all the way to control of the votes to ensure no “mistakes” like, say, Ron Paul winning. But whatever it is, it’s not a legitimate response to what is planned to be peaceful protests with no bearing on the outcome.
Meanwhile, the same Republicans who spent all year fretting about voter fraud, and who are shrouding their vote tabulation activities in secrecy, do not require a photo ID to vote in the caucuses they run.
Despite onerous polling place Photo ID requirements now passed into law in about a dozen states where the GOP controls both the legislative and executive branches, voters will be able to cast their ballot in next Tuesday’s “First-in-the-Nation” Republican Iowa Caucuses without bothering to show a Photo ID — even though the Republican Party itself sets their own rules for voting there.
Unlike most primary elections where an official state election board or agency sets the rules and runs the registration and balloting processes, the Iowa Republican Party runs its own state caucuses, determines the rules, tabulates all the votes and announces the results to the public and media themselves. They have complete control over the entire process, and yet they don’t bother to ask their own voters to show a state-issued Photo ID before casting their ballot.
I wonder why that would be?
I’ll take “Voter Fraud is a Non-existent Problem Designed to Force a Response that Disenfranchises Minorities and Voters Expected to Cast Ballots for Democrats” for $200, Alex.




17 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Diebold would spit out the right result without any stinking” vote counting”.
Can’t be too careful.
Paranoia among the faithfools. What are they gonna do? Cheat on themselves? Iowa conservatives are a subset of civilization which has been believing too much of its’ own press.
Now we can add paranoid to the list. These people are very strange.
Needless to say, the GOP won’t require caucus-goers to pass a literacy test either.
Republicans are great at projection. How many times now have they gotten caught jamming phone lines? They know fraud exists because they engage in it as often as they figure they can get away with it.
If the Iowa GOP is not letting any campaign know where the vote counting takes place well they have the opportunity to steal the election for whomever they want. Mitt has the most money but know we must ask who does Karl Rove like?
Just as long as they keep their Mitts off Big Bird….
The “NO ID Requirement Provision” will allow for miscounting, undervotes, overvotes, dead people votes, furriner votes, Mexeekin votes, buying votes, busing in votes, etc. more votes to skew away from Ron Paul.
IF that doesnt work, they got hackable voting machines.
If that doesn’t work, they “count” them in secret.
Rethug Vote Fraud (designed to defraud their own people) with more layers of protection than a Sensenbrenner Kotex.
Perfect example of my 180 Degree Doctrine
“Mitts”???? Was that Fruedian?
just timely.
Hiding the counting operation is a page out of Ohio’s rethug party theft of the 2004 pres election. it’s been used before and its effective, some people count ballots while some people destroy evidence.
Chimpy took Ohio in 2004 after every major exit polling operation had declared Kerry the winner of Ohio. In Warren County, the northeast suburbs of Cincinnati, the rethug-controlled county officials declared a terrorist alert and barred all election observers, dem. lawyers from observing the ballot counting. The result ? Chimpy took almost 80 percent of the vote in that county, a result that was proven statistically impossible, of course after the dust settled and the fix was in.
The republicans can be better understood when you think of them as more of a criminal organization than a political organization.
But then, you repeat yourself….
Why discriminate? It’s called organized crime because families cooperate and practice omertà with other families.
Does this mean that if I latch on to the right Diebold source code and ply the precinct committtee people with a few prize-winning pigs, I may have a chance to win the Iowa Republican Caucus? I hate to admit this to my fellow Firepups, but it’s something I’ve always dreamed of.
Well, here’s an easy prediction. If Ron Paul does not win the Iowa Caucus his supporters will raise a ruckus that it was stolen from him. They might be right; I don’t know.
“Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.” ~ Josef Stalin