Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels has an unearned reputation as a moderate. But when he wanted to strip the collective bargaining rights from public employees, years before Scott Walker of John Kasich got the idea, he didn’t even bother with the legislative process, he signed an executive order. And it had the desired effect in Indiana, where public employee union membership plummeted. During the labor protests of early 2011, Indiana Democrats walked out of the state, denying the legislature a quorum, to protest several bills, among them an education voucher law and legislation making Indiana a “right-to-work” state. Daniels immediately disavowed the latter bill, saying it wasn’t something he wanted to take up. That was when he was considering running for President. Now that’s over, and Daniels, going back on his earlier word, supports the right-to-work legislation.
Nearly a year after legislatures in Wisconsin and several other Republican-dominated states curbed the power of public sector unions, lawmakers are now turning their sights toward private sector unions, setting up what is sure to be another political storm.
The thunderclouds are gathering first here in Indiana. The leaders of the Republican-controlled Legislature say that when the legislative session opens on Wednesday, their No. 1 priority will be to push through a business-friendly piece of legislation known as a right-to-work law.
Right-to-work laws prohibit union contracts at private sector workplaces from requiring employees to pay any dues or other fees to the union. In states without such laws, workers at unionized workplaces generally have to pay such dues or fees.
Many right-to-work supporters say it is morally wrong to force unwilling workers to contribute to unions, while opponents argue that it is wrong to allow “free riders” not to support the unions that represent them in negotiations and arbitrations.
“Right to work” or “open shop” laws have been fought and debated since the beginning of the labor movement. Currently 22 states, almost all of them in the South and West, have right to work laws. New Hampshire passed one last year, but Democratic Governor John Lynch vetoed it and the legislature could not override him. You should really call them “right to work for less” laws, because they diminish the bargaining power of labor, empower management, and lead to wage cuts. Studies have shown that workers in right to work states make at least $1,500 and as much as $5,500 less for the same job than workers in states without those restrictions. And it’s designed to starve a union of revenue by creating a free rider problem, eventually dissolving the union entirely. First Daniels busted the public unions; now he wants to bust the private ones.
Labor leaders in Indiana plan to use many of the same tactics that delayed anti-union laws in Wisconsin and Ohio and stopped right to work in Indiana. They are already on the air with a law telling the truth about right to work. But it would probably come down to having Democrats leave the state and deny a quorum again. Daniels is supportive of the legislation this time, going back completely on his view from last year, and Republicans have large majorities in both houses of the legislature. Democrats could walk out, raise awareness about the law (which polls show a lot of flexibility on) and rally opposition, like they did in other states in the Midwest last year, including Indiana. Ultimately, this was successful in Indiana last year, so we’ll see how it goes.




12 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Progressives and other intelligent USA citizens, need to consider breaking away from moronic USA citizens
The techonology we now have may make it possible for progressives and other USA citizens to create an Intelligent Nation inside the USA.
We progressives are wasting our lives away trying to help MORONIC AMERICA!
If Jesus came to the USA, these fools would throw stones and yell at him.
Progressives need to develop a list of companies that have progressives values and tell other progressives to spend their money at these companies.
Progressives need to pick 2 banks to bank with, and let MORONIC AMERICA bank where ever.
Only a MORON would support Right to Work Laws! The idea that it is the year 2012, and Progressives and Union leaders have to explain to people that UNIONs created the middle class of the USA is getting old and tired!
How much longer can Progressives and intelligent USA citizens tolerate MORONIC AMERICA? the clock is ticking,
Hopefully all of this new technology will allow Progressives and Intelligent americans to break free from MORONIC AMERICA.
I think the time is deservedly ripe for a resurgence of labor unions. Too bad we have to fight these battles all over again.
David, how very disappointing.
PLEASE, please, words matter. Why do you think the right wing spends literally millions of dollars testing words and phrases?? it’s because they DO work.
PLEASE do NOT call it a “right to work” bill. I mean after all, what’s wrong with the right to work???
It’s a UNION BUSTING bill. That’s what it is, that’s why they’re for it, and that’s why they want it passed. People in Indiana ALREADY have the right to work. Just like they do in Pennsylvania, New York, Massachusettes, or any other state that hasn’t yet passed a UNION BUSTING bill.
Some people just INSIST on being able to ride their motorcylce without a helmet. Whatcha gonna do?
Indeed, that is ONE thing the right wing conservies are very good at, misnomers. Misleading nomenclature, lying for short. But what can you do? Just like in Wisconsin, “they made their bed”. Now they have to take it BACK to the mattress factory because they have bedbugs. Betcha Indiana funds themselves in a a similar mess.
One would think the right wing/libertarians would just say, if you don’t want to work for a company with a union, just get another job. Isn’t that more in line with the so called “individualist” arguments?
And to “Old Fat Guy”. You’re 100% correct why do progressives adopt the phrases of the right wing? It’s beyond me!
OFG is usually right.
Actually, he’s not as “O” as me. But he took that screen name first.
Maybe we should try “right to ride for free”
A long time ago, I worked for a closed hop here in Houston. We made big refrigeration packages, like Maxwell House’s original freeze dryers.
We’d assemble them on skids and truck them all across the nation.
The reason why it was a closed shop was because in other states the installer crew had to be union, and the packages had to be union made.
The unions need to work harder at protecting their turf. It used to be nobody crossed them.
Might I also point out that I can’t think of a swifter way to cut down on the employment of undocumented aliens than having a strong labor union policing its own interests.
What and deprive the 1% of their really cheap labor pool. You have to be kidding!
“You should really call them “right to work for less” laws, because they diminish the bargaining power of labor, empower management, and lead to wage cuts.”
The pool of wages is finite. So, if there is only $1,000/hour to pay wages, is it better to have 100 workers getting $10/hour or 50 workers getting $20/hour while the remaining 50 workers get nothing?
While possibly true individually, not true in a macro sense. Borrowing and increasing the money supply are two ways in which the “pool of wages” can be increased to pay all 100 workers $20 an hour.
A company that needs to borrow consistently to pay it’s workers’ wages will eventually be bankrupt. A private corporation can not increase it’s money supply, it can only increase it’s revenues. So, it an increase in revenues leads to $1,200/hour to pay workers, should the company pass the increase on and pay 100 employees $12/hour or should they pay 60 employes $20/hour while 40 get nothing?