As I mentioned in yesterday’s roundup, Indiana Democrats stalled the first session for the legislature yesterday and planned to continue that indefinitely, blocking Republicans from moving forward on a right to work bill that would crush private sector unions.
Lawmakers from the state House had blocked the bill last year through a five-week boycott during which they left the state, denying Republicans the two-thirds attendance needed to conduct business.
House Democratic Leader Patrick Bauer said Wednesday that Republicans were “railroading” the revived measure through the chamber and more public hearings should be held.
“What’s the urgency?” said Bauer, who led last year’s walkout. “They are ignoring the public input. They have not made the case that Indiana is need of an anti-paycheck bill.”
Most Indiana House Democrats were no-shows on the floor Wednesday when House Speaker Brian Bosma tried three times to gavel the House into order. He plans to try again Thursday, and said a Democratic boycott won’t lead Republicans to back off on the bill.
There’s a hearing scheduled for Friday on the right to work bill in a joint meeting of the House-Senate Labor Committee (which is unusual and a way to speed passage of the bill). Once again, without a quorum, the committee would not be able to take a vote. So far, the demand from Bauer is for more public hearings, including field hearings across the state. He does not want Democrats to leave Indiana, as they did last year for five weeks, protesting right to work and a series of other bills.
One problem for Democrats is that Indiana passed new laws around lawmaker boycotts last year in the wake of the walkout. Which is probably why you’re not going to see a mass exodus from the state. Democrats have figured out that they can rotate their ranks to get out of the fines.
After Democrats walked out last year, the Republican-led legislature adopted new fines of $1,000-a-day on each lawmaker boycotts their chamber for more than three days in a row. Concern about the 2012 elections and public response to another walkout may have made some lawmakers wary of another.
Some Democrats broke ranks throughout the day and joined Republicans in the House. Up to six Democrats could return to their seats and there would still not be enough lawmakers to conduct business.
With rules limiting the number of people who can fill the State house rescinded, protesters from organized labor and the Occupy movement packed into the building in Indianapolis and cheered on the Democrats. Already the state AFL-CIO has ads up. The Indianapolis Star has some profiles of protesters:
Hard-hatted worker Dennis Zavada, a 60-year-old Noblesville resident and member of the Operating Engineers Local 103, said Democrats were doing what they had to do.
“They are getting ramrodded,” he said, adding that Republicans would do the same thing if they were fighting for an issue they cared about.
The protesters came from all corners of the state. Among the throng, Trevor Moore, a 47-year-old United Auto Workers member from Haubstadt in southwestern Indiana, said he hoped Democrats would find a way to stop the legislation.
“I believe it’s going to hurt the middle class whether you are in a union or not,” he said.
If Democrats can refuse to gavel in the session, they begin to squeeze Republicans toward a March 14 deadline to conduct business. Already you hear some state Republicans expressing nervousness at their “long agenda” of other bills. This looks like a winnable fight especially if the public engages.





33 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
All eyes are on Indiana. The revolution starts in the Midwest.
John Sherman with a great post last night about the Occupy movement in the state.
democracynow interviewed a D & R from Indiana this morning. Permalink not up yet.
This is just unbelievable.
Democrats actually went into exile outside the state, to support unions, who want to forcibly take money from people? And you all think this is a good thing?
Is it any wonder manufacturing moves overseas. Oh well.
Huh?
As far as I know people make a decision to join unions. Or are made aware when applying for a job that it’s a union position. So they make a conscious decision to join the union and contribute dues…
From the first cite in the post…
There’s your problem. If you buy that, I’ve got some WMDs in Iraq to sell you.
Also too, I’ve never heard of a union mandating fees for people who aren’t IN that union. Admittedly I haven’t studied the subject thoroughly, but if you could cite an instance where this takes place I’d appreciate it.
As far as I know, unions don’t have the power to tax private citizens. They receive member dues and contributions.
I suppose the Indiana Republicans could be operating on the same mentality that led some states to ban Sharia law…
While I’m at it, how about that rule brought up by the eeoc. It tells employers they can’t require HS diplomas for applicants.
Unions and their cronies are killing employment here. Oh well.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/1/eeoc-high-school-diploma-might-violate-americans-w/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS
http://www.nrtw.org/a/a_1_p.htm
Woah woah woah… please cite a respected source with some credibility. Not a right wing funded think tank.
Also, from your wretched source…
So basically… if you hire on with a company that has a unionized workforce and decide not to join the union you can still be held responsible for union dues IF THE UNION HAS NEGOTIATED THIS IN THE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT WITH YOUR EMPLOYER.
I’m sure you can also be required to wear purple socks or fart show tunes if the Union has negotiated this in a collective bargaining agreement with your employer and you take the fucking job knowing full well that this is in place.
But hey, you could argue that you’re too effing stupid to read your new hire paperwork and could never learn to fart show tunes so it’s just. not. fair.
Here’s the permalink to the democracynow segment in Indiana right to work.
Yes, what is it with those Americans unwilling to work for slave wages. Ship those factories to the third world where 10 year-olds can me made to work 12 hour days for crumbs.
That’s the American dream, right shooter242?
How about that. Our democratic legislators (albeit Indiana) found a way to DO SOMETHING by simply DOING NOTHING.
What a brilliant plan!!!!
I apologize, I mistook their apathy for ineptitude. No, I mean, I mistook their ineptitude for apathy.
somebody help me out here.
“But hey, you could argue that you’re too effing stupid to read your new hire paperwork and could never learn to fart show tunes so it’s just. not. fair.”
I’ve used that argument as a defense in a “sexcual harassment” case and won.
In a right triangle, the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.
There’s a hard and fast rule for you.
The “I could never learn how to fart show tunes” argument?
Isn’t that how OJ got off?
If your ass can’t whistle, there must be an acquittal.
I live by that.
Also, the passage of a substance from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration through a semi-permaeblt membrane is why the reopublicans get stooopider every year.
That’a a little known fact.
I’m sure there’s a mathematical equation to prove that, but I’m sure no Republican currently in office could write it.
If a bear shits in the woods and nobody smells it, does it fertilize the ground on which it falls?
American workers had better bend over, grab their ankles and agree to live at a third world standard, or not live at all. Great idea.
The job creators could all create more jobs if we would just cut our wages in half!
Ask eCAHN. Much more the “worldly philosopher” than me. I’m more the “touchy-feely” type. Acordingly, I think I’ll pass on this one.
They could hire twice as many people for the same amount of money.
..
..
Didn’t Santorum endorse that plan?
We progressives have had enough!
What states do you MORONS want?
Mississippi, Kansas, Alabama? which ones
We need to pursue the idea of two Americas. One progressive and intelligent the other one MORONIC!
the good news is current technology is going to allow us to create two AMERICAS!
The day is coming when MORONIC AMERICA ie GOP AMERICA will be able to pursue all of their STUPID ideas and live in dumb A$$ bliss!
Progressives the idea of two Americas may be our only hope!
the year is 2012, how much longer can progressives continue to protect MORONIC americans from themselves, if these nuts want to jump from the 150 floor because they think they can fly, let them jump!
You sound as if you think there’s a choice.
Until China and India reach parity with the developed world, wages and less regulation will hold down US wages for years.
But hey, that’s a small price to pay for environmental constraints, and Obamacare, and being forced to hire people without a HS diploma, right?
Bullshit, I do know that at the last place I worked at the non union employees received the same benefits as union employees even though they did not belong or pay dues. Assholes who bashed the union but got the milk and honey.
Uh, who has been forced to hire people without a HS diploma? I missed that one.
As to regulation, it apparently did not prevent deaths of US miners and oil field workers or the ruination of the economy by an out of control financial sector. Are you sure we need less of it?
The EOC has determined that requiring a high school diploma, may violate the American with Disabilites Act. No this is not a joke.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jan/1/eeoc-high-school-diploma-might-violate-americans-w/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS
The financial sector is a political problem, not a regulation problem. Govt, has decided that they won’t follow up on MF Global for taking their clients money. Totally illegal, but then again, Obama abrogated bondholder rights. In Chicago politics, it doesn’t matter what the law says.
What’s the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.
Trolls are getting thick here.
We must be scaring them with all this (sometimes) intelligent talk.
We know unions scare the shit out of 1%er AND their lackeys.
Don’t we all agree to drug testing as a condition of employment?
The job creators could all create more jobs if we would just cut our wages in half!
No, they would just pocket the difference. In fact, they might end up laying people off since their order rate would likely decrease when nobody could afford to buy anything.
The drug test had to be eliminated as repubs kept trying to write their names on the wall while trying to fill the cup.