The brilliant satire that is the Colbert SuperPAC/Presidential campaign continues, with Jon Stewart watching Stephen on “television” and picking up cues to use in managing the SuperPAC. This reveals the absurdity of an “uncoordinated” SuperPAC. Obviously these entities have obliterated the campaign finance system and turned American politics, especially at the Presidential level, into a corporate free-for-all.
So it’s no wonder that the public has picked up this message, with or without the Colbert/Stewart urging.
A majority of voters who are aware of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling allowing Super PACs believe the unlimited campaign spending is having a negative effect on the race, a new poll finds.
Less than a year to go before Election Day, 54 percent of voters indicated that they have heard of the controversial 2010 Supreme Court decision that allowed super PACs to spend unlimited amounts of money for or against political candidates, according to the Pew Research Center poll. Of those who are aware of the historic ruling, a whopping 65 percent said they think the effect on campaigns has been negative, compared with only 15 percent who said the net result seems positive.
Obviously, the Supreme Court doesn’t consult polls before deciding to revisit its rulings. But public opinion can shape a legislative response. And right now, voters are saying clearly that they hate the trajectory of money in politics. That could manifest itself with something as trifling as more disclosure, or as wide-ranging as what the Move to Amend movement wants, a constitutional amendment banning corporate personhood. There is no partisan divide on this question among the public, and in fact, since Republicans saw the implications of the SuperPAC revolution first-hand in their primaries, their constituencies may be first out of the gate wanting to change the system.
Move to Amend actually has a big set of protests scheduled for Friday, the second anniversary of the Citizens United decision. They’re calling it Occupy the Courts, and they will protest on the steps of many courthouses around the country, including the US Supreme Court.




2 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
David,
So, is this letter in NYT wrong in asserting that Citizens United didnt create superpacs it just allowed Corporations unlimited contributions; that individuals already had that under Buckley?
To the Editor:
Re “For Gingrich, a Rich Friend and a Big Lift” (front page, Jan. 10):
You assert that the $5 million donation by Sheldon Adelson to Winning Our Future, a pro-Gingrich “super PAC,” “underscores” how the Citizens United case “has made it possible for a wealthy individual to influence an election.” A similar statement was included in a Jan. 13 article, “Obama Raised $42 Million in Last Quarter, Far More Than G.O.P. Rivals.”
The Citizens United case does not deal with “wealthy individuals” at all. The case that did was the 1976 ruling of the Supreme Court in Buckley v. Valeo, which concluded that since debate “on the qualifications of candidates” was “at the core of our electoral process and [our] First Amendment freedoms,” individuals could not be limited in the independent expenditures they made endorsing or denouncing candidates.
The Citizens United case dealt with a different subject — the rights of corporations and unions to participate fully in the political process.
Concluding that “political speech must prevail against laws that would suppress it by design or inadvertence,” the Supreme Court held that corporations and unions were entitled to the same First Amendment protections as individuals. Citizens United’s defense of First Amendment values remains highly controversial, but it is important to bear in mind precisely what it is about.
FLOYD ABRAMS
New York, Jan. 13, 2012
The writer represented Senator Mitch McConnell in the Citizens United case.
Money buys amplifiers, making truth or BS louder. Money can’t buy love, respect, character, or merit.