I think we should definitely be concerned that Twitter is bowing to pressure and allowing for the censorship of tweets in individual foreign countries.
Twitter has refined its technology so it can censor messages on a country-by-country basis.
The additional flexibility announced on Thursday is likely to raise fears that Twitter’s commitment to free speech may be weakening as the short-messaging company expands into new countries in an attempt to broaden its audience and make more money.
But Twitter sees the censorship tool as a way to ensure individual messages, or tweets, remain available to as many people as possible while it navigates a gauntlet of different laws around the world.
Before, when Twitter erased a tweet it disappeared throughout the world. Now, a tweet containing content breaking a law in one country can be taken down there and still be seen elsewhere.
I guess they’re selling this as an advance. But really it’s a way for countries to censor content inside their borders, without the messiness of having to kill the entire Internet like they did in Egypt briefly during the uprising.
Twitter does plan to share the content censored at Chilling Effects. And the fact that the rest of the world can see the tweets means that someone can bear witness. But this unquestionably makes censorship easier in individual countries. I don’t know how you could say otherwise.




8 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
A mere coincidence?? I think NOT:
-> twitter announces it can and will filter according to gvmt requests
-> google and facebook each announce they can and will aggregate user data (including locations) according to corps(e) requests
-> FBI announces it can and will aggregate e-networking data no longer deemed private
-> defeated SOPA/PIPA provisions will now be enacted via trade legislation
Censored in foreign countries?
How about they’re getting ready to censor it here?
A list of countries would be nice.
An even worse threat than SOPA and PIPA (although its text is still CLASSIFIED) is ACTA, the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a treaty which President Obama has already signed into law unilaterally (and thus unconstitutionally, without Senate approval) last October.
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/318690
Quoting:
“According to Forbes:
“Few people have heard of ACTA… but the provisions in the agreement appear quite similar to – and more expansive than – anything we saw in SOPA. Worse, the agreement spans virtually all of the countries in the developed world, including all of the EU, the United States, Switzerland and Japan.
“And this treaty would trump all local and national laws.”
Assholes.
So was SOPA and PIPA distractions?
Ditto…
What your article misses is that Twitter deftly showed how to workaround their own censorship by overriding the country setting: https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169220
If Twitter thinks you’re in Germany and they’ve been forced to censor some anti-semitic tweets, just tell Twitter they’re wrong and you’re really in Israel, and you’ll get to see them in all their glory.
Twitter lives in the real world, one which could put their own employees at risk in countries that want to censor Twitter. Given that they’ve taken a position that they need to follow the laws of the countries in which their users live, they couldn’t have been more transparent or more flexible in how they handled this.