The House GOP caucus definitely wants to try to force the issue on the Keystone XL pipeline with another vote. What’s not yet clear is where they want to place the rider. If they choose to attach it to payroll tax cut/UI legislation, that’s an indicator that they really want it to pass. If not, it’s an indicator that they just want to talk about it some more. So what have we seen on this?
As far as the payroll tax cut/UI legislation goes, House Republicans want Max Baucus to do their work for them.
Republicans are pressing Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) to buck his leadership and use his authority in the payroll tax conference to green-light the Keystone XL oil sands pipeline.
Baucus has told business leaders in Montana that winning authorization for the transnational pipeline is one of his highest priorities for 2012.
Republicans say Baucus, as co-chairman of the payroll tax conference, has the power to include Keystone language in must-pass legislation and will pressure him to act.
“The quickest and surest way to get the pipeline going is for the Democratic chairman of the conference committee to put it into a must-do piece of legislation, the payroll tax package,” said a senior Senate Republican aide.
My guess is that Max Baucus will not do anything on the conference committee that Harry Reid doesn’t want him to do. So this House Republican attempt to offload the responsibility for blowing up the payroll tax/UI deal on someone else will not bear fruit.
And they appear to know that. Because they’ve found a different bill to which to attach their Keystone hopes.
Speaker John Boehner says that the House will try again to tie approval for the Keystone pipeline project to a new jobs bill being introduced next week.
“All options are on the table. If it’s not enacted before we take up the American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act, it’ll be part of it,” Boehner said of the Keystone project, which would extend an oil pipeline from Canada through the United States [...]
“Now that the president has decided for political reasons that we’re not going to move ahead just yet, not until after the election… we’re going to have to find another way to lean on the Senate, to take this issue up, because the Keystone pipeline will create … over 100,000 indirect jobs,” Boehner told me on “This Week.”
(At least they’ve settled on the 100,000 number, however wrong it is.)
By the “American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act,” Boehner is talking about the highway bill. They also include opening up the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling in that bill. It’s not a serious effort, and the Senate has already moved on a bipartisan highway bill without those extraneous elements.
I fully expect the House to continue pushing forward bills to “force” the Keystone pipeline into construction. But their placement is key, because they know that’s a message vote, and therefore it won’t get attached to anything they want to see pass. Which means that they don’t actually want it attached to the payroll tax cut/UI legislation. They don’t want a replay of what happened at the end of last year. So that payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance extension look to be secure through to the end of the year.





32 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
As always, when the choice is between unemployment and fossil fuels, Democrats will take unemployment every time.
Tsk.
I wouldn’t put any money on what the Regressives may or may not do. They’re going to push their extreme right agenda any way they can.
100,000 is the new 57.
Pretty amussing coming from you. Just this morning you were whining about generalizations of the very type you make here. You truly are pathetic.
Isn’t Treason and Bribery impeachable offenses even for members of Congress?
Oh, I am still trying to unravel all those legs on the Citizen’s United rule and how close that morphs to Bribery of Elected Officials. I suspect the Koch Bros and Canada’s Oil profiteers have serious bribery charges against them and our representatives.
DAVID,
OT, but wanted you to see this:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-30/goldman-sachs-among-banks-lobbying-to-exempt-half-of-swaps-from-dodd-frank.html
I imagine our 3 branches of government would say that the ones needing to be charged with bribery and/or treason would be those involved in the Occupy Movement.
His mama must have let him play with the computer today.
Be gentle SD, pea-shooter two-fer-two, is a wee timid little thing who avoids direct interaction, seeking instead to ring the doorbell and run away. It likes to jump in, at the beginning of a thread, make a wee mess and scurry away, or else it seeks older threads, darts in, makes a pile of lecture-poop and quickly poots away …
I say put a flag on it and send it on its merry way.
If it actually contributed something, then I’d have a different attitude, as it is, it just stinks up the place a bit.
However, anyone who simply shits on the trail isn’t of much use to the rest of us, in this case, even as example.
Ah, well …
BTW, yer Diner is a daily delight and the most successful “business” I’ve seen in a while, ranks right up there with Caturday (aka, thanks to demi’s hubby, “Pull Up A Cat!”).
;~DW
Montana’s Governor Schweitzer a strong surrogate for Obama on recent Keystone veto. Baucus seems to be a wholly owned subsidiary of Big Bakken Oil crowd these days.
Tell it to her family.
So glad to see you back with your impeccable wisdom!
I’m very familiar with the shooter’s shit. Like a fly that won’t go away I like to swat at it now and again. If it sticks around though I’m not nearly as nice as Margaret.
Thanks for bringing us that. Sad and scarey at the same time.
Sometimes its worth stickin’ that lil’ red flag in tiresome buzzers, two-fer-two being a prime candidate, simply as a means of avoiding the shit.
It’s not like wee popper-off is a cute kitteh, or even a clever parrot, SD.
I’ve yet to see a shooter comment that was worth a tinker’s dam(n). Or the time it clutters up the flow, and offends the eyes and nose …
DW
Ditto
SO, they just renew for two month each time. When the two month renewal comes up again BACK THEY COME WITH ANOTHER OR THE SAME HATEFUL PROPOSAL AGAIN!
Waiting til after the reelection. Then no holds barred.
This every two months ploy is getting old. They busy themselves with the SOS thereby not having to actually pass any useful legislation. In country slang this is what is known as screwin’ old shep. Doing nothing and receiving a paycheck for it.
The Canadians have already told us if we don’t want the oil they’ll sell it to the Chinese. I hate to be on the same side of an argument with the republicans, but we need this oil.
All this oil will probably go to the Chinese, it will just be refined in Texas then put on a boat. Canadians already voted against piping the shit to the west coast and that is why we are plan B. Easier to bribe Boner and the Senate than fight the enviromentalists in Canada.
You mean the “oil” that would be shipped to a Saudi owned refinery in Houston for export purposes? Why, when the Maritime and central Provinces import almost all of their oil is Houston du Nord only interested in pipelines to Houston and the B.C. coast for export only? There’s not even a hint of an Eastern pipeline.
Baucus proves that the purpose of the Democratic Party is to give bi-partisan support to Republican, Corporate State, Imperial policies.
So the way it’s set up, Obama pushed his approval back till after the election.
If he’s not re-elected, the Republican will surely approve.
And if for some reason Obama is re-elected and decides not to approve, Trans-Canada has already said they’ll use existing pipelines to OK, then reverse flow some existing pipelines from OK to TX, or pipe it to the Canadian border and truck it accross, then pipe it the rest of the way through new pipes in the US (no fed approval required) if there’s no cross-country pipeline.
I’m afraid the oil’s comming.
What we ‘need’ is a reformation of energy policy and regulation that disallows resource wars, envrmntl jeopardy, and the few people who insist that playing a chess game with our lives is normal. As long as we continue to believe we ‘need’ any of this, and to allow it, we are hostage to the worst despoilers on the planet. Ones whom, it goes without saying (almost), would plunge us into endless climate catastrophe to maintain their hegemony as commit us to endless war.
MY dear colleagues: So there is no “UP” side to this at all???? I find that hard to believe.
BTW, I am IN Houston.
Houston you have a problem. I have seen the tar sands up close and camped on the Athabasca River. This is powerful icky stuff and is only economically feasible to extract and pipe to a refinery if barrel prices stay near or above $100. 350.org is opposed to the pipeline mostly for the carbon that will be released through the mining process not just the danger to the environment by piping down to your city.
So which is it, Shooter?
This is the most expensive oil to produce in the world, nearly $40 a barrel. The only way to get the tarsands to China or Europe and still turn a profit — and make no mistake, that was the muck’s ultimate destination all along — is to get it to Houston to be refined. So the border is still the key hurdle.
British Columbia ports are lacking two key things: The ability to refine super-heavy peanut-butter-type muck like the tar sands, and the ability to dock supertankers which are needed to move the refined muck in quantities sufficient to make it profitable. Houston has both of these things.
I don’t disagree with what you’ve posted.
But the “border hurdle” is a pipeline.
If Trans-Canada was willing to truck the “dirty stinkin’ crud’” to a pipeline receiving port in ND or somesuch, no fed approval needed.
They could build the new pipeline from there to Texas using normal state protocals (since it wouldn’t cross an international border). Just as there is currently 170,000 miles of pipeline all over the US.
I wasn’t trying to say it’s right or good, just that it’s (likely) going to happen (eventually).
On a side note, that’s not a bad thing.
Americans building pipelines and pumping stations (employment) accross America (infrastructure) and creating a product for export reduces our trade imbalance.
If one flag waver want’s to say this is going to keep us from buying Mideaste oil, and you poo-poo it because the gas is going elsewhere, the next guy can say, I thought you wanted more products made in the USA?
Let’s make the gas and sell it if we don’t need it here.
Like I said, when the choice is between unemployment and fossil fuels, Democrats will take unemployment every time. What exactly about the number of jobs makes any difference? Do you think we are so prosperous we can turn down jobs because they’re not good enough for you? The people enjoying the boom in North Dakota seem to like their situation just fine.
Hmmmm. Which party is holding up the pipeline?
It’s not a generalization it’s a legislative fact. Democrats in Congress prefer unemployment to fossil fuels.
Slow, very slow.
More government theater and everybody falls for it. A source no less than Obama’s Head Cheerleader, Eleanor Clift, says the keystone measure will come up again next year and he will approve it, so I’d consider that a done deal. Unless, of course, the revolution happens before then…