Well, that was pointless. After shifting rationales, unreliable claims of bravado and the resignation of top staffers, the Susan G. Komen Foundation for the Cure has reversed its decision to de-fund Planned Parenthood, reinstating its donation to support breast cancer screenings at the organization’s clinics. Foundation President Nancy Brinker announced the reversal.
I hope Susan G. Komen doesn’t think that this will calm the uproar over their charity. Too many revelations have been uncovered at this point for everything to go back to normal. I predict that boycotts will continue against companies that traditionally partner with Susan G. Komen. More investigations will look into their fundraising and what they actually do to support breast cancer research and the search for a cure. The right-wing leadership of the charity has been exposed. It’s a good try to un-shit the bed on this one, but I don’t see it happening.
As for Planned Parenthood, they get their screening funding back, along with hundreds of thousands of dollars donated in reaction to the initial de-funding, and the support of thousands if not tens of thousands of new donors, and a raised profile on its work that aids low-income women. I don’t expect this to stop the bleating from the right, but they should really quit while they’re behind. Planned Parenthood isn’t going anywhere.
Can’t wait to read the wingnutosphere today.
UPDATE: Here’s the press release from Susan G. Komen’s Nancy Brinker.
We want to apologize to the American public for recent decisions that cast doubt upon our commitment to our mission of saving women’s lives.
The events of this week have been deeply unsettling for our supporters, partners and friends and all of us at Susan G. Komen. We have been distressed at the presumption that the changes made to our funding criteria were done for political reasons or to specifically penalize Planned Parenthood. They were not.
Our original desire was to fulfill our fiduciary duty to our donors by not funding grant applications made by organizations under investigation. We will amend the criteria to make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political. That is what is right and fair.
Our only goal for our granting process is to support women and families in the fight against breast cancer. Amending our criteria will ensure that politics has no place in our grant process. We will continue to fund existing grants, including those of Planned Parenthood, and preserve their eligibility to apply for future grants, while maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.
It is our hope and we believe it is time for everyone involved to pause, slow down and reflect on how grants can most effectively and directly be administered without controversies that hurt the cause of women. We urge everyone who has participated in this conversation across the country over the last few days to help us move past this issue. We do not want our mission marred or affected by politics — anyone’s politics.
Starting this afternoon, we will have calls with our network and key supporters to refocus our attention on our mission and get back to doing our work. We ask for the public’s understanding and patience as we gather our Komen affiliates from around the country to determine how to move forward in the best interests of the women and people we serve.
We extend our deepest thanks for the outpouring of support we have received from so many in the past few days and we sincerely hope that these changes will be welcomed by those who have expressed their concern.




80 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Can’t wait to read the wingnutosphere today.
“Cry me a freaking river” :D
Look forward, not backward.
Someone pass Nancy a joint. She needs one.
SGK needs to be audited. i want to know how much money is wasted on high salaries, lobby activity, political contibutions-and to whom, and finally how much is spent on “the mission”. Then i want the same done to PP which i believe will show itself to be much more productive. I just gave to the central texas PP after reading of waco’s problems in honor of all the help PP has given my girlfiends over the past decades
Might be a good idea to demand that Susan G. Komen fire the person who tried to politicize women’s healthcare:
Even before Jane’s blogging, I didn’t support Komen because of their treatment of other NPOs and extortion of walkers (fine print – $2500 minimum to walk; if you don’t get sponsors you have to make up the difference, and they don’t just blow it off). That so little of funds raised goes to grants should make them pariahs in any case.
I bet the affiliates are going to have a list of demands. This isn’t over at all. Handel’s out by tomorrow?
what was that Carole King said .. “It’s too late baby, now it’s too late…”
and you know it was the corporate backlash that got their attention – but hey, donations were up a 100%! – or so they said
Very nicely stated.
Too much brand damage for everything to be magically transformed back into a bed of pink roses.
Planned Parenthood, 1. Komen Wingnuts, 0.
Good…she’s one tough looking woman…Edit: So why did Brinker hire a pro-life Repub…
One could also look at Komen’s list of corporate sponsors (h/t judybrowni) beginning with Koch then consider any patterns of relationship between them, say, with SodaStream.
http://bellesouthblogs.com/boycottkomen/
Me too.
Is this is a “New Coke” moment or what??????
I heard the CEO pulls down $500K a year plus benefits.
Having worked for one of the “million a year” sponsors and done SGK events and product placement, I can tell you that is what happened. The recruited companies with products specific to female consumers and none of them would want the taint of political agenda on their brand.
Agreed, money was lost and heads must roll. Typical for type A asshole problem solving in for profit companies.
breakdown via wiki
One could examine the ALEC who’s who of list of corporate sponsors (h/t judibrowni) beginning with Koch then examine, say, any patterns of relationship among them, say, with SodaStream.
oops
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_G._Komen_for_the_Cure
They also defunded stem cell research this week end. This might have been lost in the outcry about planned parenthood. SO they still stink.
Hate to rain on the parade, but this is of interest:
Take THAT Extremist Christain/Fascists!!!!!!
Excellent reference MayDaze. As the article points out, there are only
three open grants for PP, which Komen had already committed to fund, even with their announcement of no future funding. Also, applying for a grant and receiving a grant are two different things, aren’t they?
It’s interesting that the article came from a publication called Student Activism, because I read that after Komen’s initial announcement, the American Association of University Women dropped Komen from its list of approved organizations for university women–no speakers, no referrals. The more I read about Komen, the more I see it as a self-perpetuating fund-raising organization whose funds never go to researching a real cure for breast cancer and which privately attempts to block legislation that might actually have some effect on reducing the incidence of breast cancer.
Why would one want to give to SKG who’s hanging out with and promoting an ALEC who’s who list of corporate sponsors (h/t judibrowni)? You know, like Koch and SodaStream?
Read Komen’s weasel words carefully: they won’t stop funding of Planned Parenthood this year, but have set up new new criteria that will exclude PP from funding from here on in.
KOMEN’S CORPORATE SPONSORS
http://ww5.komen.org/CorporatePartners.aspx
You know what to do.
Good catch. Reading the statement, if that’s the entirety Dave quotes, it sure does not say they will again fund PP.
the plot thickens….
They may have reversed the decision with regards to Planned Parenthood, but they still lost several passionate people of integrity who resigned in protest. That damage will not be easy to repair.
Yup. From the Wikipedia link cited previously. [emphasis added]
Slick people.
Komen in from the culled…
Topic ONE during your meetings on how to move forward…..HOW TO CONVINCE HANDEL IT’S TIME TO SPEND MORE TIME WITH HER FAMILY!
Komen Statement on Planned Parenthood is a PR Move, Not A Policy Reversal
DING!
In other words, “We pissed you all off and are terrified that you will stop giving us money. We will reverse our decision and hope that you can forget that we put our mission statement on the back burner in order to support the self-righteous agenda of the ignorant woman hating assholes in congress.”
Nice.
I disagree, I think PP, Murray, Boxer, other public figure ??? delivered an implied threat of very public, ongoing scrutiny of their “practices” and questioning of their anemic 24% pass through rate
I know they are hubris intoixicated but I don’t see them fucking with PP ever again – not necessarily because it was the right thing – just that they were truly blindsided by the events of this week (really ? Bloomberg & Mrs Greenspan for the win ?!?!?)
oh, and it doesn’t hurt Brinker issuing the apology the very day Pink Ribboons doc. is scheduled to drop
Race For The Cur
good to see you !
It IS nice to win one occassionally. I really like ending the week on a high note.
Well…..if you want to get technical. THAT would be long version.
No, they did that in November. But since the affiliates have the upper hand….California’s affiliates rebelled, New York, and Connecticut, not sure who else. Now that everyone’s attention is on the top management. If I was one of the defunded grantees, I’d certainly get on the phone and remind my local affiliate about it.
…and less time with her values.
This post is factually inaccurate. The funding grants that were cut as of yesterday …. are still just as cut today. Nothing has changed. Planned Parenthood did not, in fact, get anything restored. Brinker just claimed a *new* reason for cutting the funding and said PP could theoretically apply for grants in the future.
I think this statement by the “Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute” spox nails it.
So, if you’d like to know how the Wingnut-o-sphere views this today: if we’re measuring based on how those strategizing to eliminate women’s reproductive rights view it: it’s a total win.
IMO, the right wing has mastered the art of getting Liberals to do exactly what they want … while pretending like it was a win for liberals.
black (eye) and pink: a very ’50s motif!
TOO LATE. Everybody knows who they really are now. Boycott their scam.
Hope you’re right, but it’s still curious that they chose to phrase the “retraction” in the way they did.
So I should cancel the champagne????
“…our funding criteria were done for political reasons or to specifically penalize Planned Parenthood. They were not.”
The nose grows.
This issue has finally opened the Komen can of worms of how they are attempting to block any investigation of environmental factors as a cause of cancer. I’m a breast cancer survivor. While I was in treatment, I saw how many young women, even in their 20′s, are getting the disease. Many of the heathcare workers I spoke to are convinced that environmental factors are an important cause of increased levels of cancer in the US.
No matter to me I will not buy anything with a pink ribbon on it ever again. I always felt a bit uncomfortable with this group. Just a gut feeling but I thought well it seems to be a good cause and the idea of a political agenda never entered my mind. So I would buy the product and think no harm in that. No I have an icon in my mind, the pink ribbon and my response is going to be….oh it’s the right winged bottoxed Texas millionaires scam…….you ain’t getting my money girl! I’m not paying for your botox treatments!
Greg Sargent tries to figure out what the announcement really means by discussing it with a Komen board member:
*Bows To The Master*
Has anyone heard from Kelly, Belch or our friends in Colorado ? I’m hearing there’s an intense blizzard out that way.
Yep, it’s clear there is NO commitment to future funding. It’s like saying I’m eligible to play the lottery.
Another fucked up D-Day post.
As some other commenters have noted, this is not a reversal but an attempt to resuscitate the goose that laid the golden egg.
It ain’t gonna work.
The only way Komen might be able to ameliorate this Netflix-like corporate catastrophe is to stand up and admit they gave in to bullying by the right wing and that this type of thing won’t ever happen to them again.
And, of course, heads must roll.
Anything less than a big public statement of this type and they are done.
Agree, my sister did a marathon with them and I always felt like it was closer to multi-level marketing company like Herbalife than a charity.
you’re way too kind, as always…
can’t help on the CO blizzard news, sorry.
And according to Sargent’s bit in Pravda, heads will definitely NOT roll.
Scamway.
They didn’t cave they just ‘apologized’.
http://www.americablog.com/2012/02/komen-caves-kinda-but-still-refuses-to.html
Mrs greenspan and BBox are still on this and suspicious. BBox called brinker’s word salad ‘gobbledegook’. They are gnawing on the fact that karen handel is still there.
Apparently on the floor of the senate as we speak, the knuckle draggers are trying to pull something about birth control this morning.
http://www.theawl.com/2012/02/federal-campaign-giving-history-for-susan-g-komen-founder-ceo-nancy-g-brinker
Jackie Speier, my Congressperson, made a really nice speech in the House yesterday. Very damning.
They make the best Scampoo.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/post/what-komen-actually-said/2012/02/03/gIQAxJ2BnQ_blog.html
What Komen actually said
… But there’s a second reason that Komen has cited: That the organization wants to spend its money on direct services, such as mammograms, which Planned Parenthood does not provide (its clinics do provide referrals, but not the actual screening). And that could mean that, while Planned Parenthood can apply for Komen grants, its applications may not be approved, because they do not provide direct mammogram services.
Interesting turn of phrase.
I’ll enjoy watching them try to shove this toothpaste back in the tube.
Shameful.
What? D-Day has another fucked up Post besides this one!
Oh so sweet, when the rich people are being annoyed. Komen is sticking to their story. But they are liars and frauds, and their “Charity” does not fight Cancer. Their scientific research is almost nothing. They do not identify the Corporate polluters and their toxic carcinogens. The polluters, the Koch Brothers are creating an epidemic of cancer, and apparently support this phony charity.
Their tax exempt status should be removed. It cannot be repeated enough.This is more class war. Komen, is not a charity. It is a political action committee, which is attacking poor women as part of the strategy of the rich.
Agreed. The statement was very carefully worded:
Yeah. But it should be noted. Breast exams are often carried out in a general services clinic that can handle a high volume of examinations and places such exams in the location where women getting any of the other health services would be most likely to encounter and make use of such examinations. This is done in order to maximize the NUMBER OF EXAMS given.
Mammograms are often associated with a medical practice geared to the focus on actual treatment of disease and concrete identification of suspicious clinical examination findings. If you force these grants to provide clinical exams only through the most expensive full-blown medical practices that also treat those identified with disease, not only does it consume resources at the medical facility that could otherwise be focused on identified cases of disease and/or concrete identification, it builds in an unnecessary inherent overhead to the clinical services and seriously curtails the ability to place reasonably low-cost clinical services in the communities where grants are needed most.
Many places that provide examination services and get grants don’t do Mammograms. To my knowledge, PP is the only one to be dropped in this process.
David D. can start by reading Marci, highly respected and the opposite end of the spectrum from “wingnut”. The headline of this Dayen entry is misleading and ABSOLUTELY not true. So, what’s up FDL?
Bingo! Can’t agree more. I call it the Komen Ponzi Scheme, where the 1% are grifting the 99% off of their cancer needs. Can the 1% get much lower? Stay tuned, as I’m sure they can & will & will not hesitate to do whatever it takes to wring blood from a stone.
ptoui!
It’s also about the ongoing rightwing/libertarian WAR against PP. I maintain it’s not so much about abortions, albeit for a certain percentage of the population, that’s the “excuse” used to gin them up.
It’s all & only about the money for folks like the Kochs, so I’m guessing they see PP much like the see ACORN: as an organization that’s rather successful at serving the needs of the poor & disinfranchised. Clearly: can’t have that.
blather, rinse, and repeat.
Yes, I, too, am rather disturbed by this headline, as it’s clearly NOT TRUE.
My take is that Komen has “backed down” ONLY bc it truly “had to.” The Komen Ponzi Scheme will quietly & with no fanfare somehow “discover” that PP simply is “ineligible” for grants, and slowly will cease providing grants to PP. But it’ll be slow & over time.
I don’t for an instant believe that Komen will continue it’s funding of PP. That’s bogus. Headline is spouting the Veal Pen line, which is regrettable.
I am not sure I understand the end game here. Ultra rich want to use the wedge issue of abortion to defund PP so more babies will be born so they can….? just don’t like it when poor people get any health services…. Fox needs something to talk about besides rich v. poor….?
And look no more splitting hairs.
Is there anything in their actions motivated by “non-political” agenda that would endanger their non-profit status?
If clusterfucking resulted in unwanted pregnancies, they’d be among PP’s biggest customers.
Perhaps it has been noted. The Susan Komen charity has already been proven to be a Corporate Public Relations Stooge. Mother Jones documented that Komen is a “front” organization. They help protect toxic polluters who also produce cancers in humans, such as the Koch Roaches.
Looks like there has been a reversal of the reversal.
See new story this location.
the (split) ends do not justify the mean.
Looks like there has been a reversal of the reversal.
Mitt’s involved now?
I surrender :)
Always collecting money “for the cure” while turning a blind eye to the causes.
persistence… :~)
“…..maintaining the ability of our affiliates to make funding decisions that meet the needs of their communities.”
Hmmmmm this sounds suspiciously like an opportunity for right winged wackos to get placed in “Affiliate” positions of Komen and then say “Our community doesn’t like Planned Parenthood so we are not going to fund them so there. They try this in the school districts now. From the 1870′s through the 1950′s I think they called it Jim Crow. Get in a postion of authority and then make rules to fit your agenda.
Everybody should keep in mind that their first instinct was to lie repeatedly. Now how confident do you feel about their decision making process?