The Senate will vote as early as today on whether to punish transportation unions in a bid to get Federal Aviation Administration authorization through 2015. The House already passed its version of what negotiators called a bipartisan compromise. But unions object to the deal and have gotten more vocal about it in recent days.
The FAA authorization bill has been held up for months, because House Republicans sought a major change to union election rules in the aviation sector. Specifically, they wanted every worker to count in a union election, even those who didn’t vote; the absent members would count as a “no” vote on the union. Senate Democrats resisted this, even allowing the FAA to shut down for a couple weeks last summer before House Republicans agreed to a short-term extension without the union rider (FAA personnel eventually got back pay).
But the compromise on a long-term extension that emerged had other measures detrimental to labor law, which unions condemned. This includes rules that would make public the vaunted “secret ballot” for those who sign cards wanting a union, and would also make it easier to decertify a union in the instance that a larger and smaller airline merge, as well as limiting the authority of the National Mediation Board, the overseer of rail and airline union laws. I wrote about this previously.
The topline compromise, which raised the threshold of the workers who had to sign cards to trigger a union election from 35% to 50%, didn’t seem like a big deal. Unions wouldn’t be likely to move forward on an election if they didn’t have at least 50% support up front. But these poison pills were obviously what Republicans wanted to salvage what has been a damaging series of confrontations on the FAA authorization bill. They dropped their lead demand of forcing election results to count workers who did not vote in a union election as a No vote. But they picked up all these other nicks in the way union representation works.
Democrats in the House overwhelmingly opposed the compromise bill, but that wasn’t enough to stop it in the Republican-controlled House. The bill also does not include the “passenger’s bill of rights” designed to ensure that planes must not stay on the tarmac for more than three hours before takeoff.
But Senate aides have referred to this bill as a compromise where nobody got everything they wanted, so it looks like it will have the votes to pass there. Labor has continued to blast Senate riders attached to the authorization, but that is the expected outcome today.




14 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’m sure the union leaders will send a sternly worded letter after this law is passed.
When is Obama going to get the clue about all of this?
No matter how much support he has from the unions, that support is no insignificant. Losing that support in a tight election means he doesn’t get elected.
Anyone remember his show of support for the unions in Wisconsin? Yeah, I don’t either.
Don’t you get it? He isn’t on our side.
O despises the unions as much as he despises the progressives. Can’t wait to get rid of them and meanwhile is playing them like the suckers some still are.
Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Abraham Lincoln, Republican
We’ve fallen a long way down the Fascism Hole and Democrat (Workers’ Party? WTF?) Obama is kicking us down farther.
Yeah, Lincoln talked a good game too but according to Zinn didn’t perform so much wrt labor. For example, Lincoln took soldiers who had just fought at Gettysburg to forcefully put down a strike.
Well, you already had 2 big unions backing him for a 2nd term months ago. Obama has them in his hip pockets so he really doesn’t give a rat’s ass about union feelings now.
Come November obama will crank up the scare of evil repug rhetoric and they will get the expected pavlovian response of union members voting dem.
O doesn’t care if they vote for him or not (i.e. stay home). O will have so much bankster money, he doesn’t need votes. Besides Pig Newt has already written his commercials for him so he doesn’t even need to pay anyone to do that.
Yup, that too.
Less Government jobs with benefits and more private sector jobs without benefits, that’s the ticket. Screw people I can run my entire mansion with my Ipad from anywhere in the world. No more asking the Gardener to translate for the Maid. That’s my walk in closet maid to be clear.
Obama’s future is secured whether or not he wins re-election. If he doesn’t repeat as President, he only sacrifices free room, board, and expenses in return for a life of wealth and leisure.
Oh, the unions objected to, and condemned, the bill and the compromises? Then Dems will pass it.
Exactly holey. BO is set regardless what happens. He served his masters well!
It’s amazing how high one can rise in this country’s hierarchy if they are unprincipled, or their only principle is capitulation.