Despite fierce opposition from major transit unions, the Senate yesterday gave final approval to the FAA Authorization bill, a five-year extension that removes uncertainty from the FAA, approves a next-generation air traffic monitoring system and, in Harry Reid’s telling, creates hundreds of thousands of jobs. But unions were unhappy about changes to labor law insisted upon by House Republicans, and they expressed betrayal at the hands of Senate Democrats.
The bill avoids the main labor tweak that House Republicans wanted, which would have counted any worker not voting in a union election as a No vote. But it does raise the bar for the number of workers needed to sign cards stating they want to join a union from 35% to 50% of the workforce. Worse, it makes those cards public to the employer, and it weakens the oversight of the lead transit union regulator, the Labor Mediation Board. Eighteen unions with some foot in the transportation sector sent a letter last week protesting these measures in the bill, which was reconciled in a conference committee after almost a year of House-Senate wrangling. But it was to no avail.
The final vote was 75-20, with most of the opposing Senators Democrats. But 37 Democrats supported the bill, including Commerce Committee chair Jay Rockefeller, Majority Leader Harry Reid, and top leadership members Chuck Schumer and Dick Durbin. Here were the 15 Democrats who opposed it:
Akaka (D-HI), Blumenthal (D-CT), Brown (D-OH), Cardin (D-MD), Casey (D-PA), Franken (D-MN), Gillibrand (D-NY), Harkin (D-IA), Klobuchar (D-MN), Leahy (D-VT), McCaskill (D-MO), Merkley (D-OR), Mikulski (D-MD), Sanders (I-VT), Stabenow (D-MI)
The conference report now moves to President Obama, who is expected to sign it. How this will affect the on-again, off-again relationship between Democratas and labor in the Obama era is unclear.




10 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Expect labor “leaders” to snuggle up, very closely to the Dimmers … what remains to be seen is what those who actually comprise, what the “natural elite sneeringly dismiss as “labor” will understand and do, in terms of “relationships”.
Expect labor “leaders” to extoll the virtues of the Dimmers … “relative” to the bad, bad Rethugs.
“Lesser weevil is all ya got ta go with, workers!!!”, shall be the clarion call.
Thank you, DDay, your labors are much appreciated.
DW
Obama and the Dems looked at the circus that is the GOP and decided it was time to punch the base again.
No doubt the union pooh bahs will be writing strongly worded letters. Carl Levin of Michigan, home of the original sit down strikes and the UAW, should be ashamed but if there is anything we’ve learned about the 1%ers they know no shame.
As a bone to the unions Obama will be announcing he plans on “fighting tooth and nail” for “card check.” HA HA
Obama is 100% behind unions – as long as their leaders play softball with the corporations who run the show in American politics.
This is a clear case of Harry Reid and other Dimmers thinking it is the year 1950!
Harry Reid and the other Dimmers are in for a very rude awakening.
Labor Leaders know that their bend over act to Dims is not going to be tolerated much longer. thank god for social media! Labor’s rank file members will remember every dem that voted for this bill.
Grand Pa Harry Reid and the other out of touch Dims better join the year 2012 soon!
The Fierce Advocate strikes (out) again.
How this will affect the on-again, off-again relationship between Democrats and labor in the Obama era is unclear.
I think it’s pretty clear that the Democrats tossed unions yet again under the bus. And I think it’s pretty clear that union energy to support GOTV efforts for the Democrats will be fairly non existent this year.
“Fierce Advocate” = Obama?
LOL. Farce Advocate, more accurately.
Would you expect anything else from someone who claims to admire Ronald “Union Buster” Reagan?