Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard professor, consumer advocate and candidate for US Senate in Masachusetts, said today that the Federal Housing Finance Agence (FHFA) must increase their actions on behalf of homeowners, including principal reductions, something that the agency has resisted to this point.
Warren spoke in concert with officials in Massachusetts, from Rep. Barney Frank, ranking member of the House Financial Services Committee, to Financial Services Committee members from Massachusetts Michael Capuano and Stephen Lynch, to state Attorney General Martha Coakley, in pressuring FHFA to act.
FHFA oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which own or guarantee a majority of all home loans in the US. They have the power to modify principal, allow for expanded refinancing or increase short-sales or cash advances to homeowners for properties. But their programs have fallen short thus far, and FHFA Director Ed DeMarco, citing his mandate to conserve taxpayer funds, has been extremely reluctant to give principal reductions on GSE loans. The Administration has tried through a new HAMP policy to encourage the GSEs on principal reductions with cash incentives. So far, DeMarco has not accepted that challenge.
“The foot-dragging in Washington has stalled economic recovery and has hurt our families,” said Warren in an emailed statement. “We need a housing policy that fires on all cylinders: principal write-downs, refinancing options, cash for keys, and short sales.”
Warren also tied the foreclosure crisis to the broader economic crisis. “We must never forget that this economic crisis began one lousy mortgage at a time,” she said. “Foreclosures don’t just harm the families that lose their homes. They also have powerful effects on whole communities, depressing home values and putting a drag on local economies.”
Warren did not comment on the imminent foreclosure fraud settlement, or on what Massachusetts AG Martha Coakley, a skeptic on the settlement, should do on that.
But this just increases the pressure on DeMarco. Of all the things the Administration could do to improve the situation for homeowners, the GSE channel represents the greatest opportunity. DeMarco has held back this tide virtually by himself, because he views his mandate very narrowly. But this is a false frame.
We don’t have to choose between conserving taxpayer dollars and helping homeowners. If you take the long view, preventing foreclosures saves money. It stops the dislocation of families and neighborhoods. It prevents cascading property values for neighbors when a foreclosed home enters the picture. It means that local communities don’t have to spend taxpayer money on upkeep and prevention of blight. Bill Clinton said in a 2008 rally I attended that every foreclosure costs $250,000 to the larger economy. Unless the GSEs would have to give up $250,000 per home on a principal write-down, this is a good economic deal in the long run.
Warren speaking out reflects only the latest clash between DeMarco and politicians on this issue. And unless and until he is replaced, this will not end.




34 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
“Warren did not comment on the imminent foreclosure fraud settlement, or on what Massashusetts AC Martha Coakley, a skeptic on the settlement, should do on that.”
No, that would be a “bridge” too far, and not politically expedient.
That Elizabeth Warren is one smart cookie … isn’t she?
Only a fool of a Democratic candidate would comment on the fraud settlement, until Obama publicly gives the “‘kay”.
Thank you, DDay, for letting us know what the cutting edge Democrats are saying.
Incidentally, have you heard about the poll that shows that the majority of rank and file Dems support the use of drones, even when used on American citizens?
Emptywheel has a post up …
http://www.emptywheel.net/2012/02/08/one-third-of-americans-known-to-have-been-killed-in-drone-strikes-were-us-servicemen/.
DW
I’m not gonna get dragged into Democratic Party bullshit, but I’m very, very glad to hear from Elizabeth Warren today, this week, this month.
DeMarco is only “Acting” chief of FHFA, fer chrissake! Get him the fuck outta there!
The Times has a new piece up about ludicrous behavior by banks in New York state foreclosure courts.
It’s not directly related to the pending multi-state settlement, which NY Attorney General (AG) Eric Schneiderman has so far rejected.
But the Times is mocking the weasel lawyers for the banks, and calling them out as egregious liars and stonewallers, in a comical way:
Then the piece ends this way:
Nothing in LA Times this morning about current state of mind of California AG Kamala Harris regarding the multi-state settlement.
There was this short piece yesterday afternoon which found
Do we know how house brokers feel about mortgage lenders? Do the Realtors hate the banks as much as home buyers do? If homeowners loathe banks for leaving smoking craters of foreclosed homes where their neighborhoods used to be, do the Realtors share that hatred?
Or do Realtors want to see all the banks & mortgage servicers immunized so the whole bubble can get reinflated so sales commissions resume?
Who, specifically, should, “Get him (DeMarco) the fuck outta there”?
Elizabeth Warren, and other Dems are simply pressuring the FHFA to “do something” …none have publicly, to my certain knowledge, come near suggesting or insisting upon what you suggest, Fractal.
Guess they’re waiting for that Obamic “‘kay”, again?
You are certainly not expecting Barack Obama to do as you suggest, are you?
It will be a very long wait, if you do.
Not to get dragged into any Democratic Party bullshit … of course … I agree with you on that … one hundred percent.
DW
Since Financial Times is behind a paywall, I am copying these grafs from the FT story quoted in Yves Smith’s post around 1:30 this morning:
My question is, how the hell do preznit’s “most ardent supporters” have any ability to criticize “the pending deal’s terms … and the extent of the release” if they have not been given a written copy of those terms and that release? If the Veal Pen did get copies of some of the documents, why have they kept them secret from the rest of us?
WTF is going on here?
Just more evidence that this is settlement fraud to cover up foreclosure fraud.
Do we know the statute governing DeMarco’s appointment? Since he is only “Acting” I presume his name has not been formally submitted to the Senate for confirmation. I suspect the Treasury Secretary and Fed Chairman and/or HUD Secretary could oust him. Certainly preznit could oust him.
Perhaps it’s time to add a new term to the pending multi-state deal: it becomes effective only if and when DeMarco is fired and the GSE’s commence writing down principal on all mortgage loans that are in foreclosure, delinquent or underwater. The point of Elizabeth Warren’s statement (email) is that DeMarco must be forced to start writedowns for our national economic security. DeMarco is a threat to national security. We should demand that preznit fire him, or order Geithner, Bernanke and/or Donovan to fire him.
Yves also linked in her 1:30 am post this morning to this item in one of Reuter’s obscure sub-sites saying the new “deadline” for the multi-state deal is now Thursday, February 9 (tomorrow).
That Reuters imprint also claimed Oklahoma has rejected the deal but Michigan has signed on. Interesting other twist: DE AG Beau Biden is rejecting the deal but his state’s Banking Commissioner is pressuring him to sign the deal, claiming DE would lose $40 Million if it rejects the deal.
The Michigan AG Schuette is a partisan hack. No surprise he signed on -
DeMarco is all about protecting the Banks and especially Fannie and Freddie, regardless of what he claims is his “mandate” … this old Reuters piece makes that very clear, Fractal.
http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/11/16/ed-demarcos-obstructionism/.
DW
Oh, one more thing – all companies have a line in their ledger called Bad Debt and this line holds out money to help cover potential bad debt. So when something has to be written off to bad debt (ie, principle write-downs), it’s all ready compensated for. I cannot believe the banks would not have a potential bad debt reserve.
David: How do you do ALL that you do??????
..
..
You got a secret “clone”??????
You do one helluva job too. With all the “WTF” going on, I don;t think I could keep up with it all without David and you.
Dos Equuis???
“I cannot believe the banks would not have a potential bad debt reserve.”
——-
I heard they used that for the multi-million$$$$ executive bonuses. Haven’t confirmed that yet. But I got that from a “reliable source who wishes to remain anonymous because she is not authorized to speak on that issue.”
spot on comment -
the solution as to homeowners is the prize – screw the PR of getting a few fines for the state or moving bank shareholder capital to the hedge funds.
Fannie and Freddie must join the write down/loan mod interest rate for those that can still make payments game.
Warren is the only voice I am hearing that makes sense – despite her not joining the “put corporations in jail – oh wait we can’t because they are not people – but still refuse homeowners help via a settlement until the AG gets his PR” crowd.
Let the Bailouts Continue………Screw anyone who acts responsibly….Nanny state will take care of us all.
It troubles me that the bulk of the discussion (such as it is) about principal write-downs has been confined to Fannie and Freddie loans. How about non-F&F stuff? Plenty of that crap out there, too.
The major banks have significant provisions for loan losses.
Pretty good hammer, alright. I’d go ahead and throw Timmeh in the mix, as well, however. He’s a major-league tool.
Indeed….much of the prob at BofA concerns all the bad Countrywide paper they were “convinced” to absorb. And Wells Fargo, bless their little pea-pickin’ hearts, got saddled with the WaMu mess. Let’s nto miss the forest for the trees.
It’s very considerate that the Banking Commissioner is concerned about what Delaware would lose.
Whoever keeps setting new deadlines usually loses in negotiating. Hope so very much here.
“I’d go ahead and throw Timmeh in the mix..”
—–
I like the cut of your jib. BUt, I’d like to throw Timmy under the combine.
(My wife’s family is in farming)
On second thought, I should have said “cement mixer.” Yeah…that could work. But I’ll take a combine, too. Nothing I like more than fresh vegetables from a family-owned farm.
So how do you “pressure” an independent agency or DeMarco, who almost cannot be fired? I thought the only way would be catching him kiting a check.
How many times has he already been called on the carpet without results? It’s almost an “I heard you, and don’t care to hear any more” situation.
How about offering him the teaspoon of sugar, Ambassador to somewhere?
“Warren is the only voice I am hearing that makes sense – despite her not joining the “put corporations in jail – oh wait we can’t because they are not people – but still refuse homeowners help via a settlement until the AG gets his PR” crowd.”
Come on, now.
No one is saying put the banks in jail. No one is saying put the corporations in jail. They obviously can’t be put in jail because they are paper entities.
People, including myself and others here at the lake, are saying put the criminal banksters in jail. They can and should be locked up for a long time, given what they have done.
I’m sure Obama will nominate a Republican to take his place. He spreads his cheeks for McConnell with the same enthusiasm he bends over for Boehner
Interesting article to read from Reuters (as if the situation isn’t bad enough already…)
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/26/us-usa-housing-mortgage-reincarnation
According to the Reuters article this morning, Oklahoma’s AG Scott Pruitt declined to comment as to why he has rejected the settlement.
I went to his website and searched for ‘foreclosure’ and the only result was the really excellent statement that the former AG Drew Edmondson wrote back in Oct 2010. That was back when I was talking to the attorney in his office who wanted to do some serious investigating on foreclosure fraud. The attorney said that it would be up to the new AG (Edmondson wasn’t running for re-election so they knew there would be a new one but didn’t know who it would be) as to whether they continued that investigation.
Nothing on the website from Pruitt on the subject, and he’s been in office for over a year. I have little doubt that the investigation was shut down when he took office. I am assuming he’s rejecting it just because Obama is for it.
He’s on the correct side in rejecting it, but for the wrong reason. I can’t imagine that he plans to do any civil or criminal investigations.
Correction.
I believe it was J P Dimon got WaMu. Wells got Wachovia.
Seems like it’s almost 1984 or am I imagining it?
I’m a CA Real Estate Broker.
The banks control my business after ruining it, never meet deadlines, mess up deals, crashed the market after causing a bubble (assisted by every politician all the way to GW Bush).
I wish a pox on them all, their houses, and their issue for all eternity.
They need to be broken up.
Realtors are the whores for the mortgage oufit that pimp for the banksters who have boiler room ops to skining their clients retirement or others and then bet against it all with CDS and MBS they sell the rot to the investors offshore. They they whine to the USG government and the Central Banks for a bucket of billions.
There may be well intended realtors but they went along without batting an eye. I watched it from the easy money from Greenspan all the way up to the top of the bubble. I lost my home in the 80/90s bubble…my realtor said that is the way the market works…50% of my neighbor hood was listed and sold or bank owned equities and feel way below purchase price. The crime syndicate is the same players with new tools.