In an impressive bit of caving, the House Republican leadership has given up on finding offsets for the payroll tax cut, proposing a bill that would extend the current cut to the end of the year without any funding. However, the other two pieces that were tied to the overall legislation at the end of last year, extended unemployment benefits and the “doc fix” to avoid a reset of Medicare reimbursement rates, would not be included.
Here’s the full statement from Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy. Afterwards we will parse it.
We support the work of our conference negotiators and continue to support a responsible resolution that extends current payroll tax relief, reforms and extends unemployment insurance, and includes a Medicare ‘doc fix.’ Republicans have attempted to reach an agreement and negotiated in good faith for months, and we will continue to do so. Unfortunately, to date, Democrats have refused virtually every spending cut proposed – insisting instead on job-threatening tax hikes on small business job creators – and with respect to the need for an extension of the payroll tax cut, time is running short.
Because the president and Senate Democratic leaders have not allowed their conferees to support a responsible bipartisan agreement, today House Republicans will introduce a backup plan that would simply extend the payroll tax holiday for the remainder of the year while the conference negotiations continue regarding offsets, unemployment insurance, and the ‘doc fix.’ If Democrats continue to refuse to negotiate in good faith, Republicans may schedule this measure for House consideration later this week pending a conversation with our members. Democrats’ refusal to agree to any spending cuts in the conference committee has made it necessary for us to prepare this fallback option to protect small business job creators and ensure taxes don’t go up on middle class workers.
This is not our first choice. Our goal is to reach a responsible agreement in conference. But in the face of the Democrats’ stonewalling and obstructionism, we are prepared to act to protect small businesses and our economy from the consequences of Washington Democrats’ political games.
Both the unemployment insurance and the doc fix expire at the end of February as well, but only the payroll tax cut would be extended without offsets in standalone legislation. The House can do that under its rules because they changed to “cut-go” at the beginning of last year. This allows tax cuts to go unfunded but not new spending. So I assume their explanation for this would be to refer to its rules.
The Senate does not have such rules exempting tax cuts from paygo. So they would have to designate the payroll tax cut as an emergency, or just secure a waiver of paygo regulations, in order to pass it without offsets.
There’s a bit of a question as to whether House Republicans have the votes to pass a payroll tax cut without offsets. A good chunk of Republicans would rather not pass a payroll tax cut at all. But the overwhelming majority of Democrats would probably vote for this (except for the Blue Dogs who wear the cloak of “fiscal responsibility,” I assume), and if the leadership introduces the bill, it’s likely to pass. I can’t see the Senate getting too tied up in rules issues not to pass this to get out of town and get their one-week President’s Day break, either.
As a policy matter, I should say, this is absolutely the right thing to do. If you’re going to do a payroll tax cut as a stimulus matter, you don’t offset it with anything. That increases demand. This of course flies in the face of everything Republicans have been saying about cutting the deficit, but I’m sure they’ll find a way to ignore that.
But this leaves the issue of unemployment benefits and the doc fix on the table. The leadership says that they would let conference negotiations continue on those matters. But a lot of the urgency for that conference committee goes away when you take the payroll tax cut out of the equation. That also happens to be the most expensive of the three measures, at a 10-month cost of around $110 billion. You would probably need $40-$50 billion (a back-of-the-envelope calculation) to offset UI and the doc fix.
But Republicans are determined to cut public employee salaries or jobs to extend these measures, and Democrats want a millionaire’s surtax or the elimination of oil company subsidies or something similarly inviolate to Republicans. Nobody really wants to see Medicare reimbursements fall 27%, so there’s still some hope to get an extension on the other two matters. But it just got more difficult, and the jobless benefits of millions of Americans hang in the balance.
UPDATE: There’s some talk, unconfirmed, that House Republicans will seek to put this payroll tax cut sans offsets bill on the suspension calendar, which would mean it would need a 2/3 vote to pass. That could make it tough to get it passed at all out of the House.




21 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Mitt Romney, who lives in the effected tax bracket, sure created a lot of jobs at Bain. Same can be said for the Kochs, right? Job creatin’ li’l worker bees, aren’t they? With their small businesses that provide community support and excellent benefits.
The payroll tax cut affects all working Americans.
Unemployment insurance extension only affects a small number of unemployed. The doc “fix” is a year-by-year correction of something that should really be fixed-fixed.
The Republicans got beat up on this last year, so now all they are doing is saying “Not our first choice” to appease the base, and passing what will affect the most people so they can claim to help the common man.
Good point.
I don’t know too much about the doc fix situation, or why Medicare reimbursement rates weren’t chained to inflation in the first place, but I do know that they’ll need to extend UI benefits to save face here. There are millions of voting age Americans who would be effected if they failed to pass another extension.
From what I’ve read, the idea of Medicare reimbursement rates was supposed to be like the Obama “negotiated” rates that would save a bunch of money in theory. But two things happened, first they miscalculated somewhere along the lines, just a screw up, and then doctors started dropping Medicare patients. No sense having Medicare if you can’t see a doctor.
So the “fix” was in, year after year.
If any more proof was needed, there it is that the payroll tax cut’s goal is to hurt Social Security – the Republicans and Democrats are joining together to Starve The Beast.
AND THE KILLIN’ GOEZ ON AND ON AND…
Citizen David Dayen:
If Obama really wants to get re-elected he will send word that nothin gets decoupled…the neocon fascists now have economic stagnation tied around their necks goin into an election and the last thing they need is another debt limit debacle to really cook their election chances. But of course our genius President may just see a way to salvage some grand “bipartisan” bargain and go down with Ronnie Reagan in the dustbin of history.
KEEP THE FAITH AND DON’T LET THE bASTARDS NEAR YER KIDS!!
The Republicans didn’t “cave.” That’s been the plan all along. As some perceptively pointed out it’s all part of the “starve the beast.” Of course Obama has some grand “bipartisan” strategy up his sleeve to impress the vaunted “independents”. I think of him as the Bamboozler in Chief.
Thank you.
I was thinking the same thing.
Even with the greatest respect for Mr. Dayden, I’m not sure what he was thinking with this story.
They want the payroll tax cut. It’s not a cave. It’s what they want. Starve the beast is correct.
Agree with both of you. The TeaGOPers simply do NOT “cave.” That’s a feature of Obama & the putative “Democrats.”
Bah! It’s the same old day old baloney.
Nothing to see here, kiddies, run along now…
Headline is an accurate description of our political kabuki b/t D’s and R’s as they fight it out like pro wrestlers. If If Hogan slams the Rock it would be true to report that even though …….
Payroll Tax Cut is old and tired Trent Lott-era policy that had been rejected over a decade ago as ineffective. In particular I noticed this on why it was ineffective as stimulus:
Good points, this is the only stimulus we have going right now and it doesn’t really have much bang for the buck. So let’s keep it going and pretend we are doing something.
My friend owns an auto body business with a lot of employess. She complains she has to put in a 3 dollars for every dollar her employees pay. Anyone have any data on this point? This implies that a lot of profit would come to the owners but not the workers. Where is the stimulus as they “kill the beast”?
I’d rather protect Social Security for the decades to come
Agree, my comments are usually sarcastic unless otherwise noted.
Just more stealing from the Social Security Trust Fund. At 75, hope I miss the worst of the hacking and slashing of monthly benefit payments that is sure to come.
This payroll tax cut is a 30% reduction in contributions to social security, correct?
So why, Mr. Dayen, do you say the Republicans “caved” on this, when in fact, that is what the Repubs want?
So if ss was not in trouble, the reduction of funding to ss will speed its demise? The reduction in contributions to ss and tying ss to the federal budget was the Repubs’ dream. Not even GWB got this into legislation, but Obama did, Obama aggressively moved to implement it.
I think Dayen is clearly an Obama operative. He hypes the Obama propaganda often exactly as Obama’s press releases would present them.
I agree with “when in fact, that is what the Repubs want”. See my above comment.
“I think Dayen is clearly an Obama operative. He hypes the Obama propaganda often exactly as Obama’s press releases would present them.”
But this is so beyond a wrong statement, that even I’m taken aback by this. One inaccuracy and … he’s a O operative? Are you high?
Have you seen his other stuff? Have you read it?
I recommend you read it and than make an informed opinion.
If he’s an O operative, than everyone here is a 1%er neo-con.
There is no 3 to 1
The payroll tax is 50/50 – the tax cut is only on the employee side.
God knows I disagree with DDAY more than most on FDL – which is not saying much as I agree with him 90% of the time. But we have very strong disagreements on certain topics.
But please, DDAY is objective – he is no Obamabot.
For you to say otherwise is to show you do not yet know him.
As to your assertions on the topic:
The payroll tax cut is 2% on a 6.2% ee plus 6.2% er rate (the payroll tax collects between er and ee an another 2.9% for disability and survivor coverage, and another 2.9% for Medicare) – so the rate reduction is 2.0 / 12.4 – and by law the funds not collected because of the 2% reduction is sent the Social Security System from the General Account Budget – so the Social Security system is not out one dime.
So NO – the reduction of funding will not speed its demise.
The bad here if you want to protect SS is the fact that once you move from 100% dedicated tax funding to even a few dollars coming from the General account, the GOP see the program as welfare, they see the social insurance paid for benefit as just another welfare benefit/entitlement, and job one becomes cutting back on that welfare payment.
The bad as to Obama is that while he says he is protecting SS/MM his actions indicate he is determined to reduce the programs for no fiscal reason – just to please his GOP and blue dog friends.
Medicare needs cost control but that can only come from single payer national heal for a basic benefit with the Maryland type board determining what will be covered and what will be paid and a law that says health providers must accept national health patients and accept the national health system payment as payment in full. Much is being done on different payment systems that “align interests” but that is playing around the edges – real reform is needed.
Ouch.
I just transitioned from state to tier 1 Federal EUC. This means I have 2 weeks until I get to move my family into the street.
Florida is already warning they are going to empty our accounts on Feb.29,2012
Glad that payroll tax reduction is so important to those with jobs.
Hey, if the UE extension doesn’t pass, that means I am no longer one of the unemployed, right?