The White House formally threatened a veto of the House version of a surface transportation bill, opening the question of whether any long-term bill will get signed before March when current funding on roads and bridges expires.
There are currently different versions of the surface transportation bill moving through each chamber of Congress. The House bill extends funding for five years at a relatively puny cost of $260 billion, with multiple poison pills included. According to the statement of Administration policy, the House bill “would reduce safety throughout the Nation’s transportation system by failing to make necessary investments in roads and bridges, limiting funding to State and local governments for highway safety, and repealing requirements that help ensure the safe handling of hazardous materials by railroads.”
The House bill also includes a provision to force permitting of the Keystone XL pipeline and a measure to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling, and in fact it links funding for highways and bridges to additional oil exploration. Finally, the bill would end the practice of dedicating a portion of highway funds for mass transit, which would impact low-income Americans by forcing either cutbacks to mass transit or increased fare costs.
John Boehner has problems, not only with the White House, but with his own party on the highway bill. He had to split up the bill into three different pieces, to allow recalcitrant Republicans to oppose certain pieces. The energy elements and the transportation elements will get voted on separately this week.
The Senate bill, which passed out of the Environment and Public Works Committee with an overwhelming bipartisan vote, only extends surface transportation funding for two years, at a cost of $108 billion. Neither bill goes nearly far enough to fund critical infrastructure projects, nor do they wrestle with diminishing dedicated funding through gas taxes which haven’t increased in over a decade. But the Senate bill maintains the dedicated mass transit funding and does not deal with Keystone XL or ANWR. The bill cleared cloture on the motion to proceed by 85-11; it is now on the Senate floor, although Republicans plan to try to attach a number of ideological amendments, including a Keystone XL provision and the Blunt amendment on conscience exemptions in health care.
The White House says they are “committed to working on a bipartisan basis on a surface transportation reauthorization bill that provides the necessary funding to modernize the Nation’s surface transportation infrastructure, increase transportation options, maintain and create good paying jobs, and ensure lasting economic competitiveness.” But they surely know that neither bill will actually go that far. It’s just a matter of choosing between one with a bunch of disastrous elements, and another, which has none of those but which is too small for the task at hand.
UPDATE: Speaker Boehner has now delayed a vote on the transportation bill, according to The Hill.




35 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Has O vetoed anything yet?
This is a GOP bluff a bad one the states need road crews and the payoffs to politicians they generate. They need roads for new suburbs state politicians buy land ahead of public news that new roads are being built and then make a killing.
In the suburbs real estate not corporations are the big thing kill the road budget and you threaten every GOPer who has voters that have to drive to the city to work and has no access to public transportation.
When you make a threat don’t point the knife at yourself should be obvious.
He threatened to veto the NDAA until it gave him the power to disappear US citizens. Does that count?
Sets the pattern. His threats are only slightly more meaningful than his speeches.
The bill also completely eliminates dedicated funding for bicycling and walking.
See: http://blog.bikeleague.org/blog/2012/02/10-top-problems-with-the-house-transportation-bill/
Has he ever fought for anything even when he has overwhelming public support? National Healthcare, Drug Price controls he caved despite the polling. Ending both wars now its three years later and he is only doing it now despite wars so unpopular that news coverage of the wars actually decreases support for the wars.
Catholics overwhelming support the idea of the church paying for birth control as discussed a few threads down but O caved anyway.
The only time O shows a spine is when he is kicking Lefties and thats one reason why I won’t vote for him.
I don’t think THIS congress has passed anything but the “ACA” and “DADT”.
I bet this whole veto threat showdown is fake drama to provide Obama with an excuse to hide behind when he caves on the Keystone XL pipeline and a measure to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.
An election is coming up O needs to pretend that he fights before he surrenders now.
No. “Threats” don’t count.
This Congress the Tea Bagger Congress ran on creating jobs as priority number one. So far the thing they are most famous for and the only thing history will remember is their cutting SS and Medicare benefits.
“The only time O shows a spine is when he is kicking Lefties and thats one reason why I won’t vote for him.”
—————-
I’m voting “green”. eCahn told me to. Somebody named Jill or June…..
Jill Stein for President. We will be taking the road to ruin on ruined roads it looks like.
MOST of the “TEA Baggers” that ran for office GOT jobs. But, that didn’t really MOVE the UI numbers.
‘…repealing requirements that help ensure the safe handling of hazardous materials by railroads…”
Ummm… do House Republicans think flaming wreckage is Conservative, and trains that are not literally on fire are liberal?
Sorry BSb…… yeah, THAT’S HER!!!!
Stein…..that sounds Jewish???
Agreed Obama talks a good game but never delivers. Notice the Dems and even on Kos the term Firebagger seems to have disappeared O can’t even hurt us and out of any group O has tried talking tough through sock puppets to us the most.
Cool I’m sold
Kos is coming around. Give them time. I think the settlement with the banksters pissed MOST of them off TOO.
When are the campoaign buttons gonna be ready??????
Buttons, buttons we don’t need no stinkin buttons…
The Jill Stein for President campaign announced this morning that it had succeeded in collecting over 3,000 signatures of registered Utah voters to form the Green Party of Utah and to place the new party on the Utah presidential ballot. For the past week, volunteers and staff for Jill Stein for President have been working day and night in Salt Lake City and neighboring communities. With Utah, the Green Party of the United States has secured 19 ballot lines, and has not missed a single deadline in working towards the goal of winning ballot access in almost every state.
“We succeeded in Utah through the hard work of our volunteers and campaign workers,” said Jill Stein. “I am committed to winning the right of voters to vote Green in every state in the union, and I am thankful to our supporters for donating the money and time to bring Utah voters into a fuller democracy.” Utah law required the 2000 registered voters to signature their intention to join a new party in order for that party to win ballot access.
Actually, I’m the democratic precinct chair. I want to wear one to the caucus after the primary. Although, if you’ve been following the news, looks like the Texas primary will be in June. Proibably irrelevant by then.
and has not missed a single deadline in working towards the goal of winning ballot access in almost every state.
Thats better than Newt he missed filing deadlines in some states. If FDL going to go from being a Lefty blog that tends to support Dems to a Lefty blog that supports Greens?
Ca is June 5 so we are always irrelevant – the largest state and we have almost nothing to say about the nominee. To me that’s just stupid.
Utah already has a Joe Smith for God.
Might as well also have a Jill Stein for President.
Truth is probably irrelevant now. :) I’m with you in that I wont give up on the D’s so congrats and good luck. When you go to the caucus you could have a newcarguy (Nordquistlike) litmus test to demand “real” Democrats sign. We could see you on CNN with Wolf someday.
Stupid for us 99%ers but smart for the <1%.
There’s your campaign button. :)
We are not setting the bar too high if we only have to best Newt but hey it’s a start.
I’m working for “change” from within. I intend to go the state convention as an “uncommitted” delegate. “Uncommitteed” being synonomous with “pissed off”.
If you don’t get results those are two good suggestions for the name of our new third party. Vote now A. Uncommitted Party B. Pissed Off Party :)
Newt is an experienced pol with decades worth of experience, connections and cash. I find it impossible to believe that if Newt were serious about running for President that he would have missed the filing deadlines in some states. I don’t buy the Newt never had the cash argument either.
I think its funny that the Green Party can get on the ballot in every state but Newt and Rick could not. So when people ask about the Green Party and say I’m throwing away my vote I will point out that the Greens are more serious than Newt or Rick were but they just don’t get the press.
I think FDL very well might become a Green Party blog soon.
Agree. Newt was more into how to make money and not as serious about running. His speaking fees will triple and Fox will give him an hour to demagogue to the masses that actually are asses.
RE: the Green Party, I received this email earlier:
She has spunk, anyway, but I really don’t know about Roseanne Barr as the GP nominee. Thoughts?
OTOH, Newt is taking this VERY personally. I’m pretty sure he is surprised we didn’t make him president “by acclamation”. Callista too.
Don’t you think that after Florida he had that “Caesar on the ‘Ides of March’ look” on his face?????
Newt is as constant as the Northern Star…