In their ongoing quest to make themselves look completely retrograde and ridiculous, House Republicans will hold a grandstanding hearing on the Administration’s birth control access rules tomorrow, featuring testimony from a leader of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Republican Darrell Issa, chair of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, will convene a hearing tomorrow, “Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Conscience?”
The lead witness is the Most Reverend William E. Lori, Roman Catholic Bishop of Bridgeport, Connecticut, and chair of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Ad Hoc Committee on Religious Liberty. Judging from Lori and the rest of the witness list, it’s obvious that Issa has posed what he considers to be a rhetorical question and lined up nine like-minded rhetoricians to answer it anyway. None of the religious groups supportive of the Obama administration will be heard from.
Lori has appeared at previous House Oversight Committee hearings before, and has criticized the birth control mandate, part of the free preventive services that insurance companies will be required to cover under the Affordable Care Act. But now, the birth control debate has been put front and center. Religious paternalism and the prioritizing of the beliefs of a few church leaders over women’s health will be on full display. Eight of the nine witnesses on the panel are, according to Sarah Posner, “Orthodox Christian, Catholic, and evangelical, and represent Christian institutions.” The many supporters among the religious community of the new accommodation on birth control will not be heard from, including prominent supporter Sister Carol Keehan of the Catholic Health Association.
This just looks like a ride off a cliff for Republicans. Americans support birth control by wide margins, and also support the concept of free contraception coverage as a preventive service. That includes Catholics, despite the bleatings of the USCCB. But Republicans inexplicably think they’ve found a winning issue here. Maybe every television station in America can pick up the hearing, so people understand that the modern Republican Party opposes birth control as an option for women.



18 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Women need not apply.
ArrgggH
Why no doctors? Huh? My sister has PCOS and HAS to take birth control pills. There are many other reasons for the hormones in those little pills than just preventing pregnancy!
You know what. Just let them keep digging that hole. It will make the scene on the map a whole lot more Blue!
He issa irrelevant. These are like Waxman hearings. Looky how concerned we are but watch us do nothing. R’s and D’s just friggin in the riggin.
Issa needs to shut the fuck up. Go steal a car or something, dood.
Yeah. It would certainly make our lives better if he just stole another car instead of the country.
One would be hard pressed to find a bigger moron or narcissist than Issa in the congress.
Actually, one wouldn’t.
Would you buy a used car from that bishop.
They’re not even pretending any more. They’re just thumbing their noses at us and daring up to respond.
On the contrary, I hope they put Virginia Foxxx up in the stirrups and perform a transvaginal ultrasound on her. Let’s see what government rape really looks like, mandated in Virginia now.
Crayola has banished all shades of blue in case you haven’t heard. CIA sent out a secret directive a week ago. Wiki exposed it. /s
One would only have to look to his right. Or his left.
Thank you Teddy. I haven’t really seen this issue raised much.
If you want to have an abortion you have to let the government rape you with a fucking object. Deal?
So are there any women on his witness list? Any at all?
Yup, we need to see a lot more of those bishops. They should be asked to expand upon their looney tune sexual theology. Let them explain how infertile couples must be policed lest they engage in non-procreating sex. Let them explain how they’d like the federal government to enforce no sex after menopause.
“See” is ambiguous. I prefer that they keep their dresses ON, but that they be otherwise ‘exposed.’
It’s interesting (and invoked by President Clinton as a defense for his denying having had true sex with his intern) that in Pennsylvania oral sex cannot be used as evidence of adultery in a divorce suit.
So issa has invited his rump-wrangling buddy to testify. Does issa have to kiss his ass, I mean ring before he testifies. Looks like santorum will also surge in washington tomorrow.
It’s time to put tails on these bishops and shut them up. Pics with their boyfriends would go along way.