House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi went sharply after oil speculation late yesterday, taking up a strategy to answer Republicans on rising gas prices that has not been employed much in the political sphere. Take a look at Pelosi’s press release yesterday on the subject:
Independent reports confirm that speculators are driving up the cost of oil, hurting consumers and potentially damaging the economic recovery. Wall Street profiteering, not oil shortages, is the cause of the price spike. In fact, U.S. oil production is at its highest level since 2003, and millions of acres have been cleared for additional development.
We need to take strong action to protect consumers from this speculation. Unfortunately, Republicans have chosen to protect the interests of Wall Street speculators and oil companies instead of the interests of working Americans by obstructing the agencies with the responsibility of enforcing consumer protection laws. They have also repeatedly opposed our efforts to end billions of dollars in outdated taxpayer subsidies for oil companies enjoying record profits.
We support efforts by the Obama Administration to expand domestic energy resources, including natural gas and renewable sources like wind and solar that create jobs in America and will end our dangerous dependence on foreign energy supplies. This can be achieved because today, the United States currently has more oil and gas rigs at work than the rest of the world combined, and imports of foreign oil have decreased.
We call on the Republican leadership to act on behalf of American consumers and join our efforts to crack down on speculators who care more about their profits than the price at the pump even if these spikes harm the American consumer and our economy.
Gas prices have gone up about a quarter in Los Angeles in the last week. This will be the next terrain on which our politics are waged. And the facts are that domestic oil drilling has never been higher, and demand for gas in the US is at a 14-year low. So only global demand, geopolitical worries or speculation can be driving this. Global demand is certainly possible, though the entire European continent is in a recession and China is seeing slower growth, along with the low US demand. And the geopolitical situation definitely drives up prices at the moment, particularly because of Iran and the threat of a military strike, along with the oil embargo (something on which the major parties don’t really disagree).
But speculation is definitely a factor, as this McClatchy article shows.
While tension over Iran has ratcheted up over the last few months, the price of oil and gasoline has leaped far beyond conventional supply and demand variables. Financial speculators are piling into the market, torquing the Iranian fear factor into ever-higher prices.
“Speculation is now part of the DNA of oil prices. You cannot separate the two anymore. There is no demarcation,” said Fadel Gheit, a 30-year veteran of energy markets and an analyst at Oppenheimer & Co. “I still remain convinced oil prices are inflated.”
Consider that light, sweet crude trading on the NYMEX changed hands at $79.20 a barrel just four months ago, but soared past $106 a barrel Tuesday afternoon, partly on news that Iran would halt shipment of oil to Britain and France. But those countries already had stopped buying Iranian oil. And Didier Houssin, the International Energy Agency’s director for energy markets and security, said that “there are alternative supplies that can make up for any loss of Iranian exports,” The Wall Street Journal reported [...]
A McClatchy review of the latest Commitment of Traders report from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates oil trading, shows that producers and merchants made up just 36 percent of all contracts traded in the week ending Feb. 14.
That same week, open interest, or the total outstanding oil contracts for next-month delivery of 1,000 barrels of oil (about 42,000 gallons), stood near an all-time high above 1.486 million. Speculators who’ll never take delivery of oil made up 64 percent of the market.
The analysts in the piece say oil should be trading around $75 a barrel, not $106. This is pretty serious, because high gas prices have proven time and again to slow the US economy, as we don’t have a flexible enough transportation infrastructure to absorb them. The energy analysts are all saying the same thing – Wall Street speculators must share the blame for this.
But if Pelosi really wants to fight this out, she has to do what the lonely few on the Democratic side – mostly Maria Cantwell and Bernie Sanders – have been doing. She has to demand that the CFTC set position limits on speculators. Their commodity speculation rule from October was comically weak, and that had clear consequences. Maybe you can hit Republicans for cutting the CFTC budget, but ultimately it’s an executive agency that can crack down on oil speculators.
That said, I really hope this speculation idea reaches the national consciousness for once. This has been going on for years. Matt Taibbi wrote about it brilliantly in 2008, when the speculation was just as bad if not worse. There’s a place for speculation and hedging but not the majority of the market. This desperately needs to be explained to the public, and having Nancy Pelosi take a role will go a long way to actually getting some information out.



67 Comments



Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
And the “leader” of the Democratic Party, holder of the grand bully pulpit is where on this? Oh yeah, in Florida talking about more offshore drilling. Yikes!
Pelosi speaks, but DOES nothing.
Boxturtle (She’s consistant, at least)
And yada, yada, yada, gas is at $4.50.
How much of Pelosi’s portfolio was in oil stocks before the speculation began.
Electricians came at 8:45am to replace the outdoor fixtures.
And there was LIGHT!
Baked brownies this morning in honor of having an oven light for the first time in months. Would you like me to slide some down the bar in your direction?
Plenty for you too BT and jb.
That was this morning. Wait’ll you see this afternoon. It’s still around $3.50 here, but yesterday it was $3.35.
Boxturtle (Expects gas to average $5 nationwide before the end of May)
How many times do we have to have the same conversation about commodity speculation? If you are not able to house or use the commody in day to day business, then you don’t get to participate!
These things harm more than just the consumer, it harms businesses, especially small biz. Surely, one day soon those people betting on commodities for greed will find themselves without. I know of no other way to teach the lesson because the REGULATORS are not paying attention.
Brownies? What KIND of brownies?
Boxturtle (Doesn’t matter, I’ll take three)
Great news! I’m glad they got it fixed for you.
There is a saying that the best way to make a small fortune in commodies is to start with a large fortune.
Boxturtle (Wonder how much money Obama is planning on raising from the speculators?)
Gosh, how many times do I have to type that I don’t do mj bc it just puts me to sleep.
Three coming in your direction.
Each time a legal courier has to carry documents for attorney’s they have to raise the rate due to gas costs. The attorney, then has to charge the client more for document prep and such.
That also means more cost for food and stuff getting on the store shelves. None of this is a good thing if you love your Country and wish to see it grow out of the Great Recession. In fact, it is almost on the level of terrorist activity.
I’ve been trying to convince the finance committee of the endowment that I’m on of that, but they are addicted to the idea of taking a small amount of risk for a bit of outperformance. As commodities are not a large portion of the portfolio, which is otherwise ‘diversified,’ I haven’t tried that hard, but I do make a point of mentioning it at every opportunity.
SOP for the looting class.
David if you are going to post what nancy says at least add to it. How about the fact that the FED has pumped trillions of dollars into the banks, hmm I think that would make them one of the biggest culprits in this.
As for speculators how about all the money Nancy and her criminal cohorts have made front running the markets on inside information.
I would say the balls of this woman to come out and say this, but then I see so many rush to cover and write about what she says, no questions asked, and I realize she knows she can say it because the media doesn’t ask her any hard questions.
Do I get partial credit for asking in 4?
Excellent comment!
They all do insider trading and even bet against the United States! They will short America everytime in order to make a few thousand.
Eh? Thanks for the update.
Pelosi? I have no use for this entity. Pelosi’s out for whatever GRIFT she can clutch for herself. She brays out some b.s. once in a while that appears to be vaguely “reasonable,” but at the end of day, it’s pretty much meaningless.
What all the prior comments said, esp in terms of whatever insider trading Pelosi’s managed to make megabucks from.
Meaningless bullshit from one of the Alpha female (thanks eCAHN) mauraders. Whatever…
You da first!
P.S. What Pelosi said, though is, like: no shit, sherlock.
Reliably, however, there was a “political” (eg 1% propoganda) cartoon in my nooz paper that reliabley blamed rising oil/gas prices on Team USA “heroically” having to “stop” Iran from making the bomb. No shit.
1% venality knows no bounds.
Ah, well. Chocolate chips are nearly as good.
Boxturtle (Did you know there are structural similarities between Cocaine and Chocolate?)
Isn’t there caffeine in chocolate too?
3 basic food groups: caffeine, sugar, chocolate.
four food groups:
Eat in
Take Out
Frozen
Canned
Boxturtle (I left home with very little knowledge of the kitchen. Entirely my fault)
Why do we keep leaving out alcohol & nicotine…
I’m off to do some outside things. Weather is gorgeous. My bee girls were out gathering pollen yesterday. And today is even better.
Yes. Cocaine is an alkaloid that can increase serotonin levels in the brain and chocolate contains similar alkaloids.
EDIT:
And as the plants both evolved on the same continent, it’s not very surprising.Actually it’s the same plant. My bad.
Nancy, I appreciate the sentiment here. But this -
If you take away that money, what controls are there in place to keep these profiteering, thieving criminals from inflating prices even more to make up for it?
Until this industry is properly regulated, we have no hope of reasonable gas prices. End of story.
Gotta love the folks complaining about Pelosi and this issue.
Here’s a question for all of you doing this.
About nine months ago Eric Cantor stood in front of the CBOE (I live in the Chicago area). He is taped saying that the Republicans would do anything and everything to prevent any restrictions on oil and gas speculation.
So why is Pelosi to blame?
As an aside, I don’t give the Democrats a pass on this. It has been forty years since this nonsense started. First by the “seven sisters” manipulating the gas market. For forty years this country has been held hostage to various manipulations of the market and Washington has done NOTHING.
At what point is enough, enough?
What do you mean? She’s very good at taking things “off the table.”
dogjudge: We are blaming Pelosi for talking loudly and doing nothing. She says the right things, but stops there.
This is her standard method of dealing with the unwashed masses.
Neither party is particularly interested in dealing with speculation. Some have their own money in it, others want speculator money for re-election.
Boxturtle (Not blaming her for starting it, blaming her for doing nothing to end it)
She could do that verbally. Didn’t even have to sign anything or attend a meeting.
Boxturtle (I still wonder what Bush told her that caused that)
Unh, are confusing coca (cocaine) and cocoa (chocolate)?
Boxturtle (Because I’ve made that mistake)
Bushboy and Cheney think she’s a doll for that.
The blame rests ENTIRELY on them, if we’re referring to oil prices here. Lack of regulation? That blame rests with Congress.
How about an actual solution? Like eliminating speculation on oil prices completely?
LOL, always.
I remembered we discussed a while back about how merkel like O came out of nowhere. Thought you might like this. His blog is a great read on the financial BS going on, and good to check in on now an then to see what he is saying.
http://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2012/02/20/exclusive-angela-merkelthe-new-german-president-a-guilty-past/
It couldn’t have been much. She’s a cheap trick.
You mean Shurb and Darth Shotgun?
I hadn”t thought of that.
Now THAT would be one helluva coincidence.
OTOH, investing in oil and gas IS a prety smart move.
Yep. That is one gruesome threesome.
You brought a nice look to the table for us. The reason we talk about Pelosi in this way is because she, along with all the other Congress critters have the ability, the authority, the oversight, and the DUTY to make sure this country is not ruined by theives.
With that said, do you see any member of congress, house or senate working to bring these discussions and actions to the table? I don’t.
Very accurate description of the former first woman speaker.
Since Darth doesn’t have a heartbeat it would still be a twosome, IMHO.
As a bit player in a great flick once said – Negative Ghost Rider, that pattern is full.
dog…..we don’t have to HAVE something tangible to complain about. We don’t like Ms.Pelosi.
But thanks for asking. Haven’t see you here before. New???
10-4 Good Buddy.
LOL!
I just LOVE that movie.
..
..
What was is it again?????
I don’t remember that line in “Smoky and the Bandit”.
You guys are confiusing me.
Top Gun. ?!?1?1?
Whazzamatter witchu?
What do you expect Pelosi to be able to do? She has been hamstrung by Blue Dogs in her own group and a DINO president.
Personally I would be stirred by a speech defining traditional liberal Democratic ideology followed by a resignation in protest. But the sad fact is; as soon as a young white woman goes missing in some part of the world her courageous gesture would fall into the wake of the past.
Two points I would like to make:
1.) You can’t categorize geopolitical concerns as a separate cause of the price spike. In reality this is a sub-category of speculation. It is not the end users who are driving up prices based on the “fear” that supply is going to be cut off. Speculators are driving up prices based on the “hope” that supply will be cut off.
2.) Though this speculation can be addressed separately, it is really only a symptom of the problem caused by the Fed’s and other central banks’ monetary policies. A huge amount of liquidity has been pumped into the system and it has to go somewhere. With obscenely low interest rates and returns on deposit accounts this money is chasing yield in both the financial and commodity markets. In addition, Wall Street financial institutions get money from the Fed at .25% interest and use it to finance their speculative activities.
Posted before but is my take of what will soon happen:
The repugs will be wetting themselves this early summer with gas prices tipping around $5 gallon and blessing their lucky stars that they soon will see the end of the Kenyon Kid. Then the big O shows up on the street (wall street-that is) and pulls out his trusty six-shooter (the SOS-strategic oil supply) With a shot here (7 million gallon release) and a squirt there (continue with 7 million releases weekly) and a firm comment on how the gig is up for the speculators soon thereafter the street (wall stree that is) will be littered with greedy bastard carcass’s. The price of gas collapses,the poor oil execs miss their bonus’s, the economy continues its recovery, and all is well in Dodge City (America)
Since the price spike is not a result of supply problems releasing oil from the SPR will have no more effect than it did last year on prices. The only way to drop prices meaningfully is to have the CFTC mandate a substantial increase in margin requirements. Since this would hurt Wall Street, and Obama is owned by Wall Street, who knows what he’ll do though I suspect he will do whatever necessary to enhance his reelection chances.
6/2/08 – Candidate Obama Promises To Impose Windfall Profits Tax On Oil & Gas Industry
6/25/08, what Candidate Obama will do to help consumers with rising gas prices included a second round of stimulus rebate checks, impose a windfall profits tax on oil companies, and close the Enron Loophole that allows for speculation’s unregulated upward pressure on gas prices.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChNNVhEZjI0
The first of Obama’s many broken pledges and promises once he got elected was reneging on his pledge to impose ‘Windfall Profits Taxes on the Oil & Gas Industry”, etc.:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMbqVDymi7k
11/10/08 – President-Elect Obama Abandons Windfall Profits Tax on Oil Companies
12/23/08 – When pressed about his abrupt about face on imposing windfall profits taxes, President-Elect Obama said, “The prices have now dropped – We’ll see about doing that if or when they rise again.”
Since 12/08, the price of oil has reached $80/barrel several times, which is the amount that Candidate Obama had pledged would trigger his windfall profits tax.
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSWAT00963020080609
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMbqVDymi7k
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/12/obama-abandons.html
That seems about as accurate as all of the Democrat hating in this thread:
Coca may refer to any of the four cultivated cocas which belong to the family Erythroxylaceae, native to western South America.
Theobroma cacao also cacao tree and cocoa tree, is a small (4–8 m or 15–26 ft tall) evergreen tree in the family Sterculiaceae (alternatively Malvaceae), native to the deep tropical region of the Americas. Its seeds are used to make cocoa powder and chocolate.
That isn’t the only reason. In washington state we had a refinery fire last week. That created a 10 cent spike here and it is oozing up.
on this….
“if we’re referring to oil prices here. Lack of regulation? That blame rests with Congress.
She has to demand that the CFTC set position limits on speculators.
How about an actual solution? Like eliminating speculation on oil prices completely?”
We agree.
However, I think both the White House AND congress in general are disinclined.
I would have to disagree with this. Congress passed the Dodd–Frank Act which empowered the CFTC to reign in speculation in the commodities markets. Congress has done its part. The CFTC has failed in its job and this is evident by the drop in price of NYMEX oil contract price from over $110/bbl in the spring of 2011 to $76/bbl in Oct of 2011 as the market awaited the publication of the new CFTC rules. The markets reaction to the new rules has been evident by the price action since. The new rules were a sham and havent done anything to curtail speculation, but it is not the fault of congress. They did their part – they passed the legislation. The fault lies with the CFTC and the executive branch. The president has the power and responsibility to enforce the laws of congress and should do so by executive action if need be. Lack of regulation is the only reason that this speculation continues today. I have posted on this very problem before.
http://my.firedoglake.com/members/realreform/activity/683612
I still contend that the president should execute the RBOB GAMBIT and end this speculation now.
http://www.rbobgambit.org/Home_Page.php
The laws to curtail this activity are on the books, they just need to be enforced.
David has it right:
DWT does NOT mince words!
“”"Since the price spike is not a result of supply problems releasing oil from the SPR will have no more effect than it did last year on prices. The only way to drop prices meaningfully is to have the CFTC mandate a substantial increase in margin requirements. Since this would hurt Wall Street, and Obama is owned by Wall Street, who knows what he’ll do though I suspect he will do whatever necessary to enhance his reelection chance”"
On the contrary a 10% of consumption per week release will show two main things:
1. Price initially not tied to demand/supply
2. More importantly there would now be another side to the trade and a side stronger than the long side. Hedgies would exit in masse and price per barrel would collapse.
Since Obama knows the oil boys are not on his side he will have no problem crushing them and the oil spec folks once and for all. Also once re-elected with his legacy available think we might see a bit more progressive Obama as the lame duck he will be. Only a hope but maybe just maybe we have that once in a generation chance for real change (ie public option or single payer, a stacked Supreme Court with a progressive tilt, campaign finance reform, elimination of special treatment for capital gains and dividends etc etc.)
Oil futures speculators in 2008 inflated oil barrel and gasoline prices by 40 percent, meaning that of $4.00 for a gallon of gas in the U.S., $1.60 went to the oil futures speculators while $2.40 of each gallon’s price was attributable to supply and demand. So, what crashed gasoline prices in 2008, driving down prices below $2.00 a gallon by the end of the year? Oh right, the fraud-driven Republican-spawned housing bubble finally burst and money markets froze, which chilled all the assets of the investors/oil futures speculators who’d been busy for years rigging the markets in their favor, for their profit, including adding $1.60 to every gallon of gasoline pumped in the U.S..
So, gasoline prices are rising again, like in 2008. Are the usual Wall Street suspects at it again, the ones that U.S. taxpayers and the Federal Reserve bailed out in 2008 to the tune of almost $8 Trillion in government loans and guarantees? Yep.
Oil futures speculators at “too big to fail” and “too big to jail” Wall Street firms like Goldman Sachs, Bank of America and at companies like Koch Industries are at it again, wielding billions of bailed-out dollars to buy up oil stocks at current prices, “gambling” that oil barrel prices will rise in the future(thus increasing gasoline pump prices) at which time the oil futures speculators will sell their “on-paper” oil stock, making them huge profits in the process. Of course, their action disrupts the distribution aspect of supply and demand, injecting an unnecessary (but highly profitable) middle-man into the oil market mix, which has the effect in itself of driving up oil barrel and gasoline prices. IOW, the perfect self-fulfilling “gambling” prophecy scam, what we saw in 2008 and are seeing again today, with gasoline consumers paying through the nose at the pump.
Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) commissioners could enforce limits on Wall Street oil futures speculators. In 2008 during the last year GW Bush was president, the oil-industry-insider-packed CFTC let the speculators run wild, blocking the CFTC’s regulatory authority and consumer protection role, thus gasoline pump prices spiked at over $4.00 a gallon. Over the past three years since GW Bush left office, Republicans have worked hard at hamstringing the CFTC’s oversight function, blocking or slow-walking any attempt by Democrats and President Obama to limit oil futures speculation, thus leading to another totally-predictable artificially-induced Republican-caused rise in oil barrel and gasoline prices.
So of course, Republican talking heads are busy trying to lay blame on President Obama and Democrats for what Republicans are doing, screwing American consumers at the pump. I believe this is all part of the Republicans’ idea of a full-service service station, where one can have their oil checked, tires filled up and windshield washed, along with with being screwed at the gasoline pump, with some of the full-service screwers being the Koch brothers and their oil futures speculators at Koch Industries.
I guess it’s best if one has a very short memory when discussing this issue.
First off, the Democratic Party has been nearly a wholly-owned subsidiary of precise these big Wall Street firms for almost a couple decades now. So when Dems had control of the House, Senate and White House, they did precisely nothing about those firms. At least they know who is buttering their bread, eh?
Second, Pelosi’s hypocrisy on this issue should be castigated, not supported. Sure, she’s a pro at screaming “the specuators are coming! The Speculators are coming!” But even using the word “speculators” should be replaced with “market manipulators” and “price fixers,” because that’s closer to what’s really happening here. Of course, those latter two terms are still illegal, IIRC, so obviously why would they publicly recognize the illegality of their major funders?
Third, since a lot of this price action is “pricing in” the coming attack on Iran, perhaps the idiots in congress shouldn’t have pushed that project along so fervently. The administration could quite easily push prices down just by backing off the push to war. As the rhetoric heats up, so will the price of oil, much to the glee of the oil barons. But I guess the fundraisers for OFA will enjoy those checks from Exxon et al.
We should also place a fair amount of blame on the media conglomerates for pushing this war. That is also a factor in pushing prices up. A major one.
But in the end, this entire situation is the making of our ruling elites. A group of people who simply don’t give a rat’s patootie about the National Interest or the Public Interest. They are willing to send us all back into another recession just to bank some more cash. It doesn’t get any more craven than that.
Quite possible. However, it is not the oil boys who would be crushed, but rather, Obama’s buddies at Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, etc. Unless of course Obama intends to give them advance notice before he takes action so they can unload their long positions and go short oil. Also, keep in mind the amount of oil in the SPR is really quite small relative to usage and would not have more than a temporary effect. The only effective way to deal with speculation is with position limits and increased margin requirements.
Since the FED Funds giveaway has allowed the ‘Primary Dealers’ to borrow money at .25% or less (virtually free money) which (‘wink, wink’… ‘nod’) was supposed to be used to increase liquidity by loaning money to individuals and businesses and get the economy going again it is no surprise that these unscrupulous assholes are using the free money to ass-fuck tax the 99% of us who care about the cost of a gallon of gas, or milk, or bread, or coffee or tea by dumping shit loads of money into commodities they have absolutely no interested position in other than a paper one. The only way to fix this is to force out the speculators and only allow people to operate in the market that actually intend on a future delivery of the products, LIKE IT WAS INTENDED, to STABILIZE PRICES! *Insert HOWARD DEAN Iowa Caucus fail scream here*
Pelosi is a lying, crooked politician (redundancy alert) who is genetically predisposed to enrich herself at the expense of the populace. She is the daughter of the crooked D’Alessandro clan that used to be involved in Maryland politics. She just married and took her show to the west coast.
Boy, sooooo sorry I missed this train! Obama needs to pick up the phone, call the CFTC and tell them to do their effing job. This is beyond ridiculous, what the speculators are doing to the price of gas.
The speculators have already set $5 as their benchmark price. Usually it hits that point at the beginning of the summer and prices stay sticky while the weather is warm. Then they cycle over to winter heating prices.
Cocaine is from a the coca plant, a shrub. Chocolate is from the cacao bean, which comes from a tree. It is confusing to right-brained people who switch letters all the time, but cocoa and cacao don’t have much in common.
realreform, if you’re correct, then it’s down to Obama to make his administration follow the law, no?
How much do you & boxturtle think the MINORITY leader in the House can do? Haven’t you already seen, over the last year, how much the GOP holds the House, and subsequently, the Congress hostage?
C’mon—realistic suggestions?