Everyone was amused throughout the Internets today by Mitt Romney holding a speech for 1,200 people inside Ford Field in Detroit, leading to images of a cavernous, empty stadium. And it’s completely puzzling WHY Romney’s advance team would site a speech like this in a big, empty stadium, just waiting for the snickering comments. Heck, for a shockingly small price, Romney’s team could have bought the Pontiac Silverdome and just painted faces on all the seats and piped in some crowd noise.
This is just fall-on-your-face political campaigning. And Romney didn’t help matters with his ad-libs.
“This feels good, being back in Michigan,” Romney said. “You know, the trees are the right height. The streets are just right. I like the fact that most of the cars I see are Detroit-made automobiles. I drive a Mustang and a Chevy pick-up truck. Ann drives a couple of Cadillacs, actually. And I used to have a Dodge truck. So I used to have all three covered.”
Who among us doesn’t have a couple of Cadillacs to drive? To be fair, when you have an indeterminate number of houses, you have to stash vehicles all over the place.
Snickering aside, the content of the speech should cause horror more than laughter:
The outline of Romney’s tax reform plan is the same as what you heard on Wednesday. And Romney backed his advisers up, promising that his plan “will not add to the deficit.” Or he appeared to. But the way it won’t add to the deficit, he said, was through “stronger economic growth, spending cuts, and base broadening will offset the reductions.” Raise your hand if you see what Romney did there [...] For those keeping score at home, that suggests that independent analyses will find that the tax plan is revenue negative. Big time [...]
Romney’s real savings come in the next section. He’ll “send Medicaid back to the states and cap that program’s rate of growth,” and then “do the same for other programs, like food stamps, housing subsidies and job training.”
Sending the programs back to the states is a red herring. The key bit for deficit reduction is capping their rates of growth. Which is to say, cutting their rates of growth. Which is to say, cutting them.
What Romney is essentially proposing to do is finance a massive tax cut by cutting Medicaid, food stamps, housing subsidies and job training. In other words, the neediest Americans — and, to a lesser degree, federal workers — will be financing a massive tax cut.
Maybe I should have just stuck to the laughing and pointing at the crowd size.
On a bright note for Romney, this cruel swipe at the poor to finance tax cuts that go mostly to the rich should be enough to secure him the Republican nomination.




26 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Did he mention that Joan drives both of her Cadillacs simultaneously?
He’s totally out of touch. He probably never sees the poor, doesn’t know what percentage of them make up the population, or how much it costs to live. Thank the gods he doesn’t have a decent PR advisory team.
Mitt needs to do a reality show experience like this one: 30 days on minimum wage.
One of them gets a urinary tract infection and of course they have no insurance.
Romney’s team could have bought the Pontiac Silverdome and just painted faces on all the seats and piped in some crowd noise.
Or he could have bussed in Mormons like he did in the South Carolina primary.
By the way, the Silverdome was one of the worst venues in the history of sports, especially in the days when people were allowed to smoke inside it.
To be fair, when you have an indeterminate number of houses, you have to stash vehicles all over the place.
Mrs. Tiger has a button from the 2008 campaign. It used the same color scheme and typeface as a McCain button, but said, “Ask Me How Many Houses I Own.”
Hitler’s advance team, OTOH, deliberately reserved space that would be too small for the expected crowd so that every speech would be to an overflow eager to get inside. Another trick he used was to always arrive a little late, after the hall had filled up and the crowd warming team had done their job. When Hitler did finally show up, he was greeted by roars of approval and great applause. Dutifully reported and disseminated by local press. These tactics went far to create the myth of Hitler’s great popularity.
Clever!
Did you know the Nazis were the first to use exit polls?
I don’t remember if I used to know that or not. My source is Childers, who is really great in this course. He may have mentioned that but I don’t recall. It sounds consistent with what I do remember.
Mitt and his team obviously thought Mitt was more popular than he is. They honestly thought they could draw a crowd big enough to fill the stadium,
Mitt and his team I am sure are going to paint this as a error made by his political staff but Mitt has money he can buy the best political staff money can buy.
So either Mitt did not buy the best staff which throws his judgement and ability to lead into question because he picked a bad staff and did not notice that the stadium was to big showing Mitt is not over seeing his staff properly.
Or Mitt did buy the best staff and Mitt and his staff drank the cool aid. I lean toward the second option.
banks loaned money to hedge funds like Bain Capital if there were no bank bailout the banks would have been forced to ask Bain for more capital when the stock of the companies Bain owns collapsed after the banking crisis.
Joan is a 2 caddy steak eating Mormon Welfare Queen.
You linked to the Childers course, which looks like it’s outstanding. Now I need to block out some time, etc.
Some years ago, Mrs. Tiger and I went to the rally grounds at Nuremburg, which have been converted into a museum. One of the exhibits focused on the Nazis’ rise to power, especially the 1932 and 1933 elections. One poster I’ll never forget showed destitute people (Germany was hit even harder than we were by the Great Depression) and read: “Hitler: Our Last Hope.”
“This feels good, being back in Michigan,” Romney said. “You know, the trees are the right height. The streets are just right. I like the fact that most of the cars I see are Detroit-made automobiles.
Mitt was against the GM bailout then he was for it I don’t think Mitt can escape a flip flop on that issue in Michigan Mitt’s only hope is that Union voters don’t vote in GOP primaries. But many Reagan Democrats/ Blue Collar voters do vote GOP.
This race should be interesting.
Barack Obama is the luckiest man alive. (not my original)
If Mitt sends programs back to the states then does he send federal cash to fund those programs back to the states If so then the debt keeps going up. the States cannot run deficits so Mitt is basically saying the States would have to either raise taxes a huge huge amount or cut the programs entirely.
Capping the spending on programs assumes that America’s population does not go up and that inflation does not keep rising.
One of the things that’s so outstanding about Childers is that he tries to put events into the context of what you knew at the time, NOT in the context of looking back, knowing the outcome of what happened.
You are absolutely right. Chilers speaks a lot about what the Germans had gone thru before Hitler came along. They were late to industrialize and did so more rapidly which ripped apart the social fabric. It was late to form a nation. The nation consisted of an industrialized protestant militant north and a rural R.C. south. The generals in WWI kept telling them they were winning and suddenly the population faced humiliating defeat with crippling war reputations. etc.
Two of the big points was that Hitler favored rearmament, against the WWI peace treaty, and surprisingly, got the 1932 Olympics there which went a huge distance in reestablishing the German population’s sense of self-worth.
Indeed. With the clown show going on stage right, nobody has bothered to confront Obama over his own rightward lurch.
He still needs a fetus in a jar.
Barry will meet him halfway: He’ll send half of the programs back to the states. He’s still “going big,” folks.
My limited experience with Wall St execs is they were limited.
My colleagues in equity research, OTOH, not so much. They were (as a group) hard working, smart, ambitious, most of whom reacted to an intellectual challenge with pleasure, and responded well when I asked them to spend some time on the surveys I developed, for which they got NO attaboys from management.
Limitations of guys at top management I came into contact with were varied. If I had to summarize, they all did what everyone else did, didn’t think too much about what the consequences might be bc financial markets spend a lot more time going up than down and they would just do wholesale firings during bear markets, and now, of course, get bailed out. There was no intellectual curiosity, no desire to do anything diff or better. They were quick to catch onto the new trend that may have been started elsewhere, like First Boston bought Bankers Trust derivative group early on.
But it does not surprise me that someone high up at Bain would have no clue as to how to go about a political campaign, how his words fall on others’ ears, how to hire. Political campaigns (presuming you care about getting voters who are increasingly irrelevant) are much more difficult than making money on Wall St.
Book Salon up with Corey Robin’s The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin hosted by Rick Perlstein
I believe that Romney’s speech was originally set for the smaller atrium, but protesters outside could be heard there.
So to “silence” any protesters for the press, Romney’s people set up in the arena, hoping to corral the news by setting them in back of the small crowd.
Ooops.
“Michigan feels good…”
Well, hayull yeah! What millionaire in his right mind wouldn’t rather be in Detroit, murder capital of the rust belt, in the dead of winter, rather than pointlessly hangin’ out in Mallorca? God, can you imagine the traffic jams in Moorea this time of year…or that shitty food in the south of France?
We’ll probably see some PR shots of Willard, wearing someone’s old living room curtain and kicking back in a cardboard box under some freeway overpass; bottle of Thunderbird in hand, giving us all a big smile and a thumbs-up, as he revels in the throes of the good life.
I don’t think the man understands just how repugnant he is when he’s trying to convince people that he’s one of the cottage folk. His entire campaign is taking on a Clintonesque air about it, as he snatches defeat from the jaws of victory.
“…nobody has bothered to confront Obama over his own rightward lurch.”
And I think that is going to get us another lathering this November.
“He still needs a foetus in a jar.”
No mercy! :o) :o) :o)