And now for something I didn’t think in January I would have reason to update: the abortion bills across the country which mandate that the women receive an ultrasound before getting the legal medical procedure.
When we last left Virginia, the thinking was that the Senate sponsor of the trans-vaginal ultrasound bill would not accept the watered-down version passed in the House of Delegates, and that this would doom the legislation for the year. This was wrong on a number of levels. Far from being uncompromising about the demand to have doctors stick instruments in abortion seekers’ vaginas, the sponsor, Jill Holtzman, had a complete change of heart about the ultrasound bill entirely, and would strike the bill because she no longer supported the concept. And far from dooming the bill, the state Senate in Virginia would have the opportunity to vote on the House of Delegates’ version after all.
Virginia officials backed off last week from requiring vaginal ultrasounds before abortions, but state legislators are still expected to pass a bill that mandates abdominal ultrasounds and adds other significant requirements for women seeking abortions.
In recent years, this common diagnostic tool has taken a greater role in abortion-related legislation. Seven states require ultrasounds before abortions. Twenty states regulate some aspect of ultrasound exams, including requiring abortion providers to give women the option to view the image or listen to the fetal heartbeat if an ultrasound is performed.
Eleven other states have legislation pending. If all of the measures pass, more than half of the states will have laws governing ultrasound exams before abortions. “I think we’re in the middle of a wave of ultrasound bills,” said Elizabeth Nash, a policy analyst with the Guttmacher Institute, which studies reproductive health.
This is an invasive procedure even without the trans-vaginal aspect. The woman would have to make an additional trip to the doctor to get the ultrasound, and pay for the procedure herself. And the entire point is to bring shame and guilt upon the woman for giving up the pregnancy, with the aim to force her to look at the fetus and hear its heartbeat. It’s true that ultrasounds are often provided in abortions to determine the development of the fetus, because of various laws surrounding abortions in the later stages of pregnancy. Some of those, at the earliest stages of pregnancy, are even trans-vaginal, because that’s the only way to get an image.
But that’s not the goal of these laws. Another trans-vaginal ultrasound bill in Alabama is a testament to that:
(Sen. Clay) Scofield said he hopes that, if signed into law, his bill will stop some abortions. Though the bill states a woman can look away from the ultrasound image, Scofield wants her to see it.
“So she sees that this is not just a clump of cells as she is told,” he said. “She will see the shape of the infant. And hopefully, she will choose to keep the child.”
By the way, states with mandatory ultrasounds have not seen a precipitous drop in abortions. The humiliation has no other utility.




18 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Women’s PAC formed following abortion legislation
“Women’s Strike Force, which boasts several former elected officials, formed after Virginia spent last week in national headlines for its attempt to require women to undergo mandatory trans-vaginal ultrasounds before an abortion.”
LINK.
List of founding members included in the article.
Hey…it’s all about “limited government.”
Yes republican wanted limited government so they can spend more time in my bedroom and yours!!!
” The Handmaiden ‘s World” lies right ahead for parts of America. After Roe is overturned and then Griswold (privacy & Contraception,) the country will visibly divide again between States where men & women will have control of their reproductive lives in some & not in others. How long will it be before another Civil War brews up between these States?
A government small enough to fit in a womans vagina. *hrrumph*
Boxturtle (Perhaps if we required hand xrays before you could own a gun…)
Republicans mandating medical procedures. Shocking!
Women’s strike force, I love the sound of that and I hope it explodes across this country. Its time that women and men stand up and fight back against these sexist right wing nut bags and make sure that everyone of them are out of a job. The assault on women’s rights will just be the start if these nut bags continue to have the power. If they win on these issues what will be next? I shudder to think what America will look like if we let them win.
So…from now on they want to be known as the “State of Vagina”? Is that it?
I’ve had a “transvaginal ultrasound” to measure a fibroid in my uterus. It was embarrassing and IT HURT. That particular ultrasound CAUSED ME PAIN and it was not due to any fibroid. During insertion I felt as though the instrument stretched my vagina and, once inside, the technician had to move it around A LOT. I felt as though I had a fist up against my cervix, inside my abdomen.
I cannot imagine men forcing women to undergo a procedure that causes pain and embarrassment FOR NO REASON. I was humiliated and I’ve had three babies! Oh and, for the record, I can’t imagine anyone forcing a woman to go through the agony and emotional trauma of an unwanted pregnancy and childbirth against her will. Outlawing abortion is tantamount to torture and hatred toward women. Religious zealots are turning America into a barbaric, horrific country.
Now there’s competition from Pennsylvania.
I have to admit to being a bit incredulous that this fervor has metastasized to the present point. It is as if something was slipped into the food and they ran out of scarlet letter branding irons.
I had thought this was a media fueled form of distraction or misdirection, which it may be.
The fact is these are bills that are about to be voted on in state legislatures.
I know it will hurt only wommen in the short run, but it seems that the only real solution is to vote these people out of office and have this crap repealed.
Both genders have lost the sense the feminist revolution of the 60′s and 70′s was really about, with women especially, being systematically misinformed about issues of choice and and birth control and men have just remained cro magnon, and stomped the light bulb of enlightenment into the darkness that shrouds the right wing.
It may be they sense a loss coming in 9 months and are trying to codify this idiocy but I really never saw this coming.
Time for women to take action. I just joined the Women’s Strike Force even though I live in California. We must start these across the country.
Idaho too.
http://www.boisestatepublicradio.org/2012/02/27/idaho-legislature-considers-ultrasound-before-abortion/
It has always been the misogynist party, has always verbally and emotionally abused women. Now it’s mechanical rape. I hope this is enough to awaken conservative women.
Remove the misogyny from the nut party and the rest would drown in a shot glass.
we had to burn this village to save it
we had to burn this witch to save her
we have to torture these sluts to save them..
fuck em
please stand up to this second catholic inquisition before they burn more women at the stake….get out your history books please….or is that too snobbish for us?
fat drunk and stupid is no way to go through life son….
While I agree that Republicans across the nation have been and are trying to use humiliation as a tool to inhibit women from getting abortions, I believe there is more to the current ultrasound legislation than that.
The state is not going to pay for the ultrasounds, which I’m sure cost over $100 per procedure. The abortion procedure is already expensive, so this is an economic attack on those whom the Republicans think are more likely to be seeking abortions: the poor. Perhaps they believe–in that twisted logic they pass off as reason–that if abortion is too expensive, women will stop having sex. In their minds this works because, of course, it expected that boys will be boys…it is up to the female to say “no” to the expected advances of males. Fear of pregnancy will give women incentive to quit doing those things in the sexual realm…right?
Why do republicans have such a great fear of women as sexual beings? And why do they ignore the reality that people have always had sex outside of marriage? Males and females have always had sex for the pleasure of it–not just for creating babies. Abstinence programs forced on teens by the republicans have had very poor success rates. The one thing that has most affected abortion rates is birth control, which they now are revealing as their next target.
So finally the truth is revealed: republicans simply want to control womens sex lives. The question remaining is: why? Is it faith based? Is it a fear of losing longstanding male power?
What do you think?
How about requiring all political candidates and those seeking to purchase a gun have to undergo a psychological exam at their expense!