Via Pat Garofalo, here’s another income stream for the banks that has opened up in the past few years. Call it another “financial innovation.” I’m talking about debit cards to deliver benefits. Banks issue the debit cards, which allow recipients to access welfare or unemployment benefits, and they make a small profit on fees from the services. This service doesn’t work for people who live many miles from an ATM of that particular bank, but they often have no recourse. And now, the system is expanding, at least in South Carolina, into tax refunds:
Last week, the Charleston Post & Courier’s David Slade wrote a column about South Carolina’s new practice of issuing tax returns in the form of prepaid debit cards from Bank of America. The state Department of Revenue announced the program back in December, but conveniently left off the long list of fees which customers without BofA accounts will be subject to.
For every withdrawal from a non-Bank of America ATM, BofA will take $2.50 off the top — in addition to any fees the ATM owner might charge. Want to get your money directly from the bank? The first time’s free, but every withdrawal after that comes with a $10 fee. Leaving the country? Bank of America takes 2% of every single transaction you make outside the United States. Had enough and want to close your account? No problem — after a $5.00 closure fee, of course.
As Slade puts it, why should you have to pay to access your own money? “They’re not even nickel and diming people, they’re five-dollaring and 10-dollaring people,” commented consumer advocate Sue Berkowitz, Director of the Appleseed Legal Justice Center.
This looks to be a growth industry for the banks. They have next to nothing in overhead, as they already have the architecture for debit cards. It’s not like the plastic costs a whole lot more. And they just rake in fees from everyone who gets a tax refund from the state who doesn’t manage to opt out of the practice. By the way, Bank of America secured the rights to run the tax return system in South Carolina with a no-bid contract (helped along by a large donation to the state Treasurer, no doubt). Bank of America is helpfully not charging the state for this, and since they get a pure benefit, taking taxpayer dollars for the processing would just add insult to injury. So I guess we can be thankful for that.
CFPB might want to take a look at this. There’s no social benefit whatsoever to getting a debit card, where you have to pay to access your own money, over a check. I don’t even see how there’s a financial benefit for the state. It’s just legalized theft.




22 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Yeah it’s a crock but my UI benefits in TX came on a Chase card, too. How I managed to not ‘feed the beast’ was to make a 100% cash withdrawal at a Chase branch each time I received a UI payment then deposit the cash at my regular bank. No fees. Yeah it was easier for me as I live in an urban area but OTOH a state tax refund is a one-time payment meaning only one trip to a BofA branch is required. Not saying what South Carolina or BofA is doing is ‘right’, just saying education & a little thought is a way to beat the bastards.
O/T
Mortgage giant Fannie Mae asks government for almost $4.6 billion after posting 4Q loss
LINK.
Let’s not forget that Barack Obama will deliver his acceptance speech from the 50 yard line of Bank of American Stadium in Charlotte.
All hail the reincarnation of Bourbon Democrats.
The States ought to be giving this business to the Post Office. The payments system is a public good, and it would be just as efficient for most people to do their current account banking through a post office, the way it has been done in Europe for over a century. There is no legitimate reason for this monopoly rent to be privatized.
Return? In some places they never left.
Great comment.
And you’re not even asked if you’d like to opt in, you’ve gotta opt out? The word “cahoots” comes to mind. That may not be illegal in South Carolina.
It appears you’d still incur a $5 closing fee. I imagine if you withdraw the full amount that you’d be on the hook for the fees resulting in the account being closed.
It seems to me that a person ought to be able to argue that the state has no right to give out your personal information and open the account to begin with. What if I don’t want BofA to have my Social Security information?
More wonderful government logic- The government has NO RIGHT to require someone to purchase health insurance, but apparently it has every right to open a private bank account for you- straight down to choosing that bank for you.
Agreed. Agree “legalized theft.” It’s marginally arguable that fees for an account you choose to open at a given bank, because you could choose a different bank…but this kind of stuff, welfare, UI, tax refund (somehow even more outrageous…you hve to file a tax return) where you have no choice, and don’t even get to opt out, or are not told you can opt out…Infuriating.
My only quibble (and of course I could be wrong, I’m just arguing from logic) – You shouldn’t have to pay a close-your-account fee when you simply withdraw all your money. If they want to charge you, just leave it open and empty.
Of course, they’ll probably charge you fees every month for failure to maintan sufficient balance, then report you to the Credit Bureaus…geez, it’s worse than I first thought.
Oh, well, new acronym: IOKIYAS – It’s Okay If You’re A State (as opposed to the Feds).
See: Romney, W. Defense of Romneycare vs. Obamacare.
Yes so the chances of this to change are 0
Your final thoughts were why I said that you’d probably be incurring fees one way or another. I didn’t think about the credit bureau angle but I would bet money that these accounts require a minimum remain in the account to keep it open.
Quoting David: “It’s just legalized theft.”
———-
These guys are GOOD!
Isn’t “Cahoots” an upcountry town that went for Newt in the primary?
About the same as the Carolina Panthers winning the next Super Bowl.
That actually is an outstanding idea(which is why it would never happen.)
Fuck Bank of America…. Corporate scum! Protect those “monied interests,” in the systemic rape of a nation and its people! Yup…. Jefferson is spot on!
“…and they make a small profit on fees from the services.”
“This service doesn’t work for people who live many miles from an ATM of that particular bank, but they often have no recourse. And now, the system is expanding, at least in South Carolina, into tax refunds:”
SC citizens pigeon-holed again into corporate sodomy! Just another form of “undeserved” wealth extraction, bought by corporate.
Corpo-government collusion. AKA as rape……
Dunno about this but there was no closing fee connected to the Chase UI card. I never closed the account, just left it at zero balance. Since I have no other business w/Chase they’d be hard pressed to get any money out of me.
Actually, you don’t have to file a tax return- just pay your taxes. If you want your overpayment (from withholding) back, you must file a return. It’s not required by April 15th either if they owe you. But I’m referring to federal issues.