Greg Sargent thinks the ad above shows that conservatives have lost the argument on Wall Street. I would say that, other than the fact that Tim Geithner didn’t actually work for Goldman Sachs, and the minor sin of omission about more money flowing this year from Wall Street to Mitt Romney, it’s mostly a factual ad. In fact, they left out a lot, merely using the appearance of impropriety and the connections between the White House and Wall Street rather than the actual decisions made, which happen to largely protect Wall Street.
We’re going to get a lot of theater in the next year, with big talk about enforcement actions. In that regulatory filing by Wells Fargo, they also highlight what are known as “Wells notices,” essentially early warnings that they are about to be sued by the SEC over mortgage backed securities disclosures. Of course, every recent SEC litigation on MBS issues has ended up with a settlement where the offending company didn’t have to admit or deny wrongdoing. Furthermore, as Yves Smith points out, the statute of limitations has run out on almost all of these MBS issues. “The ONLY deals the SEC can pursue now are the last gasp transactions of March- June 2007, and on those, the clock is ticking.”
Meanwhile, the real hole in the balance sheets of the major banks, the actual ticking time bomb, concerns $308 billion in second liens – generally home equity lines of credit – that under the foreclosure fraud settlement, they don’t have to wipe out while modifying the first lien, a complete reversal of standard practice. Banks are required to write down the second liens only at equal terms with the first lien.
The banks that service about half the nation’s mortgages on behalf of investors will be able to share losses on their junior loans with bondholders and get credit toward the cash they pledged to spend in the settlement, said an Obama administration official involved in drafting the $25 billion agreement. Second liens would typically be wiped out before senior-mortgage investors take a loss, said Laurie Goodman, managing director at Amherst Securities Group LP in New York.
It’s “a gift to the banks, at investors’ expense,” said Goodman, a member of the Fixed Income Analysts Society’s Hall of Fame. “A proportionate write-down of the first and second represents a reversal of normal lien priority.” [...]
“The roadblock to getting comprehensive modifications has been the efforts of these banks, the biggest servicers, to protect their second liens,” Wilmarth said. “To only suffer losses on an equal basis as first-lien investors is a good outcome for them.”
This is a huge victory for the banks. It preserves their books. And now that they are making their highest profits since 2006, they will easily be able to put all the fraudulent conduct they committed behind them. And by the way, this treatment of second liens will ultimately make mortgages more expensive, as investors seek a premium to protect them from future outcomes like this.
As for the vaunted task force co-chaired by Eric Schneiderman, I’m quoted in this Huffington Post story about where that goes from here.
Matt Stoller, an influential blogger skeptical of the mortgage settlement, said that it’ll take the bringing of criminal charges to prove that the government is truly serious about holding the banks accountable. “They see [the settlement] as a down payment instead of what most of us think, which is that it’s actively a cover-up for a problem that hasn’t been investigated,” he said. “I want to know when the feds are going to put handcuffs on someone from [JPMorgan] for violating the Servicemember Civil Relief Act, which they admitted doing to Congress last year.”
David Dayen, another settlement skeptic who has covered the issue relentlessly for the blog FireDogLake, said the task force needs to send a message by tapping somebody with real credibility to run the operation. “In general terms, that staff director needs to be someone with a demonstrated record of seeking real accountability for these crimes,” he said, echoing a sentiment he has discussed on his blog.
For Stoller, Dayen and other critics, it’s hard to imagine that the new task force will force Wall Street to suffer the consequences of its actions when it has so far escaped prosecution. “Let’s remember, Eric Schneiderman hasn’t arrested anyone involved in this, and not for lack of authority. He subpoenaed Stephen Baum’s foreclosure mill [law firm] in April 2011, the one whose employees were caught dressing up as homeless people. There has been no [further] action on that from his office,” said Stoller.
The appointment of a staff director will be an important symbol of the seriousness of the effort. But ultimately, there are a lot of obstacles to real accountability here. And they all happen to be in that political ad up top.




20 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Unfortunately, anyone being arrested and prosecuted for anything tangible or relevant to a “criminal conspiracy” is not going to happen under an Obama administration that is practicing its “deft” conservativism while wearing the camouflage of an ersatz liberalism, is a no-brainer, and especially when viewed from here in the Sonoran Desert. Nope, Nada, Zip, and Zilch. Perhaps, in my frustration, I am thinking of an Obamaism that is equivalent to Napster-ism.
Jaango
Celebrate Jamie Dimon’s birthday on March 13 with Occupy Atlanta.
Amusingly, this critique sounds much better coming from an actual leftist like Jill Stein (Green Party) or Rocky Anderson (Justice).
Let’s call it what it truly is: Theater = Bullshit.
Mike Papantonio stated many months ago that the best way for Romney to beat Obama is to conduct a campaign like that shown in the video above. A devastating barrage of commercials like that and the purple states will go for the red.
This post confirms my decision not to vote for either dim or repug. 0 is not the lesser of two evils, he is simply a better spokesman. Those who think that he will be better the second time around will defend him no matter how badly he does. 0′s allegience is to the 1%, and the only feelings he has for the 99% is disdain; they don’t give him enough money to bother with.
There is no truer statement that that.
0 will get his due.
I agree witrh you and jaango. NOthing to see here, move along. NO chance we will get the full weight of the DoJ against these banksters while Obama, Geithner and Holder are around.
During the Savings&Loan scandal, almost 1,000 criminals were prosecuted for financial criomed not NEARLY as serious and aggregious as what happened here. I don;t care if Obama invents a “zero-calorie pizza, he’s lost my vote. Like BC above, neither party gets my vote.
No, the best way for Romney to beat Zero is to outbid him for Diebold’s affections. Wooing that sweetheart carries a high price tag.
“0 will get his due.”
——–
I’ve been hoping that. But, a morning stroll around the national polls indicates that Obama may very likely defeat Romney.
At this point there is no way that Obama can lose. The R party is damaged beyond repair for this election cycle. Their congress critters are deciding not to run for re-election in droves. Drier from Ca dropped out today and that’s really good news.
But Mary Shapiro doesn’t think prosecution is a good idea.
But Mary Shapiro doesn’t think prosecution is a good idea.
Well, in that case, the traitorous, tyrannical motherfucker won’t miss my vote. Or yours. And our personal consciences will be clear for the next four years, since we will at least know we did not act to condone and enable the continued abuse of civil liberties and the destruction of the Rule of Law.
I did see that in some poll that Ron Paul led 0 in a head-to-head contest. I don’t have a link.
Yeah, as important as the appointment of Schneidermann was.
Or the appointment of Warren to the WH was.
This doesn’t even rise to the level of Kabuki.
They’re doing it right out in the open and laughing at us.
Nobody’s going to get arrested — only victims get arrested.
Snowjob is the way to get what you want call black white and paint it over grey. Confuse complicate and smile so we know you are on our side. Snowjobs.
Obie could diffuse the Ron Paul poll numbers if he would just stop being such a weed whacker and honor his campaign promises not to interfere with medical marijuana dispensaries that comply with state laws. The only constituency that he really pleases with his tough stance on pot is “Big Pharma”, the same constituency with whom he and Rahm Emanual cut back room deals to kill the “public option” during the health care bill debates. Until Big Pharma can figure out a way to guarantee a big payday from marijuana, they will fight to keep it illegal, and Big Pharma has a pretty good track record for winning their fights.
David, I know I have been bugging everyone about this, but my chain of title is certainly damaged due to it being put into MERS when I refinanced in June 2007. If there is any chance that a suit could be brought on behalf of people like me who lost our chain of title in MERS, and if it is not too late, I would like to have this mentioned when you are talking to the higher ups. I did read a column about foreclosure in a local newspaper by a lawyer in my town, and I am going to call him about this.
There is no way that 0 would upset the big corpses, be they pharma, mic, financial, or insurance, or anything that tags along with those groups. He has committed to supporting the 1% and feels that there is a big enough base of people that will vote for him no matter what outrageous laws he rails against until it fits his wants and then signs. Based on his track record, a second term will be worse than the first. I would be glad to make an abject apology on FDL if 0 acts any better than he is doing now.