Rush Limbaugh has faced criticism before. But the backlash at the activist feels new. At least eleven advertisers have stopped hawking their wares on his program. Two radio stations have dropped the show entirely. Republican leaders have (sorta) denounced him. Limbaugh has apologized and that didn’t stop the backlash.
Nevertheless, to assume that Limbaugh will face the same fate as, say, Don Imus, is a little far-fetched.
But a backlash that might be a career-breaker for some commentators seemed unlikely to dent Limbaugh’s considerable stature among his 15 million weekly listeners and conservative leaders.
The criticism delivered by most Republican officeholders was muted. One political action committee stepped up to buy even more advertising on his program. All of which suggested that “The Rush Limbaugh Show” might be too big to fail [...]
Limbaugh may have been enduring a bigger blowback than any in memory — bigger than when he rooted for the newly inaugurated Obama to fail, or when he called Hillary Rodham Clinton “sex-cretary of state.” But to his listeners, anger from mainstream news outlets and Democratic politicians serves as proof positive that Limbaugh is on the right track. And even after his apology Monday, Limbaugh quickly turned to suggest it was “leftists” who had instigated the ugly tone on the contraception debate.
To do permanent harm to the talk radio host, the activists aligning against him — largely via social media — would have to expand and sustain their advertiser boycott for months, experts said. The analysts don’t expect that to happen, though they acknowledged that, even for the reliably outrageous Limbaugh, targeting a virtually unknown private citizen with sexually charged vitriol was problematic new territory.
If there’s any precedent here, it would be Glenn Beck, who Color of Change stripped of over 80 of his sponsors after he called President Obama a racist. That sustained campaign lasted well over a year, and culminated when Fox News decided not to bring Beck back. But that was anchored by one progressive organization. So far, the Limbaugh effort is happening on an ad hoc basis, which makes it prone to drift.
And anyway, they’re still consecrating Limbaugh in places like the Hall of Famous Missourians. So he’s not quite as toxic as Beck yet.
I do think there’s a path to drive Limbaugh off radio. He’s the de facto leader of the Republican Party, but so was Beck at the time. However, this will take months if not years, and a dedicated effort. What the backlash to Limbaugh’s “slut” comments does show is a new assertiveness from many outraged activists to make a meaningful difference, and I think that’s an excellent development.




40 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
It’s comforting to think that gnat would go away. OTH there are quite a few other survivors of similarly offensive on-air gaffes, and they are still there.
In a perverse way maybe Limbaugh’s presence is a positive reminder to better inclined folks of where not to go. Limbaugh’s supporters won’t change regardless, but enough more moderates will be repelled. . . Let Limbaugh be a liability to his cause?
Schadenfreude!
I see elements of the Republican party (the Bushes, more moderates, etc.) that are starting to see and vocalize that Rush is a liability. I think if the Dem’s win big this fall, the PTB will axe Rush.
Limbaugh didn’t just happen. He was created by well-heeled conservative backers and his show hawked virtually for free in small rural markets with stations desperate for cheap programming. He paved the way for the other haters as well as for FOX News.
It’s all part of the conservative-business drive to take over all of our arbiters of objective reality: schools, colleges, news media, judiciary and legal system in general, think tanks, research outlets. And it’s been in the works since the 1970s:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=John_M._Olin_Foundation
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2009/081809.html
Losing national sponsors, is a short term problem, they can be replaced, and some of them will likely return, once the immediate storm blows over. the real key to ending rush’s strangle hold on radio in the USA, is to get local affiliate stations to dump the show. there are many markets in the USA where the only AM radio show on, in his time period, is mr. limbaugh, in many places competting with himself, on more than one station. Local action, to convince the local advertisers, and the station to stop carrying the show, is likely to have more impact over time. local stations and advertisers, are more likely to understand, they are being watched, than national advertisers, who know that something will come along, to take the focus away from rush, and his attacks on Ms. Fluke.
Have to laugh. They’ve got that correct.
To the minions of MORONS that listen to and believe this galactical idiot he i s a national treasure. And he is a money maker for his bosses.
Unless he throws cads of money at politicians to get them elected, he is not a leader. People like Kochs are the power, not Limbaugh. He is just a puppet the money guys use to manipulate the rabble.
Let the Missouri Speaker of the House Steven Tilley know you don’t want to see Rush enshrined with the likes of Harry Truman and Samuel Clemens. Email Speaker Tilly at steven.tilley@house.mo.gov to tell him Limbaugh does not deserve to be among the truly great folks from Missouri.
Thanks.
let’s be clear here;
rush does not rely on sponsors for his broadcast, he was losing money for clear channel as far as actual sponsor income, however he pays dividends in to the corporatocracy for his message and he will continue doing that for them regardless of income revenue
the only way rush gets off the air is if the republicans and corporate politicians begin to lose because of rush, that’s the only thing that gets him off the air
great post pw
not only was rush given away for free “nationwide” when he was a reviled personality, he lost tons of money if all we were to count was revenue based on ad income
however revenue based on the laws written and politicians promoted payed far more then add revenue and it will continue paying against that investment
rush is going nowhere
here’s a similar example;
faux news lost billions of money if all we considered was add revenue, until shawn hannity the operated in the red, now they get to double dip, they not only get positive return on add income but exponential return on political dividend
To suggest that Don Imus suffered some terrible fate because of his obnoxious comments isn’t quite right.
His radio show was being simulcast on MSNBC, and when his “nappy headed ho” comments generated protests, MSNBC cut him loose.
But he continued to have his radio show, and Fox Business News soon came in to hire him for a daily simulcast on cable TV.
So Imus may have suffered a blow to his pride, and a marginal reduction in his large income, but it didn’t end his radio career by any means, and he is still an overpaid obnoxious jerk polluting the airwaves.
In Beck’s case the underlying issue of his past alcoholism took a toll. I think that in the end, this issue made large numbers of folks unable to defend him. His behavior seemed “crazy” not healthy, emotionally unstable.
The same issue is there for Limbaugh. He is as addict. His past behavior is of issue, not just his current misstep. The truth is that there has been a pattern of misogyny in both his personal life and in what he has been saying on the radio for years. Then add the fact that he is emotionally unstable and impulsive…two features that go with addiction, (untreated, non recovery addiction, abstinence alone) and the pattern with the behavior becomes a prevailing truth. He can’t own his behaviors, he can’t see his character defects, he can’t tolerate being called out.
I have the same sense with Limbaugh that I did with Beck…this type of personality will continue to engage in these behaviors…he can’t help it. And therefore, now that the spotlight is on him…not for saying something “mean” or “shocking” but now that the definition has changed, not “mean” but “aggressive, abusive” and not “shocking” but “crazy, off, not right” it is only a matter of time.
Incidentally, Imus also was an abstinent addict. There is a pattern here…and I am willing to bet that the pattern will follow all the way through. In AA circles we may refer to this as dry drunk…or not sober. People relate to it…just like they do the drunk guy at the party…at first. He’s a great guy, he’s so much fun, he says wild and crazy things…he’s harmless…eventually that drunk guy morphs with the disease into something else. Now that same guy is an “asshole”, a “drunk”, “mean” and a “pain in the ass”. Limbaugh has now made this cross over…there is only one way back to the other side of the street…and it has to do with a bunch of steps. Without those steps, he is destined to live out his life, being “tolerated” but never again…being “followed”.
The patterns of this disease are written in stone. Oh we may focus on some part of the pattern less invariable…at times, but there are parts of this pattern that are invariable. Remember too, that George W Bush fits the same category.
You can bank on these patterns…
Don Imus On Rush Limbaugh: “He’s A Fat, Gutless, Pill-Popping Loser”
Thousands of foreclosures everyday, real unemployment (a newspeak term) around 20%, people running out of UI, commercial property bubble about to burst, austerity still #1 solution to economic tailspin~not, war hawks still disseminating false info, 30,000 deaths in Mexico each year in drug war, pollution unregulated in China (comes to U.S. via jetstream), energy markets manipulated daily to the benefit of Oil and Coal industry, Justice Dept. in pocket of big finance; and, we are having a debate about birth control from the 1950′s?
The big thing will be when the sponsors discover the true ‘ratings’ of this jackal’s ‘show’ are illusory.
He really isn’t as widely listened to as purported, and his real reach isn’t as great. He is as popular as gingrich is intelligent. Bothfrom these charlatans real popularity will eventually dissapa points are media talking points, when the curtain is pulled away they will be seen for what they are.
It has been almost axiomatic the right wing communication division is formidable but they have sold derivatives of their real reach to corporate clients who will see the bang for their buck either backfiring or missing the mark.
The end of El Rushbo (his self-reference)? Keep dreaming.
Hah!!
I suspect that Imus is just jealous that Rush gets away with all of this crap, while he gets taken to the woodshed.
Bobster, Do’t be sucked in by Bush “charm offensives”. Anyone of them is esily the match of Edward the Longshanks. They play the hardest of hardball behind the scences…or in one case 48 yeasrs ago…on the front steps.
What an outstanding American philosopher Imus is.
..
..
Who’d a thunk THAT??
Agreed. Rush is Too Big to Fail.
That’s what happens when Mr. Peabody leaves the damn keys in his “Way-Back” machine.
Whenever I say, “But Rush IS the head of the Republicans; Rush is Mr.Republican; Rush represents all that is the Republican Party!” well….. my Republican friends all up an down the scale just get apoplectic! And that’s enough reason to keep him around for me.
Limbaugh peddles political porn. There’s a market for it, just like there is for regular porn. The difference is that mainline firms don’t advertise on cable porn shows, though presumably they could if they wanted. But they know they would be boycotted. We have to do the same for political porn shows. There will always be a market for them, and there’s no law against watching or listening to the stuff (nor should there be). But decent firms shouldn’t be abetting it. Maybe the NRA and the gun manufacturers would keep advertising, as the audience is their market; maybe NASCAR, or contractors selling underground bunkers to people who fear the end of the world. I dunno.
Rush Limbaugh was just saying what all the misogynist men at Rep. Darrell Issa’s “religious freedom” hearing were thinking, that any women in America on the pill (or seeking an abortion) are nothing but a bunch of sluts and prostitutes. So Sandra Fluke was banned from testifying. The “religious freedom” guys weren’t about to let her sully and challenge their righteous “religious freedom” outrage over so many sluts and prostitutes using contraceptives (or seeking an abortion) in America. IOW, their thinking (which Limbaugh voiced later): How dare Democrats ask them to allow a slut and a prostitutes to testify at THEIR “religious freedom” hearing!!!!
No Republican has yet said they disagree with the thrust of Rush’s rant or what the misogynist men at Issa’s hearing did. No Republican has yet said that they don’t view all American women using contraceptives (or seeking an abortion) as sluts and prostitutes. They’d all choke on any such apology.
And if Sandra Fluke sues Rush Limbaugh, Rush and his lawyers will claim “freedom of speech” and “religious freedom” in Rush’s defense. And if SCOTUS hears the case, the Vatican bloc (Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, all Catholics, all who gave us Citizens United) will rule in favor of Rush (and all misogynist Republican and conservative men), ruling that they have the “religious freedom” to publicly call all American women on the pill a bunch of sluts and prostitutes (including Republican and conservative women who’ve ever used contraceptives). And the next step will be Republicans legislating that all American women must release all their medical records so “religious freedom” Republicans can identify who all the sluts and prostitutes are, for branding with a Scarlet Letter by them. Misogynist Mission Accomplished!!!!
PW is right on in her analysis. And therefore, it is very important to address the substance of Limbaugh’s crime against reasoned debate. Namely, that when a citizen raises issues pertaining to women’s health and the importance of making contraception medicines available to women to maintain their health, it is illegitimate and wrong, embarassingly so, to reduce and tranform the debate to a mere sexual characterization, with a further reduction to pornography.
The unsophisticated dullards who accept such rhetorical switches and tricks by propogandists such as Limbaugh, must always be reminded, at every opportunity, that they are being used by the bully in the schoolyard to hurt their fellow citizens. It should be further pointed out to Rush’s listeners that his use of terminolgy, especially of an illicit sexual sort and porographic nature, speak directly to his and their most obvious sexual hangups, as in kind of perverted. That’s it! Rush is a pervert! Rush is a pervert!
I think that does it.
This whole Limbaugh thing is a fascinating, though repulsive, turn of events. It exposes a real problem they have on the right – the unsavory nature of a wide swath of their base.
When all this broke, I starting tinkering with a video idea and started to gather some of what Limbaugh’s said IRT women in the past. I’ve avoided Limbaugh up to this point, and nothing prepared me for the depth and viciousness of his misogyny. Sweet Jebbus it’s nasty.
I don’t know if that’s really him or if he’s just expert at gauging his audience (I suspect it’s really him – I don’t think you can come up with such things unless you’re twisted yourself). But what it reveals is how much hatred his listenership has for women who’ve moved a millimeter beyond the kitchen. I like Knut’s characterization (@23) of Limbaugh as political porn, hate porn if you will.
It might be that Limbaugh ON the air is a bigger advantage to progressives than Limbaugh off the air. I say that with some trepidation. The impulses encouraged by Limbaugh are disgusting and corrosive.
But, forcing Limbaugh off the air doesn’t make those bitter, frightened and angry reactionaries who harbor such impulses go away. Maybe it’s better to unmask their motivations for all to see. Not just politically, but culturally.
I understand Limbaugh’s latest reaction is that this backlash is some conspiracy secretly engineered by leftists. He has to say something like this. The realization that most of the country reacts to you with horrified revulsion is something he needs to shield his audience from at all costs. Maybe, now that there’s been this groundswell, this collective national “Ewwww!” it’s more useful to continue to remind the Limbaugh audience that what they are doing is the equivalent of taking a crap on the dinner table in full view of company.
Advertise on the Rush Limbaugh show and you are dead to me, now and forever. Not only will I avoid your products like they are radioactive, but I will tell anyone who will listen about your support of this admitted drug addict who was caught returning from a notorious sex tourism haven with prescription Viagra – issued to someone else.
I will make sure they consider more ethical companies and tell them about his slanderous bullying of a young lady for exercising her first amendment right to free speech. I will explain that he hates all women, having asserted that 99% of them – those who use birth control – are sluts.
And I will never buy your products again.
___________________________________________________
I can’t guarantee that this letter would get lardass off the air, but I can guarantee that it would cost him his sponsors. If Clear Channel/Bain Capital choose to continue a major money loser, so much the better.
At this point, and probably for the first time ever, I think it’s probably better if Limbaugh is ON the air, preferably spewing as much misogynistic crap as he ever has. Now that he has called 99% of women sluts, his mere presence will be a constant irritant.
Rush ain’t going anywhere. As others have already pointed out, Rush has often been a “loss leader,” whose shows didn’t make much if any money, and usually ran in the red.
Paying Rush his gi-normous salary is chump change for the 1%. Rush is reliable in pitting segments of the 99% against other segments of the 99%, and that’s why he gets paid the big bucks.
Does anyone for one instant actually that the psycopaths/sociopaths at the top give one lousy shit about any of this? It’s GREAT for business, my friends.
Even we here at FDL are commenting on this hateful loser… sort like Nero fiddling ‘n all.
Just saying…
Rush ain’t going anywhere. He’s very very very very very VALUABLE to the PTB. So some advertisers temporarily pull their sponsorships??? Welcome to yet another ACT in the ongoing Kabuki Show.
JMHO, of course, but I’d be darn surprised to see Limbaugh “driven” off the air. And as has already been pointed out, Don Imus is still *highly paid* for his hatefulness. No big. Rush, sad to say, is here to stay.
I was only ONCE *forced* (in a car) to listen to this pig-shit spew his hateful diatribes, and that was only for about 5 minutes, plus it was many many years ago. I think Rush probably has only gotten worse and more nasty since then.
Even back then for 5 minutes, my breath was taken away at the depth and breadth of his abject bullying HATRED of all women. Rush “coats” it like he’s only “angry” at so-called “liberal feminists.” AS IF. Rush loathes, detests & abjectly despises ALL women. Period.
The scum is disgusting. And I know PLENTY of rightwing WOMEN who listen to this slime daily… go figure. they LOVE Rush. Talk about self-loathing. I never ever “got” his appeal. The depth and breadth of his negative hatefulness still “burns” after all of these years.
It’s very very sick, to say the least.
Just keep publicizing the list of sponsors:
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/03/all-ads-pulled-rush-limbaughs-show/49552/
Although whether you’d like to reward those companies for pulling their ads, or punish them for not having figured out until now that they shouldn’t be associated with Rush… that’s your choice too!
Also, some of the comments by companies denying that they were knowingly advertising raise the question of whether Rush and shows like his might actually pull “mainstream” ads into their shows as a way of conveying legitimacy.
Usually we think of pundits legitimizing the advertisers, but in this crazy modern world sprinkling your show with ads from large corporations could be intended to reflect their legitimacy on your fascism.
And then come the companies who want to be associated with Rush at his new discount rates!
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/03/some-advertisers-suddenly-want-support-rush-limbaugh/49561/
Bain Capital=Clear Channel=Rush Limbaugh=Mitt Rmoney=Bain Capital. Where can I get that bumper sticker?
Rush Limbaugh was just saying what all the misogynist men at Rep. Darrell Issa’s “religious freedom” hearing were thinking, that women in America on the pill (or seeking an abortion) are nothing but a bunch of sluts and prostitutes. So Sandra Fluke was banned from testifying. The “religious freedom” guys weren’t about to let her sully and challenge their righteous “religious freedom” outrage over so many sluts and prostitutes using contraceptives (or seeking an abortion) in America. IOW, their thinking (which Limbaugh voiced later): How dare Democrats ask them to allow a slut and a prostitute to testify at THEIR “religious freedom” hearing!!!!
No Republican has yet said they disagree with the thrust of Rush’s rant or what the misogynist men at Issa’s hearing did. No Republican has yet said that they don’t view all American women using contraceptives (or seeking an abortion) as sluts and prostitutes. They’d all choke on any such apology.
And if Sandra Fluke sues Rush Limbaugh, Rush and his lawyers will claim “freedom of speech” and “religious freedom” in Rush’s defense. And if SCOTUS hears the case, the Vatican bloc (Roberts, Alito, Scalia, Thomas, Kennedy, all Catholics, all who gave us Citizens United) will rule in favor of Rush (and all misogynist Republican and conservative men), ruling that they have the “religious freedom” to publicly call all American women on the pill a bunch of sluts and prostitutes (including Republican and conservative women who’ve ever used contraceptives). And the next step will be Republicans legislating that all American women must release all their medical records so “religious freedom” Republicans can identify who all the sluts and prostitutes are, for branding with a Scarlet Letter by them. Misogynist Mission Accomplished!!!!
Remember, arch-conservative religious types in America have been yelling “sluts” and “prostitutes” at women for many years, outside abortion clinics or in contraceptive-denying pharmacies and religious-run hospitals, but it took Rush Limbaugh calling Sandra Fluke a slut and a prostitute on air for this attack on American women, and their inherent freedom as an American, to finally resonate across the country, because in Rush attacking Sandra Fluke, so relentlessly and disgustingly, calling her a slut and prostitute, and so much else, it finally dawned on almost everyone that Republicans and arch-religious types, in attacking the legal use by American women of contraceptives (and even over the legal abortion issue), have been screaming (loudly or in a whisper) sluts and prostitutes over the years at ALL American women who’ve ever used legal contraceptives, at all of our nation’s mothers, daughters, sisters and wives.
So, we should all really thank Rush Limbaugh for blatantly expressing what all the Republicans and arch-religious types are really thinking, their condemnation, their hatred of American women and a woman’s freedom. And these type of religiously-rigid Republicans will never apologize, will never express any kind of contrition, because to do so would violate their “faith.”
Besides all American women, hopefully, all American fathers, sons, brothers and husbands will take note of the Republican’s foul judgment of all the mothers, daughters, sisters and wives of America. In Rush trying to “brand” Sandra Fluke, he instead just “branded” the entire Republican Party. Thank you Rush. Now bring on all the Democratic Party campaign ads containing snippets of Rush’s on-air attack on Sandra Fluke (and all American women using birth control).
Good! Rush and Fox will both eventually go broke. The sooner the better.
A link glitch. . .sorry if this posted twice
I agree with you RF. Limbaugh is a useful poster child.
Yet if anything cold have finished him off for good, it would be the oxycontin pills. Go figure.
If that fat fuck has 15 million listeners I AM the Queen of Sheba.
His numbers, like everything else about conservative “popularity” is entirely made up out of whole cloth.
I know (now) what you mean. I’m not easily shocked, but what I heard pushed me back in my chair. And all I could think about was what kind of person could it be that actively seeks something like that out.
If I was a space-alien flying by and only picked up Limbaugh’s radio signals, I’d call the inter-galactic pest exterminators to fumigate the planet.
Limbaugh is the stone that must be tied as tightly as possible around the necks of every conservative politician and public figure. The more he says, the more antisocial he reveals himself to be, and the more his depravity pulls them all under.
IF Fluke sues Limbaugh, it will be for “defamation of character” — and the law would be on HER side because she is a private citizen, who was exercising her right of free speech in testifying before a Congressional committee.
It’s highly unlikely to reach SCOTUS, and even if it did, Fluke’s rights were violated NOT Limbaughs. Having a nationwide radio show does not give you the right to commit assault.