If we’re seeing any renaissance in American politics at the moment, it comes from a backlash against an ever-advancing policy against the ability for women to think and make choices for themselves. This policy of female subjugation, which mostly but not entirely has focused on health care issues, has realized real gains on an almost unbroken line for 40 years. But for whatever reason – conservative overreach, a new generation of feminist activists – we’re seeing a real and sustained pushback. While it has not translated into policy advances yet, it has set the stage for them.
Consider the increasing success with stopping the most noxious of the conservative subjugation policies. The mandatory ultrasound bill in Virginia was shifted from a trans-vaginal one to a trans-abdominal one. That hardly represents much of a defense, but considering the normal trajectory of these things, it was a place to start. The Blunt amendment, which would have given employers the ability to decide whether women could receive treatment they found objectionable, also went down to defeat, and Republicans have no intention of bringing it up again. Similarly, in Arizona, a bid to allow employers to drop coverage for contraception and require employees to justify their purchases of contraception products has been dropped and will be rewritten.
Lesko said critics have wrongly read House Bill 2625 as requiring the employee to disclose her medical condition to her employer in order to continue coverage. However, that disclosure is between the worker and the employer’s insurance company, she said [...]
On Monday, she pulled the bill from the Senate Rules Committee agenda so she and other lawmakers could work on amendments before it comes before the full Senate for a vote. It has already passed the House.
But the more interesting factor is the drag these fights on contraception and abortion have had on the overall public opinion of Republicans, particularly at the state level. Consider that Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell had an astronomical approval rating and was considered a possible Vice Presidential candidate before the flap over the ultrasound bill there. Now, new polling numbers show:
Voters approve 53 – 32 percent of the job Gov. McDonnell is doing, down from a 58 – 24 percent score February 9 and McDonnell’s lowest rating since the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University began Virginia surveys June 29, 2011.
The State Legislature’s negative 38 – 47 percent score is a 19-point shift from a 47 – 37 percent positive approval rating February 9 and the first time the legislature has received a negative grade [...]
Virginia voters disagree 52 – 41 percent with a new law that requires women seeking an abortion to undergo an ultrasound examination at least 24 hours before the procedure.
Voters say 72 – 21 percent that government should not make laws which try to convince women seeking an abortion to change their minds.
Part of this is just how voters tend to dislike politicians once they try to legislate. But in addition, you have women’s issues really driving up the negatives of the Governor and the Republican state legislature. Conversely, you’re seeing reproductive freedom groups, including campaign-based ones like EMILYs List, drawing newfound attention and funding by highlighting these issues.
Finally, the one entity that made a big gamble on subjugating women, the Susan G. Komen Foundation, is reeling in the aftermath of its efforts to defund Planned Parenthood:
Two top executives at Susan G. Komen for the Cure have announced their resignation, amid reports that the breast cancer charity is struggling to raise money and repair its reputation after its decision to defund Planned Parenthood and subsequent reversal.
Katrina McGhee, Komen’s executive vice president and chief marketing officer, privately announced several weeks ago that she will be stepping down on May 4, and Dara Richardson-Heron, CEO of Komen’s New York City affiliate, announced her resignation on Tuesday. Both cited “personal” reasons and declined to elaborate.
If I had to guess, I’d say there won’t be a Susan G. Komen Foundation come next year.
I’m willing to call this a trend. It has not translated fully into political power just yet – witness Idaho joining other states on mandatory ultrasound legislation. But I think awareness has been raised to the war on women, which has really super-charged over the past two years. And the conditions are ripe for a major backlash.
UPDATE: The campaign of protesting GOP Governors on Facebook is another nascent example of this, as is the campaign of women knitting lady parts for their members of Congress.




44 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
David, thanks ever so much for highlighting this–both the contrived crap they’re trying to drag us through (once again–will it never end?) and the great and creative efforts women and the men who care about them are making to have control over our own bodies.
(David, I am in no way including you in my reference to “left” talking heads below. I greatly appreciate your work, and absolutely do not put you in the category of the MSNBC clowns).
I certainly take no glee in the fact that the Susan G Komen Foundation may not survive the recent brouhaha over women’s reproductive rights/health care. I also believe that the foundation may not be the only one who suffers from a backlash.
I’m as liberal as they come, and am definitely on the side of those who support family planning and Planned Parenthood. However, the coverage of this issue (led by “left” talking heads on radio and TV) has been over-the-top, and has, I believe, intentionally served as a “distraction” from all the other even more pressing issues that affect ALL AMERICANS.
Imagine if just a “fraction” of the time spent hyperventilating about this one issue, were spent on substantive policy discussions of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid reform.
Considering the fact that the corporatist Democratic Party has such a difficult time garnering any of the white, male vote, I suppose that it’s understandable for them to pander to female voters (of which, I am one).
At least in my case, they’re wasting their time. Of all of the single issues (and it’s not to say that this is not an important issue) that might sway one’s vote, I can’t imagine that this would be one of them.
I couldn’t disagree with you more.
I can imagine it being a make or break issue. Let alone when I started to respond…before I saw the comments….I was about to note it’s all enough to make one take up knitting…;) The world we live in has gone crazy.
The Republican party is about six months away from calling for female circumcision. These people are religious fanatics. They believe in an angry and vengeful god and they want to bring us an angry and vengeful government.
Gah, what freakin flapdoodle. Like unplanned/unwanted pregnancies don’t affect both women and men? I’d say this bullshit affects absolutely EVERYBODY at a very fundamental level.
Women’s sexual activity has been front and center for the Rs since the beginning of the campaign. They always get around to it every election because they don’t have any solutions to the other problems or simply don’t care about them. I think they believe that if they could just control women, everything would be just fine. Fat Chance!
Question: Has anyone considered that these recent attacks against women in the political sphere perhaps be part of a much larger propagandistic scheme of creating an election year narrative where Obama wins/selected due to “overwhelming support by women”? Furthermore does this set up the system to make the next puppet ruler to be a Queen?
And cutesy bullshit like “knitting lady parts for your member of congress” is so fucking stupid it just infuriates me anymore. Jesus, no wonder fascism is cleaning our clocks.
The Democrats need to hang this issue around the Republican’s collective necks and sink them to the bottom of the ocean with it.
I think enough parts could make a pretty effective statement….not sure.
It made me laugh when I read it. The worst thing that can happen to a politician is to become a joke. They get really defensive about that because they are “serious” people. If something makes them look like a bunch of a**hats, so be it.
Thanks….;) So Be it….Yep.
Usually when several others have hopped on some breathtakingly stupid comment, I leave it alone, but this one literally does take my breath away.
I am a white male who would never vote for a fascist Republican, but who remembers the constant whine of phony liberals in the 60′s who claimed that the civil rights movement needed to slow down, for fear of scaring potential supporters. Martin Luther King should be satisfied with incremental change, and in a generation or two, everything would magically resolve itself.
Now over half of the population is being treated like chattel by a powerful and aggressive fascist movement, civil rights casually brushed aside as if they never existed, and I see another self-proclaimed liberal counseling indifference.
My wife or other female relative, is now subject to state rape, since we are Texans, and you see no reason for outrage? They have taken away the only available health care for hundreds of women in this state and are going after the other 49 with varying degrees of success, and you think we should focus on “more important” issues?
You and your kind are the reason that liberalism got a bad name.
Please reconsider your position.
eCHANnomis, RevBev and Sharkbabe–
I appreciate your comments.
My frame of reference is a somewhat narrow one, admittedly. I’m referring for the most part to the commentators on MSNBC, most of whom I consider to be unserious, too corporatist, and in the case of one of them, a downright “phoney” liberal.
I honestly read the constant barrage of commentary (which did deserve serious coverage, no doubt) to be no more than an obvious attempt (by minions of the Democratic Party) to “rev up the base,” anyway they can. By doing so, they are stooping to the level of the Republican Party–using “fear” to motivate their voter base.
The fourth paragraph should read:
My wife or other female relative, is now subject to state rape, since we are Texans, and you see no reason for outrage? They have taken away the only available health care for hundreds of thousands ofwomen in this state and are going after the other 49 with varying degrees of success, and you think we should focus on “more important” issues?
Fear? No need to fear anything, the Republicans have already implemented their policies in Texas and are going after the other 49 states! This isn’t some theoretical problem, it is an ongoing assault on the civil rights of more than half the population!
Shouting FIRE when the theater catches fire is not fear mongering.
No matter what your opinion regarding the President and what he did and did not do, this issue on women will pail to the issues of Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, SCHIP programs, economic inequality growing wider, etc. will be upon this country if the push back is not framed and understood in the next election.
We are already fighting for our basic subsistence in the State of Wisconsin but we are fighting with all our inner strengths to turn around the lies and deception from the last election. Walker was one of the most corrupt County Commissioner of Milwaukee but too many stayed home or bought his bait & switch. We have seen massive school funding cuts, basic programs cuts, “jobs lost”, etc. and corporate giveaways.
Everyone must stand up and fight or this country will go back 50 years if not more. But, we are not defeated yet, recalls are already happening – one more seat in our Senate tips the scale in WI. A Lieutenant Governor is on the chopping block and the John Doe case will seal the Governors fate.
Companies that would have come to WI went to other states because they felt the education cuts would not produce the next generation of required hightech engineers and working people. The middle class is what has made this country. Our children and their children deserve better.
It’s the Roe stick all over again. The reason women (and the men who respect them) must vote Democratic — because of Roe, Roe, Roe.
Of course it’s a real issue. And it’s also great theater.
All those women who weren’t sure they could support our sexist president (sweetie) and all those women who for good reason fear for their very autonomy will now vote for the president who will make his grand bargain that will cut Social Security and Medicare — and of course, what segment of the population is MOST dependent upon these, but women! So very less likely to have pension benefits or employer health care or retirement savings.
It’s like the capitalists selling the very rope by which they will be hung — except completely opposite. It’s creating the very surge of support from us by which we’ll be impoverished.
Back to the 1970s in more ways than one, when abortion was the battle ground and the single largest demographic living in poverty were elderly women.
Really: this war on women is a wonderful two-fer, for Dems and Republicans alike. No wonder we hear so much more about it than the economy.
UnEasyOne–
Did you miss my comment that I support both family planning and Planned Parenthood, maybe?
My only point was that the entire topic has been run into the ground, especially on MSNBC and talk radio. You entirely misread where I’m coming from–sounds like you think that I am worried about “potential right wing supporters”? (Reference your second paragraph)
Anyway, I don’t want Planned Parenthood services taken away from any woman, in any state, but that’s an entirely separate topic, if you’re referring to the attacks on Planned Parenthood being legislated in various states. My posting is in reference to the recent brouhaha over the Affordable Care Act/contraception debacle–nothing more.
In regard to your concern over a “powerful and aggressive fascist movement,” my question to you is, “Whose in charge now?” Frankly, both parties concern me greatly!
Again, it’s a matter of “proportion.” Somehow I don’t see this issue as more serious than the issue of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid Reform, when the result of the reform could plunge huge numbers of the 78 million American seniors slated to retire (not to mention millions of our disabled and poor Americans) in the coming years, into abject poverty for the rest of their lives.
So, I apologize if my comment upset you. I absolutely want all women to receive family planning services and/or health care, and I don’t believe that I said that I didn’t.
It’s the Repugs using heavy-handed tactics, including “state rape” or the invasion of women’s bodies against their will with foreign objects mandated by the state, and trying to terrorize women that will “rev up the base” or drive women in droves to vote against the Repuglican Party which is imposing their cruel, fascist, irrational idiocy on women.
The fascist that call themselves the Republican party have launched an all-out assault on freedom, on every front imaginable. With their war on women, they have chosen to attack 51% of the population. Women vote.
They have been after the voting rights of minorities for decades; that has only gotten attention from progressives. Voter suppression is so important, that my hair has been on fire about it for more than a decade (pre 2000). But not enough paid attention to even slow the assault on voting rights much. Now people are starting to pay attention.
Because the Rethugs have assaulted women so directly, millions more are looking at their actual agenda.
Are SS, Medicare, and Medicaid also important? Hell yes! But with over half of the population – women – willing to consider Republicans honest agents, (and our president just itching to sell them all out) they have been under increasing threat for a long time.
Now, thanks to this assault on women, the Republicans have badly damaged their brand. They have attacked SS and Medicare/Medicaid before, with little success. They pissed off some seniors, but they managed to convince them in 2010 that Obama was the problem.
This time they have awakened a sleeping giant. Nothing is more important than that, because it will bring the demise of their reign of terror. All social programs immediately become safer.
Next we have to trade the Quisling Obama for an actual Democrat.
Thanks for covering this, Dave. I have been having a really hard time trying to figure out how this virulent misogyny has come to the fore in an election year. I have never seen such a thing happen before. Surely there are not enough self-loathing women among the religious zealots and the wingnuts to make this kind of legislation a political winner? It seems more like we are living through a parody of all that is bad about the white male oligarchy, or a dystopia, a la The Handmaid’s Tale, than any kind of reality.
fatser–
Truthfully, I believe that far more women will be affected by the draconian cuts to Social Security (remember, social security benefits also cover “women and orphans”, the disabled, and seniors) that are presently being negotiated, than will be affected by laws enacted which mandate a vaginal ultrasound for women seeking abortions.
But remember, my comment only referred to the ACA/contraception/Catholic Church/Obama debacle regarding family planning–NOTHING MORE.
The attempts to ban Birth control and various other Rethug actions in the war on women cannot be separated from each other or the Rethugs overall agenda. When a woman pissed that her niece had to undergo this crap votes against a Republican and he loses his seat, he can no longer attack SS either.
It is a lot easier for the Rethugs to use smoke and mirrors to claim that they are strengthening SS annd fool people.
These war on women actions are blatant assaults.
Yes, they are. And to try to separate out women’s issues as something lesser than those of “everyone” is sexist othering in the extreme.
UnEasyOne–
Here is a portion of your own words:
“Are SS, Medicare, and Medicaid also important? Hell yes! But with over half of the population – women – willing to consider Republicans honest agents, (and our president just itching to sell them all out) they have been under increasing threat for a long time.
Now, thanks to this assault on women, the Republicans have badly damaged their brand. They have attacked SS and Medicare/Medicaid before, with little success. They pissed off some seniors, but they managed to convince them in 2010 that Obama was the problem.
This time they have awakened a sleeping giant. Nothing is more important than that, because it will bring the demise of their reign of terror. All social programs immediately become safer.
Next we have to trade the Quisling Obama for an actual Democrat.”
I agree totally with the first two sentences that affirm the importance of the social safety net.
You lost me after that. Remember, it was President Obama who appointed the Bowles-Simpson (both rabid right wingers) Fiscal Commission that opened this entire can of worms regarding the radical remake of our social safety net. The topic was barely mentioned by either party when Obama ran for President. However, his apparent intention while he was a candidate was to dismantle social security and Medicare, as we know it.
May I reference my FDL diary of October 2, 2011, which links to a Washington Post Editorial Board interview with then “President-Elect” Obama. It links to both the WaPo article and interview video. Please read and/or watch it.
I think you’ll come away with a different perspective, if you do. But, I respect, of course, you right to disagree.
You’re wrong, terribly, tragically wrong
I guess you weren’t around in 2008. The Sarah Palin is a c*nt t-shirts. The Hillary Clinton nutcracker doll. The comments about cleavage and ankles and women who can only host tea parties and how claws come out, how women make themselves feel better by attacking, the “voice in her head” New Republic cover, that awful horrible sound that is female laughter, how horrible it would be for the country to have to watch a female leader age, anything at all written by Maureen Dowd, a full fifty percent of everything spoken by Bill Maher or Keith Olbermann, on and on.
In 2008 misogyny was unleashed in this country and very few people spoke up about it at all. Like Howard Dean, they “didn’t see it.”
Melissa at Shakespeare’s Sister did a terrific job chronicling it all. Far too many others ignored it or “didn’t see it.” Or thought it didn’t matter in the grand scheme of things.
Presumptuous Insect:
How on earth is it “illogical” to put more weight on an issue that “directly” affects (as opposed to perhaps indirectly, affecting) EVERY AMERICAN CITIZEN, over an issue that affects only one half of the American citizenry. As as for “sexist,” I would argue the same, if it were an issue that could only affect the male portion of the population, versus the entire population of the US.
Actually, quoting UnEasyOne’s own words, I have to wonder if his upset with my post is mainly because I was critical of an issue that he hopes will, to quote him, “brings the demise of their reign of terror, and presumably, re-elect President Obama.”
At at rate, I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree, on this one.
“Engage people with what they expect; it is what they are able to discern and confirms their projections. It settles them into predictable patterns of response, occupying their minds while you wait for the extraordinary moment — that which they cannot anticipate.”- Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Fascists know war almost better than anything else. The political duopoly exist only to create deception and some have yet to understand this.
“A military operation involves deception. Even though you are competent, appear to be incompetent. Though effective, appear to be ineffective.”- Sun Tzu, The Art of War
Kassandra,
I just have to ask in what way am I “terribly, tragically wrong?”
I have to believe that, to some extent, various commentators hope that this topic will be a winning issue for the Democratic Party in the upcoming election, and that my comment inadvertently stepped on their toes. Ironically, I stated in my initial post that I agree that the issue is important and bears discussion. But, simply put, it is not my main area of concern, compared to some other issues.
Anyway, thanks for your comment.
Sorry — women aren’t one-half of the population. They’re the majority.
51%.
One of these days, I sincerely hope, the fact that we are the majority of the population will be evident by our representation in politics, media and culture, work and business and every other sphere of life. Currently we only have about 17% representation in govt., are outnumbered by about 20:1 in media and culture, and make up only about 3% of business chief executives. Majority ruled by minority.
From what I understand, statisticians estimate that at the rate we’re going, parity will be achieved in about 500 years. Oh, frabjous day!
But I agree with your sense that the attack on women is being nicely played by Democrats in order to boost support for Obama. If women’s rights were anothing other than great bargaining chips, I’m sure he could make a speech on the subject, maybe after he finishes his cameo on that wonderfully misogynist show Entourage. Cynicism and scapegoating, great tools of political theater, and it’s always so easy to kick women around, even the best of men do it. This time around, I’m sure the women who have been kicked will vote for the man who’s “uncomfortable” with abortion but trusts women to make the right choice “in consultation with their partners, parents and pastors.” (Provided they’re not making the choice because they’re “feeling blue.”)
And then he’ll spend another four years silent on the issue of women.
Absolutely I agree that misogyny is part of the political culture. But to clarify, I have never seen this concentrated effort in legislation ever before. We are being overrun by legislators going medieval on our asses (tm coram nobis).
This is a true war against women and as women we need to do everything possible to stop it. It’s not just birth control and sonograms. They’re trying to pass laws that your employer can fire you if you are taking birth control pills for anything other than a health problem. Did you read the story about the employer going through the employee’s purse? If we allow this, Social Security won’t mean anything because we will have lost our freedom.
Repugs are conducting multiple attacks on the US population and we are responding to all of them. Just look at the titles of David’s posts today alone and you can see that. We don’t have the luxury to embrace a topic or two to the exclusion of all the others. To recommend that people only address a topic or two seems a divisive tactic. We have to be united and to respond to all the attacks, and respond resolutely.
When you look at the recent Gallup congressional poll, and you see that the GOP is ahead by four points, you can see that you are likely right. The GOP normally trails far behind in this poll.
Twain–
(As one ol’ lady to another–just kidding–saw that someone, in the heat of the Michael Cavlan argument, called you that!)
Of course we need to stand up against any infringement against our civil liberties.
Again, there is a risk of overdoing any story, and I do believe that MSNBC is at risk of causing a hugh backlash over this issue, and potentially a couple of others, is they don’t learn to exercise some degree of proportionality. That’s my opinion, and I’m gonna stick to it! Ha!
Thanks for your comment.
They’d have to actually “fight” on the issue. Kinda hard to do when they have anti choicers among their own ranks.
Thank you–I am grateful for a positive response!
It IS a make or break issue for me. I will not vote for another anti choice legislator. I don’t care if she or he has an R or D after their name. As a matter of fact, Kaine will not be getting my vote for Senate because he is ant choice. My message to politicians is they better start pandering to me in the same way they pander to Catholic bishops or lose my vote.
Dandelion–
Thank you for your posts!
You are one of the few who’ve picked up on part of my message, which is that I suspect that much of the attention given this matter is simply because of electoral politics, NOT because any of our elected representatives plan to do much of anything about, or for that matter, even care that much about it!
cwaltz–
I congratulate you on refusing to vote for Tim Kaine. He’s the worst kind of Democrat–a conservative and a corporatist Democrat.
By the way, your feeling about this issue, is the same as mine on the social safety net issue. I truly don’t hold it against you, or any other blogger out there who shares your opinion. I’m sorry that others can’t be as open minded.
fatser–
Never once did I recommend that anyone should only care about only one or two issues.
I can’t imagine how the fact that I strongly advocate for Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid could be taken as being divisive. Now, if I had stated: “Anyone who does not agree with me that the social safety net is the most important issue of our times is an idiot,” then, you could rightfully call me divisive.
Thanks for your comment.