The close call in the House Budget Committee for the Ryan budget led many to wonder whether the House leadership would have trouble with the bill on the floor. But The Hill reports that they’re making progress toward that goal:
Conservative House Republicans on Thursday said they support the 2013 budget resolution, leaving GOP leaders increasingly confident they will be able to pass the measure on the floor next week.
A day after the budget was approved in committee by a single vote (with two Republicans voting no), prominent members of the conservative Republican Study Committee said they back the resolution crafted by House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.).
RSC Chairman Jim Jordan (Ohio), who was undecided earlier this week, told The Hill he was won over by stronger limits on welfare and Medicaid spending.
RSC member Mick Mulvaney (S.C.), who also sits on the Budget Committee, said earlier this week that he might vote against the budget on the floor. But he ultimately backed the measure during the budget panel’s Wednesday markup, he said, after winning concessions from Ryan on increasing the panel’s oversight powers.
“Paul and I talked, and he agreed to make some additional accommodations to the RSC,” Mulvaney said.
Since the budget is a political document anyway, passage on the House floor is really the only hurdle. When two conservatives voted against the bill in committee and the Club for Growth opposed it, you could see trouble for passage, especially if Democrats kept their word and voted against it en masse. But Jordan’s support in particular probably brings along the overwhelming majority of hardliners, and I wouldn’t therefore expect more than token opposition next week.
The question then becomes why Republicans would want to force their most vulnerable members to walk the plank on something that has no chance of becoming law. The answer is that this is a rare circumstance where both parties think they have a story to tell. Democrats are obviously salivating at the prospect of a budget that they will say ends Medicare as we know it and eliminates a raft of cherished programs, with severe consequences for seniors and the poor. Democrats will also argue that Republicans broke the debt limit deal by forcing spending lower that the targets laid out there. Republicans want a budget to prove that they can do their job, and they want to accuse Democrats of ignoring the deficit and continuing down the path of big spending and big government. They also, they argue, “softened” the Medicare piece so that it’s more palatable to seniors, and they can say that they’re protecting Medicare before it goes broke.
The polling shows that the Ryan budget, properly explained, provokes a negative reaction. But few things are ever properly explained, and Republicans will probably have more money to do the explaining. So they’re not going to back up on this. Let’s see how it plays out.




18 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Rest assured, it has a bipartisan purpose, called “Kabuki Theatre!”
It will serve to move the Democrats and the Obama administration juuuuuuuust a little further to the right, right before both parties start the serious negotiations over “entitlement reform (cuts).”
I’ve seen this movie before.
Blue
Paul Ryan thinks like Ayn Rand,just let the poor die…
Are there any honest, straight talkers? No wonder cynicism is so high.
Once upon a time I thought the Democrats were the 1962 New York Mets, a group so inept that manager Casey Stengel once asked, “Can’t anyone here play this game?” Having become wiser and definitely older, I’ve been force conclude that the Democrats are, in fact, the 1919 Chicago Black Sox or, at best, the 1952-2012 Washington Generals.
The sooner this pathetic excuse for a party gets knocked off the political chessboard, the better.
With Obama as the leader of the D Party and the divine creator of The Deficit Commission, and analogies such as: the Fed is like a household budget and “we all need to tighten our belts”.
We are in for a Grand Bargain.
It turns out that Obama truly believed that Reagan really did have good ideas!
Surely you’ve heard by now that the Iraq war was not “the stupid war” Obama had sometimes referred to. Obama loves the Iraq War now. It has been a Glorious Adventure. Seems he was mistaken earlier as Campaign Obama.
Wasington Generals…that’s really good. Fake passes (meant to be stolen), fake shots, clumsy ball handling, pretend defense..
Very apt, best metaphor of the month for Dems.
Best way to protect everything is to de-privatize it.
When I was first on Medicaid the gov administered it with a 3% overhead. now the HMOs, and various other pigs take as much as 60%.
De-privatize these programs and negotiate for lowere drug prices….and WHAM!…..problem solved
I could be wrong, but my sense of Ryan’s position on taxation is that everyone should pay the same amount. Not that everyone should pay the same percentage, but the same amount. It’s an impression I got from an interview he gave, perhaps a year ago, maybe more. I wish I had the video. And if anyone else has the same recollection, I would like to know.
cipro eardrops purchased for 7 month old Walgreens ins payment 120$ co payment (sucker80$)
Canadian Pharmacy 3$
Darth had a heart transplant on the publics dime
did i mention 750 ml
drops made in Philipines
Alcon Bayer Walgreens conspiracy to break you
this country is hopeless
forget hope and change
It looks like Ryan is convinced shoring and backfilling the base’s mantra and TParty folks’red meat, coupled with a long primary, will insure the turnout necessary to keep the House and stop Obama. Which isn’t difficult these days. He’s going to keep pushing back hard on this budget fight. It keeps the money flowing in and he gets to help hand it out. Such a deal. And stay on the TV. How old will he be in 2016? The fact Obama and the Dems will compromise with themselves several times and then surrender makes soon to be geezers like me shutter.
What shocks me is that anyone who looks like Ryan, however you describe the look, can be taken seriously? Yuk….
He is in fact a Randroid:
http://swampland.time.com/2011/06/03/paul-ryans-ayn-rand-problem/
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/03/23/if_paul_ryan_s_medicaid_numbers_aren_t_important_he_should_change_the_numbers.html
tammanytiger–
Your baseball analogy is a little over my head, but your assessment of the Democratic Party as “pathetic,” is spot on.
Blue
Did any of these idiots see the news story on how Taiwan set up their HC system?
Ouch! Sounds about right to me too.
I always wonder was Paul Ryan and Norman Bates the same person. If they are the same, he has founded new work.
What kills me is that for all the talk about deficits Ryan finds about $4.2 trillion for tax cuts. You’d think if the Republicans were really serious about cutting the deficits, they’d wouldn’t cut any taxes.
Then they talk about tax reform which the average American thinks is the elimination of tax shelters for the rich and corporations. What the Republicans mean by tax reform is the elimination of things like the mortgage deduction that benefits the middle class while keeping all those corporate goodies in place.
When will those tea partiers realize that the Republicans want to gut those programs they depend on and put them at the mercy of the “free” market? In Republicanspeak “free” means “rigged”. When do the timid Democrats call out these bastards for what they are? FACISTS!