In that rarest of Washington events, a surprise choice, President Obama will nominate Dartmouth College President Jim Yong Kim to head up the World Bank. After confirming that there is, in fact, a Jim Yong Kim and this is not Larry Summers in disguise (“Barry Mummers” would have been too on the nose), I looked into Kim’s credentials.
The Korean-born Kim is a physician by training and a prominent figure in global health and development circles. Officials believe his experience will help counter criticism from developing countries that have grown weary of the U.S. stranglehold on the World Bank presidency.
Obama took a strong personal interest in filling the World Bank vacancy after current president Robert Zoellick announced in February he was stepping down. Obama and his advisers considered more than a dozen candidates, including well-known figures in the administration. But in the end, officials said, Obama pushed for a nominee with broad development experience and was particularly drawn to Kim’s innovative work fighting the spread of AIDS and tuberculosis.
Hillary Clinton will appear at the White House Rose Garden announcement, and according to AP she recommended Kim for the job, along with her husband.
This looks like a fine choice, outside of the not-Larry-Summers aspects of it. Kim has the proper set of experiences for the position – he’s been an executive manager and he has a strong background in global development and health, which is at least supposed to be the role of the World Bank. Jeffrey Sachs’ entire rationale for his candidacy was that you need a strong leader in global development, and Kim has those qualities. Being Korean-born should help mollify the global desire to have a non-American in the position. The World Bank executive board still has to vote on the nomination, and they will have other potential nominees, including Colombia’s Jose Antonio Ocampo, and Nigerian finance minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala. But given that the US is the World Bank’s largest funder, I’d guess that Kim has the inside track. Here’s a profile of Kim from when he took the Presidency of Dartmouth in 2009.
This could have worked out a whole lot worse. Summers would have been a disaster, and the global outcry against his candidacy probably did the trick as far as that went. The Administration could have picked a bigger name with less real-world skills relevant to the job, but instead they appear to have filled it with the best choice on a number of levels.
Good work from the Administration on this one.
And I expect the conservative “he picked Kim Jong-il to run the World Bank” jokes any minute now.
…I may have to rethink this, considering how much Fred Hiatt likes him.





30 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
This guy has experience fighting AIDS and TB maybe the World Bank is going to go in a new direction provide funding so big Pharma can get cures for these diseases sure it would mean more cash for big pharma but this is something I would approve of.
Maybe the WH is concerned about disease maybe they will move to stop giving antibiotics to cattle, pigs, chickens before every disease gets immune to our current antibiotics?
Before the EU and Japan decide to ban all American meat to prevent the spread of antibiotic resistant disease?
Could this be the next big issue? TB is spread by air ( coughing) a TB strain immune to every antibiotic would send us back to the days of quarantine to stop the spread of the disease.
This can’t be good but it shows the GOP is on board to approve him ahead of time Obama vetted him to the GOP Powers that be.
Exactly. You have to wonder what he promised them? On the other hand, this appointment does not require Senate approval.
The last poll I saw showed Bin Laden eking out a victory over Larry Summers.
So long as you remember that the promise, direct or indirect, to follow the dictates of the MOTU underlies the appointment, you won’t be disappointed.
While Kim is obviously a far better choice than Summers would have been (a rotten tree stump would have been a better choice than Summers), it has been my experience that physicians are quite the knee-jerk, reactionary types. Here’s hoping this guy is better than that.
Dr. Kim is one of the co-founders of Partners in Health, the absolute best nternational health service. I encouraged all FDL readers to read the Paul Farmer biography to learn how all that is PiH came to be.
Larry Summers is an ass. Dr. Kim is a brilliant physician, administrator, advocate for the health needs of the poor (PiH’s slogan is Whatever It Takes)
and his nomination gives me a hope of integrity for the World Bank for the very first time in its history. Now I can hope that the WB will be a humanitarian organization instead of one that exploits the poor in favor of the 1% regardless of the country.
THe Clintons know Dr. Kim because, among other reasons, of PiH’s long time and phenomenal work in Haiti.
Thanks so much for picking up on this miraculous event,, David.
Blessings to all
That’s correct. 52-48
Charles Manson was doing better 57-43
“And I expect the conservative “he picked Kim Jong-il to run the World Bank” jokes any minute now.”
——-
Same as, name your kid Richard and they’ll call him Dick.
“Kim is a physician by training”
———–
Proctologist????
Mght be helpful
Doctors kill their mistakes.
I don’t believe medical education in the US teaches caring as much as it teaches greed.
Reminded me of this.
From appearances, seems like agood guy. Let’s see if he ends up being a neoliberal.
I am a HUGE Dave Barry fan. Have two of his book. In fact, they’re the ONLY two books I personally own.
That was the funniest thing I’ve read in a long time. THANKS! I needed that. I’m emailing all my friends that have HAD colonoscopies but NONE that haven’t.
Could this be a clue, and can one possibly sustain the faint hope that Obama, if re-elected, will begin to fulfill some of his promises to serve the greater good instead of consistently catering and cratering to the 1%? Now that the greedy exploiters have become grossly engorged at the expense of the deprived masses, is there the slightest chance that Obama might find some courage and try to turn the tables?
In all seriousness…I hope you are right.
marchan1940 and norecovery, please refrain from using the four letter word hope in anything but cynical musings. The meaning has been revised post 2008.
Of course he’s a neoliberal. Anyone who’s going to even be considered for the job is a neoliberal. You know, sort of like the presidency, the senate, or 95%+ of house seats.
Check out the Politico story on Jim Yong Kim, entitled “Jim Yong Kim page scrubbed on Wikipedia” (in the Politico 44 section).
Apparently, his Wikipedia bio was scrubbed of “unflattering references to his time at Dartmouth after President Obama appointed him to head the World Bank this morning.”
The politico article shows the “before and after” Wikipedia pages. (I can no longer get the link tool to work, or I’d link to it as a courtesy. Sorry.)
Blue
Good point.
Given that he has a Ph.D. in anthropology, I’m on board. He also sounds like the kind of person with the kinds of expertise they desperately need.
Now, that, econobuzz, is Barry great.
And somebody owes me a new monitor screen, mine is covered with shrieking laughter …
As well (Almost said Ass well …), someone … will have to help me cover the cost of the psychological counseling both cats and the wee Yorkie Poo will need as they are now convinced that I am inclined to lie down on the floor and laugh myself silly, gasp for breath, make funny noises, and generally behave in ways which must be completely perplexing to four-legged sentient beings …
IF I, ever, recover, econobuzz, and can find ANY large chunk of it, I AM going to share a piece of my mind with you, right now, it is all over the house, quite like the other “end” of things as described by brave Dave …
I now have an empty head …ache, three traumatized aminals … AN-ee-mals … and my concentration is ruint …
I thank ya, from the bottom(!) of me wee liddle heart (which also took some stress … and the beat goes on).
;~DW
Here’s an interview on Bill Moyers Journal. Yes, a neoliberal. His approach to getting HIV drugs to people in poor countries is to tell pharmaceutical companies:
The medical industry would suffer a worldwide collapse if there was a cure for these illnesses or cancer. You’re just not thinking like a “good capitalist”.
NO.
I’m still trying to pinpoint the moment when doctors adopted the Hypocritical Oath as opposed to the Hippocratic Oath.
Nobody reads post #5!
It does not teach greed. It only encourages it.
As does the entire system known as the US.
Wall Street. Pharmaceutical companies. Any company.
And who works for them? Why Americans do. Willfully and gratefully.
Ya, doctors so bad. But don’t forget the rest. When in Rome … this is Rome, get with the program, or get rolled.
Even the prowess of Mr. Dayden (long time fan, avid reader of almost everything he writes, and personal thanks for most of the education) can be lacking at times.
He’s reinforced my prime directive: question everything. Even this.
O appointed him, and … does anyone actually seriously think/consider for one bloody second he’s not a neoliberal? Seriously? Are you Fing kidding me? Sorry, did I just imagine the last 3 years?
No insult meant, but I’m just a little surprised that Dayden could be so (apologies for using this word) “hopeful” about this. I guess no one can bat 100%. 99.9% is still pretty good.
————————————–
Respectfully I will add the following:
1. Jim Yong Kim Wikipedia page scrubbed.
Image: http://images.politico.com/global/2012/03/120323_kim_time.jpg
2. But what about what Dartmouth students have to say? Well how about The Dartmouth, their college paper?
March 28, 2011 opinion piece
“Kim’s speeches have become refined slogans iterated so frequently that they have gone from useful to cliché to white noise. Students either get angry hearing them, or worse, they roll their eyes and shrug their shoulders and decide next time they’ll go the gym instead of listening.”
read the comments
April 4, 2011 opinion piece
“As a visionary and transformative leader, Kim, like Obama, is a failure. As an administrator and college president, he is mediocre, perhaps even mildly successful. If we had expected less of Kim, as we reasonably should have, we might be unhappy with his mediocrity but we would not be suffering the destruction of our worldview.”
Comments:
“Your point is a fair, if self-evident, one. But I did a find-and-replace for “Kim” with “Obama” and the article read exactly the same, and had the same impact…not much. THough I don’t disagree with the thrust of your argument, the whole article is written in broad generalities that can be applied to any leader at the end of his honeymoon..
By Dan 07 on Apr 4 | 9:40 am”
““If we had expected less of Kim, as we reasonably should have, we might be unhappy with his mediocrity but we would not be suffering the destruction of our worldview.”
What a sad state of affairs, to always have low expectations of people. Why should we settle for mediocrity in our leadership when we know that Kim is capable of doing great things! Always being complacent about mediocrity allows us to be satisfied with an unsatisfactory status quo. Change happens through optimism, not cynicism.
By Christian W. Brandt on Apr 4 | 11:35 am”
Obama nominates College President Jim Yong Kim to lead the World Bank
Comments:
“Great news for Dartmouth, bad news for the World Bank.
By Anonymous on Mar 23 | 1:04 pm”
And from Boston.com:
Hazing issue ensnares Dartmouth president
———————————————
Reality is reality. And fantasy is fantasy. Ask any D&Der (oh ya, big D&D nerd, … booyah).
Kim is another 1%er. Just like O. Pretty speeches, and not much else.
He will fit in just fine at the World Bank.
Regarding Fred Hiatt, even a blind pig finds a truffle now and then.
I am grateful he passed over the Peter Principle in a rumpled suit.