Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Last Friday, Rachel Maddow featured Jeff Thigpen the courageous register of deeds in Guilford County, North Carolina, who has sued MERS and leading banks over faulty documents filed at his office. Rachel calls it an “exclusive” though I had the Thigpen lawsuit for you two weeks ago, in addition to profiles of Thigpen going back a year. But I won’t fault Maddow for that – it’s so rare that the issue of chain of title and foreclosure fraud gets on the teevee in a serious way, that any publicity is positive. Here’s the crux of the issue:
This is Jeff in his office in North Carolina. He’s the elected county register of deeds, which is one of the most humble little noticed jobs in government, right? He’s got Greensboro records going back to 1771 . He will pull down the old books and show them to you. All this documentation of who owns what signed by actual humans using their real names and ink. The records showing who owns what going back as long as the government exists. It says who owns what land and who owes who money for it. Jeff, this county register says he cannot be sure anymore who owns what in Greensboro or who has the right to kick anybody out. His office went back through a few years of records and they found for a few years, thousands of documents filed by big banks and mortgage companies, thousands of documents that looked to him like forgeries, like the companies that filed them did not care.
This feels like an alien broadcast coming from a country that has integrity about its land records. But yet this has been going on for years and years, with the federal government and most state regulators having just checked out on owning up to it or forcing a reckoning. It’s incredible when you think of it. All this wreck and Jeff Thigpen is ALONE, practically, suing the banks to try and get them to clean up the mess they’ve made of land records dating back almost 250 years.
There are some similarly courageous registers who have been pressing this case, though Thigpen’s goes the furthest in terms of forcing the banks to fix their errors. Other cases, like the class action in Dallas County, Texas, seek to get the banks to pay back recording fees on mortgages they traded through MERS, the private electronic registry. And another lawsuit just ruled late last week, in Oakland County, Michigan, attacks another example of ripping off counties, this time by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac:
Michigan law imposes a transfer tax on deeds recorded at the county office. Fannie and Freddie refused to pay that, claiming that they were part of the Federal government and hence exempt. That argument was clearly ridiculous and a Federal judge ruled against the GSEs.
This is going to be a boon for cash-starved Michigan counties and the state. The statue of limitations is six years, and the county treasurer estimates the damages will be $3 to $4 million to the county and between $10 and $20 million to the state. The treasurer has asked the state to allow him to keep the state’s portion of they money in his county to fight foreclosures. Good luck with that.
Other counties in Michigan have related actions underway, and I’d expect any one that does not have a case in progress to file an action modeled on the Oakland case.
Wondering how Ed DeMarco can justify “conserving tapayer funds” when the agencies under his purview go and pull stunts like this.
These local actions have a great deal of potential. In addition, local clerks or registers of deeds do not typically get their names in the papers, and may welcome the attention. They may be more susceptible to local campaigns, seeing that they inhabit backwater offices and probably don’t field many constituent calls. The great foreclosure fraud activist Lisa Epstein is running for the clerk of courts in Palm Beach County, Florida (holding the same responsibility as a register of deeds), taking on an entrenched incumbent. That’s another fertile ground for activism. There’s a lot of possibility here, considering that the state and federal options appear to be blocked off.




3 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I keep wondering how we can proactively fix the registrations of land titles.
Wondering if the following action, done at a national level, could help unravel fraudulent investment bank schemes:
People who are current on their mortgages could move their mortgages to private banks and credit unions that do NOT sell mortgages or participate in MERS.
Then those homeowners (millions of them I would hope) sue in their local courts with a “Quiet Title Action” (is this an option in a non-forclosure scenario?) to clear any unknown, bogus liens on their rescued property. Afterall, who knows how many fake claims to their mortgage exist in electronic MERSland?
I am not a laywer, so I don’t know if this is feasible. The cost might be an issue as well for some landowners, but a cost perhaps much less than the situation of an unsellable untitleable land in the future.
Think of the trickle down: without “performing loans” bundled into mortgage backed securities (because the homeowners have migrated the performing loans to safe harbor independent banks and credit unions), the investment banks and big investors perhaps will need to fight it out (and hopefully litigate it out)–”it”, meaning all the fraud that led to this mess to prevent their financial implosion. (well, I’m an eternal optimist).
In the meantime, growing portions of city and town land titles will be restored by individuals sick of the MERS mess infesting the registry of deeds in their towns and city records. They will sit safely on the sidelines while government figures out whether to bail out the banks and investors yet again.
Perhaps a market will spring up among independent banks.
If the houses for sale with untainted mortgages command a higher price than houses with MERS-tainted mortgages, more home owners will want in.
Spurred on by the chance of getting better sale price on their home, more homeowners with MERS-contaminated titles may try to rinse off their bad titles via Quiet Title Actions and new mortgages with credit unions (which do not resell the mortgage). And so on.
I guess MERS, to keep up, might try to create fake credit unions to capture the business of unsuspecting homeowners, but maybe local laws would be able to prevent this?
The crooked Florida lawyer David J. Stern and his robosigning fraudclosure mill did those massive fraudclosures — tens of thousands per year — for his client, Fannie and/or Freddie, iirc. Fannie and Freddie are founding owners of MERS and no friend of the homeowner. cf Fannie and Freddie’s Foreclosure Barons story in Mother Jones.
Also see Matt Taibbi’s recent column, which describes the sweet loop between banks and their enabler, Fannie and Freddie, describing how Fannie and Freddie are making bundles of foreclosed houses available in bulk sales on the cheap to banks: Another Hidden Bailout: Helping Wall Street Collect Your Rent:
And we’re supposed to believe DeMarco feels some sense of responsibility to us?