After both houses of Congress passed it, the White House is finally recognizing that the deregulatory bill they proposed and pushed is distasteful to liberals who have actually looked at it for longer than two seconds:
White House allies are in an uproar over pro-business legislation embraced by President Obama, exposing a new rift in his relations with Democratic lawmakers and supporters amid his efforts since the fall to mend those ties [...]
To rally skeptical Democrats, including some who were thinking of trying to keep the bill from coming up for a vote, Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) last week made a last-minute, behind-the-scenes appeal to let the bill proceed, according to congressional aides. In the Mansfield Room off the Senate floor, Reid warned his Democratic colleagues against obstructing a measure backed by the president and standing in the way of a bipartisan effort to create jobs.
The Senate voted on the legislation, although half of the chamber’s Democrats voted against passage. Congressional aides said the White House’s enthusiastic support for the bill left some Democratic senators feeling boxed in.
There are only two ways to look at the JOBS Act. Either you agree with the Republican critique that regulations are a boot stamping on a human face forever, something the White House has rejected over and over again, or you think the economy will be served by a pro-fraud bill, a bill that makes it easier for companies to bilk investors and for Wall Street financiers to facilitate it. Neither makes the White House come off looking good.
The Administration took credit for the JOBS Act last week, and this article fleshes out more details about its origin. Apparently it’s a holdover from the dark Bill Daley days.
As Bill Black writes, most pro-fraud legislation ends up being bipartisan. Republicans are down for whatever pro-fraud bits they can get for their constituency. So when Democrats support something, it’s sure to get votes. And since Washington chases bipartisanship like a tiger chases its tail, you end up with legislation like this, that can be called a “bipartisan jobs measure” if you stretch the definition to its very limits.
And this late-in-the-game uproar won’t change anything. The House has vowed to accept the Senate amendments to the bill and give final passage this week.




20 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Sorta like Disney execs blaming their predecessors for John Carter.
If you’d slap “bipartisan” on a shit sandwich, Obama would be the first to take a bite.
I’ll say it once more. Obama=worst political instincts ever.
Rather slog through John Carter than Obama’s screw ups anyday. I’d be more entertained.
If the Republicans proposed dumping the Bill of Rights, Mr. Post-Partisan President would look for “common ground” by proposing to get rid of the odd-numbered amendments.
I’ve voted in dozens of elections over the past 40 years, and Barack H. Obama is the biggest disappointment I’ve ever voted for.
I’ll say it once more. Obama=worst political instincts ever.
The squirrels that loot my bird feeders have better error-learning capabilities than Obama.
Taking a bite out of the shit sandwich and smiling!!!
“And this late-in-the-game uproar won’t change anything. The House has vowed to accept the Senate amendments to the bill and give final passage this week”
And that’s exactly why the uproar was late in the game…
Actually, Obama, who has always been a whore for banks and corporations, shows excellent political instincts. he wants to get re-elected, and needs massive funding from Wall Street, War Profiteers, Big Oil, and all the other mega-corporate predators.
Our interests don’t matter at all. Our role is to vote for Evil Democrat or Evil Republican, and that’s all.
The Bill of Rights was trashed years ago in the bi-partisan ratification of the Patriot Act.
Only applies if you believed the Obama rhetoric about serving the 99%, otherwise he’s proven to be a very adept puppet of his economic brethren.
Mr. President is continuing to dismantle the Democratic Party. Soon it will be as irrelevant as the Republican Party. I myself was disappeared from the National Democratic Party so I no longer receive pleas for contributions.
However, the Obama “folks” as they call themselves, those folks regularly request money for their Presidential Campaign. What is weird about the Obama Presidential Campaign, is that there are no issues that this President supports. I would say if Mr. President is re-elected we will have a Grand Bargain. If he is not re-elected we will have a Grand Bargain. And more wars.
Slightly OT but hysterical –
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/rulings/promise-broken/
Who was it here at FDL who used to keep an ongoing list like this?
Mr. President is continuing to dismantle the Democratic Party. Soon it will be as irrelevant as the Republican Party.
Unfortunately, the Democratic Party will continue to have major-party status. Its rotting carcass will not only block traffic but stink up the environment for years to come.
The cost of pro-fraud legislation is getting pretty deep.
The mortgagors don’t expect to recoup their equities, so they
should be seen as punished enough if there’s no recourse
(re: the banks.)
If you sold your house at the top of the mortgage Ponzi scheme
then let’s say you received $1,000,000.
If the banks sucked up their losses and fraud, the mortgagors
would lick their wounds, the U.S. would have much still needed
risk taking in tact though not one-sided as to parties to
transactions, and you would’ve cleared the market 4 years ago.
Instead, you’ve gotten not 5% on the proceeds of $1,000,000
but closer to 0%, because that’s what it means to give
(~) free reserves to the banks that created the often alleged
bogus paper work (for fees) at each step in the process along
the way to creating a mortgage Ponzi scheme.
You’re still the person who made the right decision.
You’re the payor for a truly remarkable number of inventions
for bailing out the banks. You’re watching all manner of
concern for immigration (Schumer / VISA’s / who’s
worried about terrorists today?) and property rights so trumpeted as
important by the people who created the bubble and the frauds
get plowed under overnight for their convenience.
All this so that you cannot buy back for your share of the
deal in a free market that you, now as a safe harbor seeker
at FDL, were ostensibly less fond of.
Your Congress is pleading with the world to make their
currencies stronger cause that’s supposed to help.
(It could help the Ponzi scheme until there’s nothing left
to wages / currency here.)
Ideals: Good.
Transference and hypocrisy: Bad.
Transparency and asymmetry: Fun.
Unless of course it comes to smog, etc
Na, its called FREE ENTERPRISE with an emphasis on the FREE part for the 1% that is, not so much for 99%.
Since when has Obamafraud ever opposed anything that wasn’t pro-corporate, pro-wall street, pro-imperial wars, anti-worker, anti-education, anti-transparency? He hasn’t failed or misread anything, he’s been extremely consistent in his policies, he’s doing exactly what he wants on every policy front.
The real question is when will his “supporters” stop giving him the benefit of the doubt and see him for what he truly is. Its the Repugs who propose fascism, its the Dimocraps that implement it.
http://obamascandalslist.blogspot.com/
spot on -
The 96% support of the black voters will grow in 2012, and the DNC/primary winners in 2008 will never say they were wrong. And Obama will – as with Nafta in 2008 when he told the Canadians he needed political room so ignore what I say – just 3 weeks before adopting Hillary’s “change Nafta now” position – say what he needs to get the 2012 win – and then after the election he will go back to being pro-rich and corporate once again. Indeed the simple fairness increase/deficit reduction/ easy to re-pass tax deductions for the middle class approach of letting the Clinton tax cuts come back for everyone approach is not even up for discussion in Obama land.
Makes 2012 nothing to get excited about.
Well, we really have a few choices to make. How about like my family does – living within our means, not spending unless it’s there, electing people who actually understand business and don’t screw those terrible folks who make money and create jobs! We all have choices to make and the choice for 2012 is getting easier and easier for a majority of Americans!
http://cashadvancesus.com/