I mentioned this briefly in yesterday’s Roundup, but I wanted to circle back to it, because it’s incredible. Despite the annoying way in which the President touts his policy preferences as previously “conservative ideas,” it actually is pretty incredible, just on an anthropological level, how conservatives can manage to turn on a dime on these policies, like cap and trade or the individual mandate, things that they’ve touted for many years. Now we have another example of this.
For years, Xavier University, a Jesuit school in the Cincinnati area, had a health care plan that included birth control coverage. Certainly this did not cause a whole lot of alarm as a breach with Catholic teaching. Faculty and other employees at the college, including non-Catholics, could get birth control under their health plans. It was only when the Obama Administration mandated this as part of their preventive health services menu that the President of Xavier even bothered to look at his insurance plan and what it covered. And finding birth control on there, he swiftly moved to cancel it, presumably because it violated his deeply held beliefs of which he was unaware until a little while ago.
Xavier University, one of the oldest Roman Catholic colleges in the United States, will cut off birth-control coverage for its employees in July, a move that has divided faculty members and students on the Cincinnati campus.
The administration has mandated that nearly all health insurance plans provide free birth control by this summer, with limited accommodations for religious institutions that oppose contraception on moral grounds. Top Catholic bishops have blasted that mandate as an attack on religious freedom [...]
The controversy prompted Xavier President Michael Graham, a Jesuit priest, to review the health insurance plan offered to the university’s 935 employees. Graham announced this week in a letter to the faculty that the plan will cease to cover contraception on July 1.
The story profiles one associate professor, a non-Catholic, who uses birth control, and who will now have to pay for it out of pocket. The Catholic church, by stoking a controversy, just got her employer to determine what legal procedures she can or cannot have as part of her insurance coverage. Incidentally, this is coverage she pays for, by virtue of it being a benefits package attached to her salary. Her work for the university earns her those benefits, they are not just given to her. But Xavier has now stood in the way of those earned benefits.
They didn’t stand in the way of such coverage in 2009 or 2010 or 2011. Only after the issue became a political controversy did Xavier’s President start hunting for things in his institutions insurance plan to offend him. I’m thinking that other Catholic universities, like DePaul and Georgetown, which offer birth control coverage in their employee insurance plans, will soon follow suit.
This will set off a confrontation with the federal government. The preventive services mandate begins in August, and religiously affiliated institutions only have an extra year to comply. They can pursue the compromise laid out by the President, where the insurance company itself contracts with the employees desiring coverage to provide it free of charge. Many religious institutions have sued to block the mandate, and of course if the Supreme Court throws out the entire Affordable Care Act, this issue becomes irrelevant.
For now, though, religious institutions will continue to become suddenly offended by a policy that caused them no heartburn just a few months ago.




16 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Related:
Anna Maria College cancels Victoria Kennedy’s commencement speech under pressure from Worcester bishop
“A small Catholic college that invited Victoria Reggie Kennedy to speak at its spring commencement has rescinded the offer under pressure from the Worcester bishop, who described her apparent political views as out of line with Catholic teachings.”
LINK
I really am done with the idea of “conservative ideas”. Conservatives have a personal value system that it is based on their particular notions of individual virtue and compliance with religious doctrine and this value system is not a public policy factory nor is anything that emerges from it a public policy. Deciding to increase poverty and create restrictions that run in the face of womens’ rights over their own bodies because Jesus cries whenever you take a birth control pill is regressive and backwards, and does not correspond to “ideas”.
It’s very easy: the religious school, if it is to have access to public funding and accreditation, will correspond to modern public policies surrounding birth control, or it will run on its donations and fees and back its graduates with its own guarantees.
EOF.
I’m sure Tony Scales will take all this into consideration.
These are the same people that would not hire a pregnant woman and would find a reason to fire a current pregnant employee. Total BS. Then say women are undependable and hire males across the board.
Don’t you know it’s not about Birth control at all, it’s all about the right of the religious wing-nuts out here to run all of our personal lives as they see fit, or else we’re violating their religious freedoms! Get it now? Neither do I.
David, please find out if the Xavier plan covers Viagara/Cialis and whether it pays for vasectomies and/or tubal ligations.
How come they don’t cancel Santorum or Ryan or Boner? Their political views are also out of touch with catholic teachings.
I’d love to see the entire Xavier Women’s Basketball team show up at the Award’s Ceremony on April 24 with baby pillows under their clothes.
Now THAT’S funny.
Actually, Wednesday April 25……..and i’d like to see every woman, of any age, who attends the event to wear a baby bump…….take THAT, AmericanTalibanPriests.
I do hope any and all federal dollars that will go to Xavier will be terminated as of July 1 as well. I realize this will hurt students but if the Church is so excited about women’s contraception let them pay all the bills. If you want to be the boss, you pay the cost.
The WAR Inc on women continues apace.
I can remember when the Roe v. Wade decision was first handed down. Many churches did not have a problem with it, including the one I attended at the time.
In conjunction with the Southern Strategy – but perhaps not as well documented – there has been this ongoing backlash against women and women’s rights. The steady erosion of women’s rights on all levels is clearly and undeniably under attack.
Yet again, though, unless citizens stand up against this, it will continue until it gets worse, not better.
Isn’t this a blatant violation of federal law, which prohibits public accommodations from discriminating on the basis of race, color, religion, or national origin?
How is it any different for the operator of any privately-owned business from failing to accommodate people with dark skin at lunch counters? It is the school which is discriminating, on the basis of religion, effectively saying only Catholics can interact with their enterprise.
So for Xavier President Michael Graham paying for birth control for university employes is immoral, but million dollar a year coaching salaries and a $2 million scoreboard renovation are entirely in line with the teachings of Christ. I’m not buying the “deeply held beliefs” excuse, unless those beliefs revolve around maximizing profit. This is an excuse to squeeze employees.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/writers/paul_daugherty/11/18/xavier/index.html
The left is going to lose the argument as long as it falls for the strawman set up by the right, in which the Administration is portrayed as the bad actor, repressing the freedoms of the church or religious employer; when in fact the White House is correctly acting to protect the freedoms of the individual employee or insured against the imposition of the doctrinal will of the employer.
The only one I see trying to reframe this is Terry O’Neill:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/terry-oneill/crazy-train-headed-off-th_b_1277586.html
“The conservative talking point of the moment is that this fight is about religious liberty. Religious institutions do have important rights in our democracy. But their rights must be weighed against individual women’s rights and against our society’s shared interest in public health. Thus, a religiously affiliated employer’s first amendment rights must be weighed against: women’s constitutional rights to religious freedom (1st Amendment), privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut), and equal protection (14th Amendment); women’s statutory rights against sex discrimination (Title VII) and pregnancy discrimination (Pregnancy Discrimination Act) in the workplace; the increasingly recognized international human right to unfettered access to basic health care (and birth control is obviously basic health care for women); and society’s interest in assuring public health, a key aspect of which is availability of family planning.
“Looks like the scale is weighed heavily in favor of a woman’s right to birth control access. Additionally, religious entities do not have blanket immunity from every law and regulation in the land that conflicts with their tenets, so why should this directive be any different? Oh, that’s right — this one affects women.”
We need more of this.
Follow her @Terryoneill