Almost imperceptibly, and despite nominal support nationally for capital punishment, states are, one by one, abolishing the death penalty, citing the risks of executing innocents, the inherent biases in the system, and the extreme costs. Legislatures in New Jersey, New Mexico and Illinois have abolished the death penalty in recent years, and the courts in New York found it in violation of the state Constitution. Now, Connecticut is poised to become the 17th state to ban the death penalty, after a successful vote last night in the state Senate.
State senators voted 20-16 in favor of a death penalty repeal bill after about 11 hours of impassioned floor debate.
The bill now goes to the House of Representatives, where it is considered to have a high level of support, and then to Gov. Dannel P. Malloy, a Democrat who has said he would sign it into law.
Sen. Eric Coleman, D-Bloomfield, said he was not surprised by the bill’s passage in the Senate. He said vote turned out exactly as he had expected.
“I think it is a pivotal step,” he said. “It moves us towards a more enlightened posture on the issue and puts us more in line with other New England states.”
The law would be forward-looking, and would not immediately empty Death Row. There are 11 inmates sentenced to death in Connecticut, and those sentences would not change. But courts would no longer be able to sentence felons in Connecticut to death after the bill gets signed into law. The sternest sentence would now be life without the possibility of parole. This could put the law eventually in jeopardy if and when those 11 Death Row inmates appeal their sentences. But it was the condition to get the bill passed in the more conservative (for Connecticut) state Senate.
Connecticut’s version of the death penalty really only existed in name only. They have carried out one execution, back in 2005, in the last 51 years. Nationally, we’ve seen an average of 44 executions a year since 2007, a significant drop from the 1990s.
In a statement, Richard Dieter, Executive Director of the Death Penalty Information Center, called the vote “courageous and historic,” but also cited the emerging trend against the death penalty in the states. “Nationally, there is an increasing willingness to replace the death penalty with alternative sentences, such as life without parole, that reduce the risk of executing the innocent and better serve victims’ families. In the past decade there has been a significant decline in new death sentences and executions, reflecting widespread frustration with capital punishment across the country.”
In these times of strained budgets, cost has also become a factor. Maintaining Death Row and managing the death penalty system is prohibitively expensive. A ballot measure this November in California will seek to abolish the death penalty, and one of their major selling points is the billion-dollar-a-year cost. Connecticut’s Office of Fiscal Analysis estimates that the death penalty repeal bill will immediately save $850,000 a year, and that the number could balloon to $5 million a year over time.
Nationally, polling shows that the public still supports the death penalty, but by smaller and smaller margins. So it makes sense that the more liberal states have moved to abolish it in recent years.





11 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Good for CT!! It took a LOT of years of testimony and legislative work to get NM’s DP overturned. Our current Governor is trying to repeal the repeal. It will be difficult for her to do it.
Nevertheless, we still have a DP case pending, a convicted killer of a cop who committed the crime before the repeal, so that case is still moving forward, as a DP case.
God forbid we should ever get down to trying to figure out what restitution or atonement should really consist of, how a person should be made to wrestle with some awful act committed, or what and when we might consider they have reformed. God forbid we should ever get around to punishing the rich when they prey on the poor. Right-wing Christians like to talk a lot of Jesus, but they’re still totally OT on this issue. (I know, most don’t believe in evolution.)
I’ve always thought long imprisonment would be harder than dying, myself. .. bit of an easy way out.
Ironically, the chief argument, as stated on NPR this morning, being used by DP fans in CT is that the ones still on death row could — gasp! — appeal their cases and thus might not ever be executed! Oh, noez! We can’t bathe in their blood and pretend it’s a righteous act waaaaaaah!
They love humans more when they have gills and tails and measure an inch long than when they’ve been some years out of the womb, have dark skins and want voting rights.
Most conservatives are bloodthirsty when it comes to, you know, walking & talking live human beings. It’s only when the zygote cannot speak for itself that they have a big old hard-on for keeping it alive. Once you’re born, you are truly on your own, and how! And as Trayvon Martin proves, if you get dead when you’re of dusky hue: too bad.
Most conservatives also love ‘em some unfunded mandates, such as the DP, which is extremely costly. Although it’s also expensive to house someone in prison for life, it’s actually quite a bit less expensive than what the DP entails. But hey! When one can live out one’s bloodthirst by having fevered dreams of offing someone in jail… there apparently is no price too high for some conservatives. OUR tax dollah$$ at work.
That said: hooray for CT for demonstrating common sense on many levels.
Thanks for the post.
I oppose the repeal of the death penalty. I wish Sen. Prague and Maynard didn’t flip flop. IMO, the change should not be to eliminate the death penalty. It should be to simply require absolute certainty of the crime.
I happened to be on the Cheshire Town Council when the premeditated home invasion and slaughter of a mom & her two daughters, along with the brutal beating of the father, occured. The murderers were caught red-handed, leaving the crime scene after torturing the family for six hours, going to the bank to withdraw money and burning down the house.
And it was all white people involved. There was no racial component to these murders. And I also happen to be white. So I encourage people to stop suggesting that the DP is only used as a race tool. I understand the overall pattern, but these murders are the backdrop against which I oppose the complete repeal of the DP.
I can’t forget the moment when I got the first email notifying me of the crime.
As far as I’m concerned, the DP is entirely justified in certain — though very limited — circumstances, such as what happened in my town.
I remeber a time when opposition to the Death penalty was a plank in the Democratic platform…
I remember a time when a white Dem from the south -stopped- furthered his presidential campaign to fly back to his home state of Arkansas to grandstandingly oversee – with his wife proudly next to him – the execution of a mentally incapacitated Ricky Ray Rector (who saved the pecan pie dessert of his final meal so that he could eat it after his execution.)
Bill Clinton insisted that Democrats “should no longer feel guilty about protecting the innocent.”
I remember a time, not so long ago, when a Democratic president and his AG claimed the presidential prerogative of assassinating American citizens and their offspring without due process, and I remember all the Stepford Dems silently bobbing their heads through fixated, porcelain smiles..
Who are YOU going to vote for?…
I’m afraid so. As a smart woman once said to me about abortion: they talk about killing a human being. But becoming human–becoming civilized–is a process. Many of them routinely demonstrate that they are not there yet.
How’s Rocky doing, anyway? Will he be on the ballot in my state, FL?
I’m in FL too and don’t know if Rocky will make it. But Jill Stein will and she may get my vote in any event. She’s a good candidate.
My motto for 2012 is ABO – Anyone but Obama. And, much to the shock of my faux progressive friends, I mean it.
People are frightened, struggling to survive; middle class people still spend more time working to distinguish themselves from each other–often through the status they believe they confer on themselves by their purchases–than the pursuit of solidarity.
But I could cry sometimes when I think that my otherwise-brilliant liberal friends cannot be bothered about things like our drone bombings in five countries, or Obama’s persecution of govt. whistleblowers, or propping up a brutal dictatorship in Honduras so that we can retain our bases and possibly clobber Chavez. . .
Going off to find out who Jill Stein is; thanks.