Warren Buffett, the third wealthiest man on the planet (net worth: $44 billion), often referred to as the “Oracle of Omaha,” is the target of a May 5 action called for by Stop Coal B.C. Well, not Buffett directly, but a rail company he owns through his massive holding company, Berkshire Hathaway: Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway.
BNSF Railway is the second largest freight rail company in the United States and the exclusive carrier of thermal coal from coal basins in the northwestern U.S. to docks in British Columbia, where the dirty coal is exported to the global market, primarily to Asia.
The action calls for activists to blockade BNSF’s four coal-loaded freight trains from reaching their final destination for the day and in the process, risk arrest. It is part of 350.org‘s broader “Connect the Dots” event taking place on Saturday, with actions planned throughout the world.
The Stop Coal B.C. call to action reads,
We’re doing this because we have to. The science is solid: if we don’t get to work, within the decade we are going to run out of time to avoid runaway global warming. It’s not enough any more just to go to rallies, write letters, and have dinner in the dark once a year. We’re aware of what is at stake, and we have a moral obligation to do our best to stop the things that are destroying the planet.
We really don’t want to spend the day on the tracks and risk arrest by stopping coal trains, but we’re running out of options. We’re forced to take this dramatic step to get government’s attention, because in addition to ignoring the scientific warnings, they’ve refused to respond to our repeated requests for a public discussion on this issue.
We need a province-wide discussion about what is at risk for our families and communities, and how British Columbia can start working towards a healthy and secure future that is fair for all. We hope that discussion starts on May 5th.
The activists are planning to stop all loaded BNSF coal trains traveling in a northwest direction “that approach mile 122 (White Rock pier) on the New Westminster Subdivision, Northwest Division,” explains a letter written directly to Warren Buffett from Stop Coal B.C. “From dawn to dusk on May 5th we will also stop all unloaded coal trains traveling [southeast] approaching mile 122.”
Stop Coal B.C. also made it clear that they are attempting to stop the coal trains, not passenger rail trains, which they support as a way to remove cars from the road, moving in the direction of a society maximizing the use of public transit. When the Amtrak roles through, they will step off the tracks.
Also included in the call to action’s letter to Buffett is a request of him to mandate that BNSF exit the business of coal transport:
Since we know what is at stake we feel a moral obligation to do what we can to help prevent this looming disaster. On Saturday May 5th that means stopping your coal trains from reaching our ports.
(Snip)
What we can’t understand is why you allow your railway, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, to continue shipping vast amounts of US coal out of Canadian ports to be burned in Asia. No matter where this coal is burned, it brings us closer to a climatic point of no return.
(Snip)
You are in many ways an important figure of conscience in the world. We appeal to you to seize this opportunity and make a bold decision on coal. With your support we can ensure a healthy future for our children and people around the world.
This is no small fight Stop Coal B.C. is waging, to say the least.
As they explained in a primer emailed to DeSmogBlog,
“Over twelve million tonnes of thermal coal was shipped out of the Port of Vancouver last year. Much of that is now coming from the United States’ Powder River Basin coal bed. Thermal coal from Wyoming and Montana’s Powder River Basin is also being shipped up to Ridley Terminal in Prince Rupert for export. Approximately two coal trains a day, each carrying roughly 13,000 tonnes of coal, cross our Washington State border en route to B.C. ports.”
Coal use in the U.S., as Grist‘s David Roberts explained recently, is on the decline in the U.S. — mostly due to the domestic fracking boom — so coal mining companies need the global export market to keep afloat. DeSmogBlog’s Ben Jervey recently tackled the topic, as well.
The ties that bind Buffett to King Coal go far above and beyond B.C., though.
Buffett also owns a major stake in coal-fired power plants, via another corporation held under the auspices of Berkshire Hathaway. Further, BNSF also transports tons of coal throughout the contiguous lower 48 in the U.S.
Buffett, King Coal and Obama
Energy investor Nigam Arora explained some of these ties in a recent article appearing in Forbes, writing,
Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway owns MidAmerican Energy and Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Burlington is a rail road and MidAmerican owns a utility that relies heavily on coal. MidAmerican Energy is the operator of a 1600 megawatt four unit coal-fired power plant in Council Bluffs, Iowa, commonly known as Walter Scott, Jr. Energy Center.
According to Sue Sturgis, “Coal’s ticking timebomb: Could disaster strike a coal ash dump near you?,” Institute for Southern Studies, January 4, 2009, Council Bluffs Energy Center was ranked 35th on the list of most polluting coal plant, with 1,092,320 pounds of coal combustion waste released to surface.
Author and journalist Jeff Biggers took his muckraking a step further in a March 2011 article titled, “All the President’s (Coal) Men: Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and Obama’s Wyoming Giveaway,” unearthing the unholy alliance between Buffett, BNSF, Obama, Bill Gates and King Coal. He wrote,
President Obama needs to be called out for his less than transparent catering to his long-time billionaire and coal-profiteering friends.
Consider this: One month after jointly visiting Arch Coal‘s mammoth Black Thunder strip mine in Wyoming with a fleet of nine private jets, billionaires Bill Gates and Warren Buffett sat in President Obama’s Oval Office on December 14th and discussed ways to improve the economy.
As the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett understands the economics of coal better than anyone: He owns the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad that transports most of Wyoming’s vast coal supply around the country, along with the utility company, MidAmerican Energy, which operates 11 coal-fired power plants, including four in Wyoming.
The Buffett/Gates trip Biggers covered took place roughly one year after another key Buffett/Gates visit to the Alberta Tar Sands in August 2008, in which the two of them, according to an unidentified source, “took in the oilsands, apparently with awe.”
“The Best Democracy Money Can Buy”
As covered in a recent investigation by DeSmogBlog, Buffett stands to make billions of dollars off of Alberta Tar Sands development, via BNSF’s transport capacity, with or without the Keystone XL pipeline, a pipeline which has been at the center of the North American climate and energy debate.
Buffett also is a major contributor to Barack Obama, whose campaign is using the Buffett name frequently to raise cash for the 2012 election.
As of October 2011, Buffett has given over $60,000 to the Democratic National Committee, which the Democratic Party uses to dole out to various Democratic candidates’ electoral campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics’ Open Secrets database. He has given another $5,000 exclusively to President Barack Obama, also according to Open Secrets.
This is, of course, is the money that can be publicly tracked. Then there’s the totally secret Super PAC money flowing into dark money fronts like Priorities USA Action, an after-product of the Citizens United U.S. Supreme Court decision.
Investigative journalist Greg Palast wrote his book “The Best Democracy Money Can Buy” in 2002. The title of his book is more true than ever before 10 years later.
Image Credit: StonePhotos | ShutterStock
Update: DeSmogBlog has learned that Canada’s leading energy-environment economist, Mark Jaccard is partaking in the action.
He has won the Nobel Peace Prize as a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the Donner Prize for top policy book in Canada with his book Sustainable Fossil Fuels and the BC Academic of the Year Prize. He is Convening Lead Author for Sustainable Energy Policy with the upcoming Global Energy Assessment, an initiative of the world’s leading experts in sustainable energy. He is the former Chair and CEO of the BC Utilities Commission.
In a statement released to the press, he stated why he’ll be taking part in the blockade:
This Saturday, May 5, at dawn I’m joining other British Columbians in White Rock at the pier to stop Burlington Northern Santa Fe coal trains from reaching our ports. Like others, I’m willing to engage in civil disobedience and risk arrest on Saturday to emphasize how important it is that we take urgent action to stop the actions that cause climate change.
The window of opportunity for avoiding a high risk of runaway, irreversible climate change is closing quickly. Within this decade we will either have steered away from disaster, or have locked ourselves onto a dangerous course. Our governments continue to ignore the warnings of scientists and push forward with policies that will accelerate the burning of fossil fuels. Private interests — coal, rail, oil, pipeline companies and the rest — continue to push their profit driven agenda, heedless of the impact on the rest of us.
This has to stop. We can’t comfort ourselves by thinking “if it were really that bad, government would do something about it.” It is that bad, and what government is doing in response is entirely inadequate.
Putting myself in a situation where I may be accused of civil disobedience is not something I have ever done before. It is not something I ever expected to be doing or wanted to do. But the current willingness of especially our federal government to brazenly take actions that ensure we cannot meet scientifically and economically sound greenhouse gas reduction targets for Canada and the planet leaves me with no alternative. I now ask myself how our children, when they look back decades from now, will have expected us to have acted today. When I think about that, I conclude that every sensible and sincere person, who cares about this planet and can see through lies and delusion motivated by money, should be doing what I and others are now prepared to do.
I pledge, along with everyone else taking part on Saturday, that my actions will be peaceful, non-violent and respectful of others. There will be no property damage. We will conduct ourselves in a safe, open and transparent manner. We are putting ourselves on the line Saturday because our future is at risk and we have to stand up for it.





15 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I don’t get the point of this protest at all.
I get that coal is a nasty thing to burn. I get that Buffett stands to make a lot of money from that nasty burning. I get that with his fortune he gets political access. I get that we’d all be better off if the coal stayed in the ground.
But protesting against BNSF? That makes no sense. BNSF is a common carrier railroad, and is obligated by law to carry any cargo presented to them, at their published rates. They aren’t allowed to pick and choose customers, and have limited ability to discriminate even on pricing. This dates back to English common law, and was strengthened in this country to deal with railroad monopolies in the Progressive era. (And, yes, weakened again by the Staggers de-regulation act in the Reagan 1980s.)
So are the protesters hoping BNSF gets out of the railroad business? That seems hopeless.
Better to go after the mine owners (which may still involve Buffett), or go after the people buying the coal (which may be impossible), or make the case on the actual global warming effects. Blocking trains will just get a few people arrested and that’s it.
I get it. It’s obvious isn’t it?
How else do people in B.C. call attention to this?
same as Germans blocking trains carrying nuclear waste. It worked there.
When you take the Ferry out of Vancouver B.C. you can see these trains delivering the coal, and there is a large hill of coal piled up in the terminal, with freighters loading up to take it to China. stupid .
Of all the things to protest, trains are low on my list.
Indeed coal needs to be replaced – as does oil after we get rid of coal – but we live in a world where 10% of our energy for heat and cooking comes from burning dried shit – dung.
While that may be a renewable and green, I doubt those folks would refuse a chance to convert to coal.
Indeed until there is a plan – either using less energy while maintaining the same life style, or find alternative energy replacements, protesting coal shipments seem futile – except as a way to bring the need for alternative fuels to the media. If that is the game, go for it, but I suspect protesting shale oil pipelines is a more effective method for that.
This is getting heavy.
Reminds me of actions the original Victorian Women’s movement took to get the vote. both here and in Britain.
Women were locked up; went on hunger-strikes in prison; were forcibly fed and one or two threw themselves under governors carriage wheels.
That’s the kind of passion I think we’re going to have to have to if we’re going to save this planet.
And we don’t have much time. I’ve heard that even if we stop everything today and go sustainable we’re still in for 1000 years of extreme climate
Good grief. A protest to turn the world into a place no one would want to live in.
There aren’t many areas of science where the science is so well established, and the scientists basically unanimous.
I know… some people (I don’t mean you Kassandra) don’t “believe” in science. As if it was some kind of unknowable mysterious entity like “god” that you believe in or don’t believe in.
some of the are paid to think that, some are easily misled, and some are just stupid.
I just heard on the radio, Minot North Dakota region had flooding almost without stopping last year. from spring to late fall.
heavy is already here. temperature records broken by the thousands, insurance claims records being broken every year, whole cities, regions, in drought, or flood, populations in the tens of millions forced to relocate.
and it’s just the beginning. all of the worst predictions are turning out to be the most accurate.
Good grief indeed. Apparently people fail to grasp the need to put pressure on all aspects and levels of coal mining and transport to address coming climate change. Coal is dirty in extraction, whether through the incredible destruction of blowing up mountains or in strip mining; in transport through communities in mile long dust spewing trains; in the obvious CO2 release from combustion; and finally in pollution that will cause toxic mercury laden acid-rain in the Pacific NW.
Putting pressure on BNSF and Buffet is part of a coordinated strategy. Assuming Buffet is just tied down to transport anything, as if his business acumen must only define climate catastrophe as a fait accompli is absurd. Further, defending giant corporations like BNSF or Arch Coal, and billionaires like Buffet, is flabbergasting. It is a comic reversal of political intent to get destructive corporations under control. I find it amazing that people complaining here are too shallow to realize that, but then again I have kind of stopped posting partly for that reason.
Whatever. We are going to stop the coal trains. We are going to protect the Pacific NW environment, corrupt laws or not, in Canada, in the American NW, and then even in Mexico when we shut down coal transport here.
And just how do passenger trains get through when the freight trains are blocked? This level of ignorance is just as worrisome to me as global warming.
Yes, we are committing global suicide. Yes, maybe, just maybe, this might get noticed and people might just understand what it’s about. But I doubt it.
I’ve lived in Texas for 30 years, and only one of them was the weather normal.
I suspect you’ll stop the trains right after you run faster than a speeding bullet and right before you leap a tall building in a single bound.
It’s effective; that’s what really counts right now. This from a headline news article at commondreams.org about protests in this country:
Jeff Biggers: “…The protests this week also validate, in many respects, the recent victory in Chicago, where long-time efforts by grassroots groups in the Little Village and the Pilsen neighborhoods were dramatically assisted by direct actions by Greenpeace and other national organizations. Today, in fact, multinational Edison announced it would close its decrepit Midwest Generation coal-fired plants in Chicago by September — two years earlier than expected.”
Wish we could have that out here, where the conversation is beginning about municipal ownership of energy utility lines so that local populations can have input on what is being done. PNM has totally dragged its feet on even refitting its coalburning plants, which have destroyed the quality of air in the Four Corners Region and beyond. As well, they resist renewable requirements, which might be a good thing as communities rally to consider alternatives to a very bad situation. It’s the profit motive, ya know.
This thing has legs. Bravo, protesters! Bravo!
And I say that as one who appreciates trains and the opportunity to commute via same. That is not gonna stop, and I will forego some trips if it will make the point that is needed to be made. What good are trains gonna be if we can’t survive the heat from global warming? (The rails gonna buckle in any case.)
The mercury from all the coal being burned in China makes it way back to the US. The mountain lakes in the Sierra, the Cascades and the Olympics now carry fish consumption warnings due to mercury contamination.
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/article/20080302/NEWS/803020308
While the coal trains are being protested, the US just approved the largest expansion of coal mining ever in the Powder River Basin of eastern Wyoming.
http://www.enewspf.com/latest-news/science-a-environmental/33156-groups-file-suit-over-largest-coal-plans-ever-approved-by-us-interior-department-.html
The Vancouver, Canada coal terminal is very small and can’t be expanded. The only spot to ship coal to Asia from on the Pacific coast is from a proposed new terminal in Bellingham, Washington. Bellingham was selected by Outside magazine as one of the best outdoor-cities in the US. The coal terminal would turn Bellingham into a polluted (tanker & train exhaust, noise, coal dust, acid runoff), congested (dozens of 130-car trains, 24-hours per day) mess. Bellingham is already located downwind from the two largest oil refineries in Washington state.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2017801685_apwabellinghamcoalexports2ndldwritethru.html
reminds me
find an event tomorrow and go if you can:
McKibben, 350.org
On 5/5, all around the world, we’ll be Connecting the Dots on climate change. The day will begin in the Marshall Islands, where our friends are taking their cameras underwater for a rally against the backdrop of their endangered coral reef. And we need you to join in — the images we collect in the next hours will be the bank on which we draw as we continue to wage the political fight to cut carbon emissions.
If you don’t yet know which local event you’re joining, click here to get involved:
At this link you will find an event nearby you:
http://act.climatedots.org/event/impacts_en/search/?akid=1859.501354.0i-rXh&rd=1&t=2
Blocking trains carrying nuclear waste accomplished nothing. Rather making it clear in their voting for the legislators, Germans made it clear they wanted a green economy, an economy based on a price on carbon, promoting solar and wind power, energy efficiency, and closure of nuclear power plants to prevent another Chernobyl or Fuchishima.
Why aren’t these Canadians forcing Canada to put a price on carbon, including a price on carbon shipped through Canada, reaping a carbon price on American coal which will ultimately harm Canadians?
The problem with efforts to stop this or that carbon source is it is as effective as the conservatives efforts to stop poverty and sickness by eliminating welfare and Medicaid. Gee, stop providing food stamps, medical care, and coal and oil, and magically poverty, sickness, and coal plants and oil burning vehicles will disappear. Wow! Why didn’t anyone think of that sooner?
We the People decide through the process of elections who will represent our values. To attack Buffett for doing as the market we create by our voting Republican and for pollution at any cost to give us the free lunch of cheap energy no matter the pollution or the unemployment is absurd.
Let’s represent our values in a price on pollution that is high enough to make it more profitable to have high speed trains moving people and cargo faster and cheaper than trucks and planes. Note that flowers are flown into the US for Mothers Day and the like, but then trucked around the nation, including from the east to the west coast. The highway system is cheaper than air because of the subsidies, and faster than rail because of the lack of subsidies to match those for trucking.
The left attacks liberals like Obama, just like the right attacks liberals like Obama, so we end up with Republicans and conservatives governing, because the left and right agree that Obama and the Democrats who support him need to be defeated, because Americans don’t vote their values, they vote against those who are doing what American want based on who they elect.